THE HUNGERS GAMES Review: Jennifer Lawrence Shines In An Otherwise Mediocre Film

THE HUNGERS GAMES Review: Jennifer Lawrence Shines In An Otherwise Mediocre Film

The Gary Ross-directed adaptation of The Hunger Games had so much hype before the release, and now the film is finally here. What did I make of it? Hit the jump to check out my review...

Review Opinion
By WolvieCBM - Mar 24, 2012 02:03 PM EST
Filed Under: Sci-Fi


*If you don't want to know anything about the film, please don't read this review.

OK, so before the film, I knew nothing about The Hunger Games. Never read the novels (still haven't), and from what I could read about the concept of the story online, it was all done before, but I still had interest in seeing this adaptation of the Suzanne Collins' novels, simply because of the cast. More below.

Every year in the ruins of what was once North America, the evil Capitol of the nation of Panem forces each of its twelve districts to send a teenage boy and girl to compete in the Hunger Games. A twisted punishment for a past uprising and an ongoing government intimidation tactic, The Hunger Games are a nationally televised event in which "Tributes" must fight with one another until one survivor remains. Pitted against highly-trained Tributes who have prepared for these Games their entire lives, Katniss is forced to rely upon her sharp instincts as well as the mentor ship of drunken former victor Haymitch Abernathy. If she's ever to return home to District 12, Katniss must make impossible choices in the arena that weigh survival against humanity and life against love. THE HUNGER GAMES is directed by Gary Ross, and produced by Nina Jacobson's Color Force in tandem with producer Jon Kilik. Suzanne Collins' best-selling novel, the first in a trilogy published by Scholastic that has over 16 million copies in print in the United States alone, has developed a massive global following.


I won't go too much into the plot of the film (read the synopsis above), so I'll just jump right into the things I liked and didn't like. The Hunger Games is a mixed bag. You have a young talented actress playing a strong female character, surrounded by a pretty good supporting cast. Jennifer Lawrence was absolutely terrific as Katniss Everdeen. She was actually the main reason why I decided to see this film. For those of you who saw the rather brilliant film she was in, called Winter's Bone, know what I'm talking about. Lawrence did a great job from start to finish, and she also makes you care about this character. Woody Harrelson, who plays Haymitch Abernathy, is another good thing about the film. While the story is very serious, there are a few funny moments with his character, and it all works really well. The big surprise for me in the film was Liam Hemsworth. Yes, the brother of Chris Hemsworth. For what he was in the film, I thought he was great. He definitely has the charisma like his brother. The thing is, he was not in the film for a long time. But all in all, I look forward to seeing more of him. Which brings me to Josh Hutcherson, who is playing Peeta Mellark. I can't say that Hutcherson was great, because he wasn't, but he was a lot better than other roles he played in different films. Saying that, his character was written in a way that you are supposed to feel for him at the end, and that might have worked only if Hutcherson and Hemsworth changed roles. If that was the case, I think we would have two greats leads (Lawrence, Hemsworth). Seeing Toby Jones and Stanley Tucci in a weird make-up was very interesting, and both of them did a solid job as the announcers of the games. Lenny Kravitz was also very good, I really liked his performance of a guy who is helping Katniss during her time at the Capitol, where he prepared her for everything. Another thing that stood out was the tone of the film. It's not your typical science fiction, and while this concept was done before (that doesn't matter, because every film has something different), what The Hunger Games does right is the emotions combined with the dystopian tone and look of the film, and director Gary Ross definitely made that work.


