Marvel Studios Under Fire For Paying Comic Creators As Little As $300 For Using Characters In Film And TV

Marvel Studios Under Fire For Paying Comic Creators As Little As $300 For Using Characters In Film And TV

The creators of Black Widow and Hawkeye's Yelena Belova aren't happy, as the money they were promised by Marvel Studios for the character's live-action debut ended up being considerably less than expected.

By JoshWilding - Jul 20, 2022 01:07 PM EST
Filed Under: Marvel Studios
Source: The Hollywood Reporter

We've heard on countless occasions that Disney doesn't adequately compensate the comic book writers and artists who dream up the characters we see in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Now, The Hollywood Reporter has shared another damning story, this time focusing specifically on Black Widow and Hawkeye's Yelena Belova, played by Florence Pugh. 

The trade explains that writer Devin Grayson and artist J.G. Jones anticipated being paid $25,000 each for Belova's big screen debut. That's what the "Special Character Agreement" they signed with Marvel said, anyway, but the small print tells a different story. 

It turns out that amount is split between creators, and is simply the maximum they can receive. As a result, they only got $5000 each without explanation. The deal states that they would also get $2,000 for an episode of TV over 30 minutes and $1,000 for an episode of TV 30 minutes or less. For an action figure, it's $5,000 for one figure released in a single year, $10,000 for two, or $25,000 for three or more. When it comes to video games, it's a maximum of $30,000 between all creators.

Unfortunately, it sounds like Marvel has a number of questionable, albeit legal, tactics to lessen what they pay creators. For example, they classify any character with less than 15% of screentime a cameo, meaning The Winter Soldier only had a "cameo" in Captain America: Civil War. The same also applies to Steve Rogers in Avengers: Infinity War

"It’s like the Publishers Clearing House Sweepstakes," Grayson says. "You could win $1 million, but you won’t." Jones adds, "Having spoken to a number of creators, Marvel’s financial offerings seem a bit of a bait and switch. They throw out a large number, then little by little they whittle down the actual payout."

So, what did Grayson receive for Yelena's appearances in Disney+'s Emmy-nominated Hawkeye? Well, while her agreement makes it sounds like she should have received $2000 per episode (or at least $1000 if split with Jones), she was awarded a paltry $300 per appearance. 

Remember, even at the height of the pandemic with a Disney+ Premier Access release, Black Widow earned just shy of $500 million before its DVD and Blu-ray release.

SNOW WHITE And SHAZAM! FURY OF THE GODS Star Rachel Zegler Is Reportedly Being Eyed For An MCU Role
Related:

SNOW WHITE And SHAZAM! FURY OF THE GODS Star Rachel Zegler Is Reportedly Being Eyed For An MCU Role

RUMOR: Noah Hawley Has Met With Marvel Studios About A Number Of Projects, Including YOUNG AVENGERS
Recommended For You:

RUMOR: Noah Hawley Has Met With Marvel Studios About A Number Of Projects, Including YOUNG AVENGERS

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
BigPhilbowski
BigPhilbowski - 7/20/2022, 1:57 PM
Boring. They already hot paid for their work when creating the characters for Marvel. They don't own them and shouldn't expect to get paid a 2nd time.
Origame
Origame - 7/20/2022, 2:18 PM
@BigPhilbowski - really dude? The payment in this case is what was promised by contract for future uses of the characters. In the past you argued these creators should've negotiated for pay in the case of film and TV shows. Well, these guys did and are getting screwed. Is literally any payment they receive enough to you, regardless of circumstance?

How does that marvel dick taste?
AmazingFILMporg
AmazingFILMporg - 7/20/2022, 2:25 PM
@BigPhilbowski -


Imagine someone builds a house for you and you pay them.




Years later your house gets famous or it starts generating income for you.



You get a knock on the door of the person that built that house for you demanding more money.




Sounds stupid cause it it🤡



UGLYsonic
UGLYsonic - 7/20/2022, 2:48 PM
@Origame - to be fair, Marvel pays them whatever was contracted. Disney spent millions or billions to have ownership of Marvel. Could you imagine spending all that money and still not having a right to use those characters? They are honoring the previously established contracts, it isn't Disney's fault they didn't bargain for more. And often times if the creators are friendly they get cameos and red carpet invitations, allowing them a platform to further their brand if they handle it correctly.

I'm by no means a Marvel shill, I've been very vocal about my dissatisfaction with the product.

But this case in particular, I got to side with Disney. Are they supposed to give them a pay boost just because? That would be nice, but that's a fantasy. They are a business, and it's not like they are scamming anyone or under paying.
JesseCuster
JesseCuster - 7/20/2022, 3:00 PM
@BigPhilbowski - Kevin Feige isn't going to [frick] you bro, it's okay to advocate for the right thing instead of shilling.
Origame
Origame - 7/20/2022, 3:01 PM
@UGLYsonic - but in this case they technically weren't. Marvel deliberately worded the contract to make it appear as if they were getting much more than they otherwise would. Like seriously, why would an individual contract specify the total pay of a group?
newhire13
newhire13 - 7/20/2022, 3:12 PM
@Origame - That's why you gotta have your own team look at contracts, especially when dealing with huge companies. Their lawyers should have caught that before they signed so they could have called them out right away.
Origame
Origame - 7/20/2022, 3:34 PM
@newhire13 - you're acting like they can even afford lawyers to look over this stuff.

There's a reason why all these writers are jumping ship from marvel and dc while these companies are resorting to people with zero experience in the industry writing for major superheroes. And it's bs like this.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 7/20/2022, 3:51 PM
@BigPhilbowski - Go read the article man. They signed a "Special Character Agreement" that entitled them to royalties. It's in their contract.

Try reading more.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 7/20/2022, 3:53 PM
@AmazingFILMporg - Not if you signed a contract with that builder saying that you owe them royalties if your house gets popular and starts earning money.

What more do you want? Marvel signed a contract. Period. End of story.
GhostDog
GhostDog - 7/20/2022, 1:58 PM
Is this supposed to be shocking? What else is new
Razorface1
Razorface1 - 7/20/2022, 5:09 PM
@GhostDog - No, but its news. This is a news site, not a shocking content site.
rebellion
rebellion - 7/20/2022, 1:59 PM
But what they did was for work hire, its not their original characters?
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 7/20/2022, 3:56 PM
@rebellion - Read. The. Article.

They signed a "Special Character Agreement" that entitles them to royalties.
DannRamm113
DannRamm113 - 7/20/2022, 2:00 PM
"For example, they classify any character with less than 15% of screentime a cameo, meaning The Winter Soldier only had a "cameo" in Captain America: Civil War. The same also applies to Steve Rogers in Avengers: Infinity War. "

Okay, this part is laughable and shitty. How does the 3rd biggest head on the poster get classified in any legal proceeding as a "cameo"

TheManWithoutFear
TheManWithoutFear - 7/20/2022, 2:03 PM
Honestly they should have just paid them zero. The low number makes it look worse.

Marvel owns these characters and the creators knew that. They don't owe them jack.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 7/20/2022, 4:00 PM
@TheManWithoutFear - They. Signed. A. Contract. A contract that says they owe them royalties. They 100% owe them "jack".
Moriakum
Moriakum - 7/20/2022, 6:46 PM
@CorndogBurglar - No, they don’t owe them “jack” because those royalties were paid. It just was less than they expected.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 7/20/2022, 7:54 PM
@Moriakum - Again, the comment I was replying to was someone saying that Marvel shouldn't have paid them anything because they don't owe them anything.

That isn't true. They signed a contract that says Marvel DOES owe them royalties. Yes, Marvel paid. But the guy's comment is saying Marvel shouldn't have owed them anything to begin with. Which is wrong.
1 2 3
View Recorder