Can Watchmen Work Today?

Can Watchmen Work Today?

Watchmen first appeard in the 80's, but is the story still appropriate to today's world?

Feature Opinion
By TheUnknown - Dec 08, 2008 12:12 AM EST
Filed Under: Watchmen

Watchmen was first published in 1986 – 87, when the Cold War was coming to its final years. The story deals with a heavy theme of a doomsday clock, a metaphorical representation of nuclear war. The superpowers of the world on the brink of World War III were ready for nuclear war and ready to fight.

Many small, but important, elements of the story include actual historical events, such as the Russia-Afghan relations, Korean nuclear testing, etc. These events were freighting at the time, it meant certain destruction and nuclear fear.

Whether Dr. Manhattan represents the fear of nuclear testing consequences, one thing remains clear; he was god-like being who was American. America now had the advantage over the Soviet Union, and this being was a walking nuclear bomb.

Today, there are better nuclear restriction and an overall global nuclear safety. Will Watchmen’s younger fans still understand the importance of the Cold War? You can’t have the Watchmen without the Cold War.

The Vietnam War appears in the Comedian and Dr. Manhattans’ flashbacks. They were employed by the government to fight in the war. From the Watchmen trailer we clearly see Dr. Manhattan and the Comedian fighting Vietcong rebels in the jungle. The scenes are clear panel-inspired events, and almost reminiscent to movies like Platoon and Apocalypse Now.

The Vietnam War was a major part of the Cold War era, but is it still powerful today? Another major player was the fear of communism.

People were being persecuted in fear that they would implement their ways in the American way of life. In the graphic novel, Dr. Manhattan was prosecuted for being radioactive, another possible reference to communist witch-hunts.

Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, the world has been more understanding of communism and lost the fear of a communist world.

The question is whether the movie will still use all of these Cold War events and themes. Can today’s post 9-11 world see the deeper meaning of Watchmen? Will the younger viewers understand why Dr. Manhattan had to win the Vietnam War? Will movie goers understand why Nixon is still president? However the fan, critic, and viewer respond, Watchmen only works in a pre 1989 world, where fear of nuclear war was at the heart of citizens around the world. What do you think? Yay or Nay?

WATCHMEN PART II Trailer And Cover Art Tease The Epic Conclusion To Animated Adaptation Of Classic Story
Related:

WATCHMEN PART II Trailer And Cover Art Tease The Epic Conclusion To Animated Adaptation Of Classic Story

WATCHMEN CHAPTER I Clip Recreates Two Big Scenes From Alan Moore And Dave Gibbons' Iconic Graphic Novel
Recommended For You:

WATCHMEN CHAPTER I Clip Recreates Two Big Scenes From Alan Moore And Dave Gibbons' Iconic Graphic Novel

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

NoobMike
NoobMike - 12/8/2008, 4:08 PM
I really think most young viewers won't understand the whole situation of the cold war, nuclear warfare, etc. I mean most of the viewers of the movie (as it is being marketed) will be people who can't remember two germanys, the berlin wall, the threat of Russia looming over the US in Cuba, the nuclear race for warheads or any of that matter.

However, since it is being marketed as a blockbuster special FX movie, I think it will probably do fairly good in the box office. I mean when people go to see X-men, Transformers, Hellboy, 300, etc, most people just want to see special effects that they haven't seen before, not paying attention to historical events and a lot of people usually don't care much about the story (Independence day anyone?).

Therefore I think it will do fairly good at the box office, just don't expect people to walk out talking about the intrinsic hero/antihero dilemma, the implications of a walking nuclear warhead, the morality of Veidt's actions, the psychology behind Rorscharch, etc. They will probably walk out talking about how cool Snyder is and how the special effects were so awesome.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 12/9/2008, 6:02 AM
well we already know the movie is staying true to the timeframe of the graphic novel and personally i think its themes are still relevant to todays society. the cold war context may have dated, but the themes of the use and misuse of power , arms control and the threat of a militant anti western force are as relevant today as they wer 20 years ago.the moral questions raised in watchmen are age old..and will continue to endure. obviously the movie is not going to be as complex in any way as the comic but i think the themes will be put accross as best as they can be in the running time.

