Grant Morrison On 'MAN OF STEEL'

Grant Morrison On 'MAN OF STEEL'

Famed comic book writer Grant Morrison shares his views on Zack Snyder and David S. Goyer's "Man of Steel." Said Morrison, "I don't want to sound like some fuddy-duddy Silver Age apologist but I've noticed a lot recently of people saying Batman should kill the Joker..."

By MarkJulian - Jul 30, 2013 02:07 PM EST
Filed Under: Superman
Source: USA Today

A lot of comic book writers have weighed in on "Man of Steel" with some hating it (Mark Waid) and others loving it (Dan Jurgens). So what does Grant Morrison, who recently wrapped up his run on "Action Comics" think of Zack Snyder's Superman film?

I kinda liked it and kinda didn't, to be honest. I feel bad because I like (director) Zack Snyder and (writer) David Goyer, and (star) Henry Cavill was really good. But it felt like one of those ones where it's like, "Bring on the second movie now that you've done this," and I don't need to see that as someone who knows all I know about Superman. For me, it was a bit "seen it before," no matter how they tried to make it a little bit different. I'm more looking forward to the Dark Knight version of Superman, the next one, where hopefully it will have Lex Luthor and be some fantastic second act.

It's a credible Superman for now. But I'm not sure about the killing thing. I don't want to sound like some fuddy-duddy Silver Age apologist but I've noticed a lot recently of people saying Batman should kill the Joker and, yeah, Superman should kill, he should make the tough moral decisions we all have to make every day. I don't know about you, but the last moral decision I made didn't have anything to do with killing people. And I don't think many of us ever have to make the decision whether or not to kill. In fact, the more you think about it, unless you're in one of the Armed Forces, killing is illegal and immoral. Why would we want our superheroes to do that?

There is a certain demand for it, but I just keep wondering why people insist that this is the sort of thing we'd all do if we were in Superman's place and had to make the tough decision and we'd kill Zod. Would we? Very few of us have ever killed anything. What is this weird bloodlust in watching our superheroes kill the villains?


There's much more with Morrison over at the source including his upcoming Wonder Woman series, his conclusion on Batman, Inc. and his upcoming collaborations with 2000 AD. Click the source link below to read the full interview.

RELATED CONTENT:
Geek Deals: MAN OF STEEL, GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY, Winter Soldier And More
Guillermo del Toro Open To Linking 'JUSTICE LEAGUE DARK' With 'MAN OF STEEL'
Twitter Buzz: MAN OF STEEL
Twitter Buzz: MAN OF STEEL Pt. 2



Running Time: 2 hrs 23 min
Release Date: 14 June 2013 (USA)
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Starring: Henry Cavill, Michael Shannon, Amy Adams, Kevin Costner,Russell Crowe, Diane Lane, Laurence Fishburne, Christopher Meloni, Richard Schiff, Harry Lennix
Directed by: Zack Snyder
Written by: Christopher Nolan (story), David S. Goyer (screenplay)

"Man of Steel follows the Last Son of Krypton on his epic journey to become mankind's shinning beacon of hope for a brighter future. With the beliefs and values instilled by his adoptive parents Jonathan (Kevin Costner) and Martha (Diane Lane) Kent, a young Clark (Henry Cavill) sets out to find his place in the world. But when the nefarious General Zodd (Michael Shannon) arrives on Earth, Clark will have to choose between being a normal human or Kal-el,son of Jor-El (Russell Crowe) and humanity's greatest protector and champion. Filmed in IMAX and shot in Vancouver, Chicago and Plano, Illinois, Man of Steel will be released on June 14, 2013 by Warner Bros. Directed by Zack Snyder (300, Watchmen) with a screenplay by David S. Goyer (The Dark Knight) the Christopher Nolan (The Dark Knight Rises, Inception) produced feature film will surely be the summer blockbuster of 2013."
DC Studios Boss James Gunn Explains Why He's Skipping Superman And Batman's Origin Stories In The DCU
Related:

DC Studios Boss James Gunn Explains Why He's Skipping Superman And Batman's Origin Stories In The DCU

SUPERMAN: First Trailer For James Gunn's Reboot Could Release Online Sooner Than Expected
Recommended For You:

SUPERMAN: First Trailer For James Gunn's Reboot Could Release Online Sooner Than Expected

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ...
relentless1
relentless1 - 7/30/2013, 2:18 PM
uh oh, another MOS flame war begins
Facade
Facade - 7/30/2013, 2:19 PM
Sums it up for me.
shiverman20
shiverman20 - 7/30/2013, 2:21 PM
It'll make for great character development. A movie with a poster boy, complete with glint in his eye who saves every single bystander with no consequences...well, that just sounds horrible. He'll be hated by earth now and so he should be, that's the biggest battle that the a god-like saviour of earth could face. Bravo for the decision, i say
MatTaylorX
MatTaylorX - 7/30/2013, 2:22 PM
Movie was average. Sorry fanboys. Next time don't fall in love with the film before you see it.
jcfrommars9
jcfrommars9 - 7/30/2013, 2:22 PM
@Facade

Me too.
trebud69
trebud69 - 7/30/2013, 2:22 PM
I don't get it. He made the BEST decision possible. If he left him in the choke hold then what? You can't knock him out, you can't suppress him or build a cage he can possibly break out of. It was either you get rid of the one person who can kill Superman and the entire world or leave him to one day possibly do it again.
jumpingtheshark
jumpingtheshark - 7/30/2013, 2:23 PM
I get where he is coming from on the having seen it front. However, this movie wasn't necessarily for viewers like Grant Morrison. Man of Steel was about introducing Superman to a new audience and generation, and introducing him in a way that is with the modern era. It was a a set-up that absolutely had to happen to carry a new generation of superhero fans along for the ride. That being said the next film will be more about us the entitled hardcore fan base ... well at least it should be.
ruledout
ruledout - 7/30/2013, 2:24 PM
Man of Steel is a love/hate thing for me. I enjoyed it more the 2nd viewing. It may have something to do with lowering my expectations. Before I was in denial about it being written by Goyer and (turns out) Snyder.
jumpingtheshark
jumpingtheshark - 7/30/2013, 2:25 PM
Also, the killing thing. It made sense. Supes has done it in the past in the world of pulp ... get over it. Batman on the other hand should never be murdering anyone. It's against the very core of the character.
Bodwulf
Bodwulf - 7/30/2013, 2:26 PM
Agree with him one hundred percent! He nailed it.
"killing is illegal and immoral. Why would we want our superheroes to do that?"
Mike89
Mike89 - 7/30/2013, 2:26 PM
Here we go again.
ItsATrap
ItsATrap - 7/30/2013, 2:27 PM
to me the question has never been "why did he kill zod?" but rather "what is everyone's problem with him killing zod?" everyone says "superman doesn't kill." but why? where did the reason for that arbitrary decision stem from? if you want to look for the moment where superman says he won't kill, look no further than the look on his face right after killing zod. to me, that was the most powerful moment in the movie. superman won't kill again.

unless goyer and snyder are idiots. which i've seen very little evidence to the contrary. so we'll see.
JULEZ13
JULEZ13 - 7/30/2013, 2:27 PM
Am I the only one who really saw the movie?!? Because it seems like people don't understand the situation Superman was in when he decided to kill Zod. Its not like when Reeve killed Zod and Lois killed Ursa where they laughed about it and went on with their lives as if nothing had transpired. (I don't see anybody b*tching about THAT!)

Superman obviously felt guilt and remorse for what he did, even if IT WAS THE BEST DECISION HE COULD MAKE!

People need to seriously get over. They will address it in the sequel and hopefully it will shut people up who seriously think the best option would have been to let Zod destroy the Earth.
J619SD
J619SD - 7/30/2013, 2:29 PM
I see you commenting on a lot of MoS threads TaylorX. You didn't like it or whatever. That doesn't mean other people still can't think it was Amazing. I did. It is opinion. You want average? In my opinion The Wolverine was VERY AVERAGE.

Didn't dislike it though. And don't care if you or anyone else thinks it is better than MoS.It is opinion. More power to you if you liked it better. My question is why do you feel it is necessary to keep repeating yourself? Are you just trying to start an argument?
Gunslinger
Gunslinger - 7/30/2013, 2:30 PM
@trebud69 ^actually, he could have covered Zod's eyes while the family escaped. Comic precedent and all that. Also, holding Zod's neck was pointless. It's heat vision. Not hot neck. You control its direction with the eyes, not the neck. Unless Zod had some sort of eyeball paralysis.

