Why We Need to Overlook the Changes Made to X-Men: First Class and Just Accept It For What It Is

Why We Need to Overlook the Changes Made to X-Men: First Class and Just Accept It For What It Is

X-Men: First Class has been called one of the best movies of the summer and the best of the X-Men series, but some fans just can't let go of changes in continuity and to the source material and enjoy the movie.

Editorial Opinion
By jamedog - Jun 07, 2011 11:06 AM EST
Filed Under: X-Men

Sometimes I wonder if you people are ever happy. After the lackluster X-Men: The Last Stand and X:Men Origins: Wolverine, we cried out for a good X-Men movie. Many of us seem to forget that Bryan Singer's original X-Men movie was the movie that opened the door for the comic book movies we see now, and it proved that if a comic book movie was adapted well enough, it could please all. It's sequel, X2 was even better and became the standard for all following comic book movie sequels. Then we had a disappointing third movie and an even worse prequel. After all hope was lost, we got X-Men: First Class, a movie no one wanted. First Class is surprising people by actually performing well at the box office and by also getting good reviews, with many people are comparing it to Batman Begins. But of course, there's still those detractors. People are out there, still complaining, pointing out changes made to the comic books, changes in character, and goofs in the continuity between this and the other X-Men movies.

Who cares?

The fact of the matter is that if you look past the changes and continuity glitches, you will see a damn good movie. No, it's not 100% true to the comics, but no comic book movie ever is. People have been complaining about the changes this makes to the source material, especially not using the "original First Class". First off, it is impossible for any X-Men movie to be 100% accurate to the comics. These days, the X-comics are more like soap operas with all these intersecting character stories, storylines, and character deaths and resurrections. No two hour movie can ever perfectly translate the X-Men to the big screen, at least not without losing the interest of most of the general audience. Another thing fans forget is that studios want movies to be as concise and easy to view as possible, especially for general audiences. As hard as it is for fanboys to grasp, but you are not the audience the studios make these movies for, hell, you are just a small percentage of the audience that sees these movies. The studios want an easily watchable, entertaining, summer popcorn flick, which First Class was.

But lets look at the changes made to the comic books. Fans love to point these out in the X-Men movies, when in fact every comic book movie, even the good ones, make changes. Don't believe me? Take a look...

Batman Begins: Bruce was never trained by Ras Al Ghul or the League of Shadows, in fact he never had any contact with them until later in his career. In the comics, Ras is immortal and wants Batman to be his heir. Also, the gunman who killed the Waynes was never caught or identified (in the newer continuity). Gordon and Wayne/Batman never met before Year One. Lucius never supplied or created any of Batman's equipment. Scarecrow doesn't wear a suit. Bruce's travels over the world was public knowledge, he was never seen as dead.

The Dark Knight: In the comics, Joker had his skin bleached by chemicals, and his smile was natural, not scars. Harvey Dent was scarred by Maroni, not an explosion caused by Joker. Dent is schizophrenic in the comics, not out for revenge.

X2: In the comics, Stryker is a fanatical priest, not a military scientist. I'm sure there's plenty of other little changes I missed.

Iron Man: Tony was captured in Vietnam, not Afghanistan. Obediah Stane was a business rival, not a mentor to Tony. Jarvis is a butler and not a computer program.

Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2: In the comics, Peter invents web shooters, they aren't organic. He never grew up next to Mary-Jane. Doc Ock was never controlled by his arms, nor did he have a relationship with Peter before his accident.

And that's just scratching the surface. The fact is that changes are necessary to make a comic book movie flow. If we pick on X-Men: First Class for changes then we have to pick on every comic book movie. But we fans like to play forgiveness with our favorites, letting Christopher Nolan make changes because "we have faith" but attacking other comic book adaptations for the smallest change. So no, it wasn't exactly faithful, but it was presented in a fun and exciting, and different way.

One change everyone is complaining about is the lack of the real "First Class", which is Cyclops, Jean Grey, Storm, Ice Man, and Angel. Seeing how this took place in the 1960's and was pretty much about the birth of the school, it would be hard to fit in Cyclops, Jean, and Storm. In the first X-Men, Charles did say that Cyclops, Storm, and Jean were some of his first students, but since the school wasn't even open in this movie, we can infer that they came later on. Plus, if we would have had the original First Class, that would have messed up your precious "continuity" that you all are so content on keeping seeing how in the later movies it would make Cyclops, Jean, and Storm way too old, Angel wasn't even introduced until the third movie, and when we see Ice Man, he's still a teenager.

