Details On A Huge Action Scene Featuring 'The Thing' In FANTASTIC FOUR And Why It Was Cut

Details On A Huge Action Scene Featuring 'The Thing' In FANTASTIC FOUR And Why It Was Cut

A lengthy description of the scene which was supposed to take place featuring The Thing being dropped from that stealth bomber has surfaced, as have the shocking details about the clash between director Josh Trank and 20th Century Fox which led to it being cut...

By JoshWilding - Aug 18, 2015 05:08 AM EST
Filed Under: Fantastic Four
Source: Entertainment Weekly
Considering the fact it's been widely hailed as one of the worst superhero movies of all-time, the first half of Fantastic Four is surprisingly ok. It's when that sudden time jump happens that the reboot veers wildly off the rails, with a rushed final act which is clearly pieced together with a combination of original and reshot footage. Simply put, it's a mess. However, things were at one point very different. While there was always going to be a time jump according to Entertainment Weekly, it wouldn't have originally been so abrupt and was set to reveal that time had passed through an impressive sounding action sequence revolving around The Thing. Here's a description: 
 
A Chechen rebel camp in the wee hours of the night. There’s no explanation for where we are, but there are soldiers speaking a foreign language, and they are loading up some heavy-duty weaponry. Crews are filling truck beds with the gear, preparing to mobilize – then a siren goes off. Everyone freezes, and one by one they turn their faces to the sky. A stealth bomber whispers by overhead, and a large object falls from it, streaking through the air at great speed. The object – a bomb, a missile? – collides with the earth in the center of the camp, sending debris is all directions. The soldiers take cover, then tentatively emerge and walk toward the crater, where there is a giant pile of orange boulders. Slowly, the rocks begin to move on their own, becoming arms, legs, a torso, a head …
 
This rock-figure lumbers out of the smoke, and the soldiers level their weapons – then open fire. As The Thing lurches into view, bullets spark and ping off his impenetrable exterior. Rather than some elegant, balletic action sequence, The Thing moves slowly and deliberately. He’s in no hurry. The storytelling goal was to show the futility of firepower against him as he casually demolishes the terrorists. It’s a blue-collar kind of heroism. When it becomes clear this rock-beast cannot be stopped, the surviving Chechen rebels make a run for it – and that’s when a hail of gunfire finishes them off. From the shadows of the surrounding forest, a team of Navy SEALS emerge with their guns drawn and smoking. The cavalry has arrived, but the enemy has already been subdued. The film would then have shifted to a bird’s-eye view of the camp, an aerial shot showing waves of American soldiers flooding in to secure the base. Just when it appears the American soldiers may be ready to clash with the rock monster, The Thing gives them a solemn nod, and they clear a path. He lumbers past them, almost sadly, a heartsick warrior. Then he boards a large helicopter and is lifted away.
 
Only then does the movie cut to that conference room, where Tim Blake Nelson’s Dr. Allen is crowing to his military overlords about how this mutated team of scientists is helping do the heavy lifting for America’s rank-and-file soldiers.


That all sounds pretty good and would have been a much better way of letting us know that time had passed instead of that "One Year Later" title card which was randomly thrown up on the screen. Why then didn't it make the final cut? After all, Fox have been promoting the scene! 

According to the site's sources, Trank was once again indecisive and couldn't decide whether or not to include the scene, another example of what they describe as a "director out-of-control, unsure of what he wants or how to execute it." Others meanwhile claim that he always wanted to include this, but was forced to cut the scene - which he had spent some time creating a detailed previsualization of - when the studio slashed his budget. Realising that the reboot didn't have enough action, Fox later decided to put it back in. However, this was when the movie had been taken out of Trank's hands, and what was shot (a documentary handheld style sequence which clashed with the rest of the movie) didn't work and didn't match any of the planned special effects.


It was then that Trank decided to cut the scene entirely, and this is yet another chapter in the story of why Fantastic Four ended up so terrible. Regardless of who was at fault, it seems clear that this movie was always going to be disaster, and this action scene - which can be glimpsed in the trailers and TV spots - wouldn't have helped it all that much. What do you think? Let us know below.
THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS Rumors Reveal Spoilery Details About Galactus, Reed's Multiverse Plans, More
Related:

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS Rumors Reveal Spoilery Details About Galactus, Reed's Multiverse Plans, More

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS Star Vanessa Kirby Plays Coy When Asked If MCU's Sue Storm Is A Mother
Recommended For You:

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS Star Vanessa Kirby Plays Coy When Asked If MCU's Sue Storm Is A Mother

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Scooby
Scooby - 8/18/2015, 5:51 AM
Scooby
Scooby - 8/18/2015, 5:51 AM
All I know is this:

ChiliConCarney
ChiliConCarney - 8/18/2015, 5:53 AM
I'm sure this could have changed popular opinion from F- to F+...

