SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING: Surprising New Details Emerge About The Sony/Marvel Studios Deal

SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING: Surprising New Details Emerge About The Sony/Marvel Studios Deal

We know a fair bit about the Spider-Man deal between Marvel Studios and Sony Pictures but a new report has surfaced which sheds more light on how the deal took place and the financial implications.

By JoshWilding - Jun 27, 2017 02:06 AM EST
Filed Under: Homecoming
Source: Los Angeles Times
The Los Angeles Times has a very interesting piece up about the deal between Marvel Studios and Sony Pictures which brought Spider-Man into the Marvel Cinematic Universe and it starts with a look back at what exactly the latter group had planned following the release of The Amazing Spider-Man 2. Apparently, they realised that something had to change following the release of that disappointing sequel and their ideas included a new standalone series and a reintroduction for the wall-crawler through the scrapped Sinister Six movie. Both ideas were deemed to be too "convoluted," however. 

Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige actually approached Amy Pascal back in 2014 with the idea that Spider-Man should be brought into the MCU but it was a meeting in early 2015 between Sony's then top two executives Michael Lynton and Amy Pascal at the home of Marvel Entertainment Chief Executive Isaac Perlmutter that sealed the deal and saw Feige handed the reigns to the franchise. 


Sony paid for Spider-Man: Homecoming and will keep all profits from it, but money did change hands when they paid Marvel an undisclosed producers fee for their help. However, they're expected to benefit from a huge surge in merchandising as Marvel actually owns the rights to that side of things. 

While Feige was given creative control, Sony's Amy Pascal remained instrumental in many key decisions including the casting of Tom Holland, the development of the script and the hiring of Cop Car director Jon Watts. She also played a huge part in the development of Michael Keaton's Vulture and while the reboot was shot in Atlanta, it was edited and scored on the Sony lot in Culver City. What do you think?
SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING Nets Lowest Re-Release Box Office Yet As Spidey's First MCU Movie Returns To Theaters
Related:

SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING Nets Lowest Re-Release Box Office Yet As Spidey's First MCU Movie Returns To Theaters

John Leguizamo On Missing Out On Vulture Role In SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING: Another Actor Would Have Sued
Recommended For You:

John Leguizamo On Missing Out On Vulture Role In SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING: "Another Actor Would Have Sued"

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
iMVuze
iMVuze - 6/27/2017, 2:50 AM
Sony will find a way to mess this up as well. They ALWAYS find a way.
Kevwebsz
Kevwebsz - 6/27/2017, 4:17 AM
@iMVuze -
CopperCrow
CopperCrow - 6/27/2017, 5:32 AM
I swear, Pascal and Feige better soon realize how good they could have it if they put Venom/Hardy in the MCU.
pepe
pepe - 6/27/2017, 2:51 AM
Venom should be in the MCU... I´m not a fan but he should
Chappers
Chappers - 6/27/2017, 3:05 AM
I'm stuck on a fence, I hate Sony but Tom Hardy rarely agrees to roles that aren't promising anymore. I have optimism for the Venom movie purely because he's attached to it. For him to agree there must be more to it.

Overall though I don't want a Venom separate from Spider-man and the MCU, I'm so torn right now!
BackwardGalaxy
BackwardGalaxy - 6/27/2017, 3:15 AM
Holland and Keaton were her ideas? You all might have to stop hating her.
Zer0squad
Zer0squad - 6/27/2017, 3:21 AM
@BackwardGalaxy - Easy there killer, it said she was "instrumental" in the processes there... hardly her ideas. Much more likely was that there was some sort of memo that came across her desk that she had to sign off on.
CurlyBill
CurlyBill - 6/27/2017, 3:50 AM
@BackwardGalaxy - Yeah....well a broken clock is right twice a day too.
Luminus
Luminus - 6/27/2017, 4:06 AM
@CurlyBill - 3 times at daylight savings.
Nightwing1015
Nightwing1015 - 6/27/2017, 4:39 AM
@BackwardGalaxy - I was surprised by that because I remember when they were casting the role it emerged that Marvel wanted Holland and Sony wanted Charlie Rowe. They all agreed on Holland in the end though.
spiderman620
spiderman620 - 6/27/2017, 4:51 AM
@Zer0squad - I agree with you, i think it was more of a Marvel Studios coming to her and saying "we want this, this, and this but we need you to sign off on it". And then her saying "ok". She's a terrible producer considering the issues she's had with other projects not Spider-Man related. I can't think of them right now but I'm sure a Google search should suffice
TheRealTomServo
TheRealTomServo - 6/27/2017, 4:52 AM
@Nightwing1015 - I thought Marvel wanted Butterfield and Sony wanted Holland. Maybe memory serves me wrong, I dunno.
Lem1
Lem1 - 6/27/2017, 3:15 AM
I sense much conflict in you, Sony...
kylo0607
kylo0607 - 6/27/2017, 3:30 AM
I am not for many of Sony's decisions, but I am honestly surprised that it was Pascal who was responsible for casting Holland, Watts as the director and helping develop Keaton as Vulture.

I just hope this deal works for the future. I would be extremely happy if Feige can take over the whole thing, because right now Sony are on a very thin line and can mess up everything if they want.
ArmGunar
ArmGunar - 6/27/2017, 3:32 AM
Sony, you are awesome in videogames but concerning Spidey, let Marvel Studios do their things
1 2 3
View Recorder