GhostRiderfan1 revisits The Dark Knight

GhostRiderfan1 revisits The Dark Knight

Is The Dark Knight truely as great as remembered? Find out here.

Review Opinion
By EdgyOutsider - Feb 28, 2012 02:02 AM EST
Filed Under: Batman

With The Dark Knight Rises finishing the popular Christopher Nolan Batman trilogy, I figured why not do a review of The Dark Knight. So here it is.

The Dark Knight is arguablly the greatest superhero movie ever made, no doubt. From the acting, to the directing, to the cinematography, to the editing, to the tone. The Dark Knight really is an epic, following the events of Batman Begins, the story follow Bruce Wayne trying to help Gotham recover from going down under and things are getting better a little bit at a time. But arrives The Joker, phsycopathic murder who's goal in life is just to watch the world burn. In the mist of it all Harvey Dent and the Gotham Police Department are gathering up the mobs and trying to help stop The Joker.

From the opening bank robbery sequence the movie grabs you and holds you for one of the wildest, craziest and most fun rides of your life. The acting is monumental from Christian Bale as Bruce Wayne/Batman, to Heath Leadger as The Joker, to Aaron Eckhart as Harvey Dent/Two-Face. I really enjoyed the acting from everybody except... Maggie Gyllynhal. I absolutely DO NOT like her as an actress and I feel the should've kept Katie Holmes as Racheal but that's just me. Christopher Nolan does an amazing job like all of his movies directing it. He knows his vision, he knows what he wants and he goes after it. Unfortunately even after watching the movie so many times, every now and again it's hard for me to get into it because for me almost half of the movie drags, it drags when things get good and it kills it for me. The editing is great and tells the story even better, and the cinematography is like the visual effects of the little they used and is amazing. It's faster paced than Batman Begins but it leaves me wanting more from it. I'm not a DC fan except Batman and I don't know much about the property but as I felt with Batman Begins they should've stuck with the original love interest for the film and the hero they've always been true to. Heath Leadger's Joker is phenomenal and leaves me amazed everytime and I wish it were possible to bring him into the next film. Christopher Nolan has made these movies as true to the comics but also sways from them and grounds it more into reality than the comics, hints the reason as long as Christopher Nolan is directing we won't see Killer Croc or Poison Ivy or Mr. Freeze or some of the more cooler characters.

At the end of the day The Dark Knight is one of the best CBM's to ever be made. There are some flaws that we're made but I focused more on the film and the acting and everything else pretty much as a whole. The film drags alot though and that's why I am giving it a 9/10.

RUMOR: The BATMAN-Adjacent Script Zach Cregger Hopes To Pitch To DC Studios Is A JOKER & HARLEY QUINN Movie
Related:

RUMOR: The BATMAN-Adjacent Script Zach Cregger Hopes To Pitch To DC Studios Is A JOKER & HARLEY QUINN Movie

BATMAN BEYOND Voice Actor Confirms He Will Not Reprise The Role Of Terry McGinnis Anytime Soon
Recommended For You:

BATMAN BEYOND Voice Actor Confirms He Will Not Reprise The Role Of Terry McGinnis Anytime Soon

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

EdgyOutsider
EdgyOutsider - 2/28/2012, 3:23 AM
Also I feel it's overrated. Plus it's not far over the billion mark and it was in theaters for more than 6 months so it's not surprise it made over a billion dollars. Nolan-ites back the [frick] off and face reality.
batfan175
batfan175 - 2/28/2012, 6:17 AM
@GhostRiderfan1: It was never out in cinemas for 6 months. You must've dreamed that part. The money does not make a film a great film. It's the critical and popular acclaim it got from people around the world. That should tell you something about the success of the film.
RidiculousFanBoyDemands
RidiculousFanBoyDemands - 2/28/2012, 7:03 AM
"The Dark Knight is arguablly the greatest superhero movie ever made, no doubt."


"At the end of the day The Dark Knight is one of the best CBM's to ever be made."


"Also I feel it's overrated. Plus it's not far over the billion mark and it was in theaters for more than 6 months so it's not surprise it made over a billion dollars. Nolan-ites back the [frick] off and face reality."


Schizophrenic much?
RidiculousFanBoyDemands
RidiculousFanBoyDemands - 2/28/2012, 7:13 AM
The Dark Knight ended it's mass theatrical run on September 28th when it was still shown in 1400 theaters across the country.

After that it was scattered around and barely topped 300 theaters worldwide. Even if it was in 300 theaters in the US, that is about 6 per state. After 3 months of being released the amount of screens it was showing on were in the single digits. That generally means that dollar cinema's were showing it.

