AVENGERS: ENDGAME For Your Consideration Posters Put The Movie Forward For "Best Picture" And More

AVENGERS: ENDGAME For Your Consideration Posters Put The Movie Forward For "Best Picture" And More

Avengers: Endgame is the biggest superhero movie of all-time, and Disney isn't shying away from giving it a push ahead of Oscar season with some eye-catching "For Your Consideration" posters. Check it out!

By JoshWilding - Oct 30, 2019 01:10 PM EST
Filed Under: Avengers: Endgame
Avengers: Endgame is the highest-grossing movie of all-time, and received rave reviews from fans and critics alike when it arrived in theaters this past April. Will that be enough to push it to some serious awards attention next year, though? Based on these eye-catching For Your Consideration posters, Disney and Marvel Studios are certainly hoping so.

As you can see below, they're pushing the movie for "Best Picture," an award many fans would argue it most definitely deserves. More posters like these will presumably be released over the coming weeks, but, for now, it looks like the focus is on Costume Design and the Editing categories.

Visual effects is an area you have to believe Avengers: Endgame will definitely be a hot favourite in as it's hard to think of any 2019 release with better VFX than what we saw in that final battle.

Conspicuous by his absence is Robert Downey Jr., but the actor recently revealed that he asked Disney not to put his name forward for "Best Actor" despite it being easy to imagine him at least being nominated for his amazing final performance as Tony Stark/Iron Man.

What do you guys think?





Check out some amazing production photos from
Avengers: Endgame by clicking on the "View List" button!

Image

 
Image

 
Image

 
Image

 
Continue reading below to check out the biggest
reveals from the Russo Brothers' recent AMA!

 

Steve Rogers' Return To The Present Day

Old-Steve


At the end of Avengers: Endgame, Steve Rogers returns from the past as an old man who clearly decided to remain behind in order to live his life with Peggy Carter. While fans have theorised that he grew old in the MCU's timeline and then just made sure he was in the right place at the right time to meet with his friends, it wasn't quite as simple as that according to the filmmakers. 

"You are correct in that he would have had to have worn the quantum suit, using a pym particle to make the jump," the Russos explained. "He's not wearing the suit on the bench, because that is not the exact moment to which he returned." So, Cap had been back in his timeline for at least a little while, which means there's still a story here for Marvel Studios to explore. 
 

Some Rapid-Fire Questions, Answered

Tony-Team-Suit


Was Captain America ever going to wear an Asgardian-like suit of armour? "Cap's shield is armor enough." Was the time-jump always going to be part of Endgame? "Yes." Did Infinity War ever not end with The Snap? "No." How did the directors make such a seamless leap to blockbusters?

"Action has been a favorite genre of ours for our entire lives and we had been planning on making an action movie for a while before we found Winter Soldier," Anthony explains. 
 

Why Black Panther Was The First To Return

Panther


In Avengers: Endgame's standout "Portals" scene, Black Panther is the first to appear as he steps onto the battlefield with his army in tow. Why, though, was T'Challa chosen as the first one to return? 

"We spent a lot of time in the edit room playing around with the sequencing of the portals," Joe explains. "We probably didn't lock that section of the movie until about a month before the film was in theaters. We always wanted Sam to be the first one to communicate with Cap via his comm and Sam was last in Wakanda, so logically the first portal that would open would the Wakandan portal."

"And the first person that would logically walk through a portal from Wakanda would be the king himself, bringing his army once again to the defense of Cap and the world."

 

Why James D'Arcy Appeared As Edwin Jarvis

Jarvis


One of Avengers: Endgame's biggest surprises came when Agent Carter star James D'Arcy made a very brief cameo appearance as Edwin Jarvis. That's the first major movie/TV crossover we've seen in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, so why did it happen? "Because we love James."
 
"Also, because Markus and Mcfeely were instrumental in engineering that show," the directors continued, "and because I directed one of the episodes. It seemed appropriate."
 

Why Did They Cut The Scene With The Avengers Taking A Knee?

Final-Battle


The Avengers: Endgame deleted scene featuring Earth's Mightiest Heroes taking a knee following Tony Stark's death has got fans talking in recent days, so why didn't it make the final cut? 

"We found the Avengers kneeling scene incredibly emotional as well, but when played in the run of the film, it felt incredibly similar to the moment when all of the heroes stood on the shore at Tony's funeral, paying their respects to him outside his home," they explained. "The two scenes, when in the film together, seemed to fight one another, and created a repetitious ending."
 

The Mystery Surrounding The Soul Stone

Soul-Stone


Heading into both Infinity War and Endgame, there was a lot of speculation about the secrecy surrounding the Soul Stone. It was the only Infinity Stone we hadn't seen in the MCU up until that point, and when the filmmakers were asked about the inspiration for those Vormir scenes and whether it was always the plan to keep the Soul Stone a mystery, Anthony revealed the following.

"For the centerpiece of Vormir where you retrieve the stone, we referenced ruins that were used for human sacrifice as an inspiration," the director revealed.
 
"The choice to keep the soul stone out of the storytelling wasn't entirely ours, any of the other Marvel storytellers could have gone to that stone at any opponent. But, we were thrilled that the stone had remained a mystery in the MCU and that we were able to use it for such a surprising purpose."
 

Captain America Has Always Been Worthy

Captain-America-3


Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked this same question during his own Reddit AMA and said that Captain America made a conscious decision not to lift Mjolnir in Avengers: Age of Ultron.

As you might expect, the Russos agree. "He always could," Anthony confirms. "Our interpretation of the famous scene in Ultron was that when he realized he could pick up Mjolnir he quickly chose not to, because he didn't want to embarrass Thor." Whether Joss Whedon had that in mind at the time is hard to say, but it's a cool explanation and an awesome moment in the movie. 
 

How The Russo Brothers Landed The Job

Russos1


Captain America: The Winter Soldier was a hit, but the Russo Brothers were still working on Captain America: Civil War when Feige asked them to take the helm of the next two Avengers movies.

"Kevin, and co-president of Marvel Studios, Louis D'Esposito, asked us to swing by their offices while we were in post on Civil War," the Russo Brothers explain. "The conversation, in short, was, "Guess what. We want to make the two biggest films ever made and we want to shoot them back to back. And we want you guys to direct them." Our response -- "F**K yeah."
 

Do The Directors Ever Argue? 

Russos2


Joe and Anthony are both brothers and filmmaking partners, so you have to believe that they've had the occasional argument. Well, based on what the latter has now said, it sounds like the process is a fairly straightforward one! "Film at its essence is a collaborative art form and that process begins for Joe with our partnership," he explains.

"There this thing known as the mastermind principle that says two minds are not doubly better than one they're exponentially better than one. And when we disagree its generally whether we want Indian or Italian for lunch." That's a pretty good way of doing things, and it's clear that they'll be remaining a team for a long time to come.
 

Why Tony Stark's Death Had An Impact On Them

IM-Edngame


The Russo Brothers have been lucky enough to get their hands on pretty much every major character in the MCU, but when they were asked which stands out as their favourite, Joe explained why the way things panned out for Tony Stark has stuck with him on a very personal level. 

"At this point we have been involved with just about every characters arc in the MCU. But in respect to all of the characters that aren't Cap, I think Tony's arc is incredibly tragic and unquantifiably heroic."

"As a father myself, contemplating the notion of being presented with the choice of saving the universe at the cost of losing your life, and knowing that your child would lose their father, and that your wife would lose a husband, is painfully difficult to comprehend. It's a choice that only the greatest amongst us could make."

 

How The Disney/Fox Merger Could Have Changed The Movie

X-Men-23


The Disney/Fox merger means that Marvel Studios now has access to all the characters from the X-Men and Fantastic Four franchises. Had that happened sooner, it would have changed both Infinity War and Endgame in a huge way and when they were asked about the impact they think it would have had, they say we would have seen "Double the amount" of heroes. Whoa! 
 

Captain America's Reunion With The Red Skull

Skull2


We never got to see Captain America's journey into the past,which means we were robbed of the opportunity to finally see Steve Rogers reunite with his old WWII foe, the Red Skull. 

