Stan Lee’s Former Company Claims Disney DOESN'T Own Marvel Superheros; Files For Damages

Stan Lee’s Former Company Claims Disney DOESN'T Own Marvel Superheros; Files For Damages

Stan Lee Media, Inc. claim they still hold the copyrights to such characters as Spider-Man, The X-Men, The Avengers and more - and not only are they are looking for a big payday, but control over the characters as well. Read on for details..

News
By MarkCassidy - Oct 09, 2012 06:10 PM EST
Filed Under: Other
Source: Deadline

Stan Lee's former company - Stan Lee Media, Inc. - filed a copyright infringement complaint against Walt Disney Company today, claiming that they never held the copyrights to the various Marvel Comics characters we have seen up on the big screen over the past few years..



“Defendant The Walt Disney Company has represented to the public that it, in fact, owns the copyright to these characters as well as to hundreds of other characters created by Stan Lee. Those representations made to the public by The Walt Disney Company are false.”


You can read the legal document in full here, but basically SLMI are looking for “the maximum statutory damages allowable”, meaning a nice slice of the $5.5 billion they say that the Walt Disney Company has made from superhero movies and merchandise based on Lee's characters, AND full control over anything done with these characters in the future. What does this mean for our beloved Marvel Cinematic Universe? Only time will tell. We will keep you updated on any developments.







The Greatest Comic Book Movie Of All-Time Has Been Chosen By Hollywood's Directors, Actors, And More
Related:

The Greatest Comic Book Movie Of All-Time Has Been Chosen By Hollywood's Directors, Actors, And More
Marvel Comics' God Of Thunder As You've Never Seen Him Before: First Look At MORTAL THOR #1 Revealed
Recommended For You:

Marvel Comics' God Of Thunder As You've Never Seen Him Before: First Look At MORTAL THOR #1 Revealed

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Do you have what it takes to write for us?
Want to contribute?
1 2
Phango
Phango - 10/9/2012, 7:08 PM
And they now just come out with this info...
superotherside
superotherside - 10/9/2012, 7:11 PM
I sure hope it doesn't mess up any of the films or anything. Just give them their cut and forget about it.
DaenerysTargaryen
DaenerysTargaryen - 10/9/2012, 7:22 PM
As long as it doesn't stop my movies from being made, then whatever
marvelstudios
marvelstudios - 10/9/2012, 7:26 PM
Fk this pisses me off. Hope it doesn't affect the MCU in any way.
Mrcool210
Mrcool210 - 10/9/2012, 7:28 PM
didnt they go bankrupt a while ago? plus, stan doesnt own marvel so they are gonna get theyre asses kicked in court
superotherside
superotherside - 10/9/2012, 7:36 PM
Stan isn't involved. This is a company he was involved with at one time. Hopefully they can either make a deal with them to keep the rights or it gets kicked out of court.
ImNoSuperMan
ImNoSuperMan - 10/9/2012, 7:39 PM
Isn't it ironic how when it is only AFTER Disney/Marvel has made billions of $$$ off these characters and stories that SLMI wants in?

"If you're not present during my struggle, don't expect to be present during my success"
~Will Smith
Rhinoman
Rhinoman - 10/9/2012, 7:42 PM
Not sure if anyone knows this but DISNEY HAS GOOD LAWYERS. They would not invest 4 Billion dollars into Marvel without checking to see if these contracts are Ironclad
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 10/9/2012, 7:44 PM
This is like a collection agency...
LFANCH
LFANCH - 10/9/2012, 7:44 PM
Didn't Stan Lee ditch this company years ago cause they pissed him off?
Moakynubs
Moakynubs - 10/9/2012, 7:45 PM
Lol. The company is called Stan Lee media and they don't even have Stan Lee. That's already pathetic.
jimpinto24
jimpinto24 - 10/9/2012, 7:48 PM
WTF???? Why would they sue Marvel for The Avengers when Marvel already owns the copyrights of The Avengers???
D117
D117 - 10/9/2012, 7:50 PM
Aren't they at little late? Should've settled this when Iron Man was in production lol.
Viltrumite
Viltrumite - 10/9/2012, 7:53 PM
Also, to my knowledge, Stan Lee is no longer associated with this company. The company sued -him- not too long ago, too.
StarkAnthony
StarkAnthony - 10/9/2012, 7:54 PM
Pretty sure this company has no legitimate claims to any of these characters. Disney should have no problem taking care of this
CharlesLord
CharlesLord - 10/9/2012, 8:03 PM
the real sad thing about this is that Stan's name is still attached to this company and he's not even involved. Smh now ppl are gonna be thinkin Stan is tryna sue Disney
Ghaleonausa
Ghaleonausa - 10/9/2012, 8:03 PM
Really hoping this don't screw up MCU going forward
RR51
RR51 - 10/9/2012, 8:03 PM
dc420911
dc420911 - 10/9/2012, 8:05 PM
did any of you guys read the lawsuit it seems pretty legit, if lee had any of the rights as of '98. plus the reason its happening now is because they started looking into stuff like this 2 years ago. read the law suit
GoILL
GoILL - 10/9/2012, 8:07 PM
People go crazy when big money is involved.
DrainBamage
DrainBamage - 10/9/2012, 8:19 PM
I don't know, Disney does sort of have a track record for this kind of thing.

