AVENGERS: DOOMSDAY - What Does Robert Downey Jr.'s MCU Return As Doctor Doom Mean For The MCU?

AVENGERS: DOOMSDAY - What Does Robert Downey Jr.'s MCU Return As Doctor Doom Mean For The MCU?

At this weekend's San Diego Comic-Con, we learned that Iron Man star Robert Downey Jr. will return to the MCU as Doctor Doom. What does that mean for Avengers: Doomsday and beyond? Here's our breakdown!

Feature Opinion
By JoshWilding - Jul 29, 2024 12:07 PM EST
Filed Under: Avengers: Secret Wars

For a time, it looked like rising star Jonathan Majors was on track to establish himself as the best MCU villain since, well, Thanos. However, when Marvel Studios fired the actor after he was found guilty of two misdemeanour counts of assault and harassment, the MCU lost its Kang(s).

We'd assumed the role might be recast but with the Multiverse Saga struggling to strike a chord with fans, it was clear something needed to change. That something is the return of Robert Downey Jr., not as Tony Stark/Iron Man but as Victor Von Doom/Doctor Doom!

As exciting as this news may be, it also raises a lot of big questions about what this means for Avengers: Doomsday, Avengers: Secret Wars, and beyond. Fortunately for you, we're now taking a deep dive into that in the hope of figuring out what Marvel Studios has planned for us. 

For a full breakdown of what Doom means for the MCU, click on the "Next"/"View List" buttons below.
 

5. He's Victor Von Doom, Not Tony Stark

iron-man-3-retrospective-copy

It's important to note that at Comic-Con, in press releases, and across social media, Downey has been referred to as playing Victor Von Doom. He's not an evil Iron Man or a a version of Tony who gets shrapnel in his face rather than his chest: he's Victor, a.k.a. Doctor Doom. 

It's a crucial distinction because even though the Multiverse will likely come into play, Downey has been cast as a different character the same way Gemma Chan was Minn-Erva and Sersi. Heck, even Josh Brolin portrayed Thanos and Cable in the same year! 

Doom's face is hideously scarred and he never takes his mask off, meaning this may even be a voiceover role for Downey. Sure, he can eventually take it off to reveal a familiar face but that predictable plot beat might not be one Marvel wishes to deliver in these movies. 

Marvel Studios, the Russo Brothers, and Downey have all said Iron Man will remain dead, so the fallen hero being absent from the next Avengers movies is possible. However, Doom - in his own advanced armour -  can take his place in a twisted turn of fate only the Multiverse can deliver.
 

4. Kang Is Out, Doom Is In...

401630221-899449331539757-7167903359479249373-n

Jonathan Majors was introduced as the MCU's new big bad in the season 1 finale of Loki. We learned He Who Remains had won a Multiversal War with his many Variants that left him to rule over a single, Sacred Timeline. 

Desperate to break free from the history he had written and eager to stop any more diverging timelines from being pruned, Sylvie killed the villain. We'd later learn that not all his Variants are bad as Victor Timely helped save the day in Loki season 2.

Then, in Ant-Man and The Wasp: Quantumania, Kang the Conqueror - surely the ultimate Kang Variant - was revealed to be trapped in the Quantum Realm (where he was ultimately defeated by Scott Lang). However, Immortus, Rama-Tut, and Scarlet Centurion assembled a legion of Kangs to take the fight to The Avengers after what Ant-Man had done to their banished Variant. 

Now, Majors' legal issues and the tepid response to the Ant-Man threequel have seemingly led to Marvel Studios changing course and ditching Kang to instead focus on a new big bad with Doctor Doom. 
 

3. ...Or Perhaps Not

960x0-copy

While Marvel Studios is clearly moving on from Kang - that's evident from Avengers: The Kang Dynasty being retitled Avengers: Doomsday - it feels like we'll never get any sort of satisfying resolution to the time-traveller's story. 

It would be easy enough to make it so that the all-powerful Doom kills the Kangs off-screen, though we do wonder whether the villain will be recast, even if he only ends up playing a very minor role in the remainder of the Multiverse Saga (which feels like a more satisfying resolution).

