GoodFlash - Experimenting with the Superhero Format

GoodFlash - Experimenting with the Superhero Format

Superhero movies usually fall into a standard format - Origins, a bunch of stuff while you wait for the final fight, The Final Fight. To fight this complacency, lets see what we can extract from Martin Scorsese and apply it to a difficult to adapt super - Barry Allen's The Flash.

Editorial Opinion
By AverageDrafter - Nov 01, 2012 10:11 AM EST
Filed Under: Other

Martin Scorsese is, of course, cinematic legend. He is also an explorer of forms and genres, which give hope one day that he would direct a superhero movie. If only to show everyone else what they've been doing wrong with them all this time.

That is certainly fantasy, but we can study the master's techniques to try to find a different path for our supermen and women on the screen. In this article we give the Goodfellas treatment to The Flash by way of Menace II Society.

Economy of Screentime

The vast majority of SH films fail in utilizing their time, even the good ones. A common complaint in SH movies is that it is impossible to cram decades of story into a single movie. Consider, however, how much happens in GF in its 2.5 hour running time.

Early Henry cabstand hijinx including his first bust
An introduction to all the background players and Jimmy
Meeting and Falling in love with Karen
Air France Heist
The Wedding and early married life
The Lufthansa Heist
Prison
Drug Running
Marital problems to the extreme
Final bust, trial, and Witness Protection Program "death"

The point is, that the majority of SH movies do not have this level of detail in their work, even though they have literally hundreds of stories to draw from. The main culprit? " One Hero, One Villain, One Plot ".
Now a caveat to this complaint isn't to Batman and Robin it into a convoluted mess. Just dumping characters into a movie isn't going to do the job. You don't need to see EVERY origin and back story to know their relationship with the protagonist.

But just look how many players there are in GF. Most of them are introduced all at once, and while their activity is secondary to the Henry Hill tread, even if some of them are never seen again they add richness and history to the environment.

Henry Hill is the main tread of GF, and everything we see in the film isn't just related to Henry, it is entwined. We see everything through his eyes, and if it doesn't relate directly to him, it usually happens off-screen. When we do get away from Henry, its usually short trip and for a major plot point. It is his life we are watching, everything else is extraneous.

Multiple Plot and Character Threads

GF is Henry Hill's story, but it’s a part of dozens of stories that entwine with Henry's life. Pauly, Jimmy, Tommy, and Karen are fully realized characters. Others like Stacks, Spider, Karen's Mom, Frenchy, Morry, Tommy's Mom, are all background characters, but they all feel like they have lives on their own. And everyone ADDS to the Hank's story, even if indirectly.

It’s a cohesive environment that makes sense. Running Henry through the story, we see him and others react to their environment in naturalistic manner. Look at the number of stories told in the span of the film. Each act is like a mini-movie that propels the main story. Players change, but it all builds to one goal, recounting Henry’s rise and fall. Managing this all is difficult, but it all comes down to this: Take the time to work it out. It is worth it.

I mentioned the issue of “One Hero, One Villain, One Plot”, but fortunately Barry has a nice way out of this conundrum… The Rogues. These guys are perfect fodder for Barry to build his powers. Lets face it, once The Flash learns how to fully use his powers, these guys are toast.
After Barry becomes The Flash, he leaps into action battling the individual Rogues and other challenges (I’d love to see the prison riot in action) in quick sequences. These are our introductions to these characters. Commander Cold realizes they aren’t going to stop him alone, and organizes the city’s super villains. At the same time we see Barry develop more and more of his powers and techniques (running up wall, vortexes, etc). We also see Central City and its people in these scenes were we establish The Flash’s growing popularity amongst the citizens.
All of this happens concurrently, and not necessarily on-screen.

Point of View

Here is the key. We don’t see this group up; we don’t see the origin of Captain Boomerang. We don’t need too, and in fact anything that happens outside of Barry’s perspective is usually not going to be shown. We find out about the story the way Barry does, by Barry experiencing it.
Bringing this back to GF, everything is through Henry’s eyes, with the exception of a few scenes (Tommy getting wacked for one), and he is never gone more than he needs to be. However, the world is so developed it feels like all of the characters have their own stories, their own lives.
I’m usually not a fan of voice-overs in films in general, but I think its odd that this method has been little used in SH movies. After all, the originating format is full of character’s inner thoughts tucked away in caption squares. Watchmen was one of the standouts, and I think the technique was utilized perfectly. GF is voice over heavy, and I think the method would work well with Barry.

Three Act Structure

This goes for most movies, but SH movies in particular are stuck in this mold. FILM CRIT HULK has a lot to say about this, so I'll let him give you the skinny on why three act structure is the bane of good storytelling.
The deadweight of most SH movies is the second act. The act that makes you wait literally half the movie for what you already know is coming. HULK defined act breaks by an event/decision the story/characters can’t go back from, and I like that definition a lot.
By dumping this structure and opting for an open act story, we give ourselves the freedom from its second act swallowing up screen time for no good reason, and allows for a structure that fits the needs of the film, rather than relying on a 100-year-old-plus story structure based on irrelevant theater traditions.


Let’s put this all together to give Barry his powers in a propulsive manner by mimicking the opening to GF:

Scene - Crime Lab, Late Evening. A man silently checks a centrifuge, makes a notation, does some more "science" in a slow methodological manner. Once he is done he sits down and continues reading his golden age Jay Garruk "The Flash" comic.

The silence is broken by a thunderous bolt of lighting and a freeze frame on:



BARRY ALLEN - VO

All my life I wanted to be a Superhero.

Music Cue
Cut to Black and then Fade in

Barry wakes in a trashed lab, bleary and trying to focus on a clock. Once he realizes the time, he runs (normally) out the door and sees a vacant cab just pass by. Barry starts to run after the cab (again normally), but as it speeds away Barry keeps up with it, focused on the driver and not how fast he is running. When Barry does catch up to the cab, the driver looks down at his speedometer at 60mph, and up at Barry with an incredulous look on his face. The cab veers off to another road as Barry now realizes how fast he has been running.

He slows down, stops, and stares at the empty stretch of road, wide eyed and contemplating the meaning of this transformation.

TITLE

In about 3 minutes we get to about 30 minutes into most SH movies. Origins are BORING, but most of the stuff that’s pre-origin is even more so. Do we need to see Barry’s life before we see the actual accident, or can we provide any important information later in a more economical way?

The point of this exercise is that our comic book and superhero movies are being pressed into a mold. There are a thousand ways to structure a film, and since these genres are getting stale in there structure, its time to look at alternatives.
Holiday Gift Guide 2024 - Essentials From Disney, Jakks Pacific, LEGO, Universal, & More
Related:

Holiday Gift Guide 2024 - Essentials From Disney, Jakks Pacific, LEGO, Universal, & More

A BARBIE Sequel May Be In The Works At Warner Bros. - Will Margot Robbie And Ryan Gosling Return?
Recommended For You:

A BARBIE Sequel May Be In The Works At Warner Bros. - Will Margot Robbie And Ryan Gosling Return?

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

AC1
AC1 - 11/1/2012, 12:01 PM
Good article, but certain characters do benefit from having their origins and pre-origins explored; a key example is Batman. He's one of the most psychologically complex characters in all of comic book history, and his motives need exploring. That's why, in my opinion, Batman Begins is far superior to Batman (1989), because Chris Nolan made the conscious effort to really delve into 'what makes Bruce Wayne tick', and his journey from Bruce Wayne to Batman is a slow transformation, whereas Burton briefly skims through the origin using a flashback scene without ever truly exploring the inner turmoil that would propel someone like Bruce Wayne to become Batman.
Similarly, Superman's origins need exploration, because he's an alien from another world. He's not just some random guy who gets powers; he's someone born that way, meaning he's grown up different from everyone around him, and it's worth exploring.

