Rumor: Poison Ivy Series Moving Forward - And It Will Be Part Of Matt Reeves' BatVerse

Rumor: Poison Ivy Series Moving Forward - And It Will Be Part Of Matt Reeves' BatVerse

It seems the Poison Ivy series we heard about last month is moving forward, but it will not be a part of the main DCU, and will instead be set in Matt Reeves' BatVerse...

By MarkCassidy - Jul 10, 2026 05:07 PM EST
Filed Under: The Batman 2

Last month, Jeff Sneider reported that DC Studios is developing a series focusing on Batman villain Poison Ivy, and we now have a couple of intriquing updates.

During this week's edition of The Hot Mic, Sneider said that another source has confirmed that the project is definitely moving forward, and it is expected to be set in the same universe as The Batman and The Penguin.

Does this mean that the show will feature a more grounded take on Poison Ivy, or will Matt Reeves' BatVerse introduce Metahumans? A character who has the ability to control plant life definitely would have seemed out of place in the first The Batman movie and The Penguin, but we have heard that Reeves' sequel might include more "comic booky" elements.

Even so, we can't see Poison Ivy riding a giant Venus Flytrap into battle against Robert Pattinson's Dark Knight! If this series does wind up being part of the BatVerse, a more realistic interpretation of Ivy could work. The question is, how interested would comic book fans be in seeing a Batman-related show about an evil botanist?

There is also the possibility that we could see a heroic (or at least, antiheroic) take on the character, since she is often depicted in a more ambiguous light in the modern DC Comics era.

What do you make of this? Would you be interested in a more grounded take on Poison Ivy? Drop us a comment down below.

Though plot details for The Batman - Part II are still under wraps, we have been able to piece together a few things based on casting details and comments from Reeves and others involved with the film.

Some fans have grown concerned that the sequel may rehash too many plot details from Christopher Nolan's The Dark Knight (more below), but it sounds like Reeves and co. may be cooking up something nobody will expect.

Pattinson was asked about the film during a recent interview, and while he declined to go into detail about the script, he did promise that The Batman 2 will be a "really different type of Batman movie."

"The script is so good. It's kinda crazy, because the first one was a little bit of a different type of Batman movie, and this is a really different type of Batman movie. Hopefully, people will be really pleasantly surprised by it."

The Drama star's comments have prompted theories that the sequel could play out in a single location, taking inspiration from Grant Morrison's acclaimed Arkham Asylum graphic novel.

A new take on the Caped Crusader is set to make his DCU debut in The Brave and the Bold (if not sooner).

The Batman - Part II is set to hit theaters on October 1, 2027.

About The Author:
MarkCassidy
Member Since 11/9/2008
Mark Cassidy is a writer, photographer, amateur filmmaker, and Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic from Dublin, Ireland.
The Batman 2 Set Videos Appear To Reveal That [Spoiler] Will Suffer A Serious Injury In Matt Reeves' Sequel
Related:

The Batman 2 Set Videos Appear To Reveal That [Spoiler] Will Suffer A Serious Injury In Matt Reeves' Sequel

UPDATE: The Batman 2 Set Videos May Hint At Brian Tyree Henry's Role; Possible [Spoiler] Confirmation
Recommended For You:

UPDATE: The Batman 2 Set Videos May Hint At Brian Tyree Henry's Role; Possible [Spoiler] Confirmation

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/10/2026, 5:03 PM
This show will be one of two things

1. Either the typical James Gunn slop parody
2. A Matt Reeves special where it's overly dark to the point where I can't see anything, self serious to the point of parody, and an abomination of an adaptation to the point the character is Ivy in name only.