It's also worth noting that, while never confirmed, the comics have frequently hinted that Kang is a distant descendant of Victor's. In the new Ultimate Universe, Tony Stark has even been established as that reality's future Kang after taking on the Iron Lad mantle.

Marvel Studios can combine those elements to ensure Kang is still relevant to what's on the way, even if it's not in the way they originally planned. For example, if we meet The Beyonder, then he could be a Kang Variant! 
 

2. What This Means For The Multiverse Saga

clean-2

For the answer to this question, we're better off turning to the comics. There have been two versions of Secret Wars; in the first (which was basically an excuse to sell action figures but remains a classic), heroes and villains are pitted against each other on The Beyonder's Battleworld.

Doom steals The Beyonder's powers and is ultimately defeated. However, in the 2015 version, when an Incursion destroys the final two realities in the Multiverse (Earth-616 and the Ultimate Universe), Doom uses The Beyonder's powers to recreate a new world in his image which he rules over. Following his defeat, a new Earth-616 is created.

You can probably figure out how this could be adapted for Avengers: Doomsday and Avengers: Secret Wars!

Still, the key difference here is that the MCU's Doctor Doom has no history. Thanos had no more than a few minutes of screentime before Avengers: Infinity War, so Doom can still be an effective villain. Marvel Studios would be wise to make good use of future post-credits scenes, though!
 

1. What About The Fantastic Four?

Reed-Richards-battles-Doctor-Doom-in-Secret-Wars

The three previous Fantastic Four movies have featured Doctor Doom in a lead role...and they've all been pretty lousy. Heading down that route again would arguably spell doom (pun most definitely intended) for The Fantastic Four: First Steps

The reboot won't be an origin story, so we'd like it if this is their Doom and they have a shared history with the villain established through exposition or a last-minute reveal that he's the reason Galactus has targeted their Earth. 

When Marvel's First Family appear in Avengers: Doomsday, it would be a crime for them to have never encountered Doom and for this to be their first and only clash with Victor. Unfortunately, we have a bad feeling that could be the case as Downey surely won't stick around for a Fantastic Four sequel...right?

You never know, particularly if the money is right. For now, though, there's nothing to indicate that Reed and Victor will have a history and that robs us of a huge part of what makes the villain so special. 
 

Russo Brothers Talk AVENGERS Return And Doctor Doom Plans; DOOMSDAY Seemingly Adds Another MCU Actor/Composer
Related:

Russo Brothers Talk AVENGERS Return And Doctor Doom Plans; DOOMSDAY Seemingly Adds Another MCU Actor/Composer

AVENGERS: DOOMSDAY Star Robert Downey Jr. Teases Doctor Doom Debut With New Photos: New Mask, Same Task
Recommended For You:

AVENGERS: DOOMSDAY Star Robert Downey Jr. Teases Doctor Doom Debut With New Photos: "New Mask, Same Task"

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 7/29/2024, 12:37 PM
Means a new yatch for Robert and maybe a G5.
Doomsday8888
Doomsday8888 - 7/29/2024, 12:38 PM
AVENGERS: DOOMSDAY - What Does Robert Downey Jr.'s MCU Return As Doctor Doom Mean For The MCU?

...

Doom?

I'll see myself out.
ItsNotForMeWahh
ItsNotForMeWahh - 7/29/2024, 12:46 PM
@Doomsday8888 - User Comment Image
marvel72
marvel72 - 7/29/2024, 12:38 PM
I wanted to see the original Avengers all return for Avengers:Secret Wars.

So now Robert Downey Jr can't return as Tony Stark.
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 7/29/2024, 12:41 PM
@marvel72 - Why not? Do you think he can’t play both? They could’ve cast anyone, but they cast RDJ for a reason
CreateNowSlpL8r
CreateNowSlpL8r - 7/29/2024, 12:44 PM
@marvel72 - They could. The OG Avengers would have all had to be variants anyway. Hard to imagine they have him signed for 2 movies and don't at least shoot a scene with him as Ironman.

