Why Do We Care That Peter Parker Died?

Why Do We Care That Peter Parker Died?

Why did the death of Peter Parker create more outrage than the death of any other comic book superhero ever?

Editorial Opinion
By Auntievenom - Feb 11, 2013 06:02 AM EST
Filed Under: Marvel Comics
Source: Adam Kaz (me)

By now, everyone on the planet knows that Peter Parker is dead…sort of. Even my 70-year-old father provided this insightful comment just days after Spidey passed: “So, I hear that spider-guy you like is dead.” Indeed. What fascinated me more than my father’s – and the rest of the world’s - knowledge of Peter Parker’s demise was the vitriol aimed at Marvel Comics, and the wallcrawler’s evil, husky murderer and most recent head writer, Dan Slott. With no shortage of death threats, boycotts, and downright disgust aimed at Mr. Slott and the path chosen by the House of Ideas, I began to wonder what got everyone’s spandex in a bunch.

The passing of our most cherished superheroes is not new to the comic book world. The likes of Superman, Batman, Aquaman (ever so briefly), Jean Grey and Bart Allen’s Flash have all bit the dust, or at least, the general public was led to believe that these iconic characters were defunct. But no death, not even those of Superman or Batman, created such a backlash from the comic reading (and non-comic reading) universe as did the death of the true Spider-Man.

I’m not saying that Superman’s death was not met with an outcry from fans. DC Comics no doubt had to manage harsh criticism, especially since this was the first time one of the industry’s biggies had died. I was young when Supes slept with the fishes, but I can recall the lack of death threats being slung at the minds behind DC. It is quite possible that had Facebook, Twitter, and the ever-expanding blogosphere been a mainstay in 1992, giving every one of us nerds, dorks, and weirdos a direct line to the creators of our favorite comics, the outrage from death of Krypton’s last son may have been more palpable and easily communicable. This is a fair argument but I believe an incorrect one.

Also, a complaint is that this is purely a money grab. There is no significance or in-depth meaning to the death of Spider-Man. Well, let us be honest. Comic books are a money grab. Cross-overs (I'll admit there are a bit too many), major events, deaths, characters coming back to life, etc. It goes on and on. Every issue is trying to think of a way to have you buy the next issue. While comics are a passion, an art, they also must make money. Fanboy love alone cannot keep an industry afloat.

What set waves of downright lunacy crashing on the shores of Marvel’s web presence was not simply the advent of the Internet. Nor was it the hatred that a decent percentage of Spider-Man fans had manifested towards Dan Slott, who unjustly got a bum rap for his run on Spider-Man. To digress for one moment, while not every storyline was a homerun, the majority of Slott’s Spidey tales were very well-written, entertaining, creative, and captured the comedic and hapless essence of Spider-Man. Slott injected a youthfulness and a freshness into Spider-Man. He also made common sense decisions for Spider-Man that left fanboys in a tizzy.

During his run, Slott donned Spider-Man with various new costumes. Whether it was a costume that was tailored to combat each one of his notable villains, or to protect him while he lacked his spider-sense, Slott took a realistic approach to a superhero that was constantly getting smacked around by villains (yes, I understand the absurdity of arguing for rationality about a man with spider powers). When most people were outraged when Parker left the world of freelance photography to work in a science lab, I slapped my balding head and yelled, “Of course!” If you are a science wiz, why in the world would you waste your time selling two pictures of Spider-Man a week for $400 when you can get a full time job pursuing your passion (and what you happen to be incredible at). Fanboys are not satisfied unless they have something to hate, to prove that they are the purists, the fans from the inception of all things comics. I know. I’m one of them. But I could never justify having anger at Slott for making such obvious decisions.

With anger already barreling down the tracks like the train at the end of Back to the Future III, it was only natural that heads exploded when word came that Spider-Man was going the way of the dodo bird. But was this anger justified? Was it based on Parker creating new costumes or getting a new job? No. People may scoff at this next comment, but let it resonate before you throw up your hands and declare me insane. The reason why the world had such a visceral reaction to Peter Parker’s death was that we are Peter Parker.

Okay. I’m out of my mind. But let me lay the foundation for this comment. Let us all look at the deaths of the big three. First is Superman. He died at the hands of Doomsday in 1993. An epic battle took place which practically leveled Metropolis and left Superman a pathetic, mangled, bloody mess stamped into the concrete. Even the cover of his comic book had Lois Lane holding him like a baby, screaming like an eight-year-old at a Justin Bieber concert. So, why were there no death threats to Dan Jurgens, the writer who beat Kal-El to a pulp? We are not Superman.

Like Superman, we know what it feels like to be different from everyone else, however, no one (that I am aware of) truly is their own species walking among humans. No one that I’ve met throughout my years was put into a space capsule by their soon to be deceased parents and rocketed millions of light years from a dying planet and tasked with the responsibility of saving us idiots from destroying each other. If anything, Superman is better than we are. He is what we aspire to be, and hence, he was never us. He was always noble, fair, doing what was right, even at the risk of his own life. People may say that Clark Kent was like the average man, but as anyone who watched Kill Bill knows, Clark Kent was the fake persona. “When Superman wakes up in the morning, he is Superman. His alter ego is Clark Kent.”

What about Bruce Wayne? He met his maker in 2008 (or so we thought) at the hands of writer, Grant Morrison. He’s human. He lost his parents. Many people can relate to that. But that is where it ends. Bruce Wayne is a playboy billionaire who has a servant, a secret underground cave filled with custom-made vehicles and weapons. He also has a somewhat disturbing policy of recruiting adolescents and convincing them to risk their lives against some of the most diabolical villains ever created.

Which leaves Peter Parker. As Spider-Man, Parker has received little to no credit for the countless times he saved the world. As Parker, he’s been verbally abused, picked on, bullied, mocked, made to feel like an outcast. He typically has the worst luck and even when he tries his hardest, he doesn’t always succeed. In high school, he was the nerd. He had no friends (save Harry) and no one appreciated him. At the Daily Bugle, he is constantly verbally abused by his employer. We all know these feelings. We all have experienced them. And for the first time, when we were young, we read about someone who knew exactly how we felt. Whether you are a jock, a real estate broker, or one of the greatest scientific minds, at one point you were young and even if only for a moment, felt unsure about yourself, that everyone was against you.

This is why we always root for Parker and for Spider-Man. For once, we want to see one of our own finally get the recognition and glory he deserved. So when news came that he was going to be unceremoniously killed by an already divisive writer, it made perfect sense that outrage would ensue. Even worse, no one would even know that he died. There would be no funeral, no parades, no speeches.

Obviously, we all know that Parker will once again take over his own body. It is inevitable. We can all guess as to how or when, but we all know it will happen. And when Parker finally figures out the way to take over his own body again, no one will congratulate him. No one will pat him on the back, or welcome him back and profess how much they missed him. I think some of us can connect to that as well.

DAZZLER Variant Covers Put A Dazzling Disco Spin On The Marvel Universe's Mightiest Heroes
Related:

DAZZLER Variant Covers Put A Dazzling Disco Spin On The Marvel Universe's Mightiest Heroes

MYSTIQUE Goes To Deadly Lengths To Protect What's Hers In A New Solo Series
Recommended For You:

