There Is Nothing Wrong With Appealing To Movie Audiences Or Relaunching Now And Then

Lately, Marvel comics has been accused of watering down their characters to attract fans of the film. I'm going to explain why there is nothing wrong with this, and this is exactly what fans and the comic book industry as a whole should want.

Editorial Opinion
By ironpool007 - Jul 14, 2012 11:07 PM EST
Filed Under: Other

Marvel is as big as it probably ever will be. The first wave of their interconnected films culminating with Marvel's The Avengers have been a massive in theaters and home video, and in the comics, Marvel is coming to the conclusion of an entire decade's worth of stories with Avengers VS X-Men, and ready to march towards the future with a relaunch that has branded as Marvel NOW.

But as awesome as this all is, and as many fans there are that love all that is going, their is a portion of fans who have become increasingly frustrated with Marvel, and a big sticking point for them is that they feel Marvel is watering down their stories to earn the dollars of people who enjoyed the films. This is not exactly an invalid arguement to be fair to hose making it. After all, when the first Iron Man movie hit theaters, Marvel launched The Invincible Iron Man with Matt Fraction writing and Salvador Larroca on art duties. While it was set in entirely in Marvel continuity, the movie almost felt like a direct sequel to the movie, since the villain Eziekiel Stane, was the son of Obadiah Stane, and the supporting cast, Rhodey and Pepper both featured in the series, and still do. Marvel would go on to adopt this approach for Thor and Captain America when their movies came out. And when The Avengers released, Brian Bendis cooked up a new series called Avengers Assemble, featuring the team featured in the movie battling Thanos.

Logic tells us that we can expect this trend to continue. In October, Marvel is set to begin launching books with number ones attached to begin the next era of Marvel Stories and draw in new readers. Plus in addition to sequels to Captain America, Iron Man, and Thor, Marvel will also be launching Ant Man, Black Panther, and Guardians of the Galaxy. And when people go to see these movies, some of them might be compelled too delve deeper and visit a comic book shop to try and find out where all these amazing characters originated. And that is a good thing. Yes, Marvel has tried to make their universe more accessible to the movie fans, but all the books that have done this which I am reading are telling good stories, that do not seem to be piggybacking off the films. The stories are still set in the world of the comics, not the movies. It is my opinion that is the responsibility of the film makers involved not only to make a good movie that will do well at the box office, but also something that will benefit both the originators of these books(in this case Marvel), and comic book stores as well. Like it or not, sales are not as high they need to be, and the people watching these movies and coming to the comic shops are exactly we need. That means not only must the film makers make a movie that compels a movie goer to check out a comic shop, but Marvel themselves must react to what is on screen and put out a product that will appeal to these new fans and old ones as well.

In addition tho this, Marvel should also get used to the idea of rolling their books back to issue one every few years. It is much easier to begin reading a series that has just started than to try and play catch up with a book that is 50 something or even worse, sever hundred issues in. And sometimes Marvel does something even more insane. They take a book such as The Invincible Iron Man and took it from issue 33 and all of a sudden, the next issue was 500. The same thing happened in other books as well. Captain America went from being in the double digits in the amount of issues published to the latest issue being numbered the 600th. This can only go to confuse fans who might be looking to jump on to those books, because maybe they don't know that Marvel planned for those books to work like that. For all they know, if they want to get in on reading them, they have a lot of catching up to do. A series should only be allowed to reach the hundred mark, if it reaches those numbers naturally, PERIOD! I hope this practice comes to an end once Marvel NOW begins.

Another thing Marvel needs to do is stop putting out new books every time a movie comes. I have been reading Avengers Assemble as it comes out, and it is decent, but unless Marvel plans for it be a replacement for one the existing Avengers titles, I can not really see why it is needed. Ok, so they wanted a book to feature the team from the movie so it seemed friendly to those audiences. Well, this could have been achieved by simply planning as story arc in the core series featuring that line up, and have it release when the movie came out. The Invincible Iron Man was handled much better. Yes, when it first launched, Iron Man: Director of S.H.I.E.L.D. was still going, but that book finished it's run shortly after Invincible began. Marvel NOW is the perfect opportunity for Marvel to look at all their books, and ask just how many series of each individual team they need. Seriously, I love The Avengers, but 6 books is pushing it. Unless they all serve different purposes, which some do, some should be chopped.

Finally, some of the burden must rest with comic stores. Shop owners need to do more, if they want the business of new fans. When new comic book movies come, they should have store workers at the theaters handing out coupons, and telling the movie goers where they can go to continue following the adventures of these characters. Advertising in local newspapers and the internet would help out a lot. Put ads on TV and in theaters. Better awareness will result in more readers.

Fans, publishers, and retailers, we can save this industry, and keep it booming forever, if we follow these steps.

THE 4:30 MOVIE Interview: Filmmaker Kevin Smith On How His Passion For The Theater Shaped New Film (Exclusive)
Related:

THE 4:30 MOVIE Interview: Filmmaker Kevin Smith On How His Passion For The Theater Shaped New Film (Exclusive)

THE FRANCHISE: Trailer For Max Series Starring Daniel Brühl Reveals Chaos Inside World Of Superhero Filmmaking
Recommended For You:

THE FRANCHISE: Trailer For Max Series Starring Daniel Brühl Reveals Chaos Inside World Of Superhero Filmmaking

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

ironpool007
ironpool007 - 7/15/2012, 5:38 AM
oh tea: only you...haha
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 7/15/2012, 6:22 AM
They dont need to set a book's numbering back to number 1 as a good jumping on point. The reason I say that is because even when they do come out with a new firat issue, all the continuity from the previous numbering still exists. It doesnt go away.

Essentially, a new first issue is no different than the first issue of a new story arc in the previous numbering. Look at titles like Thunderbolts. A series that has never been renumbered. They are up to issue 176 I believe. If they started over with a new number 1, what exactly would it change that they haven't changed already over the past years? Nothing. It doesnt matter if you change the team roster, dynamic, or purpose of the book, there is no need to set the numbering back to 1.

Marvel prooved this when they started renumbering new volumes of books to 600. So now you have a book that went up to issue 300 (im just making up numbers) go cancelled and rereleased numerous times, then when the 600th overall issue from all the volumes combined comes out, they renumber it to the original volume's number? Come on, its a money grab, plain and simple.

It would be different if everytime a new first issue came out, they rebooted the character's history, but they dont. So there is no excuse to come out with a new first issue every couple of years.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 7/15/2012, 6:45 AM
Another good example would be Uncanny X-Men. after Schism it got cancelled for literally 2 months, then came out with a new 1st issue. The ONLY thing that changed was the team roster. The events of Schism and everything else before still counted. In fact they still, the events od Schism are still main focal point of the book. So what was the point of the renumbering? There wasnt one, other than an excuse to slap a shiny #1 on the cover in hopes of boosting sales. Its this kind of thing that pisses off readers.
ironpool007
ironpool007 - 7/15/2012, 7:15 AM
@CorndogBurglar: Of course, continuity stays the same, but a new number helps emphasize the beginning of a new era for a series, and the main reason why I feel they should adopt this practice, is because it is intimidating for new readers to to go track down all those back issues when a book is numbered that high. Yes they could still have to track down stuff that came before a new number 1, but it just looks more reader friendly. I'm really hoping they do this to The Amazing Spider-Man, because right now I'm only gonna read it in collected form. Spider-Man has such a long history that it's easier for me to just track it all down in trades, and start over when a new volume begins. And yeah I get what you are saying about series being numbered in the hundred when they only are in the single digits, because that is how accumulated issues there are, but it just comes off looking like a cash grab, and throws people off, especially newer readers.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 7/15/2012, 8:44 AM
And see thats the thing, and you kind of said it, but ill use Uncanny X-Men again as an example. When the came out with the new #1 issue, people would still need to track down the old issues if tbey want to catch up because continuity wise, nothing changed.

I woukd even go so far as to say that it can be even more confusing. Look at Moon Knight. Over the years his books have been cancelled and started up with a new 1st issue probably more than any other comic. in a 5 year period he had 3 new volumes, all starting with issue 1. If someone wants to track something down, they cant just look at old Moon Knight issue, now they have to figure out which volume of numbering the event took place in before they can pick up the issue. It makes it that much more difficult to find specific issues that a certain tooj place in. without different volumes they would have just been able to find Moon Knight #whatever and they would have it. Now they have to look for specific volumes before looking for the issue number. Its more cumbersome.

Now I understand if a comic gets cancelled due to poor sales, then they start a new volume years later, like Namor. But that isnt how it goes most of the time. Like Uncanny X-Men, there was no reason at all to cancel that book and restart it 2 months later.
golden123
golden123 - 7/15/2012, 9:19 AM
Nice Editorial!

The comic book industry is at a low. If better marketing could be accomplished, then sales would go up. It's common logic. Comic book companies need to place commercials before their movies, in theaters and on DVD & Blu-Ray. I'm not sure why this idea isn't in effect. In the meantime, we, as fans, should take up the responsibilty to show off the medium. If we want comic books to last forever, then we should encourage others to read. I believe, that one of the reasons, comics aren't selling is that they are deemed uncool. The medium is in awareness of the average joe, but it isn't diffused into popular culture the way it used to be; however, comic book superhero movies are. If superheroes can be accepted in one medium, then they can be accepted in another. The fans just have to make the effort to diffuse comic books into popular culture.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 7/15/2012, 9:55 AM
$4.00 an issue is completely ridiculous for a comic with about 22 pages of story. Im not advertising would help sales all that much. Most parents are not willing to pay that on a normal basis.
golden123
golden123 - 7/15/2012, 10:11 AM
@CorndogBurglar: Well, advertising is just one of the reasons advertising. The cost is another reason, but if more people start buying comics, then prices will go down. Also, if parents are willing to shell out $60 for a video game, then I'm sure they will pay $20 for a trade.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 7/15/2012, 1:22 PM
@ golden

You're right, although unfortunately trade sales dont help the issue sales.
joe384
joe384 - 7/15/2012, 8:23 PM
Yes!!! Thank You!! Totally agree with you dude. Every single word, plus who says that a comic book movie has to be true to it's source material, I mean just give me a great comic book movie, weather it's a story taken from the comics, or a mix up of several stories combined. I think these long time comic book readers are starting to feel like the special club they were in as comic book know it alls, is getting upset that the club is no longer VIP, but open to the public, and they now have to share their universe with people who don't know comics, and worst of all don't know movies. So for those out there who hate on every comic book movie ever made, or most or half, I say to you, just for the love of god be thankful that you get to see so many comic book characters brought to life, not only in your life time, but your kids also. That's something that will most likely never happen again, so do as I and just try to enjoy the movies even thought there not what you were hoping.
View Recorder