noobmike i think your selling the public a bit short there. sure some people will go for the reasons you stated but they are going to be dissapointed, because regardless of how you feel this movie is being marketed (what exactly would you put in the trailers anyway? nite owl 1 and 2 discussing the plight of the human race?) i guarantee you this wont be just a mindless action movie..also i find it strange that you put xmen in the same category as independence day and transformers. because while the latter 2 are mindless action movies..the former is so much more, and is recognised as being so
Shaman
Shaman - 12/9/2008, 10:46 AM
Well, you do raise "one" good point Noob, and that was your first paragraph. However, i'd like to know where the hell do you get off calling(in different words) every movie goer a "vegetable that only gets stimulated by action"? Your biaseism is getting worse as you go here. Now all of a sudden, the only people that will line up for watchmen are mindless puppets? WTF?!?!?!?! When people got out of watching TDK, they weren't talking about the kick ass action or special effects, they were talking about Ledger's stellar performance and the duality of the characters that was portrayed to outstanding extents.

Even though "the majority" might not be as fluent as you are in World History, it doesn't mean that they won't learn from this movie. In fact, movies are the best learning tool ever invented as they provide education to both auditive and visual people. I'm pretty sure that most people that weren't aware about Pearl Harbour, learned a few things even though it was mostly about a love story happening at the same time as the war. As we will all learn from the up coming Australia movie in the same fashion.

I understand you're point because producers ARE incorporating a lot of love stories, action and special effects into these historic events but only to actually make us sit in the seats. Instead of having a narator with shitty sound effects showing stills in black and white, add a dash of love and a sprinkle of action and suddenly, history comes back to life and takes the whole audience for an unforgettable ride. There's nothing wrong with that, in fact we can all benefit from it.
NoobMike
NoobMike - 12/9/2008, 5:08 PM
rorscharch, I know it's an action movie they are making, however the trailer says ... from the visionary director of 300, comes the greatest graphic novel of all time...that for me is setting bread crumbs for the special effects freaks. I'm positive that even though x-men could have had a bit more substance, most of the movie goers to those movies (at least in the opening week), were either comic book,special effects or action fans(those are the ones that set up tents in line weeks in advance to see the movie). And I'm saying that 20 year olds grew up in a very different world than the one depicted in Watchmen, let's see if that "cultural" discrepancy makes a difference in the movie.

Shaman, in my opinion TDK isn't a very good example, Nolan has made some really kick ass character driven non superhero movies (Memento and The Prestige). Snyder has made two movies... none of which has significant character development, nor historic coherence. No matter how boring it may be, I still prefer to learn my history from books than to see Ben Affleck for 2 hours any day. And Shaman, I have never hidden my hate for the whole Watchmen movie, yes I am biased until I see the movie and it blows me of my seat (as you so insistently try to convince me it will).

All I'm saying is that I know Watchmen will be visually cool, and that will be enough for good box office sales. I still think that Snyder can't handle the subtleties Watchmen has, and regretably that in my opinion will make the whole movie suffer. I will still see it, and if I'm proven wrong will let all of you know, although I seriously doubt I'll change my opinion.
Shaman
Shaman - 12/9/2008, 6:49 PM
See, this is what i like about you noob, you keep a cool head unlike myself. Not only that but you also stay open minded even though you are biased and give us all the explanations we ask for. That's admirable. Looking forward to our next differences of opinion.

You raise another good point! "Experience" wise, he doesn't have much in his portfolio however, what he does have is brilliantly executed. Your fears are indeed well founded but weither i'm right or you are, only the actuall movie will tell.
NoobMike
NoobMike - 12/9/2008, 7:22 PM
Shaman, I was extremely hot headed, until I started going to therapy and accepting that different people have different points of view. Maybe you should try it. rofl
Shaman
Shaman - 12/10/2008, 7:09 AM
We'll see what Santa brings LOL
warpath15
warpath15 - 12/11/2008, 4:09 PM
Nuclear war is relevant again. Just strap a warhead to terrorist.
NoobMike
NoobMike - 12/12/2008, 5:17 PM
Yes it is relevant, but completely different. Anyone can be a terrorist, therefore the attack is made anonimously and it is a whole lot scarier, yet no terrorist group has the warheads to launch a full on assault on US ground.

Russia had many nukes aimed at the US and their allies to be fired at any moment, at most a terrorist group might organize themselves enough to launch an attack on 4 US cities at most, but right now the can't devastate the entire east coast, although both attacks are devastating one is a whole lot biggger than the other.
View Recorder