Then again, they are idiots.
Doomsday8888
Doomsday8888 - 7/29/2024, 12:45 PM
@marvel72
How can RDJ play 2 characters? He can't, it can't work.
User Comment Image
McMurdo
McMurdo - 7/29/2024, 12:55 PM
@FireandBlood - yes they did cast him for a reason. PRECISELY.
ShamusG
ShamusG - 7/29/2024, 1:03 PM
@Doomsday8888 - User Comment Image

I think these guys disagree.
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 7/29/2024, 12:39 PM
It’s means shit is about to go down!

User Comment Image
S8R8M
S8R8M - 7/29/2024, 12:40 PM
It guarantees Hugh Jackman. He said he would do the Avengers if RDJ was in it.

I do hope they salvage Kang. He is a great character, especially around Doom.
thewanderer
thewanderer - 7/29/2024, 12:54 PM
@S8R8M - if Jonathan Majors is still under contract, which I assume he is, they can easily bring him back to have Doom kill Kang or at least put him on the sidelines until they recast in the future.
Nomis929
Nomis929 - 7/29/2024, 12:40 PM
User Comment Image
Forthas
Forthas - 7/29/2024, 12:42 PM
This is an unwise move on the part of Marvel. While I understand they want Robert Downey Jr.'s star power there are better ways to go about reintroducing him into the MCU. Whether it is a clone, unknown twin brother, or like with numerous other MCU figures, a variant. Dr. Doom has his own storyline and it should not be overshadowed or intertwined with Iron Man either narratively or indirectly. I would even rather they renege on Iron Man staying dead.
Nomis929
Nomis929 - 7/29/2024, 12:44 PM
@Forthas -

User Comment Image

McMurdo
McMurdo - 7/29/2024, 12:52 PM
@Forthas - all Feige does is intertwine his characters/villains with Tony Stark. He's been making a living off Tony since 2008 and the well ran dry when the man died....and so now he's back as Doom.
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 7/29/2024, 12:58 PM
@Forthas - Let it play out. People swore up and down Death needed to be a part of Thanos’ storyline and well, it didn’t. This version of Doom has to fit within the context of the MCU as it is, and as long as they get the broad strokes right like they did Thanos, they should get creative with it.

This isn’t the first Doom, nor will it be the last. The main goal here is that it’s the type of Doom that makes the lasting impression this saga and these movies need, and there’s a lot of narrative opportunity here when it comes to a RDJ/Stark variant of Doom.

User Comment Image
Forthas
Forthas - 7/29/2024, 1:06 PM
@McMurdo - But what oi am suggesting he could STILL make a living off of Stark. A return of Tony Stark however it happens would give him back his cash cow. I am just not sure he needs to do it through Dr. Doom.
TheMetaMan
TheMetaMan - 7/29/2024, 1:10 PM
@Forthas - Feige said many times that Ironman’s death will never be compromised by bringing Robert back as Ironman. Therefore his role as Doom is a completely different role. Unrelated to Ironman. He will not be a stark variant. He’s just playing victor von doom. He’s not going to take the mask off. We will never see his face. This will add to the suspension of disbelief that this is a distinct performance compared to Ironman.

Ironman is dead. All that’s left is his legacy. Eventually they will recast the role but it was always feige’s plan to bring Downey back. And what better way than to have him play Dr Doom. Frankly it’s almost ingenious. You, me and every single person on this site, if you were Kevin Feige or head of Disney, WE WOULD ALL DO THE EXACT SAME THING!!! Which is hire Downey back because he’s their biggest draw and they are running a BUSINESS! They don’t care about source material, canon, they care about numbers, box office, toys, merch, marketing.

No matter what you think, everyone is going to tune into this. They have successfully sold us the investment of the next two avengers movies on Downey’s name alone. If that’s not ingenious I don’t know what is (under context).

