BlackAirs87 reviews Iron Man 2

Its finally here and I like to add my 2 cents worth

Review Opinion
By StuckInPanels - May 08, 2010 05:05 PM EST
Filed Under: Iron Man 2

Hey folks and friends. Well its finally here, after all the waiting, trailers, posters, and promos we finally got Iron Man 2, and boy is it a good piece of film making. I will keep most of this review spoiler free and I will give my breakdown of the film. I shall begin with the story.

Story: The story takes place 6 months after the events of the first film and The main focus is on Starks battery has gone haywire sorta speak and his seek of a cure. Pepper is now dealing with a greater responsibility and role with Tony. Meanwhile a man connected to Tony is seeking revenge and builds his own arc reactor device and aims to take tony out in Monaco. Stark has to now deal with his health, company, villains, friends, and family issues and lead the world into a new future. I really loved the story, it was very solid, well paced, and the subtle nods to the ever expanding movieverse was great. I give the story an 8/10, it was much more solid than the first film and really builds up from where the last one ended.

Acting: This has one of the best ensemble casting to any recent super hero films, I might say its got a much more solid casting than the first Sin City or Watchmen. Robert Downey is superb in the role of course and takes the character in some great directions of this story. He's a tad more reckless and thrill seeking in this one than in the first. Paltrow did great as Pepper Potts once again, she is able to ground Downey's performance and character. Don Cheadle did an AMAZING job as Rhodey/War Machine, I love how he made the character step up his game and wouldn't bow down to Tony even tho they are friends. I loved Johansson as the Black Widow, she felt like a femme fatal for this universe, although she didn't have a Russian accent at all I'm gonna have to dock a point, other than that she was perfect. Mickey Rourke as the REAL villain Ivan Vanko/Whiplash(which is never mentioned btw) was a really great counter part to Stark and his technology, he had less than what Tony had and he made something really awesome and bad-ass. Sam Jackson brought pure awesomeness with the role of Nick Fury, he pretty helped kick start the third act and that was a great way to bring him in, he wasn't needed throughout the whole film. Last but not least is Sam Rockwell as Justin Hammer and DEAR ONE ABOVE ALL WAS HE AWFUL, I'm sorry if any Rockwell fans read this but he was terrible in this movie, every scene he was in he looked uncomfortable, his speech pattern was awkward, his dialogue was hokey, his overall portrayal of a character whose supposed to be Starks rival was terribly done. I hope we never see him again in this franchise. I wanna give a big shout-out to the guy who played Howard Stark, he was really great and theres one scene(all who saw know what part it is) really got me and my mom(happy mothers day.lol) teary eyed. So overall I really enjoyed the actors(EXCEPT ROCKWELL) so doing the math I give the Acting a 8.5/10

Action: This film had many more sequences of Stark in the suit but he only had 3 fight scenes(first in the beginning with whiplash, second in the middle with the mark II, and the epic finally makes three with the hammer drones and the real villain). One thing Favreau hasn't quite yet perfected is extending the fight scenes, for the most part they last under five minutes(at best), but I think drawn out and we get into the New Trilogy of the star wars films(and we don't want any repeat of that). So I give the fighting a 9/10, I loved all three parts but the second was my favorite becuase of one thing...DAFT PUNK!!!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.....ahem...next topic

Easter Eggs: This is the last part of my review and boy do we get some great easter eggs. The Third act more or less slams us with a mess load of them. One of the earliest ones was the suitcase armor, its color scheme was based off the West Coast Avengers armor. One which was super quick was the badge the woman had, it looked like Cap's shield. We get so much at the end, we get hints of Thor, "a bigger problem in the southeast", we have a better showing of Cap's shield, we have that hologram map in the back that shows blips of activity(Stark, Thor, Hulk, Cap?, Black Panther?, Red Skull?, and Namor?), the new "element" Tony makes may or may not be Vibranium(never said), and of course the post credit scene of Mjlonir which made me squeal with delight(the entire audience that stayed clapped like crazy) There was so many easter eggs it didn't hurt the film at all, its trying to cement the universe into a greater reality and showing Tony really isn't alone out there. So that gives the easter eggs a score of 10/10, so much build up now its put up or shut up time for Marvel.