MYSTIQUE Goes To Deadly Lengths To Protect What's Hers In A New Solo Series

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Odin
Odin - 2/11/2013, 10:06 AM
I agree with LEVITIKUZ, death doesn't mean anything in main continuity comics nowadays. Evryone just keeps poping up from death like in some Dragonball Z(don't get me wrong, I like DB/Z). The only clever "return" that recently happend was Jean Grey(whos been awankend from death at least five times) who didn't actually rise from death, but came back from past as a younger version of herself, who then almost immediately got all the memories from her previous versions. I too wish that they would stop killing off the main characters all the time, like Spiderman whos just died in the ultimate universe and now they (kind of)killed him in 616 as well, too soon.
Odin
Odin - 2/11/2013, 10:12 AM
It's like they don't want to anymore carry the responsibility from the plot-desicions that they make. Like Barbara Gordon, who leanrd to walk again after 23 years, the legendary Killing Joke doesn't feel so dramatic anymore.
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 2/11/2013, 10:37 AM
If I wasnt on this site everyday, I'd have never known about Spider-man's "death". So yeah, I dont know why you wrote this as a response. Cap and Superman were all over the news, Peter revealing his identity publicly was in the papers, but THIS never made it out of the comics.
Auntievenom
Auntievenom - 2/11/2013, 10:55 AM
Tainted,

I hear ya but spideys death was all over the news and in newspapers. And a major point of the article was that Dan Slott received lots of death threats over this. That never happened (at least with the frequency) with Supes and Bats.
tonytony
tonytony - 2/11/2013, 11:03 AM
they kill peter parker and get the villain to bang his girlfriend to top it off, thats like killing the man and jumping on his grave. The writer then spends his time throwing shots at the character he so desperately wants to emulate through spiderman, batman!

To me it slaps spidey fans in the face.
GuardianDevil
GuardianDevil - 2/11/2013, 1:49 PM
They'll bring him back...they almost always do unless the character was killed because he/she wasn't very popular and needed to be gone for the time being (Sentry)...
bazinga85
bazinga85 - 2/11/2013, 2:53 PM
I'm upset because Peter went out like a bitch, and he was replaced by a villain!! Sure, he'll be back, but in the meantime I don't want to read about doc ock and his "redemption" because he doesn't deserve redemption, he's pure evil. When batman died, nightwing took his place, which was fine because nightwing is worthy of the title. Doc ock isn't and this was just a shitty money-grabbing stunt.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 2/11/2013, 3:15 PM
No way man, Superman's death earned the writers just as much hate and just as many death threats.

Superman and Spidey have garnered the most hate from their deaths. Cap was pretty high up there as well.
xcrementus
xcrementus - 2/11/2013, 5:00 PM
just to note something, high sales of Batman did immediately follow an "event", the new 52 relaunch. big events like this happen because a) they get attention and b) they can be used as continuity milestones.

the industry needs peaks and valleys to survive,especially now when sales generally are low.
jarel93
jarel93 - 2/12/2013, 7:23 AM
This is a great article. Read every bit of it and loved it.
The only problem I see, though, is that you left out a HUGE factor in the negative response: someone who stands against everything Peter Parker fights for became Spider-Man after Peter died. The fact that Doctor Otto Octavius took the reins from the most-relatable character to ever grace our reading in a comic book was upsetting to the masses. It left us questioning whether Marvel really even understood who Spider-Man was and is.
Auntievenom
Auntievenom - 2/12/2013, 10:25 AM
Jarel93,

I agree that a lot of the outrage was from Doc Ock taking over his body. I think the anger first started though as soon as people knew he was dying and before anyone could confirm that Doc Ock was taking over his body. There were so many rumors before we knew it was Doc Ock.

But I definitely agree that most people were not thrilled with how Slott handled the death and to an extent, I don't think his death was the most well-written issue of Spidey. But also, all the anger, whether its from Doc Ock taking over his body, or it just wasn't written well, etc. stems from everyone's connection to Peter. No one would care as much about his death or how it was handled if he wasn't such an incredibly relatable character that people grew up with and rooted for.

I definitely think some of the comments and criticisms of the article have validity. But hey, to each his own.
AmazingFantasy
AmazingFantasy - 2/12/2013, 9:12 PM
My idea:

Miguel spots out Spock and fights him. He proves he is smarter, stronger and better than Superior, Otto being a douche still attacks him in a huge battle until he loses and Miguel proves him out to the Avengers/X-Men which then they revert Otto back to Otto and Peter back to his own Body as Spider-Man. Then Miguel goes back to his time.

Otto is dead in HIS body.
View Recorder