Reboot the MCU and DCU
bobevanz
bobevanz - 7/10/2026, 5:15 PM
@FireGunn - The Penguin was 5 stars. You're the leader of this clown circus. You think you're so witty and clever lmao
InfinitePunches
InfinitePunches - 7/10/2026, 5:27 PM
@FireGunn - The Penguin is the best live-action show DC has ever put out, fam. I'd personally love to see a serious take on Ivy, akin to Arkham maybe.
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/10/2026, 5:31 PM
@bobevanz - Matt Reeves didn't make the Penguin dork
roboticJohnson
roboticJohnson - 7/10/2026, 5:31 PM
@FireGunn - just out of curiosity, what are your favourite comic book movies or TV shows?
UltimaRex
UltimaRex - 7/10/2026, 5:43 PM
@roboticJohnson - look at his avatar.
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/10/2026, 7:04 PM
@roboticJohnson - It's getting tiring being asked this question lmao

TDK
Watchmen
Spider-Man 2
Mask of the Phantasm
ZSJL
Daredevil
BTAS
dragon316
dragon316 - 7/10/2026, 8:49 PM
@FireGunn - sloppy joe slop slo psloppy joe kids like them extra sloppy
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 7/10/2026, 9:23 PM
@FireGunn - What are you talking about? Reeves wasn't the showrunner, but he was absolutely heavily creatively involved with the Penguin.
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/10/2026, 11:54 PM
@Patient2670 - No he wasn't
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 7/11/2026, 12:27 AM
@FireGunn - Out of curiosity, how do you come to this conclusion?
roboticJohnson
roboticJohnson - 7/11/2026, 2:11 AM
@FireGunn - and what are your favourite comics?
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/11/2026, 3:38 AM
@roboticJohnson -

Watchmen
The Walking Dead
Saga
The Sandman
V for Vendetta
One Piece (I know this is manga but I just had to put this)
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/11/2026, 3:40 AM
@Patient2670 - Can you show me a single episode that Reeves wrote or directed? If not, can you tell me any creative choices he made with the series? There is no proof that he was "heavily involved". Being an executive producer doesn't really mean anything other than him hiring talent.
roboticJohnson
roboticJohnson - 7/11/2026, 4:00 AM
@FireGunn - one piece deserves that spot, it is really good. Have yet to read the walking dead, and I'm waiting for saga to end before picking it up
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 7/11/2026, 11:48 AM
@FireGunn - I can ask you the same thing; Can you show me any proof that he was NOT involved?

Based on your generalization, you seem to know little about the position of executive producer. Sure, sometimes, the title is ceremonial (for instance when given to the star of a franchise, in order to sell or promote the project), however, it's also given for several other hands-on, practical reasons.

He did not Write or direct any particular episodes. But neither did any of the grips or electricians, and you would say they were involved. right? Matt Reeves was however heavily involved in the developement of the story, and as you said yourself, hiring, not only the Talent (which includes not only cast, but Production designer, DP, the writers, and department heads), but also the crew to ensure continuity with his movies and the world he was building which absolutely counts as involvement. It was in fact off the strength of his movie's performance that the series came to be, in the first place. So, really, every creative choice in the show was due to him. I don't expect you to take my word for it, but it's true. Also, after every episoode, there were the "making of" segments, and he was in every one of them, discussing his part. I don't really assume you'd believe your own eyes either, but it is what it is.
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 7/11/2026, 11:51 AM
@roboticJohnson - Saga is Great. If you don't want to wait, the first arc is available in 9 collected volumes. After that it starts another story, so you can break it down that way.
SpiderParker
SpiderParker - 7/12/2026, 10:09 AM
@FireGunn - Colin Farrell said this about Part II and The Penguin back in 2022:

“Matt's up to his bollocks, you know, hovering over the keyboard and just planning the story because he's just so meticulous, he's so, Matt Reeves is so obsessive about what he does, but he's all over The Penguin as well. I mean, he's not gonna direct it but he's all over the structure of the scripts and who's gonna direct them. And so, it's exciting."
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/12/2026, 10:17 AM
@Patient2670 - So you don't have any proof? Thanks
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/12/2026, 10:19 AM
@SpiderParker - Nothing in this quote confirms that he was involved in creative storytelling choices
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 7/12/2026, 11:23 AM
@FireGunn - LOL! I offered plenty of proof. But as I expected (and even said) I didn't think you would believe either me, or your own eyes, because it doesn't suit your narrative. That's fine. It's totally on brand for you.