Then there's the issue of continuity. The big issue is including Emma Frost in this movie despite her having a (rather pointless) cameo in X-Men Origins: Wolverine. I've brought this up in previous articles and I'll bring it up again: it seems like everyone is pretending Wolverine didn't happen, and is that a bad thing? Both Matthew Vaughn and Bryan Singer have said that they ignored Wolverine when asked why they put Emma Frost in this movie. Also, when asked how they were going to explain Deadpool's fate at the end of Wolverine, Ryan Reynolds has said that the Deadpool film will ignore the events of Wolverine. Hell, even Hugh Jackman has said that The Wolverine will be standalone and ignore the events of X-Men Origins: Wolverine. So, considering that, it seems like Origins never happened, which is something I'm okay with.

There are two other big continuity goofs in First Class, the first being in the first X-Men when Xavier says that Magneto helped him build Cerebro yet in First Class we see that Hank McCoy invented it. This is a pretty big oversight, yes I'll admit it. All I can think of is that it was a change made for brevity's sake. While it would have been cool to see Charles and Magneto figuring out how to build Cerebro, it would have meant the movie stopping in it's tracks for fifteen minutes or more to do so. While having Hank build it was a change from the previous movies, it kept the plot moving at a steady pace, and that's essential, especially when the movie is already two and a half hours long.

Another big continuity goof is in X-Men: The Last Stand when we see a young Charles and Magneto recruiting Jean for the school, yet in First Class they go their separate ways before the school even opens. All I can guess is that Singer and Vaughn chose to also ignore The Last Stand, but once again, is this a bad thing? X-Men: The Last Stan pretty much undid all of the awesome from the previous two movies, and I'm totally fine with it being wiped out of continuity along with Origins.

But the fact is that we can on and on about the changes First Class made, but if we take our fanboy egos out of the equation and just watch it as a movie, we can see how good it really is. As a comic book, X-Men are some of the hardest to access, being so bogged down in years of convoluted plot lines and such, and it's hard for anyone to keep track of things. X-Men: First Class was a great way to present a different spin on the origins of the team for fans and general audiences alike. No, it really didn't show us a "first class" but it showed us Xavier's first time showing young mutants how to use their powers, and we see the seeds planted for the school, which is necessary for an origin. We asked for a good X-Men and we got it, and there are still people being ungrateful, but lets not forget that it wasn't so long ago that it seemed like we would never see any of our favorite comic book characters on the big screen. X-Men opened the door for the comic book movies we see today, and though the series fell on hard times, it returned triumphant with First Class and we should be happy to see it. For those of you complaining about First Class, just go watch X-Men: The Last Stand and X-Men Origins: Wolverine then come back to me and complain about X-Men: First Class.

Go ahead, I'll be waiting.

By: TwitterButtons.com

By TwitterButtons.com

X-MEN: Pedro Pascal's Sister, Lux Pascal, Reveals Why She Wants To Play The MCU's Jean Grey
Related:

X-MEN: Pedro Pascal's Sister, Lux Pascal, Reveals Why She Wants To Play The MCU's Jean Grey

RUMOR: THE LAST OF US Star Bella Ramsey Is Being Eyed To Play Kitty Pryde In Marvel Studios' X-MEN Reboot
Recommended For You:

RUMOR: THE LAST OF US Star Bella Ramsey Is Being Eyed To Play Kitty Pryde In Marvel Studios' X-MEN Reboot

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

freddblob
freddblob - 6/7/2011, 12:38 PM
Excelent! Agree with you.. First!
freddblob
freddblob - 6/7/2011, 12:39 PM
Could you provide a link where everyone says they are dismissing X3 and origins, i want to read that
DeadShizzle
DeadShizzle - 6/7/2011, 12:46 PM
I agree with the OP 100% I think most people hate on it because it's Fox, Don't get me wrong after X3 and XO Wolverine they deserved it.

Marvel has made changes but thats ok because it marvel, Nolan has made changes and thats ok because everyone wants to chug on his schlong and cup his balls because it's nolan.

Me personally I enjoyed watching X-Men FC, was it faithful no, was it in continuity not really, was it fun yes.
jamedog
jamedog - 6/7/2011, 12:51 PM
@freddblob just check out any of the First Class articles on the Editorial page or some of the reviews. The fan boy nitpicking is out of control
Ethic
Ethic - 6/7/2011, 12:59 PM
I just saw the film.
Thought it was pretty good, some parts of it were brilliant even.
Fassbender's Magneto was awesome, he's definitely a highlight.
The only problems I had were directorial issues, some of the editing and I thought Beast looked pathetic and was miscast.