Back to my original point, Feige is a man of his word. When he said he wouldn’t touch ironman nor his death, he wasn’t lying. However he never said that Downey couldn’t come back in a new role and play a different character. For god’s sake it’s literally no different from Chris Evans playing Captain America and JHONNY STORM. Two different characters who basically exist within the same shared universe. From the perspective of business and acting, its very simple economics.
Forthas
Forthas - 7/29/2024, 1:14 PM
@FireandBlood - So I have tried to imagine what a Downey jr. as Dr. doom might be like. And let me preface by saying I am not sure it won't work out and end up epic. But everytime you see or hear Downey jr. as doom in the back of our collective minds the ghost of Iron Man will be present. I also am a bit leary of using a variant of Tony Stark that is going to play off the emotions of his memory if and when he encounters the Avengers and they have nostalgic flashbacks of Tony. You could do the same thing with just a new Tony Stark. From a personal point of view it robs the audience of a verbal and physical showdown between the extremely self absorbed heroic Iron Man with and extermely self absorbed villainous Iron Man. I will certainly be there opening day, and the Ruuso's have given me the top four of five MCU films to date in my opinion so they deserve the benefit of the doubt...but there is still doubt!
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 7/29/2024, 1:16 PM
@TheMetaMan - “Feige is a man of his word.”

Feige will outright lie to preserve spoilers, and not only that, the man just said the same thing about Logan, only to have Deadpool dance around with that versions corpse to “Bye Bye Bye” and outright replace him with his own version in yellow.

User Comment Image
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 7/29/2024, 1:27 PM
@Forthas - “But everytime you see or hear Downey jr. as doom in the back of our collective minds the ghost of Iron Man will be present.”

That’s the point. For both us as an audience, and the characters.
Forthas
Forthas - 7/29/2024, 1:50 PM
@TheMetaMan - Lot to unpack here....

1) "Feige said many times that Ironman’s death will never be compromised by bringing Robert back as Ironman." Right...and Hughe Jackman said he was done playing Wolverine...he came back and no body is complaining. Not sure whay people think actors or in this situation producers cannot change their minds.

Yes, I would bring Downey Jr. back (that is a no brainer) because he is their biggest draw, but no, I would not do it as another character. He was popular as IRON MAN...if it ain't broke, don't fix it! You keep bringing up the fact that it is “ingenious” for them to bring back Downey Jr....absolutely....no disagreement here. In fact, I am sure it will be a screaming success at the box office, BUT...narratively speaking, you could have 1) brought back Downey Jr. as a variant of Iron Man and STILL got all the benefits you have been listing, and 2) created yet another iconic villain in the tradition of Killmonger, Thanos, and Loki by hiring someone who is as charismatic as Downey Jr. like ...just throwing out a name...Tom Ellis or better yet...you know what would be bigger than Downey Jr as Dooom? Tom Cruise! There are a lot of ways to go with this without sacrificing narrative flexibility just for the purpose of having everything revolve around Downey Jr. and you would still get the same result at the box offcie and in my opinion a more satisfying story.
Forthas
Forthas - 7/29/2024, 1:58 PM
@FireandBlood - But wouldn't you like to see a new villain in the MCU sort of the same vain as your avatar's sake...Killmonger? Or Thanos, Loki or the Winter soldier? Those villians helped make their respective films classics. Having Downey Jr. will muddle that! Is Robert Downey Jr. going to play the role with an Eastern European accent or will they downplay that aspect of the character? I am no purist by any sense but it just seems gimmicky when there is no need for it.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 7/29/2024, 2:06 PM
@Forthas - I disagree. I don't think this is overshadowed by Iron Man at all. It's Victor von Doom, so it is a seperate character.

I do fully understand that that isn't the case for how others see it, but it works for me.
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 7/29/2024, 2:08 PM
@Forthas - But no matter what which way you present it, this’ll be the third Doom. He’s not new in the same way those characters were, and he never will. It’s just the latest iteration of a villain that will always be adapted over and over, just like Joker and the Fantastic Four. I’m excited about what they do with Doom this time around within the context of this universe and this overarching storyline they’re telling.

Remember, Kang wasn’t working, regardless of the Majors fiasco. They’ve sat there for a while now thinking of ways they can pivot this away from him, they’ve brought back the Russo’s. There’s a plan here, and despite some initial reservations, I’m invested in seeing it play out.