That and it topped a billion dollars the last week of August/first week of September! Don't say things that can be easily fact checked up Google.
EdgyOutsider
EdgyOutsider - 2/28/2012, 8:02 AM
The Dark Knight crossed the billion mark 2 MONTHS after it was released on dvd! I'm not saying it's a bad movie, like I said it's one of the best CBM's to ever be made and one of the best sequels. I personally think X-MEN: First Class is the best CBM ever but that's just me. But like I said before Nolan-ites [frick] off, you guys think anything to deal with Nolan's Batman films is the greatest ever which it isn't. Which clearly all of you are.
LAWLZY96
LAWLZY96 - 2/28/2012, 3:55 PM
Like everything that is great, there is a legion of people claiming it is overrated. The Dark Knight is THE best comic book movie ever made, and a fine moment in cinema.
EdgyOutsider
EdgyOutsider - 2/28/2012, 4:58 PM
@LAYLZY96: I'm saying this with all due respect, The Dark Knight really is over rated. Did I enjoy the film? Of course, but 1: To me the movie drags in story development, I've seen longer movies that kept it exciting that TDK couldn't. Plus I could name 5 comicbook movies better than TDK.
Alexandre
Alexandre - 2/28/2012, 8:49 PM
why do people feel like they have to write an article to prove their point on how much they hate tdk or nolanites or anything associated with Nolan and tdk? enough already please for the love of god.
i love iron man and it can be argued that iron man is marvel's best film. and i can also use the same arguments used on tdk to prove that iron man sucks but i dont because those arguments in the end never work.
iron man has flaws but neither i, a "nolanite", nor do others care.
iron man has a director who since then has been praised by fanboys and critics
iron man is overrated, its fans are constantly praising it as being the best thing ever created and im one of them along with praising tdk.
obviously batman is going to get the more praise because its [frick]ing BATMAN. the dude as been around for over 70 years.
Alexandre
Alexandre - 2/28/2012, 9:02 PM
batman and superman are the most known heroes in the world so back the [frick] off @GhostRiderfan1 and face reality.

tdk is not overrated because it lived up to its hype. its the best incarnation of batman on film to date. the reason its more popular and made all that money is because its batman and because it was done right.

xmenfc and iron man were done extremely right but they're not as popular as batman and those are the facts. the closest thing to batman and superman on marvel's side for many years was spiderman and the hulk(just because he had a 70's show) other than that, the people who went to see iron man, thor and captain america where all marvel fans and some action cgi fans.
and notice how i wrote some action cgi fans because if they would've received all the action junkies then the numbers would've looked more like transformers number.

because you know damn well alot of people who went to see that shit were not going to see a honest adaption of their graphics counter parts. they went to see robots fighting robots. and its sad because that means people would rather see a dumb piece of shit film than a real, well written, honest to the comics, recent marvel movie.
LoudNoises
LoudNoises - 2/28/2012, 11:34 PM
I'm sorry, but I think X-men First Class was terrible. I cannot understand why it gets the praise from X-Men fans that it does. I am a huge X-Men fan too.

Anyways, about TDK... It feels like it drags because there's no action just for the sake of action. The story comes first and the action comes in when it is appropriate unlike most of the crap CBM's. The problem for me is that I'm not 10 and I like movies with more substance and depth now. I grew up with Marvel comics, toys, video games, cartoons, not to mention all the sketchbooks I filled with love for these characters. Batman was the only DC character I really liked. I think the problem people like me are facing is that we want our CBM's to be as mature as we are now. We want them marketed towards us and not kids because we grew up with them because most of us have been waiting since we were kids to see some if these characters come to the big screen. We are the generation that brought comicbook characters to a new level! Finally it's happening and now I find that the majority of them are primarily marketed towards a younger audience. For us they are just one time fun popcorn flicks. TDK is the best CBM to me because it filled that void that was missing for my generation of comic fans... A CBM that grew up and matured with us.
EdgyOutsider
EdgyOutsider - 2/29/2012, 2:07 AM
First off I'm 16 and I'm alot smarter with this shit than you guys think. I've grown to appreciate substance over the action, The Dark Knight to me dragged for whatever reason. There are some things we can't explain and for me I really can't explain other than to me it dragged. The 5 CBM's I feel are better than The Dark Knight are 1:X-Men: First Class 2: Spider-Man 2 3: Iron Man 4: The Incredible Hulk 5: Captain America: The First Avenger, no I know these are Marvel movies but except for Nolan's Batman trilogy, the original Tim Burton Batman movies and of what I hear of the first two Superman movies, how many ACTUAL good movies or even decent movies has DC put out? Also wanna know proof that I appreciate substance over action? Ok, as an entertaining movie I perfer Ghost Rider 2 over TDK but as an actual GOOD movie I perfer TDK over Ghost Rider 2 (though GR2 is greatly under appreciated). The Dark Knight as I stated before IS one of the best CBM's ever made but alot of people make it out better than it actually is, like seriously TDK is more entertaining and is better than Batman Begins but I perfer Batman Begins over TDK cuz I can get into it easier. To me it has more excitment in the substance to me than TDK's substance. The reason they target most superhero movie towards kids is for marketing and they hope the younger kids enjoy it and the more of the family that sees it, the more money it's likely to make. For The Dark Knight, everyone loved Batman Begins, between Batman Begins and Heath Ledger's death the movie became more popular than what I thought it should've been.