Personally, I just want to see Marvel Studios take a shot at the franchise because the tone still isn't what I used to get watching the animated shows.
And those shows were pretty ideal in my view.
freddblob
freddblob - 6/7/2011, 1:40 PM
@jamedog i meant a link where vaughn or reynolds or hugh jackman told something about ismissing X3 and origins.
DarthGeoffPeterson
DarthGeoffPeterson - 6/7/2011, 2:20 PM
@freddblob

No. Noone can because obviously no such statement exists. I have read countless interviews on first class and have searched the web and NOTHING of the sort comes up. Singer has said that for the sake of story he has made a few changes, but also says that he tried to follow the previous stories. He never said, oh we just are using X1, and X2 and [frick] the rest cuz I didn't do them.
Pure fanboy speculation until I see definitive proof
marvel72
marvel72 - 6/7/2011, 2:40 PM
the film was good,but not as great as some like to think.

not exactly the line up i wanted to see.

@ deadshizzle

i don't think the fox hate is just x-men 3 & x-men origins wolverine.

its almost every comic book movie they've made.

1.x-men 2 ***/x-men first class ***
2.x-men ***
3.x-men 3 **
3.fantastic four 2 **
4.fantastic four **
5.daredevil **
6.x-men origins wolverine **
7.elektra *

BigK1337
BigK1337 - 6/7/2011, 2:47 PM
Yeah, but here is the thing; fanboys wouldn't mind changes as long as the movies don't compltely change the origins and characteristics of those characters.

Spider-Man series: Still works at the Bugle, retain his origins, fight many super villains, and have a complicated life.
Iron Man: If he still build his armor in a cave to escape a group of terrorist, that is still his origins just updated (in the comics, they said the war during the time of his captured was the Persian Gulf War).
Batman: He was still trained for combat to fight crime after his parents died. Two Face was created due to criminals wanting him dead for all that he have done. Joker mention pieces of his past found in the Killing Joke.

While yes, alot of comic book movies changed some things to the characters; the things done to the X-Men cannot be overlooked for it doesn't made much sense to be done in the first place. Like nationality, professions of characters, the members used to "recreate" the origin, and the overall development of characters.
So all I am saying is there is nothing wrong with nit picking from time to time; fanboys ave the right to express these distastes, just as fans have the right to express acceptance. Nothing is perfect.
jamedog
jamedog - 6/7/2011, 2:54 PM
In this article Singer discusses how certain items were changed to support the story of First Class, namely putting in the White Queen.

http://www.superherohype.com/news/articles/128876-bryan-singer-on-x-men-first-class

This is an article with Ryan Reynolds stating Deadpool will be stand alone

http://screenrant.com/ryan-reynolds-discusses-deadpool-character-spinoff-rob-6127/

And the title to this says it all

http://screenrant.com/wolverine-2-title-the-wolverine-rob-87685/
DeadShizzle
DeadShizzle - 6/7/2011, 3:39 PM
@Marvel72 I was just going on the X Series.

I personally like X 1&2 & Daredevil, but the rest of those movies are pretty bad.
TheDetectiveComicRises
TheDetectiveComicRises - 6/7/2011, 3:46 PM
Very good & well put article, sometimes people get to stuck in their own ways and don't realise movie making and that some things that happen in movies happen for a reason. I think U provided wonderul example good job.
marvel72
marvel72 - 6/7/2011, 4:10 PM
@ deadshizzle

my mistake,yeah x-men 2 is good & daredevil directors cut is more watchable than the normal one.

but i can't stand how much they change them.
kylum616
kylum616 - 6/7/2011, 4:26 PM
the movie was good and i wana see a sequel and all but i reall hope this dosent preform well becuse i want the rights to go back to mavrel so they can make the perfect x men movie and they havent made a bad movie yet
luckylu
luckylu - 6/7/2011, 6:47 PM
no
Wadey09
Wadey09 - 6/7/2011, 8:44 PM
i agree with most of what you're saying.
no adaptation is perfect.
nor should it be.
each CBM needs the right to be its own film in spite of the source material. granted, the original source needs to have a heavy influence on the film. especially in the manner of tone and characters. but as for stories and plotlines, i feel that each and every screenwriter and director has the right to create their own unique spin on the character.

btw,
i have a slight correction for you.
i do not know whether you are referring to the movies or the comics, but the Original Five are as follows:
Cyclops, Jean Grey, Iceman, Angel, and BEAST.
Storm was not introdiced into the comics until Giant Size X-men #1 in 1975.
OptimusBurgundyMaximus
OptimusBurgundyMaximus - 6/8/2011, 10:42 AM
quite overrated

not better than X2

great film , abysmal adaptation

to compare it to TDK is embarassing 2 say the least
kriswone
kriswone - 6/8/2011, 12:29 PM
this was a typical movie in the typical movie fashion, FOX keeps pumping out crap just to make money, it doesn't have to be good or bad, it simply is.