Visually, the film looks pretty good, but when it comes to CG shots, they have that "low-budget" look (fire dress, train ride, CG backgrounds, Capitol, dogs) and while Rhythm and Hues, Pixomondo and Rising Sun Pictures did a solid job, I was expecting much better visual effects. As for the actual games in the film and action scenes, it's a complete mess. The camera work (lots and lots of shaky cam) and editing in the film are one of the worst I have ever seen. And that is not an exaggeration, because when the action is on screen, and there are quite a few big fights, you just can't tell what the hell is going on. Everything is so fast and the quick cuts don't help much either. It took me out of the film a couple of times, actually. The script written by Ross, Suzanne Collins and Billy Ray is a hit and miss. While you care a lot about the main character, and you want to see what happens next, unfortunately everyone else is left behind. The people who are running these games (control them, if you will) are just there, they don't have any role other than being emotionless and moving things along, until the very end. And what a boring ending it is. Running time of the film is 142 minutes, and it's really slow and boring in most parts, and with all the killing and twists going on, I expected a little more exciting finale. I know they are setting up everything for the sequel, but at least they could have end the first film with something interesting.

Overall, The Hunger Games is a film that does a lot of things right, but also a lot of things wrong. Strong performance from Jennifer Lawrence is the main reason why the whole story works, but even with that, it's still not a great film. If you are big fan of the novels, you will probably enjoy the film for what it is, and for everyone else, you might want to wait for the Blu-Ray or DVD to check it out.

RATING: 7/10

A Third REBEL MOON Film Would Take An Act From God, Says Zack Snyder Collaborator Kurt Johnstad
Related:

A Third REBEL MOON Film Would Take An Act From God, Says Zack Snyder Collaborator Kurt Johnstad

MADAME WEB Star Sydney Sweeney Says Edgar Wright's BARBARELLA Remake Is Gonna Be Worth The Wait
Recommended For You:

MADAME WEB Star Sydney Sweeney Says Edgar Wright's BARBARELLA Remake Is "Gonna Be Worth The Wait"

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
TheGambitFreak
TheGambitFreak - 3/24/2012, 2:46 PM
Nah, I don't give a shit about wanna-be Spidey and Katpiss... All I know is it is taking up time, space and lights at my IMAX, the movie is being used as a screen testing for The Avengers.
Nick56
Nick56 - 3/24/2012, 2:47 PM
Im seeing this next week with a couple friends but honestly there is nothing that looks interesting about this film (based on trailers/tv spots).
superotherside
superotherside - 3/24/2012, 2:48 PM
I'll probably watch it when it comes to DVD.
Killmonger9
Killmonger9 - 3/24/2012, 2:51 PM
I saw it last night, i liked it. Good movie
Not the best, but enjoyable to watch
Asterisk
Asterisk - 3/24/2012, 2:52 PM
I'm seeing it soon probably...but I saw John Carter and that was really good!
TheGambitFreak
TheGambitFreak - 3/24/2012, 2:52 PM
God I hate that guy, I don't know why, I don't see how Hutcherson keeps getting movies, Blackmail?

prettynuclear2
prettynuclear2 - 3/24/2012, 2:56 PM
Don't watch this movie. It's boring. It's too long. They don't focus on the actual killing stuff at all really. It's just a small portion of the movie. The rest is crying and Dawson Creek drama.
TheHitchhikingGhost
TheHitchhikingGhost - 3/24/2012, 3:01 PM
prettynuclear2 said it.

The f'ing games don't start until at least an hour and a quarter into this movie, and the stuff we have to slog through to get there is boring as hell. What's worse is when the games start they're completely underwhelming and have zero teeth given its PG-13 rating.

Do yourself a favor and rent BATTLE ROYALE instead. Much more satisfying.
TheGambitFreak
TheGambitFreak - 3/24/2012, 3:03 PM
prettynuclear2 HAHA!That's what I figured.

magma123
magma123 - 3/24/2012, 3:09 PM
Going to watch it next week, but I have a feeling this will be shit..
P862010
P862010 - 3/24/2012, 3:09 PM
ggoblin31 if we just shoot into the games right away that is boring

we need to feel for the situation we need to feel for katniss before the games

it is called character development
pro346
pro346 - 3/24/2012, 3:11 PM
Wolviecbm....great review! It was a 5.5/10 for me your about the only reviewer I trust on cbm.
Giraffehead
Giraffehead - 3/24/2012, 3:12 PM
I agree Wolvie, the movie was really a mixed bag. Though there were times I really cared for the characters (even nearly crying when one of them died) and the intimate framing really brought you close to them, even a subtle shake was too much and they went overboard with it.