Before they officially took them over, didn't they get sued by Henson's family a while back for using The Muppets without their permission?

And on the flipside, is SLMI also suing Sony and Fox as well, or are they just singling out Disney? Or have they already reached some sort of agreement with the other two?
ZombieOverEasy
ZombieOverEasy - 10/9/2012, 8:22 PM
Wouldn't it be funny if a company successfully sued Disney for the characters "owned" (allegedly) by Marvel, created by Stan Lee and that company was called Stan Lee Media, but yet had no involvement with Stan Lee?

This is almost as confusing as the Summer's family tree.
TheNightmare
TheNightmare - 10/9/2012, 8:25 PM
Dc420911 I just looked up Stan lee media it looks like the been suing everyone mostly Marvel and Stan Lee since 2007.
Most of the lawsuits they lost, not having anyway to prove their ownership the courts have thrown out most of the cases. Here are two cases though not high courts are appeals court http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/stan-lee-appeals-court-denies-spider-man-rights-302877 as well a federal judge http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/stan-lee-media-fails-reclaim-conan-290025.
I don't know if they have any validity to their claim, but does not seem they have any ground to stand on. Sorry for the long post as well as bad grammar.
genesis609
genesis609 - 10/9/2012, 8:28 PM
hopefully this means disney can get x men spidey and ff!!! ;)
Howlett
Howlett - 10/9/2012, 8:33 PM
Ronald McDonald suing McDonalds again.
IronWarrior777
IronWarrior777 - 10/9/2012, 8:38 PM
Stan Lee is a BOSS!
dc420911
dc420911 - 10/9/2012, 8:41 PM
thenightmare, good to know. i was just going off of what was said in the paperwork
buckjoe
buckjoe - 10/9/2012, 8:42 PM
First of all can we fixed it where it says Stan Lee was co-creator. Not one characters he came up with by himself. It's always with other artists.
OdinsBeard
OdinsBeard - 10/9/2012, 8:43 PM
DISNEY LAWYERS ASSEMBLE!
OtakuPapi
OtakuPapi - 10/9/2012, 8:47 PM
Oddly enough Stan Lee has a habit of claiming ownership from nowhere.I think his lawyers just look for loopholes all day to get over on
nikgrid
nikgrid - 10/9/2012, 8:50 PM
as well as to hundreds of other characters created by Stan Lee.......AND Jack Kirby AND Steve Ditko and other people no doubt.
rockerdude22
rockerdude22 - 10/9/2012, 8:53 PM
Didn't these people also sue for the profits of Conan the Barbarian awhile ago? I think it was for 100% of the profits of that movie. It makes me laugh that these people will sue just about anybody for some cash lol.
rockerdude22
rockerdude22 - 10/9/2012, 8:55 PM
Also, Disney is a multi-billion dollar company. They're sure to have a really good legal team, so I wouldn't worry too much guys!
PistonSmash
PistonSmash - 10/9/2012, 8:55 PM
Can you people please get things straight in your twisted little minds?

1. Stan Lee has NO CONNECTION to this lawsuit at all

2. Lawsuits like these can take years to assemble and formally issue. I'm sure this isn't just a spur of the moment lawsuit, they have been putting this together for awhile

I can't believe there wasn't a clause somewhere in Stan's contract when he was at Marvel that any characters he created were in part owned by Marvel. It's not like he could have brought Spiderman over to DC if they paid him enough, right?
1 2
Related Headlines
Latest Headlines

Hot Headlines Hot Headlines

Sci-Fi & Fantasy

Anime & Manga

Gaming

Horror

Cartoons & Animated Features

Action Movies & TV

Pro Wrestling & MMA News
View Recorder