it's just sad to see a great franchise that the x-men COULD have been let go to poop.
DarthGeoffPeterson
DarthGeoffPeterson - 6/8/2011, 12:33 PM
Again, that interview with Singer does NOT say that they are discounting X3 or Wolverine. It says EXACTLY what I put in my original comment. They tried their best to stay in continuity with the other films, but for the sake of story had to make some concessions. Wolverine 2 not being called Wolverine 2 doesn't mean shit either. It's supposed to be a stand alone movie, meaning that it could take place at any time in continuity. Before X1 after X3, inbetween events in XOW, whatever. Still no proof.
DarthGeoffPeterson
DarthGeoffPeterson - 6/8/2011, 12:40 PM
BTW, it never is really established that Emma In Origins is in fact Emma Frost. Granted she has a similar look, and powers, but they could easily explain this away if they wanted. It's not that big of a deal. The character TV spot doesn't count either cuz continuity is based on the ACTUAL film, not advertising. Countless trailers and tv spots for movies feature scenes not present in the final films that contradict the final product.
ShadesAtKnight
ShadesAtKnight - 6/8/2011, 6:31 PM
To ask me to simply ignor that, is to ask me to leave my brain at the door. This movie wants me to take it seriously, and to view this as a prequel to the first film, so asking me to forget and ignor things is stupid!
KineticSwampRat
KineticSwampRat - 6/9/2011, 10:55 PM
I swear, I had to double check and make sure my name wasn't listed as the author of this article. This includes EVERYTHING that I've been saying for the past several years. It's as if someone went ahead and read my thoughts. (CHARLES!!!!) Nice to know I'm not alone in my views.
PoPcornDude
PoPcornDude - 6/9/2011, 11:21 PM
Jamedog:
Great article, I agree with you that, so far, there's not a single CMB that is 100% faithful to the comic book BUT I think there have been very decent adaptions like, X-2, X-1, spiderman, spiderman 2, batman begings, Thor, Iron Man, Iron Man 2 and obviously X-men first class, which I just saw and I thought it was very well done !
it's hard to please everybody and in this particular case (CMB) it will be always the case: Damn if they do and damn if they don't...
peace
TheMyth
TheMyth - 6/10/2011, 12:06 AM
I also agree. Purists are what they are however, and their disdain shows their fear of losing control, or even the lack of control some have, that they become so unwound over a differing rendition of fictional characters, F-I-C-T-I-O-N-A-L characters. It is the most foolish thing to "judge a book by its cover" which is exactly what many of these people do.

But that's just my opinion.
jjmeylar
jjmeylar - 6/10/2011, 8:21 AM
Storm wasn't an original in the comics. Beast was, but Storm wasn't. She wasn't introduced until the series was relaunched. Even so: great article. I'm going to share this on my facebook, with some friends of mine who are big X fans.
comicNERD1031
comicNERD1031 - 6/11/2011, 12:33 PM
magneto could of helped rebiuld it with beast and X at the school after the attack from Shaw on the CIA head Q and they might of just left it out.

XO:Wolverine butchered a lot of story lines but it was still a "cool" movie if you ignore all the oopses.

for the Xmen FC2 i wanna see a step-brother juggernaut team up with Magneto! right after Juggernaut gets his powers in the Korean War...its the right time period.
ComicBrooks
ComicBrooks - 6/11/2011, 3:00 PM
Very gooticle. Im happy to see someone on here who didnt care about the continuity. Nice job!
jon1362
jon1362 - 6/15/2011, 9:06 PM
As we all realize, at least those of us that read the xmen comics and other comics, the storylines also get messed up in those as well, from issue to issue, based on different authors/etc. supposed to be contuing the story and they mess up something in the plot. When this happens either parallel universes are created (which after a while can really get confusing and complicated), they might be made into a stand-alone comic book/series, or there is a common agreement made by the author/franchise/marvel and even fans on pretty much what to do. Like, whether to ignore/overlook a slip-up in the storyline/plot, to ignore the story completely and view it as a stand-alone, to fix or explain later on in future stories, or to take the change to mean something else entirely, etc. We can also just view the changes in the movies' storyline/plot, continuity, etc. as all just taking place all different endless parallel universes, where one minor thing is changed or many things are changed. Just look at the Cable comics with time travel and parallel universes. Look at Cyclops and Jean Gray's past and her clone (Madelyne Pryor, Goblin Queen), Cable as Cyclops' and Madelynne's son, who also has a clone Stryfe. Now that gets crazy, as always, things can get complicated quickly.
View Recorder