About 5min in, everyone I was with was looking at each other and hoping the shaking would end.

The fights were terrible, I kept backing my head up against my seat trying to self zoom out.

The action and poor editing in spots just didn't make it a satisfying experience. At this point I really don't care if they have a sequel.
TheHitchhikingGhost
TheHitchhikingGhost - 3/24/2012, 3:19 PM
Thanks P862010, I didn't know that's what it was called. Because of you I have a newfound respect for filmmaking and storytelling. Have you told others?
marvel72
marvel72 - 3/24/2012, 3:23 PM
i'll be watching it by download or dvd,nothing at all intrested me in the trailer.

so i'm not paying £9.00 to see a film that i probably won't enjoy as much as i would like to.
pro346
pro346 - 3/24/2012, 3:23 PM
@p862010 good films have character development...that doesn't mean the movie has to be boring .This movie is something a 14yr old girl would watch at her pyjama party.
WolvieCBM
WolvieCBM - 3/24/2012, 3:25 PM
pro346: Thanks man.

Giraffehead: Yeah, overboard is a good word to describe it. It was just too fast and that weird editing made it even worse. As for the sequel, it will happen because the film made a lot of money already, so hopefully they will improve some of the stuff next time.
CyclopsWasRight
CyclopsWasRight - 3/24/2012, 3:25 PM
[frick]!!! WHAT'S WITH THE HATE?! WHAT THE [frick] IS WITH THE HATE??? THERE IS BARELY ANY ROMANCE IN HERE. WHAT THE [frick]?!
WolvieCBM
WolvieCBM - 3/24/2012, 3:27 PM
TheIncredibleHulk: Hate?? What hate?
pro346
pro346 - 3/24/2012, 3:37 PM
@the incredible hulk wolvie cbm gave an honest review...not everyone likes the same.
Mysterion
Mysterion - 3/24/2012, 3:48 PM
just came back from watching it...the hype is def overblown, it was nothing special. Its much more tolerable than the shitty twiight movies. I couldve waited for the dvd which I will do now for the next 2 movies.
GeekyCheekyChic
GeekyCheekyChic - 3/24/2012, 3:53 PM
The 'boring' stuff you had to slog through was called plot,back story and drama. It seems most people just wanted to watch 2 hours of teenagers killing each other. What you get though is a very deep look at the ugly facets of society that actually exist today. This film was an examination of our own world unfortunately speaking and when someone makes a comment like "aarrgg it was so boring and the kills aren't in focus" just proves what the film is saying about us. The movie is at its core focused on things like tyranny,poverty,reality television addiction,morality...oh well to each his own. All the blood hounds can go rent Final Destination or Saw for their blood fix.
If you really break this movie down and factor in the plots of the sequels- while most try to claim Collins stole Battle Royale--- it seems she borrowed the best elements of Star Wars.
District 13-> the Rebel Alliance
Haymitch-> Drunk Han Solo lol
Cinna-> a little Yoda-ish
The Capitol-> The Empire
President Snow-> The Emporor
Katniss -> Luke
There is more but no need to compare- you either like it or you don't. Catching Fire will be a lot better though ala Empire Strikes Back (pretty much because The Capitol strikes back)
As for the 'Anti Climatic' ending- go back to the end of Star Wars medal ceremony and then draw the comparison. It was pretty much same flavor different movie,different decade.
Mysterion
Mysterion - 3/24/2012, 4:03 PM
I also see nose diving next weekend in the box office eith Snow white & Titans being released
pro346
pro346 - 3/24/2012, 4:05 PM
@the baroness I've seen plenty of movies with great plots,character development....and guess what they aren't boring.You can have all the character development you like but that's no excuse for a director that has no idea how to shoot action scenes and CGI that wouldn't look out of place in syfy channel original.
krooklyndodger
krooklyndodger - 3/24/2012, 4:06 PM
TheBaroness89, you're so on point. I loved the movie, but I did love the books more. Wolvie went in already biased about the movie. Too bad that so many people are trying to compare The Hunger Games to Twilight. Nothing in common except that the characters are teenagers and so is the fan base.
P862010
P862010 - 3/24/2012, 4:07 PM
^even if it does i dont think it matters