You still haven't answered either of my questions - not that you likely would or could (again, totally on brand). But just to jog your memory:

"Out of curiosity, how do you come to this conclusion?"

"Can you show me any proof that he was NOT involved?"

Reboot FireGunn!
SpiderParker
SpiderParker - 7/12/2026, 11:23 AM
@FireGunn - The series was already in development before the movie even came out. Reeves initially wanted to do Penguin’s rise to power in Part II. Shifting that arc from the sequel to The Penguin, along with how deeply involved he already was on the show, is the exact reason Part II has taken so long to develop.

I would even speculate that Zaslav, and perhaps even Gunn, probably wanted The Batman to be folded into the DCU and must have tried to force his hand. He must have given them the finger by refusing to compromise which probably led him to give up on Clayface (and Arkham) for his own universe.

He is an obsessive perfectionist who won’t let anyone mess with his vision and then cry about it later like Ayer or Snyder. But honestly, he understands the core of the character much better than even Nolan did. The mere fact that the development started before The Batman even came out, expanding from opening Act in Part II to having a full series, and having the reputation for being a control freak, Reeves was obviously very much involved.
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/12/2026, 11:39 AM
@Patient2670 - No sources, no links, no articles, no anything. There was no proof. I came to this conclusion through common sense. He didn't direct or write any episodes and there is no proof he was involved in any real creative decision making. What you're doing is deflecting and shifting the burden of proof. You've yet to prove anything. Also, lack of disproof is not itself evidence that your claim is true.
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/12/2026, 11:42 AM
@SpiderParker - This is still not proof that he had creative involvement within the story. You guys are struggling big time.

There is a difference between "being involved" and saying that he made The Penguin. He did not make the Penguin, which was what my original statement said. He was an executive producer who hired people and oversaw production. That's it. Lauren LeFranc was the showrunner and multiple others were directors and writers.
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 7/12/2026, 12:23 PM
@FireGunn - LOL!! poor guy, I'm not shifting anything. I cited HBOmax as a source - on camera interviews with not only him, but everyone else on the show talking about him and his involvement. There were a million articles on this very site, so you don't have to look all that hard. What you're describing as your "Common Sense", is actually nothing more than pathetic, beligerant denial - which definitely seems to be common for you.

Even if I came here and told you that I've known Matt for over 25 years and saw, first hand his involvement... You wouldn't believe it.

Your lack of faith is inconsequential.
SpiderParker
SpiderParker - 7/12/2026, 12:57 PM
@FireGunn - Man, this is the reason you always end up getting owned by me. You never try to understand when I'm casually informing and correcting your ignorance.

He is an Executive Producer on a TV series that is direct spin-off of his movie, meaning it couldn't exist without him. In TV, top-tier EPs hold the ultimate creative control and supervision. He literally hired the director and the showrunner. The show sits between two of his films so whatever happens would have to be approved, supervised and planned (the main layout at least) by him. So, he absolutely made The Penguin.

But, like always, I'll entertain you and show you exactly how wrong and hypocritical you are being. (Remember our last talk? I said "in this instance" for a reason.)

If this is Reeves' Batverse and he is the main architect, he is creatively occupying the exact same position in this pocket universe as Gunn does in the DCU. Creatively, he is the James Gunn of the Batverse. And if you are able to keep up with me without pulling some weird logic to argue against that just to save face, my next question should be eye-opening for you. But you already know where I'm going with this and already pulled out your Book of Excuses and Bad Arguments for a Hypocrite.

If Gunn is to be blamed (or praised, not that you will) for every creative decision for Creature Commandos, Supergirl, Lanterns and Clayface, why is Reeves not getting that exact same credit for what happens in his universe?
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/12/2026, 1:01 PM
@SpiderParker - Because The Penguin isn't his show and he wasn't involved in it. Gunn has been involved in every single DCU project so far. False equivalence.
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/12/2026, 1:02 PM
@FireGunn - *He wasn't heavily involved in it. He had no real creative process. Supervising, hiring, and approving of stuff as long as it doesn't interfere with your films is not "creating" anything.
SpiderParker
SpiderParker - 7/12/2026, 1:37 PM
@FireGunn - User Comment Image
Yup, pretty much what I expected from you. Somehow Gunn is involved in everything even though you have no "proof" of it, but the same doesn't apply to Reeves. You just need all of them to be bad because you only know how to whine.
User Comment Image
User Comment Image

Colin Farrell: "Knowing that he was in our corner and that he was a very active participant in the whole process, from the inception of the storyline to the execution of the story on film, in camera, was probably the greatest source of confidence that I had going into the show, even before the first episode. Just the knowledge that Matt Reeves was going to be overseeing all this, and while he wasn't going to be directing any of the episodes, he was going to have a real aggressive hand in the pie, you know?"

User Comment Image
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/12/2026, 2:12 PM
@SpiderParker - Name a single DCU project that's out right now that Gunn wasn't involved in and I'll prove you wrong. You can't prove that Reeves was heavily involved in the Penguin
SpiderParker
SpiderParker - 7/13/2026, 1:58 PM
@FireGunn - How about you prove Reeves wasn't heavily involved? Why are you trying to shift the burden of proof onto me for an accusation you made? You’re the one making the claim, so it's your job to back it up. BTW, I have only seen one DCU project, Superman, and I have zero interest in the others, nor do I plan on watching them anytime soon. I never said Gunn wasn't involved. I merely exposed your hypocrisy. In fact, I won't even pretend to know his exact level of involvement.

But common sense says that he couldn't be deeply involved with at least half of them, since his Superman movie and Peacemaker S2 both just came out just last year. With Lanterns and Clayface also coming out soon, it's impossible for 6 projects to be released within 2years and have every single one heavily influenced and controlled by Gunn.

And, it's more absurd to think that James Gunn can mastermind 6 projects in 2 years time period (and somehow pull off mostly positive reviews for the majority, even thinking that's a possibility is high praise coming from you), but Reeves somehow can't be heavily involved in a single project over what looks like forever. You seem to think you have much better insight than Colin Farrell, who literally said: "He was a very active participant in the whole process, from the inception of the storyline to the execution of the story on film, in camera."



Have a nice cope.
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/13/2026, 2:34 PM
@SpiderParker - I don't care anymore chief
Batmangina
Batmangina - 7/10/2026, 5:04 PM
User Comment Image

User Comment Image

User Comment Image
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 7/11/2026, 12:14 AM
@Batmangina - Basically, but Reeves fans are quickly become indistinguishable from Snyder and or Nolan fans...so I got nothing to say.

User Comment Image
Batmangina
Batmangina - 7/11/2026, 7:58 AM
@TheRevelation - User Comment Image

Repian
Repian - 7/10/2026, 5:13 PM
It should be about a group of bioterrorists planning an attack. They are led by Dr. Pamela Isley, who has engineered a virus known as Fall.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 7/10/2026, 6:05 PM
@Repian - I feel that idea works better if someone else is the protagonist.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 7/10/2026, 5:15 PM
I'd watch it. Of course Sneider is another chuckle [frick] so I'll wait for confirmation from an actual source
OrgasmicPotatoe
OrgasmicPotatoe - 7/10/2026, 5:23 PM
A more fantastical element in Reeves' grounded take ? I like it. Either her or Freeze, I'd love to see his take on them.
spr0cks
spr0cks - 7/10/2026, 5:27 PM
Obligatory troll for CBM comments section:

It would be really funny if this turned out to be a bigger hit on streaming than the Gunnverse Lanterns or .... {**insert-other-Gunn/DCU-streaming-show-here**}
1 2 3

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder