Why SUPERMAN Needs To Be Brought Out To Pasture (Or Changed)

Why SUPERMAN Needs To Be Brought Out To Pasture (Or Changed)

While this may sound like blasphemy to some, I've come to the conclusion that Superman as a character needs to be benched. Read on further to hear my reasoning.

Editorial Opinion
By Hulksta - Sep 23, 2013 07:09 PM EST
Filed Under: Superman

I want to preface this article by saying that there's been many moments in my life where I've had a fondness for Superman. Watching Superman or Superman II I have fond memories of. I also remember watching the Superman Animated TV Series, and subsequently the Justice League cartoon. So with my following points, I'll hope you understand that it's not stemming from fanboy hatred, or blind nerd rage; but rather a healthy criticism for the character.

IMPERVIOUS TO CHANGE


Just in case


It's inevitable that as times change, so do our heroes and villains. I can think of so many examples. The Joker has changed many times since his first appearance, and so has Batman. Spider-Man is now his former arch-nemesis; Captain America was for one period of time his former sidekick. You get what I'm getting at here, that sometimes the status quo for a hero is changed.

This is not to say that Superman hasn't had attempts at a reinvention. There was Red Son; and even Man of Steel in a way could be considered a reinvention. The problem is that the changes are either temporary (ala Red Son) or they completely piss off a huge sect of the fan base.

In Man of Steel Superman was admittingly a bit of a jerk. There's always the criticism of the destruction he so mindlessly let happen; there's also the whole end scene where he drops the drone from the sky. I always remember Superman from the Dark Knight Returns book. So it was jarring to see the same Superman who for the Government took down Bruce Wayne then drop military equipment. This could be for the sake of the story; and reversing the two. That said, it didn't quite work (if this was the case).

No matter what different writers try, it's almost impossible to change Sueprman without pissing off his fan base. It's a tough task, I'll agree to that. I'm just seeing Superman at a tough crossroad of sticking to his iconography, or going in a radical direction. Either way, it's something that seemingly draws controversy.


WHAT'S SO 'SUPER' ABOUT SUPERMAN?


Just in case


While Superman may have been one of a kind when he first debuted, he's now in a crowded market of similar heroes such as:

Captain Marvel
Sentry
Wonder Man
The Aquarion
Hyperion
Gladiator
Atoman
Black Adam
Shazam

Even characters like the Hulk take a trait like Superman's (in this case near Invulnerability) and add nuance. Like Superman, The Hulk is nearly invincible but unlike Superman, The Hulk has issues to contend with. With Superman being near-perfect in every way; I think it's nice to have a character like The Hulk who has flaws. This isn't to say that Superman doesn't, but they're never really apparent; and like I elaborated on earlier, any time writers try to add nuance to Superman it never quite goes over well.

MAKE SURE YOU KICK A DEAD CORPSE


Just in case


In arguably one of Superman's most popular stories, The Death and Return of Superman it had a major chance to completely send the status quo of the character into complete upheaval. Instead, months later, Superman returns...alive.



Like the video above illustrates, the story was meant to completely revive Superman, problem is that it didn't really. It wasn't executed well, and instead of leaving the character dead and giving him an amazing story to which he could've gone out on, they made everything null. All it did was give DC a temporary boost in Superman sales.

His resurrection also showed that death is not permanent in comics.

ICONOGRAPHY


Just in case


The ultimate problem with Superman is his iconography. In much the same ways that we don't like reboots, or the Star Wars prequels, Superman is too iconic for him to continue in much of a different way.

I'd love to see a complete departure from who the character is, but DC wouldn't allow it, and the fans won't allow it. If we can't change the character; give him nuance or anything like that. What's there left to do?

I don't like suggesting this lightly, but I think it's time that DC take the spotlight off Superman and give a spot on the JLA to a new character. Characters like Flash, Green Lantern, and of course Batman have been reinvented throughout the years but Superman is the one hold out. I think DC, and it's fans, owe it to themselves to try something new.

SUPERMAN Is Downed By Kryptonite And Fights Ultraman In Epic New TV Spots For First DCU Movie
Related:

SUPERMAN Is Downed By Kryptonite And Fights Ultraman In Epic New TV Spots For First DCU Movie

Watch The Highlights Of The SUPERMAN Manila Press Tour; James Gunn Shares Inside Look At The T-Craft
Recommended For You:

Watch The Highlights Of The SUPERMAN Manila Press Tour; James Gunn Shares Inside Look At The T-Craft

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

NovaCorpsFan
NovaCorpsFan - 9/23/2013, 7:19 PM
Damned fine editorial, Hulksta. I agree completely. One of the main reasons I've never felt inclined to read Superman books is that he just seems relatively unchanging. There's been times when friends have given me Superman books and I've gotten bored and given them back.

Anyways, great editorial, as I expected.
jojofmd
jojofmd - 9/23/2013, 7:30 PM
NO!. That is what is so awesome about Superman, he is constant, unchanging. However, he did change for a while Remember the blue energy suit?
Superman has had a lot of challenges and changes over the years. His death had great effect on him. However, one could say it put him in touch with his own limitations. Thus allowing him to further embrace humanity.
The great thing about his character is that while there is so many copy cats, he is only the real deal. If he did depart from who is character is, then he wouldn't be his character. He would have been a betrayal to his morals/ethics and to who Jonathan Kent raised. He wouldn't be Superman. That is why Superman is so great. He is not Nietzsche's ubermensch, as Lex is protrayed, he is something greater. He knows what it means to be responsible and in Man of Steel, movie wise, I think he learns this.
I believe it was Batman who said, "Even though Clark isn't human, he is perhaps the most human of all." He understands and learns what it is to be not only Kyrptonian, but to embrace humanity, in all its faults and frailties. "That we will join him in the light."
Hulksta
Hulksta - 9/23/2013, 7:33 PM
I'm down Gusto, you have your license right?

Lhornbk
Lhornbk - 9/23/2013, 8:36 PM
Another 2 minutes of my life that I'll never get back. What, is it "write really bad editorials" night?
MoonDoggyX
MoonDoggyX - 9/23/2013, 8:40 PM
Great read! I have to both agree and disagree, however. I don't think superman himself needs to change. The fact that he is so imitated to this day by almost every strongman in marvel and dc show that the core characteristics of of superman is very relevant. He is the archetype. That said, his overall mythos could use a MAJOR update. A great example is Smallville. That show was a mess, but superman is such a draw that it lasted 10 seasons. The show was a modern telling of clark's road to becoming Superman. Very fresh and different. Even though Clark never became "Superman"(that last episode was BS!) the core character was very much the same. Now on the other end of the spectrum there's Superman returns. The same character in the context of a 30 year old film. Very dated in its approach, hoping to cash in on the nostalgia for the donner films. FAIL!

This article is awesome. It reminds us that our favorite characters ar not real people, but stories. Superman is a story that has gone mostly unchanged for 75 years. Is he iconic as ever? Yes. But so are the greek gods. Public awareness does not equal success in modern fiction, but rather public interest does. If superman is to hold on to that, then hisbstory is going to have to modernized a bit. Again, not the core character as much as the villains, weaknesses, etc...
NovaCorpsFan
NovaCorpsFan - 9/24/2013, 12:01 AM
Lhornbk

Dudd, why do you have to be such a dick all the time? And be brief with your answer rather than write an editorial in your comment.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 9/24/2013, 3:35 AM
I dont know man. It isnt this way with Superman alone. Lets look at other characters.

Spider-Man

Doc Ock is Spidey and it has pissed off a lot of people. The Spider Totem story line. Spidey unmasked in Civil War. Need I even mention One More Day?

Batman

Broken Bat. Batman lost in time after Darkseid killed him. The return of Jason Todd.

X-men

Schism. Cyclops' fall from grace. The death and return of just about every character that has ever been an X-Man.

Wolverine

Bone claws. Transformation into a more feral state. Wolverine leaves the X-Men.

Superman

Death of Superman. Electric Blue Superman. Superman and Wonder Woman are together instead of Superman and Lois. (Hasn't changed yet, but you can bet it will.) Superman's various costume changes.


As you can see, I can name quite a few thinga that been changed with pretty much all characters that the fans hated. This isn't just an issue with Superman, ita comics in general. Any time there is a shake up, you can guarantee there will be a return to the status quo at some point.
aantny88
aantny88 - 9/24/2013, 4:53 AM
My biggest issue with your editorial is when you state that Superman in Man of Steel was a bit of jerk. Why because he took out a drone that was following him and trying to discover where he lives? Give me a break! Remind me again how he "let the destruction happen". You act like he was sitting around having a wank while the world engine and Zod, Faora, et al. did what they wanted to Smallville, Metropolis and to some extent the rest of the world. Last time I checked, he did all he could to save as many people as possible. Maybe you should watch the movie again and lay off the Donner films you are so fond of, which were pretty terrible.
Superman, as a character, is the basis for all other superheroes. None would exist without him. Honestly could the JL defeat villains such as Darkseid, Brainiac, Doomsday, Vandal Savage, etc without Supes? It isn't possible. What needs to change is people's expectations...Man of Steel showed that Supes is vulnerable, especially emotionally, and that he may not always make the perfect decision.
KalKent853
KalKent853 - 9/24/2013, 9:15 AM
Here's a thought. Go [frick] yourself.
KalKent853
KalKent853 - 9/24/2013, 9:22 AM
On a more constructive note I agree @aantny88

Why don't people get that this he had been superman for 1 DAY. He hasn't yet become the superhero we all know, he makes shit loads of mistakes yes. But he was trying his best in an impossible situation, he just had to roll with it.

I MUST disagree with you however on the donner films being terrible. You have to look at them in their day and what they did was let audiences and comic book fans see the greatest comic book superhero of all time on the big screen in the first multi million dollar superhero movie. They paved the way for all CBM's. Plus for kids (which was their audience) they were great.
MoonDoggyX
MoonDoggyX - 9/24/2013, 10:39 AM
@KalKent - You're both right about Donner's films. They definitely deserve every bit of reverence that we can afford them. However, by today's movie standards, they did not age very well. That's not saying anything bad about the movies at all. Naturally, art has to progress. Just like Donner built on everything that came before himn today's filmmakers have all seen Donner's films plus 30+ years of other awesome action and Comic Book movies.
aantny88
aantny88 - 9/24/2013, 11:46 AM
@kalkent I agree for their time the Donner films were something novel and put superheroes on the big screen map, but at the same time the liberties they took with Supes and his abilities were mind numbingly idiotic. Hell, did the people not even think about physics when they decided to allow Supes to spin the earth in an opposite direction on its axis to go back in time? That would have destroyed the planet! Then in the 2nd film, they decide to give him the power to throw a cellophane "S" from his chest, to kiss Lois and have her forget everything. To top it all off, Lex and his real estate schemes are not something I would equate with the "greatest criminal mind of our time" even in the 70s/80s!
JorL5150
JorL5150 - 9/24/2013, 1:00 PM
editorials on CBM need to be benched.
KalKent853
KalKent853 - 9/25/2013, 2:25 AM
@aantny88 Yeah but the movie version never had to follow any rules (even the laws of physics haha) Auidences wanted to see superman defeat the bad guy and save the day. It wasn't taking itself seriously and it is still to this day an enjoyable movie for children...and for me but that's beside the point. I don't think the majority of the audience cared about an intricate plot for a children's superhero movie. It was campy, and light hearted which is was meant to be.
Hulksta
Hulksta - 9/25/2013, 7:15 AM
CorndogBurglar Those aren't huge character changes; aside from The death of Superman which I even mention is the worst attempt at doing so; Superman is the same character he was when he first debuted.
JorEllinator
JorEllinator - 9/25/2013, 10:38 AM
You've missed the whole point of Superman. The point of Superman is that he'll never change.Superman is supposed to be an enduring, never changing figure because the world needs his old fashioned sensibilities. He gives the world hope, both the DC Universe and to an extent our world. He is a product of WWII where half of the world has no hope. Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster create a character that inspires us to do good and does good. He shows that we can come out of all this war and we can aspire to be better. He's classic hero in league with Sherlock Holmes, Robin Hood and Heracles. You can do different interpretations but you'll still see the original iconic character that gives hope to the world. IncredibleHulksta, this is a well written article and I'm not going to insult you but you obviously don't get Superman.
aantny88
aantny88 - 9/26/2013, 5:11 AM
@JorEllinator...as much as I agree with most of what you stated, Siegel and Shuster created Superman in 1938 and WWII didn't begin until 1939 in Europe, and it didn't even start for the U.S. until 1942, so I'm not sure it was him being a product of WWII despair as much as it was about the worldwide depression. Siegel was even drafted into the army during 1943, so his influence on Superman even dwindled.
JorEllinator
JorEllinator - 9/26/2013, 12:10 PM
@aantny888
But people knew it was coming, they new it was inevitable. Sorry if I forgot to say that.
jimdotbeep
jimdotbeep - 9/27/2013, 5:11 PM
Thank you for this editorial. The hokeyness and silver age feel of Superman is something that has been holding back DC and the Comic book industry at large for a while now. As much as I dislike Superman he is an important pillar of the DC Universe. General audiences probably wouldn't stand for a DCCU without Superman even though that would be like a wish come true for me. WB/DC NEED to go back to the drawing board and FIX Superman so that he is relevant, interesting and most important of all fits well within the Larger DC Universe.
View Recorder