this film cost 70 million and The weekend is gonna make 140 million

so it already doubled its budget in 1 weekend
WolvieCBM
WolvieCBM - 3/24/2012, 4:11 PM
TheBaroness89: Hmm, can't say I agree with that. When I say boring, I mean nothing interesting happened or anything related to that "plot" anyway. I understand the need to give us some sort of a back story, but the way they did, is what I didn't like. I'm definitely interested in seeing a sequel though. Hoping to see more of Hemsworth in that one.
GeekyCheekyChic
GeekyCheekyChic - 3/24/2012, 4:17 PM
@pro- the camera work during the fights was purposely done to avoid the gratuitous violence you were seeking. Some people don't need to see a 10 yr old get their throat cut open. If we are going to nitpick then for that matter NOTHING happens for very long stretches of time in The Dark Knight which inevitably is it's biggest flaw but most people worship that movie. NOTHING happens for over an hour in the 1978 Superman and by today's audience standards would be considered boring. Same goes with the LOTR trilogy and the mostly uneventful Harry Potter movies.

@Dodger- agreed Hunger isnot Twilight and its not Battle Royale...and to wax indifference- Star Wars original trilogy had more put into the Luke,Leia,Han love triangle than Hunger Games. And yes that was a triangle until Leia finds out Luke is her brother and tells Han. If that movie trilogy came out now we would see Team Luke and Team Han t-shirts ala Twilight.
GeekyCheekyChic
GeekyCheekyChic - 3/24/2012, 4:19 PM
I see the reverse effect happening for Hunger Games-
everyone will really like the 2nd one Catching Fire just like Empire is liked more than Star Wars and TDK for the most part is loved over Batman Begins(I like Begins more)
pro346
pro346 - 3/24/2012, 4:27 PM
@baroness who said I was seeking bloody violence...shaky cam is just lazy it was over used p.s please don't compare this turd of a movie to great movies....syfy channel called it wanted its effects team back.
DWiz
DWiz - 3/24/2012, 4:39 PM
Yuo've got to be [frick]ing kidding me. this movie kicked ass.
LordHuck
LordHuck - 3/24/2012, 4:44 PM
I just got the feeling that I was watching some average made for Canada TV series.
WolvieCBM
WolvieCBM - 3/24/2012, 4:47 PM
DWiz: Haha. Glad you enjoyed it that much. I didn't say it awful, just that it's not THAT great either.
DoomXfactor
DoomXfactor - 3/24/2012, 5:38 PM
[frick] THIS SHITTY MOVIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
hartley07
hartley07 - 3/24/2012, 5:39 PM
omg that is the worst still picture ever. if you can find the bigger one its even worse. The arrow is laying on her wrist, shes got the string pulled almost to her mouth instead of the corner of her mouth, and for petes sake some one get her a nocking point cause shes got her hand 3/4 of the way up the string. Noob.
TheGambitFreak
TheGambitFreak - 3/24/2012, 5:40 PM
NinjaJesus It's only 3 books? That means 3 films, thank God it won't be as long as the Twilight or Harry Potter atrocities.
hartley07
hartley07 - 3/24/2012, 5:43 PM
@thebaroness89

speaking of, AVATAR is the worst. A young man with no surviving family meets a princess, the bad guys destroy the princess' home, the boy must learn to use an all powerful force that binds life together....you get the idea. friggin star wars all over again. It made money cause it was in 3d.
1 2
View Recorder