THUNDERBOLTS* Director Breaks Silence On Movie's Box Office Struggles; Responds To Olga Kurylenko's Comments

THUNDERBOLTS* Director Breaks Silence On Movie's Box Office Struggles; Responds To Olga Kurylenko's Comments

Thunderbolts* director Jake Schreier has broken his silence on the movie's struggles at the box office, and responds to complaints about Olga Kurylenko's shock departure as Taskmaster in the first act.

By JoshWilding - Jul 25, 2025 10:07 AM EST
Filed Under: Thunderbolts
Source: Variety

Thunderbolts* opened in theaters to overwhelmingly positive reviews, but struggled to make an impact at the box office. The movie ended its run with less than $400 million worldwide, a disappointing result for *The New Avengers

The movie's lead characters weren't well-known to anyone who hadn't been paying attention to Marvel Studios' streaming shows. Plus, despite an inventive marketing campaign, the "Thunderbolts" don't exactly have much in the way of name recognition. 

Thunderbolts* is now available on Digital and hits 4K and Blu-ray next week, giving people the chance to discover this team at home. Talking to Variety, filmmaker Jake Schreier was asked to reflect on his movie's box office performance in theaters. 

"For me, it’s so strange trying to grasp how many people watch these things," he started. "It was really fun to go around to audience screenings. You can’t even take for granted that you’re going to get a theatrical release, so to be part of a movie that goes out there...it really is about the theatrical experience."

"People can share it and talk about it and say what they think, whether they liked it or didn’t, and then have that continue, it’s nice to be part of a movie that gets to have that life," Schreier added, clearly not eager to be drawn into a conversation about box office receipts. 

Either way, it hasn't made much difference to the director as he's already signed up to take the helm of Marvel Studios' X-Men reboot.

During a recent interview, Olga Kurylenko addressed learning her major role in Thunderbolts* had been reduced to a glorified cameo (which ended with her death) after returning to work following 2023's strikes. 

Responding to the Black Widow star's comments, Schreier said, "Yeah, I think Olga has spoken about that. It was something that happened after the strike, when we were redeveloping the script. I know that there are people that have reached out to let me know that they’re displeased with this, and I totally understand that. It’s not something we did lightly."

"Obviously, I think Olga is a wonderful actress. It’s a hard thing to do," he noted. "It’s just showing that, for these characters, this is a thing that’s done, and they feel that all of their lives don’t have a ton of value."

While many fans have demanded justice for Taskmaster, there are equally as many who seem unbothered by Antonia Dreykov's shocking demise. The female Taskmaster wasn't exactly a hit in 2021, but we'll never find out whether the original version of Thunderbolts* redeemed her. 

You can check out our interview with Schreier in the player below.

Here's When THUNDERBOLTS* (*THE NEW AVENGERS) Officially Premieres On Disney+
Related:

Here's When THUNDERBOLTS* (*THE NEW AVENGERS) Officially Premieres On Disney+

SMALLVILLE Creators Open Up On The IRON MAN Movie They Worked On: Tom Cruise Was Interested
Recommended For You:

SMALLVILLE Creators Open Up On The IRON MAN Movie They Worked On: "Tom Cruise Was Interested"

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
OgHerManM
OgHerManM - 7/25/2025, 10:27 AM
Olga def deserved to be in the entire movie. His reply is BS.
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 7/25/2025, 10:54 AM
@OgHerManM - The fact that she is a good actress doesn't change the fact that her character is shit. That is not Taskmaster, so better to kill of that shitty version.
OgHerManM
OgHerManM - 7/25/2025, 11:10 AM
@Urubrodi - Or not had the character in the movie to begin with. it was a waste.
Astroman
Astroman - 7/25/2025, 11:51 AM
@OgHerManM - concern over Taskmaster’s demise is ridiculous. That version of the character was awful, and that’s not a slight at Olga just the character she was given. An acceptable way to illustrate the Thunderbolts expendable nature and get rid of one of the worst character takes Marvel ever conceived.
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 7/26/2025, 5:29 AM
@OgHerManM - Not having the character in the movie would keep the character alive. And what benefit having a shitty version of such a cool character bring? At least now they can do right by the character and adapt a more faithful version (maybe after the Secret Wars reset). If you are concerned about the story, it helped to show how disposable those characters were to Valentina and the world in general.
Ryguy88
Ryguy88 - 7/26/2025, 9:36 AM
@OgHerManM - why? She was probably the worst adaption of any character in the MCU.
dagenspear
dagenspear - 7/26/2025, 1:28 PM
@OgHerManM - I think this is totally correct. These people spin it for an excuse to get rid of the character, when I think what they argue is as empty as the reasons for making the character what she was in Black Widow in the first place. Val and the world is something most of these characters have no reason to expect to care for them, as they have no relationship with it and they don't need to be reminded of that, and it has nothing to do with that character specifically.
dagenspear
dagenspear - 7/26/2025, 1:38 PM
@Urubrodi -
@Ryguy88 -