DEVWoulf
DEVWoulf - 8/18/2015, 5:54 AM
This film sucked Thing's no-Thing. What a mess.
Highflyer
Highflyer - 8/18/2015, 5:57 AM
I would pay a lot of money to see the film Trank wanted to make. The reshoots were very obvious. The first half felt like one person's movie while the rest felt like 15 people behind one camera.
DerekLake
DerekLake - 8/18/2015, 5:58 AM
"Slowly, the rocks begin to move on their own, becoming arms, legs, a torso, a head …"

So, The Thing was supposed to break apart into rocks upon impact, and then reform? I guess that would explain his appearance.
Earthbound
Earthbound - 8/18/2015, 6:05 AM
@GodzillaKart

It's not really fair or even logical to lump in Man of Steel next to movies like Green Lantern, Batman & Robin, or even The Amazing Spider-Man 2. Man of Steel may have disappointed a lot of people, but it equally impressed others. It's a controversial film, it's a divisive film, but to throw it in the GL, B&R, TASM2 movie pile seems a little harsh. The film is left to the interpretation of the viewers and many even hold the film up as the best CBM film in their opinions (it's not the best, but it's up there for me). I feel that Man of Steel's response depends more on an individual's taste in films.
Kevwebsz
Kevwebsz - 8/18/2015, 6:05 AM
You guys remember this awesomeness

slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 8/18/2015, 6:06 AM
Poor Trank, he made a fool of himself. Should've known better than to make a deal with Fox.
California
California - 8/18/2015, 6:08 AM
Shake it baby, shake it , baby
DallasAvenger
DallasAvenger - 8/18/2015, 6:09 AM
@barber2323 People still talk about and discuss movies that are 75 years old, and this one is just a couple weeks old and still in theaters. I mean this is comic book movie dot com not upcoming comic book movie dot com, isn't okay to discuss any and all comic book movies?
rabid
rabid - 8/18/2015, 6:12 AM
My theory is that Fox tried to cull the violence and much of Thing's nudity from the film in an attempt to make it palatable to Marvel fans.
micvalpro
micvalpro - 8/18/2015, 6:14 AM
Yawn. This movie is past already. This movie TRANKED. Josh TANK moved on, so should we.
nikgrid
nikgrid - 8/18/2015, 6:14 AM
@GodzillaKart
@barber2323: Probably never! We still talk about all the shitty CBM: Green Lantern, Batman and Robin, TASM2, MOS, etc.


Holy shit! if you're putting MOS in with that lot, then don't forget Iron Man 2 and Thor 2, in the case of Thor 2 at least in Man of Steel people Know who the villain was lol!
AbhiShake
AbhiShake - 8/18/2015, 6:17 AM
I am actually curious what Trank's next movie will be. I believe he has the potential to make great movies.
Earthbound
Earthbound - 8/18/2015, 6:20 AM
@GodzillaKart

That's fair, if you don't like it you don't like it. And it might be difficult for some to prove that Kal is a moral person in MoS because of how the film ended, but the tally of (deliberate) deaths that he has inflicted is far out-numbered by the people any one of the Avengers have killed and in those movies it's for the cool factor like when Iron Man shoots the tank and then walks away (there had to be at least two or three people in that tank) and if it's not for the coolness, it's for humor like in Avengers: Age of Ultron when Thor celebrates Hulk's kill-count in the beginning of the movie by saying: "The gates of Hel are filled with the screams of his victims!".

At the very least, the moral or immoral (depending on your pov) decisions made in Man of Steel will have consequences in BvS and will be addressed in some fashion.
ComicsDoneRight
ComicsDoneRight - 8/18/2015, 6:34 AM
Team Trank
BlackStar25
BlackStar25 - 8/18/2015, 6:51 AM
@Scooby

Yup. Fox has sucked this year.










YeezusWept
YeezusWept - 8/18/2015, 6:53 AM
RIP Trank's studio career

MercwithMouth
MercwithMouth - 8/18/2015, 6:55 AM
Finally saw Chronicle last night. Absolutely fantastic movie. Judging from Chronicle, I have to take Trank's side on F4. I really do believe he would've made a great movie.
YeezusWept
YeezusWept - 8/18/2015, 6:56 AM
They just really wanted a cool scene of a hero walking towards the cam.



1 2
View Recorder