SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING Director Jon Watts Says IRON MAN Was Always Part Of The Film

SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING Director Jon Watts Says IRON MAN Was Always Part Of The Film

While it made all the corporate sense in the world to include Iron Man in Spider-Man's first entry into the MCU, Spider-Man: Homecoming director Jon Watts says the Avenger was always part of the story.

By MattBellissimo - Jul 05, 2017 03:07 AM EST
Filed Under: Homecoming
Source: Den of Geek
When Sony and Marvel first announced their deal to share the Spider-Man film rights, it seemed logical that some of the MCU's biggest stars might make their way into the webslinger's world. This was confirmed with Robert Downey's Jr.'s inclusion in Spider-Man: Homecomingand director Jon Watts has confirmed that this was a cornerstone of the film's story.

In an interview with Den of Geek, Watts explained that it was always part of the plan to have Iron Man appear as the "reluctant" mentor figure to Peter, especially with the way it contextualized Peter's childhood. "[Iron Man] was always a part of it," Watts said. "That was always a big part, the idea of him being this reluctant mentor – or the unintentional mentor – to Peter. Like, just sort of the grand ambition to be like that someday. Because if you think about it, now that Spider-Man is in the Marvel universe, that means that Peter Parker was probably like eight years old when he saw Tony on TV telling the world he’s Iron Man. And when you start thinking about it as a whole world like that, it gets really fascinating. You know?"

"And now the most famous person in the world has picked Peter Parker and taken him on this crazy adventure, and now dropped him back off and gone to deal with his own thing. And here’s Peter, left in his bedroom, you know, having had the greatest experience of his life, and not being able to tell anyone about it. That would be crazy!"

Of course, going by most reports, it seems that most (but not all) of Downey Jr.'s scenes have been shown off in trailers. While there has been some derision that the same trailers have shown the whole film, Watts assured there's plenty fans haven't seen yet.  "Well, if it was up to me, I wouldn’t have revealed anything. Ever. Like, I wish my movie could be just, only, a series of complete surprises. But I can say that there’s still a lot more to be revealed than what’s in the trailers. You know, we’ve made a pretty dense movie. A lot happens. So, yeah, there’s more to it than just what you see in the trailers, for sure."

Spider-Man: Homecoming
swings into theatres on July 7, 2017.
SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING Star Michael Keaton Reveals Whether He's Been Contacted About Playing Vulture Again
Related:

SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING Star Michael Keaton Reveals Whether He's Been Contacted About Playing Vulture Again

SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING Nets Lowest Re-Release Box Office Yet As Spidey's First MCU Movie Returns To Theaters
Recommended For You:

SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING Nets Lowest Re-Release Box Office Yet As Spidey's First MCU Movie Returns To Theaters

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
ElJefe
ElJefe - 7/5/2017, 4:23 AM
incredibleTalk
incredibleTalk - 7/5/2017, 5:43 AM
Going to see Ironman: Homecoming tomorrow!!!
KWilly
KWilly - 7/5/2017, 5:59 AM
@incredibleTalk - Never heard of that. Uhh, I know there's a Spiderman Homecoming coming out soon. That has a little Iron Man in it.
Ragnarocknroll
Ragnarocknroll - 7/5/2017, 6:45 AM
@incredibleTalk - I think you mean Spider-Man: Homecoming. Might want to relook at that ticket seller. Seems like you've been robbed.
NightWing81
NightWing81 - 7/5/2017, 6:35 AM
Were people complaining that Widow was in Winter Soldier, or that Hulk will be in Thor 3? I don't get all the hate towards Iron Man (other than the fact that he was a douche to Steve!). He's like the "Godfather" of the MCU. As Vision mentioned, since Tony announced he was Iron Man, the world has gotten real weird. It's... almost like they're trying to tell a story...
MattBellissimo
MattBellissimo - 7/5/2017, 6:55 AM
@NightWing81 - "I don't get all the hate towards Iron Man"

Me neither, honestly. I chalk a lot of it up to people not liking Downey Jr., or at least his performance as the character.
Ragnarocknroll
Ragnarocknroll - 7/5/2017, 6:46 AM
I've seen the movie and Iron Man is in it for the perfect amount of time. In fact, I left wanting to see more of RDJ if anything. The haters can suck the big one.
Bat4romHell
Bat4romHell - 7/5/2017, 7:42 AM
What people dont understand is that this was his origin solo movie. First solo being in the MCU, so thats why i dislike RDJ being it tbh. BW being in winter soldier is fine. It was a transition from the first avengers movie so it worked seamlessly
Kman
Kman - 7/5/2017, 8:23 AM
@Bat4romHell - What people don't understand is that he's getting his introduction into the MCU extremely late.... and if Marvel Studios had made this deal earlier this RDJ-less solo Spider-Man movie would have probably happened. After Civil War you couldn't just abandon the Tony Stark/Peter Parker relationship. They had to bring some closure into it so they could move forward with Peter doing his own thing. Although I haven't seen the movie yet, I imagine this is what happens.
Bat4romHell
Bat4romHell - 7/5/2017, 9:28 AM
@Kman - Ehh I understand that. It was more or less a relationship than an invite tho. But I get where you're coming from
Kman
Kman - 7/5/2017, 9:41 AM
@Bat4romHell - I get where you're coming from too... I really do. But it just couldn't happen that way. And the fact we already have 2 other Spider-Man franchises that cover about the same thing, they're going to try to make these films different than the 2 franchises that came before it.

Aaaaaand I still like RDJ as Iron Man.... so there's that lol


One thing that will piss me off... is if they keep this "Oh well we didn't give him any Spidey Sense" thing going. He needs to have Spidey sense and he needs to dump that AI suit. Hoping both these things happen and I'll be perfectly fine with the other decisions they made with this movie.
Jazzy4
Jazzy4 - 7/5/2017, 4:34 PM
@Bat4romHell -

What people do not understand is that the sony/Marvel deal was made on the sole premise that if Marvel wanted Spider-Man in the MCU, reciprocity had to be involved.

Early on, it was rumoured that Sony wanted IM and CA in their movies i ever Marvel wanted Spider-Man in theirs.

That was always the deal breaker.

If it didn't end up like this, Sony would have go for a third reboot on their own, after already having sacked Garfield...not to mention, pushing the very real and bad idea of that Aunt May movie.

Sony was VERY desperate and Marvel Studio did offered the best alternative for them to save Spider-Man gfrom the dangerous rope it was and not spoil their flagship character even more.

Only to achieved that, they had to compromise by letting some of their best characters appearing in movies financed by Sony, IM being the one Sony wanted the most.
1 2
View Recorder