And same goes for the Fantastic Four. This idea that they should start small with Mole Man has never been appealing. [frick] that. They’re the Fantastic Four! They deserve the respect that it looks like they’re finally giving. This retro-futuristic adaption featuring Galactus and Silver Surfer? Now that’s more like it.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 7/29/2024, 2:29 PM
@Forthas - he won't have the accent
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 7/29/2024, 12:42 PM
I still want some Kang resolution dammit , I don’t want them to toss it aside and I don’t think we will…

Things usually come back into play at Marvel so far , he’ll we are getting a movie early next year that brings back Samuel Sterns/The Leader after 16/17 years so anything is possible!!.

I just hope the resolution is satisfying even if it isn’t Majors in the role (even though I did enjoy his performances as the various variants).

User Comment Image
WEAPONXOXOXO
WEAPONXOXOXO - 7/29/2024, 12:47 PM
What Does Robert Downey Jr.'s MCU Return As Doctor Doom Mean For The MCU?
Well it means that maybe Chris Evans is coming back as Cyclops and Scarlett Johansson as Rogue.
TheMetaMan
TheMetaMan - 7/29/2024, 12:53 PM
@WEAPONXOXOXO - Scarlett is unlikely to ever return to the MCU. Remember she had that court/legal battle with them over some bullshit I can’t remember what it was.
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 7/29/2024, 12:59 PM
@WEAPONXOXOXO - I’ll do you one better

User Comment Image
RolandD
RolandD - 7/29/2024, 1:13 PM
@TheMetaMan - She’s producing an MCU show with them so I sure appearing in something is not off the table.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 7/29/2024, 12:49 PM
I haven't read comics in ages, but if they use this storyline where Doom basically swaps minds and he uses Tony's body and resources to make some [frick]ed up shit. So we could see the real Doom and RDJ Doom. This really changed my opinion and I'm really [frick]ing hyped if this happens, because if it is just RDJ cosplaying as Doom it just doesn't work
McMurdo
McMurdo - 7/29/2024, 12:51 PM
@bobevanz - that storyline was awful tho IMO.
Spoken
Spoken - 7/29/2024, 12:52 PM
@bobevanz - I've been saying this for a min now lol.

Imagine Spider-Man goes to meet "Tony" only to realize he is the only one who knows he's Peter Parker, which sends a red flag to Peter immediately!
McMurdo
McMurdo - 7/29/2024, 12:51 PM
It means he's a Stark variant. Notice the Russo's didn't deny him being a variant but only reiterated his name is in fact Victor Doom in his world. His name being Victor in no way prevents him from being a Stark variant. You do not hire the guy who played the most popular character in your universe to play the next Thanos of your multiverse saga unless you have a story purpose for doing so. It's wishful thinking hoping he never takes his mask off or somehow just looks like Tony. This has intentionality written all over it.
sheisthekey
sheisthekey - 7/29/2024, 12:52 PM
It means millions for Robert Downey jr's bank account
User Comment Image
Batmangina
Batmangina - 7/29/2024, 12:52 PM
Who keeps Photoshopping Reed's moustache out of the thumbnails?
SheepishOne
SheepishOne - 7/29/2024, 12:54 PM
I think the coolest way to introduce Doom would be to have Kang arrive in some time/space ready to annihilate or take over Latveria, only for Doom to rip out his spine.

As for what RDJ as Doom means…I think it’s impossible to not acknowledge the resemblance to Tony Stark, unless Doom is masked the whole time. Which likely won’t be the case. So you’ve got to set Doom up to be a variant of Tony Stark. Though they’ve said RDJ is Victor von Doom, you can still make him a Tony variant. Maybe in an alternate universe, Howard Stark makes a Latverian enemy who kidnaps an infant Tony to raise him as a von Doom. Or make it a Kang antic in which Kang travels back in time to kill Tony’s parents and give him to Latveria. Sort of a long play to fight the Avengers (perhaps noting his own inevitable demise).

McMurdo
McMurdo - 7/29/2024, 2:33 PM
@SheepishOne - I won't be surprised if Latveria doesn't come into play at all
1 2 3

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder