Tom Holland Shares The Sweet Reason He And Zendaya Enjoy Rewatching SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING
Related:

Tom Holland Shares The Sweet Reason He And Zendaya Enjoy Rewatching SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING

Marvel Studios Finally Shares Official Explanation For SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING's Continuity Error
Recommended For You:

Marvel Studios Finally Shares Official Explanation For SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING's Continuity Error

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
dracula
dracula - 6/25/2020, 2:48 AM
More like an original character that they chose to give the initials to. as that she is fine, more interesting than the Raimi MJ, not as interesting as Webb's Gwen Stacy
HulkisHoly
HulkisHoly - 6/25/2020, 8:26 AM
@dracula -

Exactly. I’m fine with her being Michelle Jones but I’m not okay with her being Mary Jane
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 6/25/2020, 2:52 AM
I love her character. Truly. I love her in the role, I love how she's written, and I love her as Peter's main love interest. But she's not very much like MJ at all (and it has nothing to do with race).

I've come to accept that we're not getting the classic Spidey supporting cast in the MCU, because I genuinely do enjoy these characters. But a part of me will always dream about the perfect adaptation that remains elusive.
OmegaBlack13
OmegaBlack13 - 6/25/2020, 3:01 AM
Really like her character and her chemistry with Holland, but still such a weird decision to not just have her be Mary Jane. What’s the point if she’s still gonna be called MJ for the entire second movie? It’s like they wanted their cake and to eat it too in the most roundabout way they could think of.
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 6/25/2020, 3:31 AM
@OmegaBlack13 - I think it was just a pointless twist that somebody thought was clever and unexpected. "You were expecting a supermodel, but look, it's a very normal looking dressed down girl!"

There are definitely shades of Ultimate MJ in the MCU version, but that never felt like MJ to me either. She's much more girl-next-door in that version. Granted, I don't think we ever met 616 Mary Jane before college, so it's theoretically possible to posit she had a total makeover in her late teens before she tells Tiger he hit the Jackpot.

Romita was apparently inspired in his design of Mary Jane by Ann-Margaret in Bye Bye Birdie, and a running theme for her character in that film was living in that gray area of wanting to graduate into full sexual womanly maturity while still being innocent and naive. And I think there's a lot of classic Mary Jane in that performance (especially imagining what Ann-Margaret's character would be like after a few break-ups and hook-ups).



Again, I'm torn because I love what Zendaya is doing in these movies. But I also have so much deep affection for Mary Jane Watson's character in the comics. She seems at first blush to be a superficial party girl, but she has so much depth and sincerity and grit to her (born out by the trauma she experiences mostly due to her relationship with Peter). He puts her through the ringer so much that she's this glorious hard-as-nails codependent ride-or-die icon by the 90's.

To me, Mary Jane is everything that those weirdos celebrating Joker/Harley's #relationshipgoals wanted to see. Both good and bad.

She's an amazing character, and to see all of her complexity overshadowed by Raimi's airheaded drama queen and the MCU's totally-bizarro take on the character just depresses me. She deserves to be every bit as consistent and iconic as Lois Lane (mostly) is.
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 6/25/2020, 3:46 AM
Ack, I did I start watching Bye Bye Birdie clips? This is just so early Mary Jane it hurts.

roxas1003
roxas1003 - 6/25/2020, 6:32 AM
@Spock0Clock - yes!!!!
Nightwing1015
Nightwing1015 - 6/25/2020, 7:03 AM
@Spock0Clock - I actually prefer the Ultimate version of MJ to 616 but that's just because I thought their relationship was written better (up until issue 111 and then it's just crazy lol)
Goldboink
Goldboink - 6/25/2020, 7:47 AM
@OmegaBlack13 -
She isn't Mary Jane Watson, that's for sure.
OmegaBlack13
OmegaBlack13 - 6/25/2020, 8:02 AM
@Spock0Clock - But it’s not like Zendaya isn’t literally a model and attractive even by actress standards haha. So much so that everyone sort of assumed she was Mary Jane right off the bat. It was so ridiculous.

Wow. You just made me see the character in a whole new light. I’ve always liked the fact that she doesn’t love Peter for what he can do as Spider-Man, and not the glory he gets for it, but because she sees the toll it takes on him and the fact that he still chooses to do it. She loves him because he chooses to be Spider-Man, but I never really considered what it does to her. I also wasn’t a fan of Raimi’s version, it took away all the elements that she subverts which is a big part of her appeal. The Joker/Harley comparison was perfect too. Man, points were made.

And I didn’t hate the ultimate version it just didn’t feel like Mary Jane, just his best friend. She gives a big swoony speech to this guy at one point about why she cares about Peter so much but it’s not as good as I remember. That said, as someone mentioned, I really do like the way Bendis wrote their whole relationship.
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 6/25/2020, 9:48 AM
@OmegaBlack13 - One of the things I love about Peter and MJ is so much of what draws them together is that shared grief of Gwen dying. This moment solidifies for me what makes MJ such an amazing character. Before this, she'd been that fickle frivolous girl playing at being a woman. And then, suddenly, for just a moment, she's not.



This article sent me looking for details and images for my own comments on MJ, and I just discovered an entire series of articles chronicling her comic history that I'll probably spend all day reading. Just skimming it, I found this quote from Gerry Conway.

[Gwen Stacy] was a nonentity, a pretty face. She brought nothing to the mix. It made no sense to me that Peter Parker would end up with a babe like that who had no problems. Only a damaged person would end up with a damaged guy like Peter Parker.

I don't know how damaged I think Mary Jane really is at the outset. She's certainly been callous and would be later traumatized by her front-row seat to Peter's perpetual psychological decline. But she's clearly drawn to damaged people.

But to have their relationship begin in earnest with their shared grief and her courage and generosity and understanding sets the tone perfectly. It's not healthy, but it's what both of them needed. She could have flaked, but she stayed. In order to grow up, she needed people to need her. And (to call back to Bye Bye Birdie again), being a woman isn't about mascara and curves and whistles and pink champagne anymore. Being a woman became about offering a boy a shoulder to cry on.
JonC
JonC - 6/25/2020, 10:08 AM
@Spock0Clock - MJ clearly did not have good parentals in the comics and that is what links her to Peter who was not raised by his parents. They both share that hole in their life. MJ's beauty puts her into a different pressure cooker like Peter's abilities due to the bite. They share this as well. In her own world of beauty she is a superhero too, with all the ups and downs that come with it.
Gwen was always just a pretty face that Peter got stuck on... later on they developed her story more but she was just a crush of Peter's.
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 6/25/2020, 5:36 PM
@JonC - I see that. I've not read every single Spidey comic, and the ones I did read were decades ago so I'm more than a little hazy. Maybe there were more overt examples of her being damaged in a similar way to Peter. But still, I wouldn't go so far as to say bad parenting equals "damaged person", though. (I'm not trying to put words in your mouth, but just connect what you said back to Conway's quote.)
bkmeijer2
bkmeijer2 - 6/25/2020, 3:03 AM
Wait, I thought Michelle was an original character
TheLight
TheLight - 6/25/2020, 4:56 PM
@MalseMarcel - She is. Don't let Disney/Marvel fool you.
Odin
Odin - 6/25/2020, 3:15 AM
I honestly really like the MCU's take on Spiderman's supporting characters. Ned and MJ are fresh takes that work well on the context. And Flash is also updated sensibly, since the whole dumb jock thing wouldn't really make sense in STEM school. Also, is the whole jocks vs nerds really still a thing in US high schools?
BTW, I'm pretty sure character's last name is Jones, where did the Gonzales at headline come from?
OmegaBlack13
OmegaBlack13 - 6/25/2020, 8:04 AM
@Odin - It's not as dramatic as the movies, but bigger stronger kids will still mess with ones that can't really defend themselves. This can also happen at STEM schools, but I grew to appreciate that they made the bullying more verbal than the comics. Still, Flash could've been casted to be bigger than Peter.
AC1
AC1 - 6/25/2020, 3:26 AM
I hate the fact they gave her a different name just to try and shoehorn in some underwhelming "twist" with her nickname. They should've just called her Mary Jane from the get go. None of this "Michelle" nonsense.

Hell, if they really wanted it to be a "twist", they could've had a running gag in the first movie of people getting her name wrong, which could've fit given the fact that her character is something of a misfit up until the end anyway.

I really like Zendaya though, and she has great chemistry with Tom Holland, so that's all good I guess. Just a shame about the name.
1 2 3
FOLLOW ComicBookMovie.com
View Recorder