So the final overall score I give the film is a...8.8/10. I really loved the film, I thought it was well done and it will make lots and lots of money of course. I liked the acting, all but one person, and the action scenes were well paced and properly placed and the easter eggs were just icing on the comic book movie cake. Til next time...BlackAirs out!!!

Marvel Creative Committee Nixed IRON MAN 2 Scene With A Drunk Tony Stark Hitting Pepper Potts
Related:

Marvel Creative Committee Nixed IRON MAN 2 Scene With A Drunk Tony Stark Hitting Pepper Potts

IRON MAN 2: New Details Emerge About Why Demon In A Bottle Storyline Was Scrapped
Recommended For You:

IRON MAN 2: New Details Emerge About Why "Demon In A Bottle" Storyline Was Scrapped

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

StuckInPanels
StuckInPanels - 5/8/2010, 6:56 PM
@ozy, yeah the fight scenes are short. I wish favreau really upped the ante when it comes to #3 with the Mandarin, have all 10 rings used. Why does he always refer to his rings as magic, its alien tech thats mistaken for magic, or they could make them advance tech that even stark couldn't perfect
StuckInPanels
StuckInPanels - 5/8/2010, 6:59 PM
@della, yeah there had to been a cutoff point...one part i really hated was that stupid kid in the helmet...it was like the kid in spider-man 1 just standing there as the stage was collapsing...WTF RUN FOR YOUR LIFE kid...although the drones weren't that smart if the mistook a kid with a helmet as iron man, great programming.
StuckInPanels
StuckInPanels - 5/8/2010, 7:15 PM
@tea, oh yeah...della it was black widow not scarlet witch. unless your making a joke then.lol
Scarface
Scarface - 5/9/2010, 5:38 AM
Good Review @BlackAirs87 well done
I loved Iron Man 2, I,m gald SLJ had very small scenes
I think he is overated as an actor
Rockwell and Rourke are brilliant they stole the show.
Scarlett was Ok
Cheadle is capable of so much more as an actor.
RDJ what can you say the suit and RDJ are one.
McLovin
McLovin - 5/9/2010, 8:45 AM
I just watched it last night. Besides the fact that I had to switch theaters because some dickless piece of shite had to bring his 6 month old daughter to a PG13 moving showing at 11pm, I enjoyed the movie. Did it live up to the first one? IMO ... no. I enjoyed the first one better. Don't get me wrong, I almost had a nerdgasm watching Iron-man and War Machine kicking ass and taking names. But RDJ must have been channeling Shatner during a few of his scenes. SLJ did not deliver the best rendition of Fury and the movie had too many scenes that focused on the comedic relief, rather than making it seem realistic. Rourke was great and so was Rockwell. I agree that they stole the show. Scar Jo wasn't that bad and she is always great to look at. But the first one was better.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 5/9/2010, 2:38 PM
ANIL @ Damn straight, [frick] that FURY!!!

He basically played himself as SHAFT from 10 years ago!

Waste of the character! : P

BLACK @ Nice review but a tad to high on the marks scale!
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 5/9/2010, 2:40 PM
But are you and DELL [frick]ing serious??????????????

SAM ROCKWELL made this picture!!!

And DON!
StuckInPanels
StuckInPanels - 5/9/2010, 9:19 PM
@lee, I just didn't like the way he portrayed a rival to tony stark. He complained all the time when something wasn't going the way he wanted, he never seemed prepared or competent at the task at hand. He wanted to get back at tony but the way he went through with it was out there even for comicbook movies. Theres trusting a bad guy because you have a common enemy but oh IDK maybe a bit more of INVESTIGATING your ally might have been smart. Ivan basically made Hammer look like a total idiot, which he was. I might have given some credit if he and tony had a much deeper connection than just competitors. Like a flashback that would have made a bigger difference. I judged him on performance of the character, and I think he wasn't the strongest. He only fitted as a means for Ivan to gain the upper hand in battle, nothing more nothing less.
StuckInPanels
StuckInPanels - 5/9/2010, 9:21 PM
@anil, I saw those nods and mentions over at CHUD.com so don't quote me on those. Favreau was doing nothing more than just teasing us fans. I'm sure we will see these characters but it won't be for awhile.
View Recorder