Fright Night: The Casting of the Film

Fright Night: The Casting of the Film

Fright Night opens today and CBM continues its behind the scenes look at the making of this remake of the 1985 original vampire classic. In this installment, having previously discussed the casting of Colin Farrell as Jerry Dandridge, the focus shifts to the rest of the cast.

By EdGross - Aug 19, 2011 02:08 PM EST
Filed Under: Horror

Fright Night - Imogen Poots 4
With Colin Farrell on board to play vampire Jerry Dandridge in Craig Gillespie's version of Fright Night [for more, click on the V&S logo at the top of the page], the production team turned to the other characters populating the film, begining with Charley Brewster, who discovers his neighbor is a vampire. Ultimately they chose Anton Yelchin (Chekov in JJ Abrams' Star Trek), who was thrilled for the opportunity.


   "I like the relationships in this story," says Yelchin. "Charley versus Jerry, Charley and his girlfriend, Charley and his friend who, who he has shunned; are all interesting elements. With Craig Gillespie at the helm, we got to develop the nuances of all the relationships."


   Academy Award nominee Toni Collette signed on as Charley's mother, Jane, helped no doubt by Gillespie directed her in her Showtime series United States of Tara. "I love working with Craig Gillespie," she enthuses. "If I'd been offered this film and there was another director, I really don't know if I'd have taken it, but I trust him wholeheartedly. I think he's going to make the film scarier by making it real and honest."


   Adds the director, "I was very excited to get Toni for this role. She's able to blend humor and drama, which is such a tricky dance to do, and she does it beautifully. Also, you feel an instant bond between Toni and Anton, which made my work easy.



Fright Night - David Tennant
    Next up was Peter Vincent (portrayed by the late Roddy McDowall in the original), now a Las Vegas magician,illusionist who Charley turns to with his vampire problem. British actor David Tennant was chosen. "We were really excited to get David Tennant for this role," says Gillespie. "He hasn't done a lot of work in the States and this is such a great platform for him. He has excellent comic timing and also comes from the dramatic arena."


   For his part, Tennant expresses, "The vampires in this film are just proper old rip-your-head-off, run-screaming-for-your-life type of vampires. And I like that. And this character of Peter Vincent is just delicious. He's onstage doingn this huge show, which is slightly perposterous and yet absolutely rooted in the kind of things you might see if you went to see a magic show in Vegas. But whilst his onstage life is so expansive and bonkers, when the wig comes off he's actually a little, bitter, damaged, disenchanted wee man. It's great to play a character that has that scope and then gets to do things that are pretty extreme and extraordinary."


   British actress Imogen Poots was cast as Charley's girlfriend, Amy. "when I first read the screenplay," she says, "it was exciting because there's a real combination of horror and humor. It's not a purely gruesome film. It has real character. Amy's relationship with Charley is sweet. As the story unfolds, they're obviously on this advneture together. It's really about what they learn about one another, and themselves."


   And then there's Charley's former best friend, Ed (known as "Evil Ed" in the original), a part that Christopher Mintz-Plasse (Red Mist in Kick-Ass) was cast in. "Although this is a remake of a really popular movie, it's totally new and amazing because Craig, our director, is keeping the eerie, smoky, creepy vibe of the original version," he explains. "And Marti Noxon, the screenwriter, did an incredible job. She really went deep into the relationships. Unlike some recent vampire films where there are, like, fifty of them and they can walk in the sunshine and sparkle instead of bursting in flames, our film has just one specific vampire. It's very straightforward:  no reflection in mirrors, crosses will burn him, stakes to the heart and sunlight will kill him. It's all very cool."


   Look for more Fright Night coverage throughout the weekend.

CROSSED: Movie Adaptation Of The Most Disturbing Comic Of All Time In The Works
Related:

CROSSED: Movie Adaptation Of "The Most Disturbing Comic Of All Time" In The Works

THE SUBSTANCE: Demi Moore And Margaret Qualley Fight For Control Of The Same Body In Bloody New Trailer
Recommended For You:

THE SUBSTANCE: Demi Moore And Margaret Qualley Fight For Control Of The Same Body In Bloody New Trailer

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

CherryBomb
CherryBomb - 8/19/2011, 3:11 PM

Imogen Poots is amazing, so beautiful and talented.


TheBurnSays
TheBurnSays - 8/19/2011, 7:44 PM
Just saw it and I really really wanted to love it but I can only like it at best. The original is way better in almost every way. Good points: Jerry is a beast, Peter Vincent steals the show, lots of blood and at least 5 or 6 very cool "various things" from the original. On the down side, the story is rushed, many major changes in the plot, too much obvious cgi and major lack of ambiance. This remake doesn't even try to be spooky. Overall, I cannot say it sucks (it doesn't) but the original keeps the number one spot on my list.
TheBurnSays
TheBurnSays - 8/19/2011, 7:49 PM
And by "various things" I mean quotes, props and...well...you'll know when you see it!
ElBicho
ElBicho - 8/19/2011, 9:27 PM
David Tennant stole the show!!!

Overall, the original is better (due to the campiness).

However, the remake was pretty good...
Ichaos
Ichaos - 8/20/2011, 7:36 AM
Remake was "ok" it did feel rush, their was over use of CGI. Which someone else said it was obvious and it was. The orignal with its older practical make up effects looked better. Tennant did a great job for what he was given. The shots were too obvious at times of it being a 3d movie. If you see it stick to a matinee. I saw no reason for a remake. Given a choice I would just see the original.
View Recorder