The 'T-dog' syndrome....

The 'T-dog' syndrome....

I just had to put it out there.....

Editorial Opinion
By screenwriter614 - Nov 15, 2010 02:11 PM EST
Filed Under: Fan Fic

Lets all have a little talk about the T-DOG syndrome. What is the T-DOG syndrome? Its when an writer, producer, director, Ect. add an person of minority just to make the cast/characters more 'diverse' but in the end the character is either a fail as an character, just full of negative stereotypes, and/or just plain not necessary.

Take T-DOG from the walking dead, for he is a great example. First of all his name is 'T-DOG'. That right there offends me. I mean, im african american and ive never, and i mean never known somone who actually went by the name T-DOG! Its just stereotypical. Becuase he's black, he needs an street name that goes along with it. And thats not the end of it, there's also an failed attempt at making him the 'tuff guy with a solf heart'. Thats an very un-original idea, and its really unrealistic. 'T-DOG' gets beaten to a pulp by a racist man in the begining of the of eppisode two, but by the end of that eppisode, he wants to rescue him. Why!? I dont know, it just makes me mad.

The T-DOG Syndrome doesnt only aply to black people. It can reply to any minority. And it doesn't aply to every time a minority member is added to an cast. Yes the T-Dog syndrome was aplied to the JLA and JLA-UNLIMITED, but it wasn't a fail. We actually got a good character from it. But some times we just dont need it. I for one hope that the new Aqual lad isn't an example, just to add diversity to the aqua-family...

Please dont get me wrong, im not saying I dont like the Walking Dead TV show, I just had to get that off my chest......

PLEASE COMMENT...

A.I. - Artificial Ironman: An all original WHAT IF...
Related:

A.I. - Artificial Ironman: An all original WHAT IF...

DC & Marvel Team Up In Awesome Fan-Created Infinite Crisis Video
Recommended For You:

DC & Marvel Team Up In Awesome Fan-Created "Infinite Crisis" Video

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

cmmprime
cmmprime - 11/15/2010, 3:34 PM
Was this written by a 1st grader? Spelling and sentence formation are horrible.
screenwriter614
screenwriter614 - 11/15/2010, 3:54 PM
No, a ninth grader, and trust me, thats way worst.:)
Wadey09
Wadey09 - 11/15/2010, 4:54 PM
@screenwriter
i haven't seen the show nor have i read the graphic novel from which it is based on. so i cannot be deemed an expert of The Walking Dead.
but i consider an expert when it comes to TV and movies.

every film and TV series have what i call throw away characters. these are the guys who are not central in the general plot, but add another level to any project. now these characters can and usually are extraordinarily simple: T-Dog for instance. from your description, he is simple in concept and in nature. there have been many characters like him over the years and there will doubtlessly be more. Astinos from 300, Agent Clay from Hellboy, Phil from Ghost Rider, Happy from Iron Man (although i hope his character is properly developed in Iron Man 3!), etc.
and then there are the deeper characters that may start small but grow into something larger. did you know that John Constantine first had a meager cameo appearance in an issue of Swamp Thing? and i hope that you know that the Punisher's first appearance was as the villain of a one maybe two issue Spider-man arc.

granted, some writers do exploit sterotypes, but to do so, they may actually have good reason. just because you haven't met someone named T-Dog or something similar doesn't mean that the writers have not. most writers work out of their bedrooms or home offices. only the lucky few score it big.

so isn't it a distinct possibility that there was no malice intended by introducing a sterotypical character into a TV series where the very premise is unbelievable?
Joker11
Joker11 - 11/15/2010, 10:16 PM
I would only be offended if they named a guy on the show Cacker ass.
Joker11
Joker11 - 11/15/2010, 10:17 PM
Freakin spell check!!!! I meant Cracker ass.
Stumblin
Stumblin - 11/16/2010, 7:38 AM
Yeah, I'm sorry but their really is nothing racist or stereotypical about this character. He may not be the most interesting but that's probably his only down fall.

It's stereotype for him to be called T-Dog? I have met many blacks with nuttier names than that, hell even white guys with two first names. It happens they do exist people out there do have names like this and act just like T-Dog. That's not saying all blacks act the same, that's like saying all white people act like that racist hick bastard. Not all southern US citizens are all racist, it's just a character, get over it.

T-Dog going back to the racist bastard was him not being "soulful" it was him being human. I don't care who you are, if you got the shit beat out of you and that person who beat you could end up handcuffed to a metal pole to starve, dehydrate, sun poison basically suffer a slow and tormenting death you wouldn't want that on your conscious regardless of him beating the shit out of you. One thing to punch a guy a shit ton another thing to let someone basically be tortured to death, I know I thought the same as you though, "Why would he go back?" But then I understand it's because he's human.
SHHH
SHHH - 11/16/2010, 8:10 AM
Im over 30 yrs.. Ive heard white, black, purple, yellow give themselves the craziest name's like a "T-DOG" you haven't seen it or heard it all yet... I would of left the racist man up there personally...
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 11/16/2010, 10:16 AM
Maybe he went back to get him because he's a good person and doesn't think anyone deserves to suffer and die like that. it doesn't mean he wants to be best buddies with him now, just that he doesn't think he should die. its actually noble.

also, T-Dog wasn't in the comics, unless they're planning on making this guy Tyreese, which would make me never want to watch this show again.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 11/16/2010, 12:55 PM
T-BAG!!! : P
blueballs
blueballs - 11/16/2010, 6:35 PM
I understand what your saying but T-dog isn't the only sterotypical character on the show how bout, how bout the racist white red necks Merle dixon and his brother Daryl. I could be offended by those cliches or how bout wife beater Ed? Morgan was black but certainly not sterotypical of a black character. Writers use these "archetypes" as shorthand for introducing who these people are in a quick manner when other things in the story need to take center stage. If you are indeed black and are wondering why there are such depictions of african americans on television than look no further than to the music industry where black artist constantly out do each other in stupidity.
BubbaDude
BubbaDude - 11/16/2010, 8:24 PM
I watched the new episode this morning. This whole redneck-on-the-roof thing kinda reminds me of the old Sgt Rock story "Color of His Blood". Jackie Johnson saved the life of a racist G.I. by giving him a transfusion on the battlefield. At the end, the racist repents his evil ways. He says, as medics carry him away on a stretcher, "His blood is red...."(or words to that effect)

Anyway, my point is, I'm waiting to see if this racist will see the error of his ways, or will he become zombie chow?
cmmprime
cmmprime - 11/16/2010, 9:03 PM
People like T-Dog do exist, even though you've never met them. The creators of the show are seemingly pulling characters from all walks of life and dumping them together in the same situation. It's good to have a large cast of characters from different backgrounds to showcase all the different emotions and reactions forged by one's upbringing. Unless your show is called "Lost" or "Heroes". Then you're screwed.
Gmoney84
Gmoney84 - 11/17/2010, 8:11 AM
@ screenwriter, noble effort and I see your point but seriously don't harp on everything that happens to a black person just because you are black. The world/"Man" is not out to get you. Character development is completely necessary in order to produce a good piece of literature of film. Always remember that the knife cuts both ways. Have you ever wondered why there is a BET channel or why black people in general are referred to as African Americans instead of just Americans? Why there is an African American section in the bookstore housing only black authors? White people didn't do this. At some point one or many black people got together and said "why isn't there a section with stuff for just my people?" It's all misguided nonsense.
View Recorder