Are the number of comic book movies being released decreasing demand to see them?

Are the number of comic book movies being released decreasing demand to see them?

The last two big blockbuster comic book movies released opened to critical acclaim, but had lower opening weekend box-office results than their predecessors. Are the large number of comic book movies being made and released decreasing the demand for them and their eventual profits?

Editorial Opinion
By Gandalf - Jun 14, 2011 05:06 PM EST
Filed Under: Other
Source: boxofficemojo.com

We are living in a great time. Advances in movie technology have allowed all of our favourite comic book characters come to life in fully realized live-action feature films. Over the last 10 years we have seen dozens of comic book movies...some good, some bad, but almost all of them making a lot of money for the studios. This had led to more and more comic books being adapted to the big screen with 4 huge comic book movies coming out this summer. However, the first two of these released, Thor and X-Men: First Class, have made significantly less money their opening weekend than these big-budget spectacles have in recent years despite positive reviews and big hype. Neither is done their theatrical run and may pull even financially with other films from recent years, but are we seeing the beginning of simple economics at play with our summer movies? Is the supply of comic book movies currently outpacing demand?

With box office results from boxofficemojo.com -- top comic book adaptations -- I have broken down comic book movies released over the last 10 years to try and determine if the number of comic book movies released during a year has an impact on those films earnings. I understand there are many other factors involved, I am currently only looking at movies released and profit.



Based on looking at this list, there is no definitive correlation between number of movies released in a year and their profits, but one thing is for sure...comic book movie fans have become more selective. Back when they first started releasing these movies, anything that came out comic book related was guaranteed to make money. Look at Hulk and Daredevil. Both were released in 2003 and neither was a great movie, but at the time fans were so excited to see any of their heroes up on the big screen that we would go see anything in big numbers; as a result both of these movies profited over $100 million. Fast forward a year to 2004 and it became much more apparent to studios that they needed to put a decent product on the screen to put buts in the seats, with much lower profit margins and a loss that year.

It looks like with much more selection for comic book fans at the movies these days the quality of the movie really helps it make money. Hopefully the next 2 big ones this summer will be as good as the first 2.

Gandalf
THE 4:30 MOVIE Interview: Filmmaker Kevin Smith On How His Passion For The Theater Shaped New Film (Exclusive)
Related:

THE 4:30 MOVIE Interview: Filmmaker Kevin Smith On How His Passion For The Theater Shaped New Film (Exclusive)

THE FRANCHISE: Trailer For Max Series Starring Daniel Brühl Reveals Chaos Inside World Of Superhero Filmmaking
Recommended For You:

THE FRANCHISE: Trailer For Max Series Starring Daniel Brühl Reveals Chaos Inside World Of Superhero Filmmaking

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

golden123
golden123 - 6/14/2011, 5:44 PM
It's interesting how your answer to the title was with a "no". Most of the time when people put a question as a title, they answer it with a "yes".
golden123
golden123 - 6/14/2011, 5:48 PM
@TGDSG: I'm no Marvel expert but I always thought the Fantastic Four were really popular. Also, Hawkeye and Black widow aren't getting there own movie. Which you may know that, but I'm writing it anyways because your comment is hard to infer from.
Gandalf
Gandalf - 6/14/2011, 5:49 PM
Well, the numbers don't give us a defintiive answer. The answer could still be yes but there is not a definitive correlation.

Wow, I don't know if that response could have been nerdier.

luckylu
luckylu - 6/14/2011, 5:57 PM
definitely. its a simple rule of business. the more you have the less demand.
pitchblack
pitchblack - 6/14/2011, 6:06 PM
Well I think for sure The Dark Knight Rises, Avengers, Iron Man 3 and possibly Man of Steel will give a shot in the arm (if one is even needed). I think Marvel and DC are better off sticking to the big guns.
l0rdleg0las
l0rdleg0las - 6/15/2011, 1:33 AM
honestly, the studios need to quit with backround and secondary characters. i mean does SHIELD, Black Widow, Hawkeye, Nick Fury do any of them really need a movie? what about them can't be explained in a 2 minute portion of any other Marvel movie with a somewhat established character

same can be said for Dr Strange, Ant Man, Black Panther and numerous others that aren't coming to me at the moment. .

it isn't the amount of renderings that is causing the common person to lose interest, it is the characters that are chosen.

look at DC. sure Green Lantern seems like a good idea, but truthfully Green Lantern is not a featured character that everyone knows, and because of that it is possible that it doesn't make a lot of money.

all these studios have top tier characters at their disposal, or at least characters everyone has heard of. why bring out Green Lantern(a B list character) when you have the Flash, Wonder Woman, or even Green Arrow that are more well known and more deserving of movies?

