SPIDER-MAN HOMECOMING: Spoiler-Free Review - The reboot that will have you "thwipping" for more!

SPIDER-MAN HOMECOMING: Spoiler-Free Review - The reboot that will have you "thwipping" for more!

It’s the movie that every Marvel fan has been waiting for for nearly a decade: a Spider-Man film set within the MCU; but the big question is, is this film “amazing”?
No. It's "spectacular"

Review Opinion
By Goochmiester - Jul 09, 2017 04:07 AM EST
Filed Under: Homecoming


In one of Marvel’s more riskier moves, in the wake of Captain America Civil War, Doctor Strange and Guardians Of The Galaxy Volume 2, we get a film about a teenage boy being, mentored shall we say, by an eccentric older gentleman who happens to be a billionaire and insists on making said teenage boy wear skin-tight spandex and perform acrobatics.  However, in all seriousness, it’s the movie that every Marvel fan has been waiting for for nearly a decade now: a Spider-Man film set within the Marvel Cinematic Universe; but the big question is, is this film “amazing”? 

 

No, no, no, no…. It’s not “amazing”, it’s “spectacular”!!

 

So it’s two months after the events of Civil War and eight years after the Battle Of New York and a minor headache trying to figure out the timeline considering The Avengers came out in 2012; we have a young Peter Parker balancing high school and aspirations to be an Avenger. He’s dodging his friends and other responsibilities all in hope of Iron Man giving him a call for a new adventure. Meanwhile, Adrian Toomes, played by the original Batman Michael Keaton has been secretly scavenging weaponry from all of The Avengers previous battles, however when Spidey and The Vulture cross paths, things escalate for everyone involved. 

 

Now Marvel fans do not need to be convinced to see this film - they’re all already up to their third screening of this whilst I’m furiously working away on this review - however, what about general audiences who are on the fence with yet another Spider-Man reboot or just aren’t as invested in following the ever expansive cinematic universe and dump-trucks filled with money that is also known as Marvel Studios

 

The main things to address are the concerns these people may have: first off, the film does not rehash the origin story yet again, we are not inflicted with another tortured angst-ridden Peter Parker, it’s a kid who actually enjoys being Spider-Man; Even though Robert Downey Jnr. features heavily in the trailers, this is not Iron Man 4 (or Iron Man 5 if you consider Civil War to be Iron Man 4) - Tony Stark and Iron Man show up in very small chunks and at no point overshadows the story of Spider-Man. The one-and-done bland villain problem of other Marvel movies is absent in this film because Michael Keaton creates genuine motivation for his character and can flick between charming and menacing with seasoned ease. There’s no light-beam in the sky or death from above tropes to this film, Spider-Man Homecoming keeps it grounded whilst still providing some really spectacular aerial acrobatics.  Overall, for a character who has been in seven films in total over the last fifteen years and seen three actors portray a well known and well-treaded character, Spider-Man Homecoming manages to keep things fresh.  

 

This no doubt comes down to the talent on-screen. Tom Holland is the Peter Parker and Spider-Man you never realized that you needed so badly. His childlike glee and fascination with everything is accompanied by insecurities and a unsureness that are relatable and endearing. Whether he is hyper-actively asking a thousand and one questions to Happy Hogan or his suit, or hanging his head sheepishly when being spoken down to by Tony Stark or The Vulture; Tom Holland is easily the most fascinating of the Spider-Men we have had over the last fifteen years. Thankfully Tom Holland is also supported by a diverse cast which once again keep this interpretation feeling fresh. It is more representative of a high school environment and adds new layers to characters that we may or may not have seen before. For example, Tony Revolori’s Flash Thompson is still a bully, but a different type of bully to previous versions of the character - and of course, Jacob Batalon’s Ned Lees and Peter Parker are just the most adorable best friends I’ve seen on screen in a long time and easily has become a new #FriendshipGoal.

 

If there was one complaint or fault, and it is only minimal, is that with such a large and diverse cast, some characters don’t really get an opportunity to properly shine or reach their full potential. Now some may say that the casting choices of the smaller roles were nothing more than stunt casting, however I would say that casting people like Donald Glover, Hannibal Burness and Martin Starr in these smaller roles helps to make those smaller moments stand out. Each adds their own charm to characters that could easily have been ignored otherwise. 

 

Of course it wouldn’t be a Marvel film without Easter eggs and this film has more Easter eggs flying left, right and centre than a meth-fueled Easter bunny trying to stash the evidence before the Easter bunny police arrive. Keen eyes will see lots of references to the previous films, there is some real world-building of just the Spider-Man universe with things that are said, characters that show up along with other great things that include very subtle visual explanations for why actors such as Kenneth Choi shows up in this film despite already having played a character in Captain America The First Avenger

 

Ultimately, Spider-Man Homecoming is a welcome return to form after several poorly conceived Sony Spider-Man films. This movie builds on the promise shown in Captain America Civil War and offers a wide range of fresh possibilities for Marvel’s favorite future Avenger. With Avengers Infinity War only ten months away, Spider-Man Homecoming will have you thwipping for more. 

Spider-Man Homecoming gets Four and a Quarter out of Five meth-fueled Easter bunnies showering us with lovely Marvel Easter eggs. 