All Star Superman is ine of the best Superman stories ever told. Morrison knows his stuff. So much that the best bits of dialogue were uncerimoniously lifted from All Stars by Goyer. Cause he can't write for shit unless he has someone else holding his hand (like Jonathan Nolan).
jcfrommars9
jcfrommars9 - 7/30/2013, 2:30 PM
@DrDoom

"Can anyone have a conversation about Man of Steel without talking about 'omg he killed Zod' or 'omg too much of Metropolis got destroyed'?

For once?"

These things were at the forefront of the movie for people, just like The Mandarin was for Iron Man 3. It's going to be one of those things that's talked about.
JULEZ13
JULEZ13 - 7/30/2013, 2:32 PM
"...unless you're in one of the Armed Forces, killing is illegal and immoral." - Grant Morrison

In MOS, was Superman NOT fighting alongside the American military in order to subdue and KILL Zod? The military was not trying to rehab the Kryptonians, they wanted to KILL them! Even Superman until they realized he was on their side!

Therefore, Superman WAS AT WAR with Zod! Therefore, his act of killing Zod was excusable. Why? Because that is what you do during a war! If the other person doesn't surrender, you must KILL them!

Mr. Morrison, your argument is invalid.

I rest my case.
P862010
P862010 - 7/30/2013, 2:32 PM
ok fanboys what was superman suppose to do

- phantom zone is gone
- there is no prison on earth that can hold zod
- zod was'nt going to stop since his goal of new krypton is now dead and his only intention was to kill humans and kal el

how else was he suppose to stop this man???
Gunslinger
Gunslinger - 7/30/2013, 2:33 PM
@drdoom - can we have a conversation about Iron Man 3 without mentioning Trevor or Killian? Yeah, no. They're so integral to the story you MuST discuss them. He leveled Metropolis and killed Zod. The destruction was a big chunk of the movie
malekithdude
malekithdude - 7/30/2013, 2:34 PM
So we watched the Avengers kill hundreds of Chitauri in 2012 and not a single person kicked up a fuss... but in 2013 when Superman killed one person, Zod... suddenly everyone's horrified by the thought of a super hero killing.
GoILL
GoILL - 7/30/2013, 2:34 PM
I'm surprised Morrison isn't getting much hate yet.
glynthomas86
glynthomas86 - 7/30/2013, 2:35 PM
This again. Who cares anymore?....All arguments have their merits. Avoid killing if possible unless perhaps it's a super-powered being hellbent on the destruction of earth.
Greengo
Greengo - 7/30/2013, 2:35 PM
" I don't know about you, but the last moral decision I made didn't have anything to do with killing people."

Then again, YOU ARE NOT SUPERMAN!
Spideyshawn
Spideyshawn - 7/30/2013, 2:36 PM
gotta agree with this.The sci-fi aspect was great & Henry Cavill did a damn good job but I left disappointed but excited for part 2.Now its whatever as cool as a superman vs batman film is I was interested on how a solo superman universe was going to function.
SwingsetKnight
SwingsetKnight - 7/30/2013, 2:36 PM
At everyone going "best decision he could have made"... way to miss the point.

This isn't about whether or not Supes could have done something else. People are pissed (or not) because he was written into that situation to begin with. Goyer was not commanded by God to put Superman into those particular circumstances. He made a conscious choice to write in a scene where Superman HAD to kill, where it WAS the obvious solution.

Those who are angry about that are angry because they feel Superman, as an aspirational figure, should have been written to be a bit bigger and grander than the necessity of killing a man or destroying a city to save the day. He's not Iron Man or Wolverine, he's f*cking Superman. His power is pretty much unlimited. There were numerous other ways that story could have gone, to give the audience "an ideal to strive toward, blah blah."
glynthomas86
glynthomas86 - 7/30/2013, 2:36 PM
More specifically the people of earth
Mike89
Mike89 - 7/30/2013, 2:37 PM
I dont get how superman covering Zods eyes would have been easier. It only would have dragged the fight even longer thus causing more destruction and casualties. He had no other choice but to kill Zod. Even after that he was devastated.
glynthomas86
glynthomas86 - 7/30/2013, 2:38 PM
@Swingset
Valid point
WarnerBrother
WarnerBrother - 7/30/2013, 2:39 PM
Morrison forgot to add that Police Officers have the legal authority to kill as well.