Marvel and DC need to stick to the big names and lay off on the lesser knowns.

for the lesser known characters the best route to take would be the animated Direct to DVD route. it works in 2 ways.

1st you get the character a movie that introduces said character to a wider range of people and by sales and reception you can decide whether a live action adaptation is a good or bad thing.

2nd, you don't flood the market(theaters) with your product making everyone lose interest in other more deserving characters that do get theatrical showings.
Orphix
Orphix - 6/15/2011, 1:54 AM
I think the important thing here is that ALL the movies above at least made some sort of profit.

What studios will be trying to work out it whether they make enough or if there is another type of genre of film which will get more money.

Personally I think the CBM is here to stay (the fact that there is a Marvel Studios kind of supports that) but no doubt, as audience start to suffer from CBM fatigue, those properties brought to the big screen will be fewer and fewer.

The article makes the most important point when it discusses that audiences are becoming more discerning - and that the 'wow' factor of a superhero on screen has diminished.
Ethic
Ethic - 6/15/2011, 7:31 AM
The only way I can see more comic book movies breaking out in a successful way is if they STOP treating them as a certain genre that has a list of requirements to fit the bill.
Just focus and writing a good script (which means developed characters and drama, not just BOOM BANG LOL), casting well and treating the story (and source material) with respect.

It's like they whip out the same 2 or 3 blueprints for every film and it's making everything stale.
A film doesn't always need the same path of
1 Guy is normal
2 Guy becomes superhero
3 Villain shows up with evil plot
4 Love interest
5 Big final battle
6 Victory, happy ending.

There's so much to draw from in comic book history that I really don't know how they can't shake the trends.

The most annoying thing for me is all the attention on "making it more relatable" because the stories were written with enough of it, and also "not taking itself too seriously" which usually leads to cheap, shitty jokes that take you out of the moment.
If the character in the story is that type of person then fine, but it tends to always be the same overused crap.
superbatspiderman
superbatspiderman - 6/15/2011, 9:40 AM
I just think of it this way as long as the CBMs are good people will go to see them. The reason it seems the demands in decreasing to see them is because there are too many CBMs that are bad or just mediocre and it leaves a bad taste in people's mouths. If all the CBMs are as good Ironman or the original Spider-Man then people will go to see them.
luffycapri
luffycapri - 6/15/2011, 12:54 PM
Its all because of the economy and inflation.

marvel72
marvel72 - 6/15/2011, 5:39 PM
thing is how many of the cinema going public even know there going to see a comic book movie & not just a fantasy movie.

also i think the problem is having other movie studio's owning the rights.

if marvel had all its characters under one roof,they all wouldn't get movie treatment.they couldn't afford to churn out movie after movie.

@ thegoddamnsuperguy

the fantastic four is as important to marvel as action comics is to dc,its the one that started it all.

i agree spin off movies are not needed,but build up movies are a great idea.

team movies that need movie treatment.

1.x-men
2.the avengers
3.fantastic four

single character movies needed

1.spider-man
2.silver surfer
3.hulk
4.daredevil
5.nova
6.thor
7.iron man
8.captain america

but some these will not see the light of day if everything was at one studio.

same goes for dc stop wasting money on crap like jonah hex,catwoman,red & losers movies of these are not needed.

just focus on the intresting ones i.e batman,superman,flash,green lantern,wonder woman,aquaman & then maybe justice league.
ellispart3
ellispart3 - 6/16/2011, 6:17 PM
I think the biggest problem with comic book movies is that they follow a formula that (including me) are tired of. I know origins are important, but really how important is it? 007 flicks arent about james bond, its stories that involve james bond.
yea i know these characters are different because they fly and shoot crap out of their hands or whatever, but the Incredible Hulk did the best job to me by keeping the origin contained mainly in the opening credits. kinda like a comic, any newbie can pick up a spider-man comic and get a quick synopsis of how he got to where he did and go from there. dark knight was a great story envolving batman, not a story about batman..i think i might just be babbling,i hope someone gets what im saying.
View Recorder