Death and Rebirth: Comic Book Controversy

Death and Rebirth: Comic Book Controversy

Over the years the death and eventual rebirth of many fan favorite characters has left fanboys confused and angry. It's time we tackled this issue head on so take the dive!

Editorial Opinion
By Caboose - Dec 11, 2008 12:12 AM EST
Filed Under: Other

Since their birth in the summer of 1938, superhero comics have enchanted fanboys the world over with their classic tales of good vs evil. But as the stories of the characters we've all come to love continue to evolve, one topic still evokes the rage of die hard fans everywhere: death. Killing off characters has been a common plot device injected into a story to bring about drastic change, but these changes are not always necessary and their negative reception has lead to the implication of another literary tool that the comic book industry is becoming infamous for: resurrection.


Bucky, Green Arrow, Barry Allen, Hal Jordan, Jason Todd and even Superman himself have all fallen victim to this nefarious scheme by comic book editors everywhere to create "change" and produce bigger sales figures. However, death and resurrection have often lead to retcon and temporary loss of sales, but more importantly...they forever leave a blemish in the character's world on and on the character's fanbase.

After their graduation from comic strip to art book, writers and artists have worked themselves to the bone doing their best to make these worlds believable only to have their work undone when a hero overcomes the one obstacle they really shouldn't. Once the stuff of an eight year old's dreams, comics have over the years ground themselves in science and realism in an effort to reach a more mature audience but this approach has also put limits on the writers who further develop these worlds.

When a hero finally bites the dust with a heroic end readers are stunned and whether or not they admit it, emotionally dented as well. It's the symbolic sacrifice of a hero that further adds to his legend and briefly creates an opening for greater plot development, but these opportunities are usually wasted as death no longer holds her sway over superheroes anymore. Killed in glory and resurrected with a seemingly improbable storyline, readers are left scratching their heads and subconsciously become distanced from their heroes.

Using death as a plot device destroys a hero's greatest ability; their humanity. When a hero is facing his end he should be granted a heroic death and allowed to take his place alongside his fallen comrades. This now opens the door for a new hero to take center stage and allow his tale to begin as a possible successor or a new hero driven to greatness in honor of his fallen idol. With the release of Green Lantern:Rebirth however, DC Comics damaged the heroic legacy of one of their most famous characters, Hal Jordan, who began his run as the silver age Green Lantern and was eventually developed into THE Green Lantern above all else and later evolved into the ultimate villain: Parallax. Jordan later returned to his heroic roots to reignite the sun to save all of planet earth, he died a hero. His heroism further added to his legend and Jordan continued to inspire generations of heroes who followed in his footsteps, as well as his successor Kyle Rayner. Though outraged at his fall from grace, Hal Jordan's legacy was that of the ultimate hero and his death allowed him to redeem himself in the eyes of his peers. His resurrection however, allowed writers to chip away at Hal's legacy and moral character, displaying Jordan as a man whose willpower, a point of pride was overcome and destroyed.

Even more outrageous was the resurrection of the silver age Green Arrow, Oliver Queen. Resurrected through a STILL unknown means, Queen's resurrected literally destroyed his son's run at Green Arrow and has almost erased his existence from the DC Universe. For what?? To bring back a character who had a diminishing fan base?

But the ultimate example of a character who did not need to return from the grave has to be former boy wonder Jason Todd. Jason met his end in 1988's Batman: A Death In The Family, after having the holy snot beaten out of him by Batman's ultimate arch enemy The Joker, Jason's fate was left in the hands of readers who were instructed to call in and vote for life or death. The votes were cast and Jason was killed and in one of the more creative plot devices used in Batman lore, Jason's legacy was emotionally evoked during Bruce Wayne's most trying times forcing The Dark Knight to face his ultimate failure as well as guiding new Robin Tim Drake to greater heights. Jason's death served added an additional driving force to Batman's character while allowing Jason's legacy to live on. His resurrection as a murderous anti hero destroyed Jason's legacy and has really served no true purpose in Batman's universe.

Now I'm not saying death should be removed from comics, but the point and hold death has characters is removed once the character is brought back from the death. Instead of killing characters off...why not create new ones? New villains and new heroes alike to further a characters odyssey and create new stories for fans and new creative outlets for writers. Expanding a character's universe instead of keeping in tightly in hand seems like a better solution instead of resurrecting characters that once killed should stay dead. If you think that a character still has plenty of life in them, and if they serve a higher purpose...let them live.

Alienating your audience for sales is a horrible thing to do and since your readers have such an emotional attachment to these characters killing them should be only with the mindset of introducing a new character or continuing the character's legacy in a new way. Not to mention the fact that you completely waste the hard work of your writers and artists.

Whether or not the death and resurrection are done well or not is a moot point. Death should be reserved for only the most pivotal moments of a character's story.

So please DC, Marvel and anyone else..stop destroying the world's you have worked so hard to create!


Caboose Out!