Its not bloodlust,its the fact that superheroes were originally considered strictly for children who would at most,read their adventures for 5 years until they moved on to Western,crime or war themed comics as young teens then Playboy,cars and real girls
as young adults.

Sometime in the 70's or 80's it became socially acceptable for grown men to still be fans of comic books and the industry adapted by presenting stories with adult themes of graphic sex and violence like Watchmen,The DarkKnight Returns,Batman Year one and The Killing Joke at DC,Daredevil ,The Punisher and Wolverine at Marvel.

Those adults,raised on a diet of Dirty Harry,Death Wish,Chuck Norris,Arnold and Stallone films, no longer would accept a hero tying up a serial murderer like the Joker,for the Police knowing he will escape to kill again. Those adults would stick around and see that the Joker killed 10 people a year ago and now he is out of Arkham again.

In an adult mindset,it would be more moral to take him out if you catch him in the act (See the end of Dirty Harry) then to take him back to a broken criminal justice system that seems geared to the rights of criminals (I know its in our Constitution) verses the security of society.

A sizable portion, maybe a majority, of comic book fans are now adults and they want their heroes to fit into the adult world they live in.

In that world, a superhero is in the same class as a soldier or cop.

Someone who has to make tough choices in the service of the majority who can't or won't defend themselves.
glynthomas86
glynthomas86 - 7/30/2013, 2:39 PM
@greengo
My thoughts. Your words.
jp688
jp688 - 7/30/2013, 2:39 PM
I'm really, really fed up with people saying it's all about Superman deciding to kill. He's not Dirty Harry. The decision was not a decision at all, but instinct, the right move from a moral man. A lesser hero would have watched the innocent slaughter of a family not even of his own race in favor of preserving his own race. Superman's love of mankind is so complete that he was willing to sacrifice the survival of his own race. To consider this anything else is to be shallow and incapable of simple deduction. No, Grant, we don't all have to make moral decisions that involve a possibility of killing, but you are VERY wrong about the war/military analogy. Zodd, a military man, was waging war. I'm glad you weren't in command when the Nazis invaded Europe (if you think that is a far fetched analogy, think again; Zodd was conquering another world, committing genocide and ethnically cleansing). Buildings got battered in MOS, people got hurt. You'd think from reading the ravings of the likes of Morrison and Millar that everyone was just fine with Superman Returns or campy romcoms. Here's something from the MOS novelization for these folks: ; "The wanton destruction tore at his (Superman's) soul. At this rate, it would be a miracle if Metropolis had any skyline left when the fighting was over, one way or another.” Then Supes comments: 'This City doesn't deserve this', he thought, angrily. "Earth doesn't deserve this". And, regarding the killing of Zod, the book explains,"The position they were in wouldn't allow him (Supes) the leverage he needed to fly-to carry them away from here. ‘Stop!”, says Superman (as Zod’s laser eyes beam closer to the family). ‘Never!’ says Zod. ‘No’, says Superman. ‘Don't make me do this!’. Anguish tore at his heart (after Zod goes limp). Superman cried out in anguish, knowing he had no other choice. It was Zod's life or the lives of innocents. He had always sought out to save lives, not take them. He was, now, truly the last Kryptonian."
Greengo
Greengo - 7/30/2013, 2:40 PM
Bodwulf
Bodwulf - 7/30/2013, 2:40 PM
@P862010 Trick them into watching him go into a run sun chamber. But! he is actually safe from the red sun rays. They are turned into normal humans!. Then break Zod's hand throw him into a deep hole. Hell, Lois can throw one in too after a right cross to the jaw. Let the Arctic police arrest them. Make out with Lois. Fly into space. Smile at the camera. HOW HARD IS THAT!!!
jcfrommars9
jcfrommars9 - 7/30/2013, 2:40 PM
@MalekithDude

"So we watched the Avengers kill hundreds of Chitauri in 2012 and not a single person kicked up a fuss... "

In general, that's right.

"but in 2013 when Superman killed one person, Zod... suddenly everyone's horrified by the thought of a super hero killing."

In general, yes. The Avengers executed that part of their story better than Man of Steel did theirs, in my opinion.
Greengo
Greengo - 7/30/2013, 2:41 PM
Greengo
Greengo - 7/30/2013, 2:43 PM
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ...
View Recorder