New JOKER: FOLIE À DEUX Posters Revealed As Todd Phillips Justifies Decision To Make The Sequel A Musical

New JOKER: FOLIE À DEUX Posters Revealed As Todd Phillips Justifies Decision To Make The Sequel A Musical

New posters for Joker: Folie à Deux have found their way online today, showcasing the twisted romance between Arthur Fleck and Lee Quinzel. Filmmaker Todd Phillips also talks about those music numbers.

By JoshWilding - Sep 27, 2024 05:09 AM EST
Filed Under: Joker

We're now just one week away from Joker: Folie à Deux arriving in theaters and, despite this being 2024's only DC movie, excitement seems oddly muted among comic book fans. 

There are those who feel Joker is a movie that should have been left well alone, while others find the prospect of a musical just too off-putting. Warner Bros. has largely kept that out of the sequel's marketing campaign but it's no secret that Joaquin Phoenix and Lady Gaga will be busting out some tunes together. 

Talking to Entertainment Weekly, Joker: Folie à Deux director Todd Phillips justified the decision to make this sequel a musical after the grounded nature of the 2019 movie. 

"[Arthur] had issues. Clearly. But, there’s a light, a beauty, and a romance inside of him," the filmmaker explained. "It was something Joaquin and I talked about early on; yes, he’s out of step with the world. However, there’s a romance inside of him, and there’s music inside of him."

"What happens when a guy who hears music inside his head finds love for the first time in his life? Maybe the music that he hears inside his head starts coming out," he continued. "Why wouldn’t that music come out when he meets somebody who gives him the time of day? His biggest issue in the first movie, outside of childhood trauma, was a severe lack of love."

Phillips added, "After the first Joker, Joaquin and I were really sad. Like, really sad. We didn’t want it to end. Not only because we like working together, but because we didn’t want to leave Arthur. We loved Arthur and became attached to that character. Simply put, it was to spend more time with Arthur."

We'll see how things pan out for this one but with 63% on Rotten Tomatoes, the movie is only 6% behind Joker with many more reviews yet to be counted.

Check out some new posters for Joker: Folie à Deux in the X posts below.

Joker: Folie À Deux finds Arthur Fleck institutionalized at Arkham awaiting trial for his crimes as Joker. While struggling with his dual identity, Arthur not only stumbles upon true love, but also finds the music that's always been inside him.

The sequel stars Joaquin Phoenix once again in his Oscar-winning dual role as Arthur Fleck/Joker, opposite Oscar-winner Lady Gaga (A Star Is Born). The movie also features Oscar nominees Brendan Gleeson (The Banshees of Inisherin) and Catherine Keener (Get Out), alongside Zazie Beetz, reprising her role from Joker.

Phillips, who was nominated for Oscars for directing, writing and producing Joker, directed Joker: Folie À Deux from a screenplay by fellow Oscar nominee Scott Silver & Phillips, based on characters from DC. This follow-up was produced by Phillips, Oscar nominee Emma Tillinger Koskoff and Joseph Garner. Lady Gaga served as music consultant.

Joker: Folie À Deux arrives in theaters on October 4.

JOKER: FOLIE À DEUX Opens Even Lower Than MORBIUS With A Laughable $37.8 Million Weekend
Related:

JOKER: FOLIE À DEUX Opens Even Lower Than MORBIUS With A Laughable $37.8 Million Weekend

JOKER: FOLIE À DEUX - 6 Reasons The Sequel Flopped (And Todd Phillips' Biggest Mistakes)
Recommended For You:

JOKER: FOLIE À DEUX - 6 Reasons The Sequel Flopped (And Todd Phillips' Biggest Mistakes)

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

TrentCrimm
TrentCrimm - 9/27/2024, 5:50 AM
Joker was good, but I never understood the decision to make it a DC movie focusing on the Joker, when you keep only the character names and throw everything else out the window, for me it makes me ask why bother using the IP in the first place, outside of just using the name to put butts in seats.
TheStranger
TheStranger - 9/27/2024, 6:51 AM
@TrentCrimm - Exactly; it has nothing to do with the character or Batman. It's just a vanity project for actors. It would've been a far better movie if they had made the guy an Arkham Patient that's inspired by the real joker and has a breakdown and starts thinking he is the Joker and starts living out his fantasy. Even gets his own Harley. Copycats happen all the time in the world of crime.
Forthas
Forthas - 9/27/2024, 6:48 AM
So in other words Todd Phillis used the shell of the Joker to trick comic book fans into seeing the film but in fact he was imagining a whole character that had nothing to do with the comic book other than they dressed alike and the Wayne family. This is stupidity at its highest. When Warner Brothers asks itself why it's stock price is so low...I think I know the reason.
satanicbatman
satanicbatman - 9/27/2024, 9:14 AM
@Forthas - Is the “stupidity at its highest” the part where you were tricked into watching a good movie, lol?
Forthas
Forthas - 9/27/2024, 9:30 AM
@satanicbatman - Uhh...Yes!?!?

If you trick people then they will have no trust in you going forward therefore no one is interested in the follow up film...a film with a reported $200 million dollar budget. You have just set yourself up to lose money.
TrentCrimm
TrentCrimm - 9/27/2024, 9:54 AM
@Forthas -

I don't like the decision either but they didn't really trick anyone, they were very open from the beginning that this wouldnt follow any kind of source material, all of the marketing seemed very clear what the movie would be going into it.
Forthas
Forthas - 9/27/2024, 11:20 AM
@TrentCrimm - I disagree. What then is the point of casting and highlighting Thomas Wayne and trying to link him to the Joker. Then having a cameo of a young Bruce Wayne. None of those things add to the film other than to try to connect it to the comic book Joker.
TrentCrimm
TrentCrimm - 9/27/2024, 1:48 PM
@Forthas -

You're misunderstanding what I said, I was replying to you saying they were trying to trick people. Nobody was tricked, everyone knew going into the movie that it wouldn't have anything to do with the source material, that shouldn't have been a surprise when you saw the movie, we were told and shown over and over that this wouldn't follow the source material, even with the inclusion of Thomas and Bruce, they were very open about there being no Batman or anything of the sort. If the trailers leaned into the Wayne's and Bruce, and showed hints of a Batman or something, that would be tricking people, but they literally told us from the beginning that these characters would be in the movie, but not to expect anything resembling the source material.

If you went in feeling tricked then that's more to do with your own confusion.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 9/27/2024, 1:51 PM
@satanicbatman - I was tricked into seeing a bad movie.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 9/27/2024, 7:28 AM
I find it funny that it seems like now people are clueing into Phillips just using the Joker IP to help sell his original film even though he more or less admitted to it when the first film came out.

Anyway Arthur having music in him was indeed something we saw in the first one like him dancing with his mom , after he killed those 3 guys or of course down the stairs in full costume…

User Comment Image

The latter 2 especially felt like him almost getting into character or expressing that side of himself , like almost letting his true self out so this seems like them really focusing in on that idea (especially if the movie deals with Arthur struggling with his identity).
satanicbatman
satanicbatman - 9/27/2024, 9:13 AM
Everyone hating on this movie (that’s not even out yet, lol) is a FAKE FAN that never watched BTAS. The Joker sang in that, A LOT. And also, I don’t understand pushback for trying to make something different with an IP. Personally, I’m board to death with the same exact 3-part storyline..Deadpool 3 was fun but the story was awful. In conclusion, I’ll quote Uncle Baby Billy and say “Quiet, nerds!”
r1g0r
r1g0r - 9/27/2024, 9:48 AM
@satanicbatman -
Well, I'm NOT hating a film I haven't seen yet.
I watched the first, and while I didn't enjoy it, it is a good film.

But, are you saying that I'm not a real Batman fan because I've never seen BTAS?

Like almost all generalizations, that's a poorly phrased statement that's inherently false.

I'll guarantee that I've been reading about Batman longer than you've been alive.

J2 being a musical is a questionable decision, unless the film asserts that it's taking place in Arthur's mind.

I'll watch it when it's available for free, and I suspect I'll have the same takeaway as with the first.

And learn to spell before trying to school other people.
Otherwise you look foolish to those who can spell correctly.

And before you decide to fire off some kind of witty (?) reply, I've blocked you as soon as I finish this post.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 9/27/2024, 1:54 PM
"Why wouldn’t that music come out when he meets somebody who gives him the time of day?"

So what about Zazie Beetz?

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder