EDITORIAL: How The DC Extended Universe Should Have Made Its Movie Slate

EDITORIAL: How The DC Extended Universe Should Have Made Its Movie Slate

DC has had a tough time getting consistent quality on film recently. Sure, Wonder Woman was good, but what about Batman V Superman? Suicide Squad? Here's how I would've planned DC's movies.

Editorial Opinion
By KWilly - Aug 04, 2018 04:08 PM EST
Filed Under: DC Studios
Think about it. Man of Steel came out in 2013, so Warner Bros has had plenty of time to establish their characters and set up a coherent universe. Yet, what have they given us? A messy Batman v Superman, an even worse Suicide Squad, and a decent but not great Justice League. Only Wonder Woman has been the true gem so far in the DCEU, and even that wasn't exactly incredible.

The point is, it feels like Warner Bros did not have a great feel of direction while making this blueprint. Instead of making us care for these characters, they just kind of throw stuff at the wall and sees what sticks. However, if I personally had the chance to rewind time, and do this movie slate all over again... Here's how it would go. 


2013- Man Of Steel



So here, there obviously doesn't need to be a change. DC made the right move starting their cinematic universe with The Last Son of Krypton. Man of Steel gained mixed reviews across the board, so I wouldn't consider this a bad film at all. Room for improvement? Of course. Although, it was just a launching pad for what was to come, so it was good enough.

Now that Superman is in the books, DC should have went straight into introducing their next biggest hero of all time. And that's...


2014- The Batman 



The Dark Knight himself, deserves all the attention and respect possible. So squeezing him in Batman v Superman wasn't the best idea. You have to distribute a huge character like this by himself, before he starts teaming up with anyone. Sure, it's quite close after The Dark Knight Rises, which came out in 2012. But the general audience isn't dumb. If they see a new actor playing Batman with a different setting, it's obviously a reboot.

Currently, The Batman won't be getting a film until at least 2020. Seems ridiculous for one of your biggest money makers to be put on the back burner, instead of front and center. Bottom line, DC should have displayed Batman way sooner than they did. That way, his transition into Batman v Superman would make sense and feel natural.


2015- Batman v Superman, Wonder Woman



I don't mind Wonder Woman being introduced through Batman v Superman. Just make sure you give her a solo film right after. At this point, three years would have passed by. And already, we would have thoroughly established DC's Trinity one by one. Lex Luthor could still be the villain (although played by another actor not named Jesse Eisenberg), Doomsday could still be the final battle piece, and Wonder Woman could still have her origin story later that year. But now that we got these three out the way, things are going to get real interesting. 

2016- The Flash, Man of Steel 2



It still amazes me The Flash hasn't had his own film yet. There's no telling when he will ever have one either, considering his upcoming solo movie is still a mystery. It's even worse that Superman has still never got his sequel yet. Again, there's no telling when that will happen either. This is why both of these tasks should have been completed in 2016. No Suicide Squad, just forget about that project all together. Instead, give some story and development to the fastest man alive. It doesn't have to be an origin story, but it must be about the Flash being a rookie hero.

So for Man of Steel 2, it's the same thing. Give Superman more development, so his inclusion in Justice League is satisfying. Also, killing him off at the end of Batman v Superman was a mistake. So just pretend like that never happened here. 


2017- Justice League, The Batman 2



Here's what we've all been waiting for. The big teamup. The get together of the century. In Justice League, you would have to introduce Aquaman and Cyborg. Two new characters the audience has never seen before. And that's okay, because we already know four members very well at this point. All Justice League would have to do is split the time between Aquaman and Cyborg in half, and then we have a film. Set Justice League around the early summer, and then release a Batman sequel by October or November. 

2018- Aquaman, Wonder Woman 2



The King of the Sea still deserves his own film. Just not before Justice League. DC should make the audience want more of Aquaman after his debut from Justice League, and that's exactly what they're going to get. I wouldn't make it an origin film, but I would explain this character and his backstory in the beginning. After that exposition is over, just fast forward to the present day where he's already fought with the Justice League once. Wonder Woman should also be getting a sequel by this time as well. Can't forget about her. 

2019- Shazam, The Flash 2



If you want to save the world, say the magic word. God, I love that tagline from the trailer. Anyway, Shazam being in the DCEU is definitely a good move, so nothing changes on that end. However, he shouldn't be the only DC hero gracing the screen that year. The Flash would be due for a sequel around this time.

Have it be a duo movie, where The Flash teams up with Cyborg. That way, since Cyborg may not get his once promised solo movie, he still gets to share the limelight with The Flash. There could be a potential friendship between the two "accidents".


2020- Green Lantern Corps, Justice League 2



The last time Green Lantern was on the big screen, it didn't go so well. Which means Green Lantern is up for some major redemption. Instead of simply focusing on Hal Jordan, Green Lantern Corps would give the chance to focus on other Lantern members as well. In other words, it's a cop movie in space.