The character was already cured by the end of the BW movie. It was done. It was over with. The character ending right there and never returning, particularly to be killed, only really effects the specific subsets of fans who like things like the Leader and Red Hulk for no reason being the villain of Captain America BNW or those, who, to me, for no real reason are so annoyed at a, to me, dumb thing a movie did years ago the idea of the character existing out in the world is something they won't let go of. There's no reason not to keep the character alive, when it benefits nothing to bring her back and kill her. If they just introduced a comic like version with a handwave about how she was an attempt to replicate him or she was his daughter from an affair with Dreykov's wife and that's why Dreykov didn't care about her, it'd effect nothing. A Secret Wars reset could adapt a more comic like version anyway. This adds nothing to that.

Also, the character of Antonia was a big part of one of the main MCU characters emotional stories in her last movie. So, why is keeping the character alive bad story or characters wise overall to do that?
Ryguy88
Ryguy88 - 7/26/2025, 7:10 PM
@dagenspear - that was way too many words to spend on this dumb character.
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 7/26/2025, 7:38 PM
@dagenspear - Jesus man give it a rest. It's like the death of Javelin in The Suicide Squad movie, they just wanted to show that no one is safe, and what better way to do that than with a character no one could give a damn about? You don't kill off an actual important character so early in the movie. It's not that complicated.
dagenspear
dagenspear - 7/27/2025, 4:55 AM
@Ryguy88 - The words are spent on the dumb writing, to me, surrounding now every choice they've made for the character.
dagenspear
dagenspear - 7/27/2025, 5:20 AM
@Urubrodi - Bro that movie killed off Rick Flagg and Polka-Dot Man, after I think making Flagg an actual character and doing something with Polka. Thunderbolts killed off literally no one that mattered within their story. Javelin was just a pointless filler character who meant nothing to anyone in that movie. You don't get it. One character has an entire backstory and personal connections to one of the most prominent MCU's characters and was connected to that character's main story in her last movie, a character whose family is in this very movie, and she's randomly killed off and it doesn't matter to this movie in any meaningful way. Javelin has none of that.

That's what I think's not complicated. That you're comparing this to a nobody that nobody knows and wasn't in anything and has no connections to anyone in this movie beyond flirting with Harley, shows, to me, your heavy bias. Honestly Javelin actually ended up having more impact on the plot of that movie maybe.
ogrodafloresta
ogrodafloresta - 7/28/2025, 11:56 AM
@OgHerManM - And miss the opportunity to pull a “Suicide Squad” in the MCU? Come on…
ogrodafloresta
ogrodafloresta - 7/28/2025, 12:01 PM
@OgHerManM - Don’t know what’s worse: his non-reply or this article citing bs claims about her character’s reception. Did most of the audience (or the fans) didn’t like MCU’s Taskmaster or just the people inside this article writer’s bubble?

I know Taskmaster from the comics and was unbothered by her in “Black Widow”. Her new origin was on par with the plot, related to Natasha’s backstory and character guilt, her uniform and moves were awesome, what’s the problem? It’s just because she’s not like her comic counterpart or because she’s a woman?
dagenspear
dagenspear - 8/11/2025, 6:13 PM
@Astroman - So, you justify, to me, poor writing construction because poor writing construction happened before?

You spin it for an excuse to get rid of the character, when I think what they argue is as empty as the reasons for making the character what she was in Black Widow in the first place. Val and the world is something most of these characters have no reason to expect to care for them, as they have no relationship with it and they don't need to be reminded of that, and it has nothing to do with that character specifically.