Now as far as X-Men: First Class goes, the movie is so well recieved (and apparently there are people who don't appreciate it) that between the fact that alot of people didn't like the previous X-Men movies (why I don't know) they didn't expect much from it. X-Men: First Class has a good story, strong script, good acting (especially Michael Fassbender, though there were parts I didn't like James McAvoy as Xavier), good effects and editing and great directing. It was also very faithful to the comics for the most part. That's why it's so greatly recieved. Hell unlike The Dark Knight, X-Men: First Class even in the substance kept me interested and excited. But that's my opinion.


On an unrelated note: Despite what people say 2012 does not have another Green Lantern, especially Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance. Spirit of Vengeance I thought was a GREAT start into the year of CBM's. Also I say The Avenger's is gonna be CBM of the year but again that's just me.
Alexandre
Alexandre - 2/29/2012, 10:37 AM
rt scores
green lantern 27%
grsov 14%

the avengers cbm of the year?? calm down, dont start predicting the future now like most of all you do. i tell you, you marvel fans are all living in a bubble. the avengers has the potential but the director has to be extremely careful because either this will be the best cbm or a complete piece of shit. there cannot be anything in between
EdgyOutsider
EdgyOutsider - 2/29/2012, 9:36 PM
*Alexandre: 1: Critics are critics, they don't like Spirit of Vengeance because it's a movie you can actually enjoy. 2: Marvel fans living in a bubble? If that's the case then you DC fans are in dream land because Christopher Nolan's Batman Trilogy is far from the best CBM's to grace the screen. Plus I don't see why there are DC fans really, Marvel's characters and stories are actually interesting and even in the smallest bit, you can at least relate to their characters and you believe the world they are in. The closest DC has to that is Batman, he is in no way relatable, his stories aren't interesting and the closest to believing anything in it is the way mobs and thugs are, that's it.
Alexandre
Alexandre - 2/29/2012, 11:23 PM
oh yes because we so can relate with a guy who turns into a green monster when he is upset and a god from another world or a juiced up experimented soldier.
Alexandre
Alexandre - 2/29/2012, 11:32 PM
look dude i saw grsov and i agree with most critics. i didnt enjoy and i was bored out of my mind. but thats is my opinion.

you dont see why there are many dc fans when marvel has interesting characters and stories is your opinion.

batman being a character no one can relate to. completely wrong



EdgyOutsider
EdgyOutsider - 2/29/2012, 11:38 PM
We relate to their flaws, dumbass. DC characters don't have shit, who can relate to a billionaire? Just about no one, or how about being indestructible? NO ONE! Spider-Man, we can relate to to his normal life problems. Hulk, cuz we all have anger problems. Just to name a couple. That's a big reason why Marvel has been able to have pretty-very successful movies. All DC has is Batman, Superman, Wonder Woman, and maybe Green Lantern and Flash who are all their popular heros. Marvel has better heros and villains, comics, shows and movies. Hell even to an extenet Ghost Rider and The Punisher are barely but still are relateable, alot of Marvel's villains are also barely but still relateable. X-Men deals with prejudice, that's a real thing and it's believable and it makes you care about the characters and because of prejudice, people can relate because people deal with it.
EdgyOutsider
EdgyOutsider - 2/29/2012, 11:45 PM
In my respectful opinion, Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance, minus the juvinille humor is a true Ghost Rider film and even though they did no true research on Blackout (who is my favorite Ghost Rider villain), I completely understand changing his powers so he's more of a threat than in the comics. I was hooked the moment the movie started.
theblackmamba
theblackmamba - 3/1/2012, 2:32 AM
Okay like @Alexandre said on one can relate to being a super hero. Super heros may have some issues that can vaguley be related to us though. And with GRSOV, I liked the first one thought it couldve been better, the second I really feel I got robbed. Like not trying to sound like a dick but if I wouldve known before hand what I was about to walk into I wouldve waited till it came out on Redbox and paid the $1 plus the tax.
Other than that, did an okay artical. Stay in school and go to college.
EdgyOutsider
EdgyOutsider - 3/1/2012, 5:21 AM
@Dox: I argued because, well at least the top half of the comments, they try telling me that I was basically wrong. So I got fed up and throwing shit in their face.
Alexandre
Alexandre - 3/1/2012, 12:18 PM
bruce wayne is a billionaire just like tony stark.
they both are rich playboy heroes.

Bruce's problems: he witnesses the death of his parents at an EARLY AGE, blames himself for their death for the rest of his life. you dont have to be a billionaire to relate to that.

tony's problem: he's an alcoholic arrogant billionaire who feels like he he isnt meeting his fathers standards and is sad that the girl he likes doesnt like him, awe how sad.
ok lets see, who can relate with the alcoholism trait? not children, who are the one's which this comic should be applying to. oh yes assholes who drink. next!

who can relate to the part where the girl he likes doesnt like him? well, i'll give him that much, most guys who read the comics, cant get girls. common ground.

who can relate to the part where he feels like he isnt meeting his father's standards? mostly rich kids. poor parents work hard and they usually only want one thing from their children, to go to school. rich parents on the other hand are always putting pressure on their kids. they have to go the best schools or else. also, they have to become doctors and lawyers. you get the point.

ok lastly, who cant relate to the whole, rich billionaire whose an arrogant and alcoholic man. well, i can tell you this, 99% of Americans dont relate to that. only 1% of Americans relate to that. i hope you're smart get my reference, 99% and the 1%. lol
EdgyOutsider
EdgyOutsider - 3/1/2012, 1:02 PM
If you're smart you'd take my lead and be straight edge
Alexandre
Alexandre - 3/1/2012, 1:25 PM
listen man, i get it, ur 16. it must be really hard to understand, but try to get this at least. opinions dont beat out opinions.

i dont agree with yours, but i respect it.
you on the other hand, cant seem to do the same. you disagree with our opinions and then you offend them. adding more to the fact that ur 16 and have a lot more to learn.

so just stay quiet, stay in school and read or something.
theblackmamba
theblackmamba - 3/1/2012, 2:37 PM
@Alexandre Hey I collect comics and the get the girl. Just sayin. lol
WildCard
WildCard - 3/1/2012, 3:44 PM
Based on your comments and name, it's easy to tell you prefer Marvel to DC. Hell, you even say it yourself by saying you don't know why there are even DC fans to begin with. I don't necessarily know where I'm going with this, nor do I know what I'm trying to say. But I just want to point out that as an opinion of someone who obviously prefers Marvel over DC, a comic book reality with more unrealistic characters in relation to the topic at hand (despite the character flaws you say people can relate to), I find it pretty interesting that you consider the absence of unrealistic characters, like Killer Croc, Poison Ivy or Mr. Freeze, as the downside to Nolan's reign as director.

Also, do you think that maybe, just maybe, the reason it drags (for you) is because you have a crappy attention span? I think it's fair to say most of the movies you mentioned rely on action more than anything, given a few exceptions here and there. And those were the very ones that kept you going through the whole thing.

Finally, I just want to say that I respect your opinion no matter what. Bash mine, for all I care. Nolanite I am not, but call me that anyways. Stay in school, kids.
EdgyOutsider
EdgyOutsider - 3/1/2012, 10:37 PM
@Everyone: I'm sorry for my misbehavior.

@Wildcard: I don't have a short attention span, even though it ain't a comicbook movie, Warrior was slower paced than TDK and it's one of my favorite films (with my all time being Jurassic Park), was the action in TDK good yes, and it didn't ignore the story factor of course, I just feel it dragged when trying to carry the story. Maybe I should've been more specific, it didn't drag at first, but after awhile (namely the third act) it dragged.
WildCard
WildCard - 3/2/2012, 6:57 AM
Warrior is just freaking brilliant and the slower pace, I think, is one aspect that makes it brilliant. You'd think a movie with MMA in the story would be more fast-paced and action packed. But that aspect was not able to overwhelm the character/story development because it was all beautifully distributed with an unusual pace that actually worked well.

Similarly so, I agree with LoudNoises in the sense that TDK probably feels like it's dragging in some parts because there is no action for the sake of having action, unlike other CBM films. Like Warrior, I think it is necessary, though, as much as it might drag for some. I also agree with MarVell in stating that they are especially necessary for character/story development, something that is obviously worked on more here, as opposed to the overly-used action route most CBM films tend to take.

I guess what I'm getting at is that while you might say it's dragging, I say it's necessary. The story is key here, and it surely needs to be developed when it can and whichever way it can, without destroying the whole thing with pointless action. (Like LoudNoises said, we're not 10 anymore nor do we want to be treated like 10 year-olds. Hell, I'm almost 20. Substance and depth is a must, even though I can admit I watch crappy films sometimes and end up enjoying some.) And as usual, it's a matter of opinion. For some reason, you tolerate it in Warrior but not in TDK. I like it in both simply because I love Tom Hardy and I love Batman, besides the necessity of it all. The first half could just be 'cause I'm a chick, though. :P
EdgyOutsider
EdgyOutsider - 3/19/2012, 12:12 AM
@WildCard: True and I completely see where you are getting at.
View Recorder