THE 4:30 MOVIE Interview: Filmmaker Kevin Smith On How His Passion For The Theater Shaped New Film (Exclusive)
Related:

THE 4:30 MOVIE Interview: Filmmaker Kevin Smith On How His Passion For The Theater Shaped New Film (Exclusive)

THE FRANCHISE: Trailer For Max Series Starring Daniel Brühl Reveals Chaos Inside World Of Superhero Filmmaking
Recommended For You:

THE FRANCHISE: Trailer For Max Series Starring Daniel Brühl Reveals Chaos Inside World Of Superhero Filmmaking

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

NoobMike
NoobMike - 12/11/2008, 7:06 PM
Usually the continuity of a character's story happens when said character belongs to someone, not something. When a character belongs to his creator he can finish it when he wants and how he wants it (look at Seinfeld). When a character belongs to a corporation, even if it is in the creative business, the decissions made today by some, will be considered bad choices by the future people involved (writer, exec, artist, editor, etc). The irony of it all is that usually when a character is killed it is because his sales are not that good, but when word gets out that the character is going to be killed there is a huge interest for those comics (collectability of those issues hits the roof, low supply and high demand means high prices).

After a while everyone involved will change, either they move on to other projects or change company (hell they can die too). Then when new people see figures, they don't understand why they cancelled or killed that character if sales were so good (sure they were good six months prior to his death and probably a year afterwards) which makes them revive the character. Just look at how many times Moon Knight has been killed and brought back to life. And when sales go down again, they usually blame it on the new character who took over the mantle, making it the easiest way out to just bring the old one back to life.

Keep in mind that Marvel, DC, etc. Are companies made to make money first, not to tell great stories (although they sometimes manage to do that). That is one of the reasons I have given up on following certain characters and just concentrate on creator runs, I like to see what they do with the characters so I will follow them, but I don't follow characters as feverishly as before.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 12/11/2008, 7:57 PM
thats a great article Caboose. i can count on one hand the characters in superhero comics that have died and stayed dead! some i was glad they ressurected, some i wasnt, some i was indifferent. When Martian manhunter was killed off in final crises i was devastated! theres one i hope does come back in some form. Then theres the cop outs like Batman R.I.P. okay so nobody wants batman killed off right? but why say its going to happen and then pussy out of it with a lame "it was all a dream" conclusion.
IonParallax
IonParallax - 12/12/2008, 8:02 PM
They didn't really do that did they Ror? I'm SICK of the it's a dream (St. Elsewhere)/mental problem (Buffy and Tick)/simulation (Family Guy)/random writing of a character (Roseanne) endings to things. It happens WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY too much in entertainment, and is really starting to piss me off.

As for bringing back the dead, it's usually (I say that lightly) a good way to bring back a character that people have grown to love. For example, Hal Jordan (who only sacrificed himself, THEN became the Spectre, before Rebirth, so it wasn't an absolute death), Sinestro, Jean Grey, Professor Xavier, Spock. IMO, these are all good examples of characters who have died, and been ressurected in GOOD ways. In bad ways, well, there are probably countless, but my LEAST favorite was that douche Todd whatever his name is that took up the mantle of Robin, then got killed, and came back later as Red Robin and is now Red Hood. NOOOOO! Stupid people. On the topic of coming back, the DCU is taking it to the EXTREME with the Black Lantern Corps. Comprised ENTIRELY of reanimated corpses of the DCU! Now that's going to be a trip. Check it out on the Book of Oa fansite, dedicated solely to Green Lantern news.

HA! Yes, I shamelessly plugged my own fansite on yours. I'm sorry if that bothers you, but I want that free Dark knight DVD. just tell me and i'll remove the plug.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 12/13/2008, 2:03 PM
they did ion, they really did! it wasnt quite as blatant as "it was all a dream" but it turnrd out some villains had kidnapped him and wer making him believe the whole R.I.P storyline was real...just like we thought it was! in fairness, i should have known they would never kill off batman, apparantly the bookies lost a fortune!
IonParallax
IonParallax - 12/15/2008, 3:55 PM
SOB! I hate things like that, I bet the writers got a chuckle out of that one..."I bet they're all going to think it's real, but really, it's not! AHAHAHAHA" Bastards...
Shadowelfz
Shadowelfz - 12/29/2008, 6:20 PM
Totally agree with you here, Caboose. I hate it when they kill off a main hero, not necessarily because I think its a bad idea (most of the time it is but as in the Hal Jordan thing it made sense), but because the fans that love these characters wont let it happen. Period.

Superman, Green Arrow, Green Lantern and so on are just too iconic to really kill off, so the writer will enivitably be forced to bring them back, doing triple back flips and creating implausable reasons to do so, which undermines the whole point of the arc. They tried to pass the bat-mantle to Azreal the whole Knightfall thing. Didn't last very long, did it? Then the Scarlet-spider/ spiderman fiasco was even worse.

Writers need to stop with this crap, or they have to stick with their stories despite fanboy angst. Killing off characters for profit is a short-sighted solution to poor sales, and it surprises me that these people with business degrees keep making such obvious blunders.
View Recorder