Darren Aronofsky Explains Why His BATMAN Movie Starring Joaquin Phoenix Didn't End Up Happening

Darren Aronofsky Explains Why His BATMAN Movie Starring Joaquin Phoenix Didn't End Up Happening

Black Swan director Darren Aronofsky has shed some light on his Batman: Year One movie, explaining that while he wanted Joaquin Phoenix as the Caped Crusader, Warner Bros. had very different ideas...

By JoshWilding - Apr 17, 2020 09:04 AM EST
Filed Under: Batman
Source: Empire Online

After successfully directing Requiem For A Dream, filmmaker Darren Aronofsky was eyed by Warner Bros. to take the helm of a Batman reboot. Inspired by Frank Miller's Batman: Year One, what little has been revealed about the film has divided opinions as it re-imagined a lot from the comic books.

For example, Alfred Pennyworth was set to be re-invented as "Little" Al, the owner of an Auto-Repair shop, while Bruce Wayne would have become homeless after the murder of his parents. It still sounded like it had some potential, though, and Aronofsky has now shed some light on why it didn't happen.

"The studio wanted Freddie Prinze Jr and I wanted Joaquin Phoenix. I remember thinking, 'Uh oh, we're making two different films here.' That's a true story. It was a different time. The Batman I wrote was definitely a way different type of take than they ended up making."

The director even enlisted the help of Miller to work on the film. "It was an amazing thing because I was a big fan of his graphic novel work, so just getting to meet him was exciting back then."

"The Batman that was out before me was Batman & Robin, the famous one with the nipples on the Batsuit, so I was really trying to undermine that, and reinvent it," he explains, referring to his plans to take the Dark Knight down the R-Rated route. "That's where my head went."

Joaquin Phoenix did eventually find his way into the DC Universe when he played the Clown Prince of Crime in Joker, but it definitely would have been interesting to see him as this very different version of Batman. Clearly, it wasn't meant to be, and Christopher Nolan took charge of the franchise instead for a successful trilogy which was a hit with fans and critics alike. 

BANE And DEATHSTROKE Live-Action Movie In Development At DC Studios
Related:

BANE And DEATHSTROKE Live-Action Movie In Development At DC Studios

Hayden Christensen Responds To BATMAN Rumors And Explains Why Darth Vader Would Beat Thanos
Recommended For You:

Hayden Christensen Responds To BATMAN Rumors And Explains Why Darth Vader Would Beat Thanos

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
tmp3
tmp3 - 4/17/2020, 9:34 AM
This would have been the Ang Lee Hulk of Batman movies. Also, even with a director like Aronofsky I think Phoenix would have still said no, doesn't seem like the kind of guy who'd ever do franchises. Really curious what Aronofsky's Wolverine film with McQuarrie would have been like.
Superspecialawesomeguy
Superspecialawesomeguy - 4/17/2020, 10:01 AM
@tmp3 - Man to this day I still think about how good a Darren Aronofsky Wolverine film would have been.

Here's a quote from Christopher McQuarrie (who wrote the movie) on the script:

"Well you know, it was an X-Men movie - it was a Marvel movie - but it existed very much in a real world. And more than anything, I love it for the very fact that - at least in the script I wrote - he was the only mutant in the movie... It was what you'd imagine the Wolverine universe to be under the control of somebody who wrote 'The Usual Suspects' and 'The Way of the Gun' and is a fan of Sergio Leone. It was Kurosawa's Wolverine. There was a real romance to it, there was real humor to it, and a very straightforward sort of plain-faced brutality to it. I'm hoping they preserve that."

Dredd97
Dredd97 - 4/17/2020, 10:06 AM
@Superspecialawesomeguy - "Kurosawa's Wolverine"
tmp3
tmp3 - 4/17/2020, 10:12 AM
@Superspecialawesomeguy - Oh man. Wow. Had no idea about that, and now I really wish it happened. A Kurosawa Wolverine followed by Logan would have been such an incredible one-two punch. In a perfect world...
GhostDog
GhostDog - 4/17/2020, 10:17 AM
@Superspecialawesomeguy -

The Wolverine just barely scratched the surface of that storyline. Should've been more Kurosawa to that tale.

Reeds2Much
Reeds2Much - 4/17/2020, 10:39 AM
@Superspecialawesomeguy - he was the only mutant in the movie

I mean, he pretty much was.
Origame
Origame - 4/17/2020, 9:40 AM
From the sounds of it this movie would've been a great movie but probably one that didnt get a lot of attention for being a very different batman. Say what you will about the dark knight trilogy but it was still a contemporary take on batman with everything you'd expect. At this point we were just waiting for a modern batman to get the formula right before we got a batman that changed the formula. Kinda like how things ended up with wolverine. We needed the wolverine, a genuinely good wolverine giving us what we wanted, before we got the radically different logan.
tmp3
tmp3 - 4/17/2020, 9:42 AM
As far as "cancelled auteur superhero projects" go, give me Tarantino's Luke Cage or George Miller's Justice League any day over this. Or even Aronofsky's take on Wolverine, the version we got was only ok (but led to the utterly fantastic Logan, so maybe it was for the best)
Nightmare
Nightmare - 4/17/2020, 9:43 AM
Bruce Wayne making bets on turning criminals into law abiding citizens?

inkniron
inkniron - 4/17/2020, 9:46 AM
Words cannot describe how glad I am that this didn't happen.
VicSage
VicSage - 4/17/2020, 9:49 AM
Was it Little Al or Blind Al? I thought he was referred to as Blind Al. Any how, the take was a little to extreme.
VicSage
VicSage - 4/17/2020, 9:50 AM
@VicSage - Oh wow, I'm thinking of Blind Al from Deadpool. Ha.
BigMikeReviews
BigMikeReviews - 4/17/2020, 9:54 AM
I remember reading the leaked script all the way back in 2004.. and it sounded just as bad back then as it does now.
FleischerSupes
FleischerSupes - 4/17/2020, 9:57 AM
Sounds like be basically wanted to make Drive



tmp3
tmp3 - 4/17/2020, 10:00 AM
@FleischerSupes - Drive. God, what a bad-ass movie.
FleischerSupes
FleischerSupes - 4/17/2020, 10:03 AM
@tmp3 - Totally, it got a lot of praise at the time but also got forgotten way too quickly. It's a classic in my book.
Dredd97
Dredd97 - 4/17/2020, 10:05 AM
@FleischerSupes - Drive was amazing. Also, love your name. Fleisher is the standard all Superman adaptions be held to
tmp3
tmp3 - 4/17/2020, 10:13 AM
@SmokingMan - Fleisher is one of the, like, 2 Superman adaptations to not completely shunt Clark's journalistic side, haha. It gets infinite praise for that alone, and that's before it's absolutely incredible animation
1 2
View Recorder