If you like my reviews, then don't forget to subscribe to my movie review blog: 
https://chrishateshashtags.blogspot.com.au/

 

WWE Superstar Austin Theory Was An Extra In SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING; Shares Surprising BTS Details
Related:

WWE Superstar Austin Theory Was An Extra In SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING; Shares Surprising BTS Details

SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING Star Michael Keaton Reveals Whether He's Been Contacted About Playing Vulture Again
Recommended For You:

SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING Star Michael Keaton Reveals Whether He's Been Contacted About Playing Vulture Again

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

ArmFallOffBoy
ArmFallOffBoy - 7/10/2017, 9:15 AM
Mmmmmm....those tasty meth-fueled easter bunnies
Goochmiester
Goochmiester - 7/14/2017, 2:02 AM
@ArmFallOffBoy - Meth-fuelled Easter bunnies are the best.
Phlegmbot
Phlegmbot - 7/11/2017, 7:40 AM
Wow, this is a lot of blind praise for a really problematic movie. I'm not saying you don't have good reasons for enjoying, but to even like the half-baked, poorly realized Flash Thompson character? Come on, he never gets the best of Peter at any moment in the movie -- not even the party scene (Peter's not even present.)

I wrote an essay -- more outline of what's wrong than a review of the film -- here on CBM: https://www.comicbookmovie.com/spider-man/notmyspiderman-or-how-i-learned-about-film-am-shocked-this-wasnt-a-bomb-a152330
Goochmiester
Goochmiester - 7/14/2017, 2:41 AM
@Phlegmbot - @Phlegmbot - I feel you have an axe to grind but seeing your essay/outline and comments on other people's reviews, you assume that anything positive directed towards the film is automatic "blind-praise". Which is ultimately short-sighted and limited criticism of other people's opinion.

Does that make other people's opinions wrong? No. Does it make yours right? No. Is there something in between? Yes.

The film is far from problematic. Flash Thompson is an updated and modernised version of a bully, more adept to the traditional high school environment of today (gaining the upper hand without Peter Parker being present at the party still undermines Parker's social status which affects teenagers today just as much as physical abuse)

With regards to Spider-Man failing or inconsistency with regards to powers/abilities - well, sounds like you haven't fully understood the comics that these films are adapting. If Spider-Man succeeded in every endeavour we would complain that there is no drama, no challenge.

If you had learned anything about film then you would understand that "once you put the protagonist into the metaphorical tree (unfamiliar circumstances), you must throw metaphorical rocks at them (challenges/obstacles/plot devices) before they can get out of the tree (film's resolution/ heroes' lesson). Otherwise you have a very uneventful narrative that has no sense of journey or challenge. Many of your complaints about the film would retread old storyline threads and removal all sense of drama from the film.

Thank you for your feedback on my review, unfortunately I did fall prey to your click-bait article but hope you have received the discussions and clicks you were angling for with your article. Good luck with any future endeavours.
Phlegmbot
Phlegmbot - 7/17/2017, 5:37 PM
@Goochmiester - Wow, LOTS to unpack here. OK...

"I feel you have an axe to grind but seeing your essay/outline and comments on other people's reviews"
No axe at all. You do seem to heap a lot of praise on the film, somewhat wantonly, which is the wont of many fans. It was merely an observation. You're welcome disagree with it...as that also seems to be your want.

"you assume that anything positive directed towards the film is automatic "blind-praise". Which is ultimately short-sighted and limited criticism of other people's opinion."
Not at all. I merely felt your assessment was blinded by your excitement for the MCU or perhaps what was finally a strong take on the character of Peter. It was not a blanket statement about all reviews. It was directed at you, but no offense was meant. My apologies if you felt it was an attack.

"Does that make other people's opinions wrong? No. Does it make yours right? No. Is there something in between? Yes."
No disagreement here.

"The film is far from problematic. Flash Thompson is an updated and modernised version of a bully, more adept to the traditional high school environment of today (gaining the upper hand without Peter Parker being present at the party still undermines Parker's social status which affects teenagers today just as much as physical abuse)"
And yet, it didn't. It had no ultimate effect on Peter. None of what Flash did in the film seemed to. He was quite superfluous imo.

"With regards to Spider-Man failing or inconsistency with regards to powers/abilities - well, sounds like you haven't fully understood the comics that these films are adapting. If Spider-Man succeeded in every endeavour we would complain that there is no drama, no challenge."
Failing is AOK. The issue was that he's a stooge. A distracted kid with other problems to consider? That's AOK. A young superhero learning the ropes? Not a problem. But stupid? Peter is and never has been portrayed as stupid, but I felt much of what he did here belies the character's incredible intelligence.

"If you had learned anything about film then you would understand that 'once you put the protagonist into the metaphorical tree (unfamiliar circumstances), you must throw metaphorical rocks at them (challenges/obstacles/plot devices) before they can get out of the tree (film's resolution/ heroes' lesson). Otherwise you have a very uneventful narrative that has no sense of journey or challenge. Many of your complaints about the film would retread old storyline threads and removal all sense of drama from the film."
On this we surely disagree. And, more importantly, I don't feel the film accomplished this at all. Because he never really overcomes any of it. If I recall the climax, he wins out more out of determination - something he had the whole time - and luck (b/c doesn't Vulture essentially blow himself up? Honestly, I don't remember at this point...it just wasn't memorable enough to me.)

"Thank you for your feedback on my review, unfortunately I did fall prey to your click-bait article but hope you have received the discussions and clicks you were angling for with your article. Good luck with any future endeavours"
Well goodness, that was rude. You're very sensitive. Buck up, man, it's the internet. I don't know you personally, nor do I care to, but I certainly was not attacking you -- not with my grinded axe nor my words. Ciao.
Goochmiester
Goochmiester - 7/21/2017, 9:28 AM
@Phlegmbot - TL;DR

Clearly you have more time than I do. Good luck in all future endeavours.
Phlegmbot
Phlegmbot - 7/21/2017, 5:51 PM
@Goochmiester - Happy to have a reasonable conversation should you decide you are able. Good luck.
View Recorder