"It was probably more awkward than you imagine it was," Anthony says when asked how that meeting might have gone. "Red Skull felt slated because Cap didn't recognize him."
 

Will We Ever See A Director's Cut Of Avengers: Endgame?

Iron-Man-3


Avengers: Endgame was three hours long as it is, but we know for a fact that some footage ended up on the cutting room floor as Katherine Langford's scenes were nowhere to be found. But before you start campaigning for the "RussosCut," the directors want you to know they're happy with it as it is. 

"Honestly no, we have always released the version of the movie we wanted to, so you would never see a director's cut of a Russo Brothers' Marvel movie because you have already seen it," Anthony confirms after being asked if they would ever want to release an extended cut with more footage. 
 

Was The Hulk Always Responsible For The Second Snap?

Hulk-Snap


In the movie, The Hulk uses the Infinity Stones to bring back the people Thanos killed, and his arm is left horribly burned (and seemingly useless) as a result. Now, Anthony has confirmed that the Jade Giant was always going to be the one responsible for undoing Thanos' attack on the universe in Infinity War. "[It] was always going to be the Hulk," the director reveals.
 

Now They're Done With Marvel, Which Franchises Are Next For Them?

Endgame-3


For the time being, the Russo Brothers are finished with the MCU, and while we know from Comic-Con that the filmmakers are going to be busy elsewhere, which other franchises are they interested in exploring? After all, you have to believe that they can do whatever they want after Endgame! "Interesting question. We are quietly, and secretly working on one right now..." they tease.

Here's hoping they end up heading to a Galaxy Far, Far Away or something similar, eh? 
 

Thor Was Stronger Than Ever In Endgame

Thor2


One Redditor asked the directors if Thor was weaker in Avengers: Endgame's final battle than in Infinity War or whether his worthiness meant he had returned to his normal power levels.

"The difficult road that Thor's traveled ultimately gave him strength," Anthony confirms. "He was stronger than ever by the end of Endgame." In other words, Viking Thor is a legitimate badass!
 

Will The Russos Bring Wolverine To The MCU?

Wolverine2


It's hard to imagine the Russos not returning to the MCU down the line, and they've said on numerous occasions that they would like to bring Secret Wars to the big screen. Asked which superhero movie not currently part of the MCU they would most want to take the helm of, Anthony responded by singling out one fan-favourite mutant. "We've always loved us some Wolverine."

That would obviously be amazing, but there's nothing to say it will actually happen!
 

How Long Did They Know About Iron Man's Fate?

Iron-Man-Hawkeye


It's been pretty obvious for a while that Robert Downey Jr.'s time as Iron Man was beginning to wind down, and while some fans hoped to see him become Director of S.H.I.E.L.D. or something similar, the decision for Tony Stark to make the ultimate sacrifice was decided upon fairly early one. 

"We knew for about three years before we shot the film," Joe said, referring to the hero's demise.
 

Are There Still More Easter Eggs To Discover?

Howard


Now that Avengers: Endgame is out on Blu-ray, we're going to be able to pore over every single moment in order to hunt for Easter Eggs. The question is, are there more to find? "Yes."

Time to get hunting... 
 

What Was Their Most Difficult Day Of Shooting?

Stark


Avengers: Endgame was a lengthy shoot and it can't have been easy to bring that and Infinity War to the big screen. However, when asked which day stands out as being the most difficult, they quickly responded with "Tony Stark's death."

We know that was shot on the final day of production so the Russos clearly saved the trickiest and most emotional scene for last, and it's hard to blame them. 
Kevin Feige Reveals Surprising Way LOGAN Inspired One Of AVENGERS: ENDGAME's Biggest Moments
Related:

Kevin Feige Reveals Surprising Way LOGAN Inspired One Of AVENGERS: ENDGAME's Biggest Moments

Robert Downey Jr. On The Use Of AI: I Intend To Sue All Future Executives [Who Recreate My Likeness]
Recommended For You:

Robert Downey Jr. On The Use Of AI: "I Intend To Sue All Future Executives [Who Recreate My Likeness]"

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 10/30/2019, 1:34 PM
Oscars are dumb. That is all.
GhostDog
GhostDog - 10/30/2019, 1:35 PM
@Spock0Clock -

Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 10/30/2019, 1:38 PM
Though, I have to say, the picture choice for the campaign is on target. Two Oscar winners in frame and a Shuri as a prominent reminder of the last time Marvel was nominated. That's probably a pretty smart choice.
lawndart
lawndart - 10/31/2019, 8:57 AM
@Spock0Clock - Exactly.
knocturnalzen10
knocturnalzen10 - 10/30/2019, 1:36 PM
"not cinema tho .........right ?



GhostDog
GhostDog - 10/30/2019, 1:41 PM
@knocturnalzen10 -

Cinema
knocturnalzen10
knocturnalzen10 - 10/30/2019, 1:43 PM
@BlackBeltJones - Rufflao's face was golden lol lol
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 10/30/2019, 1:44 PM
@BlackBeltJones - If this was made by Studio Ghibli, it would already be nominated for Best Animated Picture.
GhostDog
GhostDog - 10/30/2019, 1:46 PM
@Spock0Clock - imagine these images but Ghibili-ed. It would def win Best Animated Picture haha



Studio Ghibli presents: My Neighbor The Jade Giant
knocturnalzen10
knocturnalzen10 - 10/30/2019, 2:05 PM
@BlackBeltJones - TOTORO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BertieGregory
BertieGregory - 10/30/2019, 1:38 PM
It will definitely have a chance at getting nominated, because the Oscars just want viewership and relevance, which this would give them.
NoAssemblyReqd
NoAssemblyReqd - 10/30/2019, 1:38 PM
If the only criteria were cheers, tears, laughs, and applause, ENDGAME would win easily. No film I’ve seen this year has been as enjoyable on so many levels. But it’s chances of being nominated for BP are pretty slim.
dracula
dracula - 10/30/2019, 1:39 PM
Great movie, but infinity war was better, so I doubt it will get the nomination, plus it’s just not the type of movie that gets nominated.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 10/31/2019, 3:33 AM
@dracula - The time travel stuff was very poorly written. I can't see this being nominated, much less winning with that kind of writing.

And you're 100% right. Infinity War was better.
GhostDog
GhostDog - 10/30/2019, 1:40 PM


TheManWithoutFear
TheManWithoutFear - 10/30/2019, 1:47 PM
Awards are a whole lot of who cares. But Endgame was my favourite film of the year. I would have put Cap on the "costume design" poster, seeing that costume is another level.

Also @Josh have you tried not using phrases like "you have to believe", "it's easy to imagine", "fans have to think" etc. Only because it annoys me.
heisei24
heisei24 - 10/30/2019, 1:47 PM
Wasn't there some talk about how Academy members refuse to vote anything with word Avengers in the title before?
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 10/30/2019, 1:54 PM
@heisei24 - I think that reporting was based on an interview with just one Academy voter who said something like that. I'm sure there are members who will never support Marvel on principle, but there are also members who will never support lots of things for lots of reasons. The Academy membership is probably a tangled mess of grudges and personal loyalties that (for many voters) far outweigh the objective quality of a film.
SwampThing
SwampThing - 10/30/2019, 1:53 PM
Infinity War was better imo.
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 10/30/2019, 1:58 PM
Infinity War as a film took me on a roller coaster(maybe pun intended) of emotions that I don't think I've ever experienced, but I didn't get that same thing from endgame.

I don't know what constitutes Oscar worthy nominations, but endgame, and marvel, deserve some kind of special award dedicated to them because this journey has been monumental.

I've never followed anything this closely and checked for any information I can everyday. Words can not fully describe this universe. VFX awards just wouldn't do it justice
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 10/31/2019, 3:43 AM
@MyCoolYoung - Now this, my friend, is a great comment!

I totally agree. I was let down by Endgame, personally. I thought they really messed up by using time travel, and the writing around the time travel was terrible, contradictory, and raised far too many questions.

I thought Infinity War was far better. That movie kept me on the edge of my seat as our heroes kept coming so close to stopping Thanos, only to be beaten at every turn. And the emotional weight of seeing all those characters get dusted at the end? Just pure gold.

But I totally agree. Marvel definitely deserves some kind of award for what they've accomplished as a whole. Maybe not Endgame itself. But the whole of the MCU. They've successfully accomplished something no one else has even really tried, at least not until the MCU started. And even the ones that tried to copy it failed miserably.

The closest thing I can think of to the MCU would be the James Bond films, but only because those all take place in the same universe (except the newer reboots I believe). But even those are just multiple sequels of the same character. They made over 20 Bond movies before Daniel Craig's reboot, but that still didn't have multiple franchises all participating in an overall story in the same world.

So in the end, there really isn't anything quite like the MCU.
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 10/31/2019, 5:28 AM
@CorndogBurglar - I can't say the time travel element was contradictory but I agree with everything else. It's going to raise a lot of questions moving forward. Which will take a lot of comic book logic to answer.
"why not go to an alternate tineline and get stark? Why not go get the infinity stones from the alternate timelines?" etc... It really has the power to mess up the mcu going forward.

I was also disappointed with the story overall. Infinity war, antman 1 and 2, and civil war set up a perfect story that I don't feel like they ran with.

One being the quantum realm. Thanos "destroyed" the stones but really he only shrank them down to atom level, which technically means they're accessible via the quantum realm.

I would've liked Thanos to have handed the heroes their own ass in that beginning fight then destroyed the stones in front of them which would lead into a similar movie we had.

Rather than a random rat pushing a button I was hoping Scott used a quantum connection with ghost, similar to the one he and Janet shared, to lead her to helping him escape.

Also, since a lot of the stories were continued arcs from age of ultron we could've gotten more from this line:

"Ultron thinks we're monsters. That we're what's wrong with the world. This isn't just about beating him: it's about whether he's right"

Once Thanos did the snap they could've shown the world divided because things actually had gotten better on earth which would raise the issue of "you wanna protect the world but don't want it to change" but then eventually we see the world revert back to how it use to be through greed and human nature, which makes the avengers set the quantum realm plan in place. Just my opinion though -
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 10/31/2019, 8:10 AM
@MyCoolYoung - The only reason I say its contradictory is for one thing. It might seem like nitpicking, but I can't seem to let it go because it has so many implications.

The Hulk says that you can't change the future/present by changing the past. That means that if you change the past it would have to create another timeline. Can we all agree on that?

The Ancient One also says removing the Infinity Stones from a timeline would create an alternate timeline. Which is kind of a no-brainer considering what Hulk said. If you go back in time and remove the stones, then it will create another timeline because you've now changed the past.

So going back and replacing the stones and Mjolnir in the past where they got them from makes no sense. Because the second they removed the stones it would have created an alternate timeline with no stones. So going back and replacing those stones at the exact time they were removed wouldn't matter, because you can't change the future/present events that already happened. So they can replace the stones, but it wouldn't destroy that other timeline that was created once they removed them. If anything, it would create a THIRD timeline. So we would be left with this:

The original MCU timeline. The timeline where they removed the stones. A THIRD timeline where they removed, then replaced the stones. This isn't taking into consideration anything The Ancient One said about timelines being created by removing stones. This is going 100% off the idea that you can't change events that have already happened.

"Ultron thinks we're monsters. That we're what's wrong with the world. This isn't just about beating him: it's about whether he's right"

This quote leads perfectly into another big problem I have. It makes the heroes seem very UN-heroic. They lost fair and square to Thanos in their original timeline. But they're willing to go into the past, alter events there causing god knows what ramifications, all so they can try and save their own timeline. Thats bordering on sympathetic villainy, if anything.
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 10/31/2019, 8:22 AM
@CorndogBurglar - I agree with everything you said. We should've gotten a retread of that line.

I never understood the putting them back in the same spot thing neither. Hopefully Kang the conquerer is on his way to explain these things
lawndart
lawndart - 10/31/2019, 9:02 AM
@MyCoolYoung - Kang will fix it all. It's what he does.
1 2 3 4 5
View Recorder