Thunderbolts killed off literally no one that mattered within their story, so doing this to Task, who was a one off character, not given a character in one movie, offers nothing to kill off I think, as the fake 'expendable' thing, adds nothing when it's fake. Compare this to The Suicide Squad, that kills off a bunch of people at the beginning and keeps that promise of expendable-ness by killing off it's main characters that the story actually cares about. Task is killed off randomly, and as far as I've seen said, no one really cares. So, what's the point of including her, let alone killing her?
GeneralZod
GeneralZod - 7/25/2025, 10:32 AM
Glad Taskmaster (she/her/hers) got offed. And early in the film.
SpideyPuffsMJ
SpideyPuffsMJ - 7/25/2025, 10:37 AM
I feel for the actress but this is really on whoever made the decision to have that "twist" in Black Widow at the complete expense of the character. As soon as Taskmaster was part of this movie we knew her fate.
RaddRider
RaddRider - 7/25/2025, 10:40 AM
Glad they got rid of “Taskmaster” in such an unceremonious fashion. Probably this movie’s only redeeming quality. Hopefully we can get the real Taskmaster someday
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 7/25/2025, 10:57 AM
@RaddRider - the movie is really good overall, what you on about?
dagenspear
dagenspear - 7/25/2025, 2:25 PM
@RaddRider -
@GeneralZod -
@Urubrodi -
@WhatIfRickJames -
@OrgasmicPotatoe -
@Matchesz -
@DocSpock -

All I think you're doing is arguing for the MCU to write something poor on purpose, to me. This thing they did was poorly done isn't a reason, to me, to do more poorly done things, to me.

This shows, for me, that some of you aren't interested in writing consistency story or character wise.
GeneralZod
GeneralZod - 7/25/2025, 2:46 PM
@dagenspear -
User Comment Image
dagenspear
dagenspear - 7/25/2025, 2:50 PM
@GeneralZod - How did the death of this character in this movie benefit the story or characters of anyone? If it didn't benefit any of that, then what was the point of it?
OrgasmicPotatoe
OrgasmicPotatoe - 7/25/2025, 2:50 PM
@dagenspear - I strongly second @GeneralZod's feelings on the matter.

Try that again. What is it you're trying to say ?
GeneralZod
GeneralZod - 7/25/2025, 3:15 PM
@dagenspear - "How did the death of this character in this movie benefit the story or characters of anyone? If it didn't benefit any of that, then what was the point of it?"

I'm still not sure I understand your rephrased questions, but I will say that the death of Taskmaster (she/her/hers) so early in the film benefited me greatly because I have no patience for Disney/Marvel turn-men-to-women nonsense done purely to check off DEI boxes.
@OrgasmicPotatoe
User Comment Image
WhatIfRickJames
WhatIfRickJames - 7/25/2025, 3:51 PM
@dagenspear - huh?
dagenspear
dagenspear - 7/25/2025, 6:43 PM
@GeneralZod - So, no reason based on actual storytelling or character work. Just empty politics?
dagenspear
dagenspear - 7/25/2025, 6:44 PM
@WhatIfRickJames - What does the writing quality of the movie get out of this choice?
dagenspear
dagenspear - 7/25/2025, 6:44 PM
@OrgasmicPotatoe - How does it benefit the characters or story of the movie to do it?
GeneralZod
GeneralZod - 7/25/2025, 7:25 PM
@dagenspear - Correct. The same "empty politics" that has seen Marvel Studios shoot itself in the foot these last 5 years and seen great comics characters go to shit (e.g., Taskmaster).
OrgasmicPotatoe
OrgasmicPotatoe - 7/25/2025, 9:03 PM
@GeneralZod - Well said, I doubt I could have been as directly-to-the-point myself.


@dagenspear -
So, no reason based on actual storytelling or character work. Just empty politics?

How does it benefit the characters or story of the movie to do it?


You know, those are all fair and level-headed questions that should have been asked when they race/gender-swapped 'Taskmaster' (Taskmast-her ?) in the first place back in BW. That may have prevented the desire to see that character wiped off the universe. Alas, here we are.

I wish movies didn't make dumb & avoidable mistakes like these, because then I wouldn't have such desires and could focus my attention to what really matters. But when the bar for my entertainment is as low as 'I'm glad they erased their mistake', that's what happens.

If Marvel Studios would like to avoid similar circumstances in the future, it's their job to not make such amateur mistakes in the first place. It's not like they had no way of knowing beforehand this was gonna be a mistake.
dagenspear
dagenspear - 7/25/2025, 9:21 PM
@OrgasmicPotatoe - Never argued for it being the initial choice. Argued against this and the idea that it's somehow better.
dagenspear
dagenspear - 7/25/2025, 9:23 PM
@GeneralZod - So, you act like Marvel Studios? What's the difference between them and you now, when you also applaud weak, to me, writing tactics.
OrgasmicPotatoe
OrgasmicPotatoe - 7/25/2025, 11:58 PM
@dagenspear - When you make a mess, getting rid of the mess is the better option, yes.
dagenspear
dagenspear - 7/26/2025, 12:31 AM
@OrgasmicPotatoe - I think that's a response not based in writing quality, but in a personal issue. How does a mess covered by a mess fix anything?
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 7/26/2025, 5:26 AM
@dagenspear - How did gender swapping Taskmaster and turning him into a boring character with 0 personality and that barely speaks benefit Marvel? Taking such a cool character and throwing in the trash is positive now?

At least by killing this Temu Taskmaster off they can now eventually do right by the character.

And how did it benefit the story? Well if you watched the movie, one of the main points of the movie was to show how disposable those characters were to Valentina and the world in general. The main "villain" of the movie was depression.

@GeneralZod - Having to explain why killing MCU's "Taskmaster" is a good thing is not something I would have expected to do in this site. Sometimes I question if some people around here even like CBMs XD
dagenspear
dagenspear - 7/26/2025, 1:19 PM
@Urubrodi - This, to me, seems like a whataboutism response. I didn't state here in this that BW benefited the character or story with what it did. I think it was not much different than what it did with the character here.

I think this is such an excuse to argue for, to me, poor writing to cover for poor writing. Killing the character effects nothing and doesn't offer any opportunity to do "right" by the character. How can you think they will even do that?

That's not a story or character reason. Any of them could die to make that point. And it's not even needed to, because Val has no care for any of them and they have no reason to think she does, same with them having no relationship to the world, so there's no reason for this to be something they would need to face, especially considering it doesn't matter and most of them have no reason to care. Why this character, when it has it mean nothing for the story to be her, or for her to even be in the movie, and it barely effects the characters she was actually connected to, who have plenty reason to care, not just based on her, but based on her being a big part of someone they cared about's story? Give me a real story and character reason. Can you?

I question if the people here even like quality writing. All you really argue for here is you want it because you didn't like that the character existed as this and you argue for the MCU to purposefully write a story where it disregards its own stories and characters. And this is why some of you "fans" will keep getting slop writing. You'll accept so much that caters to your inclination and justify it.

Not much different, to me, than the MCU fans who threw acclaim onto the Black Widow movie for what it did with the character in the first place.
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 7/26/2025, 7:33 PM
@dagenspear - "How can you think they will even do that?" By actually adapting Anthony Masters aka Taskmaster, who is a badass mercenary. That shitty version they came up with has nothing to do with the actual character, there is no salvaging there.

They used this movie as an opportunity to get rid of a character they realised it was shit. Is that really that hard to get your head around? They needed to up the stakes of the movie and killing an already established character unceremoniously helped do the trick. It was literally killing two birds with one stone. Get rid of a shit character and show that anyone could die in the movie.

Why keep a shit version of a character alive? What does that accomplish? That character meant nothing, absolutely nothing. Killing her off won't bother any real "fans". Is ignoring her existence and not showing her again in future projects better? lol

Such a stupid conversation. From all the things to nitpick from the movie you choose to talk about the death of a character no one could give a damn about.
dagenspear
dagenspear - 7/27/2025, 5:09 AM
@Urubrodi - How can you think the MCU will use this character at all, especially now? Do you think they'll care more?

The part where the character's existence effected nothing, because that story was done. Like I said, before, to me, arguing for the MCU to purposefully write not for story or characters. You can recycle the phrases of stakes if you want, but one character dying at the beginning that neither the movie or the characters in it really care about isn't stakes to me, especially when they're not gonna kill off anyone else, and they don't.

Because the character has a set emotional connection to one of the prominent MCU characters and to kill that character off with no meaning story or characters wise adds nothing. If the character is so pointless, then bringing the character back to kill her only serves the same function, wasting time.

Of course that's what matters to you. I think because you're really only, mostly, looking at from the lens of what you want. Not consistency in structure, story, character or weight. Why should it matter if anyone cares about a character for that character to be written well?
SuperCat
SuperCat - 7/25/2025, 10:52 AM
User Comment Image
OrgasmicPotatoe
OrgasmicPotatoe - 7/25/2025, 10:52 AM
I finally got around to watching it last night. It was surprisingly pretty good ! It's a shame Marvel has turned me off their movies lately, otherwise I might have shown up for it in theaters.

And yeah, glad we don't have to parade that travesty as Taskmaster anymore.
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder