TRASH OF THE TITANS

TRASH OF THE TITANS

*THIS REVIEW HAS SPOILERS*

Review Opinion
By Aiiwolf - Apr 02, 2010 03:04 AM EST
Filed Under: Fantasy

***There might be some SPOILERS in this review***

Let me start of by stating that, I still think Louis Leterrier is a pretty good/decent director, the guy's very talented, and I admire two movies within of his work. The first being "The Incredible Hulk, and the other being "Unleashed" (aka "Danny the Dog).

The flaws with this movie were within the script and altering of the story, there wasnt enough character development, and also there was bit of over-acting in certain scenes. You know how they say it takes about the first 15-20 minutes of a movie to grab your attention, this movie take all that tention and slowly destroys it through-out the story arc. The movie is nothing like the 1981, "Clash of the Titans"...which I am a huge fan of. The movie bores you through its special effects, and twisted plot.

The problem is no component of the movie stands out over the rest.
Yes, the CGI effects are very good, but they lack a "wow" factor; this is not so much the fault of moviemakers as it is of audiences who have become so blasé by special effects that they consider most of what they now see routine.

The characters are dull and boring, and have no individuality. Sam Worthington is mostly a repressed, or slightly glum of a Perseus, the demigod chosen to save mankind right? He neither looks nor acts the hero! Whined through the whole movie about, how hes going to do everything alone. This is exactly, what happens when you change the origina of a story. Perseus, took the help from Zeus in the mytholocgial story, and even in Clash 1981, in this movie he some sort of "pride-ful warrior" or a lone wolfe should I say of a character, who ends up creates a double standard towards himself taking the Gods help...using the Sword and Pegasus.

The only two characters who even come close to exhibiting a personality are the warrior Draco, played by a buffed-up Mads Mikkelsen, the villain La Chiffre opposite Daniel Craig's James Bond in "Casino Royale." And Gemma Arterton, who was the character "Io" (that could be because, she was the prettiest girl in the film). But, the movie isnt supposed to be about her, what is she doing in the movie in the first place? She wasnt in the original. Anyways, her character was amusing at first and slowly dies down as the story goes on.

There were other things also, such as why the other GODS were just standing around like they had nothing better to do? Apollo and Posiden had two lines in the movie. Why Liam Neeson is a pompous Zeus, while Ralph Fiennes hisses his overripe dialogue as Hades. Pegasus, showing up in random scenes. The tammed scorpion in the city of Argos during the chase scene between hades and Perseus while riding pegasus (by the way, he never rode that horse in the movie until now). Calibos is Acrisius? There is alot more, that I can state, but I dont feel like writing all that down at this moment, for it will make this review even longer than it is. This movie was almost like a FAST- PACED CLUSTER [frick] OF MANY EVENTS FIT ALL INTO ONE.

Also, Adding 3-D to an already filmed 2-D movie creates problems similar to those in Tim Burton's "Alice in Wonderland." It is difficult to create the correct perspective if a film is not planned and shot in 3-D.
Thus while some of it works, most of the 3-D appears gimmicky and unnecessary. Plus, it puts a strain on the eyes.

the greek created epic tales about Gods and Men, and their journey among themselves, and each other. This movie wasnt an epic tale, it was an EPIC DISASTER. It would piss off any God or Goddess watching it. This story lacks inspiration, humor, pacing and that spark that makes us applaud and bring joy to our faces.

I recommend those of you that have NOT watched it to wait for it to come out on DVD, or Blu-ray, or find a source that can give it to you for free. Save your 11.50-15.00 and just wait for the "Trash of the Titans" to hit in your homes near you. This movie sums up everything that's wrong with Hollywood right now. it is filled with meaningless action, and it also feels like not one single person involved with the production could give a shit about it.

I rate this film 2.5/5 stars. 50%. (And thats me being Generous)

RED ONE Looks Set For A Disastrous Opening Weekend After Taking In Just $3.7M From Thursday Night Previews
Related:

RED ONE Looks Set For A Disastrous Opening Weekend After Taking In Just $3.7M From Thursday Night Previews

RED ONE Star Dwayne The Rock Johnson Mocked For Sharing Bizarre Story About Watching OPPENHEIMER In IMAX
Recommended For You:

RED ONE Star Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson Mocked For Sharing Bizarre Story About Watching OPPENHEIMER In IMAX

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Kyos
Kyos - 4/2/2010, 4:42 AM
Oh crap, I was really looking forward to this. :( Might end up seeing it anyway...
Scarface
Scarface - 4/2/2010, 5:57 AM
Good review I had my doubts about this movie and Sam Worthingtons ability to carry a hollywood blockbuster
Aiiwolf
Aiiwolf - 4/2/2010, 6:57 AM
@ Kyos
No problem bud. As long as my review helps you set some sort of expectation for the movie when you do decide to see it, just make sure you go in with "low" expectation. I had high expectation, thinking it might be different, and good. But, it was whatever.

@ Scarface

Thanks. Yeah, worthington still has a long way to go...hes s decent actor but no where near A...or even B list material. I think they're really trying to push him down our thoarts. But, Mads Mikkelsen and Gemma Arterton (gorgeous as always), they did a pretty good acting wise. Man, I wanted this movie to be good.
GoGoGadgetsBruh
GoGoGadgetsBruh - 4/2/2010, 9:32 AM
I agree 100 %
saw it yesterday
it was entertaining
but I think it's cause most are having high expectations of this movie (i know I had HUGE expectations and was hugely let down)
I was impressed by Worthington though
I felt he did carry the movie
Mads, Fiennes, & Gemma were great (Gemma's FRICKING HOT!)
I don't blame the actors at all it seemed more about the writing
Plus the movie felt way too rushed I was expecting it to be 2 1/2 hrs long not 1 hr and 50 min (with previews!)
Leterrier seems to be a hit or miss director :/


P.S. you basically have to do what someone does when they watch the Transformers movies.....DON'T THINK!! :P
Aiiwolf
Aiiwolf - 4/2/2010, 12:41 PM
@ Got Batman

Well said. lol.

Gemma was amazing, I love her appeal in this movie. She always looks great in her films, or on camera.

Too bad the movie wasnt longer, and the script wasnt stronger. :/
superbatspiderman
superbatspiderman - 4/2/2010, 3:03 PM
I think you are taking a few things too seriously you should just learn to enjoy a movie and not point out flaws unless it is major flaws like Schumacher's Batman Movies.
Scarface
Scarface - 4/2/2010, 4:27 PM
Have you seen the movie yet superbats.
I have not maybe it is Schumacher bad
Aiiwolf
Aiiwolf - 4/2/2010, 4:54 PM
@ Superbatspiderman

Its a re-make of the 1981 movie...when you re-make a movie you dont change the story, and even if you do decide to change it you dont make it complexed, or BORING.

You go to the movies, to be entertained, this movie did NOT entertain me. This movie didnt even have Sex, or gore if they were going for anything appeal to our generation. In fact, the movie had a bad script, short fight sequences, except the ones with the scorpion...and everything else was just "meh" whatever. THE CLASH OF THE TITANS 1981 is still a MUCH BETTER FLICK than this. dont waste your money thats all i have to say.

@ Scarface

It was Schumacher bad lol
Ven0m
Ven0m - 4/2/2010, 4:54 PM
@ Aiiwolf Good review spot on.
@ Gotbatman I agree with you 100% I saw this yesterday. It was average movie. Entertaing but not anything like original.
This Director needs to stay away from the Avengers.
Scarface
Scarface - 4/3/2010, 6:15 AM
@ SuperBats LOL OK i,ll take your word for it.
Now its so bad I have to see it
Aiiwolf
Aiiwolf - 4/3/2010, 4:03 PM
@ Virtual VD

There isn't any nudity, there maybe one blood scene in the movie which is when Calibos rips this guy apart int he forest, everything else is barely any blood...the scorpion scene, characters in the movie get thrown around and stepped on, perseus basically rip the scorpion from the inside and instead of blood its "goo"....when medusa head comes off there isnt any blood...just a head rolling on the floor...when "Io" dies in the hands of calibos, she has his claws through her stomach...and when perseus kills calibos he basically stabs him through the front and pushes him off a cliff as he shredds apart...

Movie is kind of weak when it came to ACTION, like i wrote in my review, the first movie will always be the best.

Take your 7 year old to see "How To Train Your Dragon"....its a really good movie. Hands down, real good.
Aiiwolf
Aiiwolf - 4/3/2010, 9:09 PM
@ virtual VD

Good choice, mate.
Aiiwolf
Aiiwolf - 4/18/2010, 4:05 AM
I know exactly what you mean. Im half persian...half mongolian and turkish. I know alot of my hertiage that other people dont know as well. the way you feel about Clash is kind of how I feel about the prince of persia movie. Which I feel will be just a bad, I ahve my fingers crossed on that one as I did with Clash 2010.

I grw up reading Greek mythology as a child, so I can relate to what youre saying. I will always be a fan of the original, but if they were going to do a remake and not follow the clash from 1981....they might as well just named the movie something else.
View Recorder