Make that film good, and then you could easily slide Hal Jordan into the next Justice Legaue movie. The audience at this point would know each Justice League member very well, and would be in open arms for newbies like Shazam and Green Lantern. After this, DC would only then have the flexibility to do whatever they wanted.

Overall, this is my personal blueprint for the DCEU. These are all characters that should have proper guidance through film. So far in reality, they haven't done that well. Some say DC should do their own thing, and not follow the Marvel formula. However, it's the Marvel formula that is proven success. If I was DC, I'd learn from the best and try to make it better. Hopefully, the future for these DCEU films becomes bright down the road. 


What Entries In The Upcoming DCU Could End Up Being Rated R?
Related:

What Entries In The Upcoming DCU Could End Up Being Rated R?

DC Studios Boss James Gunn Talks Comic Accuracy And Addresses Confusion About PEACEMAKER Being DCU Canon
Recommended For You:

DC Studios Boss James Gunn Talks Comic Accuracy And Addresses Confusion About PEACEMAKER Being DCU Canon

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4
Nebula
Nebula - 8/4/2018, 6:51 PM
KWilly
KWilly - 8/4/2018, 7:05 PM
@Nebula -
RocknRolla
RocknRolla - 8/4/2018, 10:33 PM
@Nebula - perfectly put. I'm so tired of seeing DC anything
DR3D
DR3D - 8/5/2018, 6:31 AM
How The DC Extended Universe Should Have Made Its Movie Slate...

Without Snyder, is the correct answer.
Buckster10
Buckster10 - 8/5/2018, 7:43 AM
@KWilly - Here's what DC does not get. You have to establish the characters first in their own movie that is true to the essence of that character. I love Cavil's Superman but his film was too dark overall (and I'm not talking about killing Zod). Papa Kent would NEVER tell Clarke to let a bus full of kids die. EVER. For all of JL's problems (awful villain, pacing and CG, to name a few), his brighter take on Superman (despite the bad CG lip) was my favorite part. But all of the other characters should have been introduced in their own movies first. Show don't tell comes to mind. I want to see Batman in his world battling HIS villains (Joker, Bane, Freeze, Scarecrow, etc) before he's teamed up with other heroes. With Marvel, we see and experience the history of our favorite heroes. We see Cap fight Red Skull first. We see Thor's world and WATCH him fight Loki. We experience Tony's journey into Iron Man. That way, when they come together and meet to form the Avengers, it feels special. With DC we are being TOLD the history of the characters and expected to accept them simply because we know their names. If I followed Barry's journey to become the Flash first (in a quality movie) it would have meant so much more when he joined Batman and the other heroes in the JL.

My two cents.
KWilly
KWilly - 8/5/2018, 8:11 AM
@Buckster10 - Completely agree. And that's what I was trying to get across.
rocketeuropa
rocketeuropa - 8/4/2018, 6:51 PM
It's so obvious except to the property holders themselves. Warners seems to be as bad as D.C. Comics themselves, CONSTANTLY shooting themselves in the foot, jumping from one ill concept to another. Instead of course-correcting with The Batman or Man of Steel 2, we get crap like Shazam (?) and Aquaman (??).
Kevin Feige must be laughing his ass off.
Gizmoduck
Gizmoduck - 8/4/2018, 8:01 PM
@rocketeuropa - A. Feige doesnt care about DC, the imaginary war is in your head
B. Shazam looks pretty good and is a fun character
C. Aquaman looks like a decent popcorn flick, lots of action and one liners - plus Wan is a good director
nikgrid
nikgrid - 8/4/2018, 9:14 PM
@rocketeuropa - "Warners seems to be as bad as D.C. Comics themselves"

That's quite a leap in logic.
TexasAvenger
TexasAvenger - 8/4/2018, 10:01 PM
@nikgrid - Not to mention false as [frick]. DC Comics [frick]ing rule.
RocknRolla
RocknRolla - 8/4/2018, 10:35 PM
@nikgrid - shouldn't have used the word logic there, try speculative judgement.
nikgrid
nikgrid - 8/5/2018, 4:25 AM
@RocknRolla - Haha Yeah!
Nerdman3000
Nerdman3000 - 8/4/2018, 6:57 PM
I'll have to disagree a bit, though there are some strong points. First of all, I would have pushed back Justice League to 2018 or 2019, then I would have had Green Lantern Corps take it's place. It was a mistake to not include Green Lantern in Justice League in my opinion. In fact, I would have had him replace Cyborg entirely (who despite how much DC tries to force fed him down our mouths has always been a Teen Titan, not a founding member of the Justice League in my mind).

As for Batman, to be honest, 2014 is really too close after the Dark Knight Rises to give him his solo movie, which is why I partially understood introducing him first in BvS, so I would actually give him the solo movie after. 2017 makes more sense to me as the date of the first new Batman film.
Imfunnyhow
Imfunnyhow - 8/4/2018, 7:05 PM
Well good slate... In a Zachless DcU
TheUnworthyThor
TheUnworthyThor - 8/4/2018, 7:14 PM
I would have gone

Year One: Superman, Wonder Woman
Year Two: Batman, Martian Manhunter
Year Three: The Flash, Green Lantern
Year Four: Superman 2, Aquaman, Vixen
Year Five: Justice League, Batman 2, Wonder Woman 2
Year Six: The Flash 2, Green Lantern 2, Martian Manhunter 2
Year Seven: Superman 3, Aquaman 2, Vixen 2
Year Eight: Justice League 2, Shazam, Birds of Prey, Batman 3
Year Nine: The Flash 3, Green Lantern 3, Wonder Woman 3, Vixen 3
Year Ten: Justice League 3, Aquaman 3, Shazam 2, Martian Manhunter 3
Year Eleven: Plastic Man Kills the DC Universe
DR3D
DR3D - 8/8/2018, 6:43 PM
@TheUnworthyThor - Vixen?

I'm guessing because she is black and female, but it would probably be better to stick with a female team-up film if the studio wants to recover money.
TheUnworthyThor
TheUnworthyThor - 8/8/2018, 6:59 PM
a@DR3D - Vixen is an incredibly underutilized character by DC. I know she would be the favorite superhero of several ex-girlfriends of mine if they actually knew she existed. And DC has a dearth of female superheroes that can stand by themselves outside of Wonder Woman. I’m also a firm believer in creating new brands and not constantly relying on the same few.
Binker
Binker - 8/4/2018, 7:14 PM
My turn:

PHASE 1 - THE GOLDEN AGE: PRIMARILY ABOUT SUPERMAN, BATMAN, AND WONDER WOMAN, WITH EACH OTHER JL MEMBER CAMEOS IN THE FILMS EXCEPT FOR MOS, BVS, AND JL (OF COURSE).
MAN OF STEEL
IT'S SUPERMAN
BATMAN V SUPERMAN
WONDER WOMAN
THE BATMAN
JUSTICE LEAGUE

PHASE 2 - THE SILVER AGE: THE REVERSE OF PHASE 1, WITH EVERYONE EXCEPT THE MAIN THREE GETTING THE SPOTLIGHT. THE BIG THREE RETURN IN THE LAST TWO FILMS, WITH ONE OF THEM BEING WORLD'S FINEST; A FILM I HOPE WB REALIZES THAT SUPERMAN + BATMAN IS A CONCEPT ONTO ITSELF.
THE FLASH
GREEN LANTERN CORPS
AQUAMAN
MARTIAN MANHUNTER
WORLD'S FINEST
JUSTICE LEAGUE 2

PHASE 3 - BRONZE AGE...AND SO ON, AND SO ON.

Thoughts?
99OPTIMISTPRIME
99OPTIMISTPRIME - 8/4/2018, 7:34 PM

Stopped reading after the "Wonder Woman movie wasn't exactly incredible part". Guys, put your sexism aside for one second, and realize that nobody cares that you wouldn't rank Wonder Woman up there with Iron Man and The Dark Knight. It had just as much impact as both of those movies, and is just as beloved.
KWilly
KWilly - 8/4/2018, 8:04 PM
@WAKANDABATMANFOREVER - WW was a very good movie imo. Gal Gadot did an excellent job, as well as Chris Pine because they had top notch chemistry.

Besides that however, nothing else about WW stood out to me, so that's why I personally don't think it's incredible. But that doesn't make me sexist, lol
Fogs
Fogs - 8/4/2018, 10:01 PM
@KWilly - of course it does, just like when you dislike Ghostbusters or The Last Jedi, lool!!!
CaptainMexico
CaptainMexico - 8/4/2018, 7:41 PM
Should have, would have, could have....

What a pointless editorial.
SethBullock
SethBullock - 8/5/2018, 12:01 AM
My "they should have" is shorter: they should have just copied the (sucessful) Marvel formula.

Marvel introduced the main Avengers with Iron Man, Thor, Captain America and The Incredible Hulk, then made an Avengers movie that added some extra superheros to the team, so WB should have just made a Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman introduction, and then go for a Justice League movie.

This is actually what they did somehow, but they just f*cked up with the way they did it.
TheAmazingSpiderDumb
TheAmazingSpiderDumb - 8/4/2018, 7:44 PM
In all honesty, i really didn't and still don't mind the DCEU slate. I actually think it was interesting and a way to be different from Marvel. The True problem was that some of the movies were really bad.

Man of Steel - Ok
Batman V Superman - Bad
Suicide Squad - So bad you end up wanting to die (no pun intended)
Wonder Woman - Good (First two acts are really good! Bad Third Act & Ares British Moustache)
Justice League - A Depressing Dissapointment

What could've been,if done right...
1 2 3 4
View Recorder