The Flash, on the other hand, needs none of that. The method you described above would work perfectly because his origin is very simple and can be explained in a matter of minutes. He's a police scientist, which is why he is predisposed to using his powers for crime-fighting, and he's granted powers through a freak accident all of a sudden. Before that, Barry Allen was just an ordinary guy. That's why Scorsese's GoodFellas approach would work; Scorsese makes films about ordinary people, to an extent, who need no real explanation. All you need to know about Scorsese's characters is what you see or learn in the timeframe of the film, but many characters need exploration from different points in their life.

In fact, here's another Scorsese/Superhero comparison. Taxi Driver in Superhero terms. In Taxi Driver, Travis Bickle is a fairly odd character from the offset, but the majority of the film deals with his transformation into the disillusioned vigilante. Travis Bickle, Travis would get his powers when he buys the guns and starts training. He would then become a superhero at the point that he shaves his head into that mohawk - his transformation is complete, and he's ready to fight. It's his metaphorical costume.

In GoodFellas, on the other hand, the characters are already almost fully realized, and their journeys in the film are quite small.

Flash is already an almost fully realized character. Once he gets his powers, he's ready.

Batman isn't a fully realized character before he becomes Batman. He isn't even close. He has this huge journey to complete before he becomes Batman.
evilness
evilness - 11/1/2012, 5:04 PM
at the risk of sounding like a complete fanboy, here it goes...



i don't know why everyone seems to want barry to be the flash on film. he is neither the first, nor the newest, nor the best. he barely has a personality ffs. just a big pile of nothing.

wally's where it's at. he made flash interesting. he had a personality. he was stronger. he discovered the speed force. he is the most inspirational, and that is because we saw him grow physically and as a character from kind of a snotty brat into a responsible and reliable superhero.

[frick] boring allen
wally west forever

evilness
evilness - 11/1/2012, 5:15 PM
about the article, nice writeup but i completely disagree with what you say about origins.

yeah, some movies don't pull it off too well. but if you are even trying to make a good superhero flick, that 'boring' origins stuff is necessary. would iron man going around killing terrorists be anything but mindless michael bay-esque action had we not seen what he was like before and what this transformation means to him? would batman's crusade mean a damn thing if we didn't know where he was coming from or why he was so damn motivated about it? would spider-man's newfound power mean anything if we didn't know what his life was like before?

the origins don't even have to be boring, in case of iron man and batman begins, they were the most interesting part of the respective films.

you might know what the character's about, but most of the moviegoing public wouldn't give two shits about the characters if they didn't really know him. action films, hell, superhero films come a dime a dozen in today's day and age. if the audience doesn't find themselves invested in flash, they'll just go watch something else.
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 11/1/2012, 7:41 PM
You sir, are awesome.
I have been saying this for so long, and while some people tend to agree, it's like my points (which aren't mine, exclusively) are never discussed again anywhere else. It's nice to see it pop up somewhere else.

I'm gonna go out on a limb here, because I'm currently lamenting the absence of my car (which was decorated with custom-made bumper stickers of singers popularized during the 80s)....

One-hit wonders. Donna Summers and Hot Stuff. Dexy's Midnight Runners and Come On Eileen. They aren't on my car (just David Bowie, Freddie Mercury, and Pat Benatar), but think about it - you turn on the radio and you hear something you like. Does it really matter who sings it? Sometimes, but assuming you have no idea who it is, and if you're not aware as to whether it's a cover or not, the enjoyment is in the song. Not knowing the singer's style. Not knowing the singer's personal life. Not knowing that the singer has been dead for over twenty years. It STANDS ON ITS OWN MERIT.

One of my all-time favorite movies, the Princess Bride, is one fine example of this. Inigo Montoya is a skilled swordsman who has studied nearly every manner of fencing in hopes of hunting down the six-fingered man who killed his father. You see NOTHING of this, he tells the story's protagonist.

Speaking of Westley, he vanishes for years and is believed to have been killed by his fiancé. The truth of the story is that Westley's ship was attacked by the Dread Pirate Roberts, who took him on as a slave for the years to come. Westley explains that one day the Dread Pirate Roberts told him his secret: he is not the real Dread Pirate Roberts - that man has long retired and left the mantle to him, just as he intended to do with Westley. It is the name and reputation that was important. No one would surrender to the Dread Pirate Westley, now would they? Again, this is explained, not seen, which is kind of the point.

In Blade Runner, do we see ANY of what Roy has seen? Do we see why Deckard is the "best" Blade Runner to hunt down the replicants? He's not the best, as we see, he blows his cover time and again, gets his ass handed to him by the DUMBEST replicant of the fugitives, and is made a complete mockery by Batty at the end.

What works is the environment. The characters who refer to the past, how the primary character responds to such interactions is how the audience is meant to judge and weigh their importance.

This is not to say that origin stories aren't needed at all times. Of the Nolan movies, Batman Begins is my favorite (well, actually my favorite is Memento, but you know), BUT it was written AS an origin story. All the characters were set up in correlation of that fact, which is why most are disposable. On Memento, the movie is played backwards, so you get the "origin" last, as a sort of a scavenger hunt of clues pointing towards it. That is how it was intended.

The stigma is thinking superhero movies are unlike any other.
AverageDrafter
AverageDrafter - 11/2/2012, 12:03 PM
The Wally vs Barry argument falls in line with the larger mythos of the speedsters of Central\Keystone city. In my imaginary DC Cinematic sandbox the big epic event picture isn't JLA but Crisis on Infinite Earths.

Barry's sacrifice in Crisis is one of the I chose Barry as the Flash to depict. After the sacrifice is when Wally takes on the mantle of his mentor and uncle, with all the doubt that comes with it. Basically, Wally is Phase 2 Flash.

And for the record, I'm not against origins, I just rally against any format where a third of your running time is automatically sucked up by a seemingly static element of the genre.

I also agree that Superman, Spiderman, and Batman's origin's are vital to their stories, but I counter that these origins are well known enough that they don't have to be COMPLETELY reiterated every time we reboot or switch gears. Their central conflicts based on their origins and personalities should come out in the action of the narrative, and not as an aside to the main story.

We make icons for a reason, they are shorthand for more complicated ideas. Once something is icononized, there are aspects of their stories that become redundant because they are already familiar.

Most of our superheros are not at this level, but for the ones that are, we should use this iconography to our advantage.
aresww3
aresww3 - 11/2/2012, 10:06 PM
What a brilliant article. You really understand writing. it´s given me food for thought as a writer. However I will say two things, it´s not the three part structure (actually Aristotilian in origin I believe) but rather how they fill that space in between. no matter what structure you use, if your characters are boring, soulless etc etc and each scene´s plot doesn´t have a distinctive punchline, then you´re films going to be bad. I think you´re absolutely right CBM´s need to experiment with other narrative structures and Flash would fit Goodfellas well. He´d be perfect for that treatement, but that´s be cause of his connection with time - he´s so fast, it would be cool if the viewer could see how time starts being experienced differently by him, so there´s this kind of episodic journey through the first two years of his life as the Flash.

However someone like Manhunter or WW I think the epic, would be much more appropriate form wise to their character, where there is a beginning middle and end, because their mythology is so integral to who they are. what happened to them is their heart and how an audience would be able to relate to them. There´s others where you could literally explore all kinds of forms.

I could see Hit Man Tommy Monaghan given a kind of Pulp Fiction Resovoir Dogs treatment, or golden age The Sandman could be worked into a neonoir a la David Lynch. It could really work with some imagination. Thanks for this post. great stuff.
View Recorder