It Would Be A Huge Loss For Marvel Studios To Not Bring Back The GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY Says Zoe Saldana

It Would Be A Huge Loss For Marvel Studios To Not Bring Back The GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY Says Zoe Saldana

Gamora actress Zoe Saldana has implied that the role of Gamora could be recast and that the MCU would be foolish if they didn't bring back the Guardians of the Galaxy.

By MarkJulian - Apr 01, 2024 10:04 PM EST
Filed Under: Vol. 3
Source: The Playlist

Checking in on the Guardians of the Galaxy franchise, James Gunn is done with Marvel and the MCU as he's now calling the shots for DC Studios and can't legally work for them.

Drax actor Dave Bautista has repeatedly confirmed that he's done playing Drax, although he's open to returning to the MCU in a less physical makeup-intensive role.

Chris Pratt's Star-Lord seems headed towards a solo film or solo Disney+ series.

With so much of the original magic gone from what made the Guardians of the Galaxy special, should Marvel Studios continue on with the franchise?

Gamora actress Zoe Saldana certainly seems to think so, although she's taking a play out of Bautista's playbook and suggesting that it's time for someone else to play the Mad Titan's daughter.

Speaking to The Playlist, and responding to a question on whether she was done with the role, Saldana stated, “I mean, so far, I think that she is [gone for good] for me, but I don’t think Gamora has gone for good,” she teased, implying that someone else could take up the torch.

She went on to say, "I would think it would be a huge loss for Marvel if they didn’t find a way to bring back The Guardians of the Galaxy. It’s just such a fan-favorite group of misfits, you know? And then at the helm, they had a voice like James Gunn’s writing—which is just so marvelous for and very specific for this genre."

"And it’s so great for this genre as well. So, I would be the first one in the first row to sort of celebrate when the Guardians of the Galaxy come back.” 

At the end of Vol. 3, the closing moments saw a new team of Guardians assembled and led by Rocket Racoon which consisted of Groot, Kraglin, Cosmo, Adam Warlock, and Phyla-Vell.

It's hard to imagine Marvel Studios moving forward with such a hodge-podge roster of Guardians for another feature film but all of the original team members are still alive and well in the MCU, even though some of them are now on separate journeys.

Perhaps they'll reunite in Avengers: Secret Wars and go on to kickstart a new trilogy once The Multiverse Saga comes to a close?

If so, who would you want to see take Gunn's place as writer and/or director? And would you want the franchise to move forward with the roster seen in the closing moments of Vol. 3, bring back the original team or a mixture of both?

Let us know in the comment section below.

GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY VOL. 2 Star Michael Rosenbaum Details Scrapped Plans For Martinex In The Sequel
Related:

GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY VOL. 2 Star Michael Rosenbaum Details Scrapped Plans For Martinex In The Sequel

SUPERMAN Star David Corenswet Auditioned For Adam Warlock In GOTG VOL. 3, But James Gunn Doesn't Remember
Recommended For You:

SUPERMAN Star David Corenswet Auditioned For Adam Warlock In GOTG VOL. 3, But James Gunn Doesn't Remember

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
OrgasmicPotatoe
OrgasmicPotatoe - 4/1/2024, 10:46 PM
I'd rather a sequel to the video game, though I feel that's unlikely.
ComicBookPsycho
ComicBookPsycho - 4/1/2024, 11:07 PM
@OrgasmicPotatoe - I vastly prefer the game characters to the movies.
Taonrey
Taonrey - 4/2/2024, 1:13 AM
@OrgasmicPotatoe - it sadly was a flop so no chance
AmazingFILMporg
AmazingFILMporg - 4/1/2024, 11:06 PM
I think Gunn left the guardians in a perfect spot for a new creative to come in and put his style on it.


AllsGood
AllsGood - 4/1/2024, 11:10 PM
User Comment Image
Nomis929
Nomis929 - 4/1/2024, 11:25 PM
Child, Please.

User Comment Image
IAmAHoot
IAmAHoot - 4/1/2024, 11:30 PM
Isn't their supposed to be quotes in the headline?
BruceWayng
BruceWayng - 4/1/2024, 11:46 PM
I think it’s time we finally get to see these guys instead…

User Comment Image
SolarSoldier
SolarSoldier - 4/2/2024, 4:56 AM
@BruceWayng - Agreed!
Forthas
Forthas - 4/2/2024, 12:22 AM
In hindsight Guardians of the Galaxy was a massive mistake. It ushered in the slapstick phase of Marvel with numerous Marvel franchises trying to emulate its silliness which is why it has lost much of its appeal. During a period when the franchise was averaging a billion dollars per film, not one of the Guardian films ever reached that plateau demonstrating that its audience was limited.
FishyZombie
FishyZombie - 4/2/2024, 12:45 AM
@VISIONaryNPa1 - yeah we got a satisfying begining, middle and end. Let’s check back in like 10-15 years, see if we want more then.
FishyZombie
FishyZombie - 4/2/2024, 12:47 AM
@Forthas - Y’know Guardians came out AFTER Joss Whedon’s Avengers. Let alone like every single movie in phrase one. Like they all weren’t action comedies. James Gunn just did it better.
Kurban
Kurban - 4/2/2024, 12:49 AM
@Forthas - I refuse to blame GotG for Marvel’s seeming inability to juggle tone. They were dumb to think that kind of comedy worked everywhere.
SolarSoldier
SolarSoldier - 4/2/2024, 4:57 AM
@Forthas - high five!
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/2/2024, 6:16 AM
@Forthas - They started the slapstick with the first Iron Man with the whole robot arm/perfecting his mark II suit stuff, continued with it and literal toilet humor in Iron Man 2, ample in all the rest of phase one thru the first Avengers film such that BotG can't take all the blame in any way and would say it was more so an issue with Antman films than with the team of A-holes where it actualy worked well.

The whole averaging a billion dollars box office period was only in 2018/19 when there WASN'T a GotG film and when you take out the Avengers films (including Civil War) and Spider-man (the ultimate A list comic character) there is only THREE MCU films that passed the billion mark.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 4/2/2024, 7:48 AM
@Forthas - I'm really curious how y'all are defining slapstick, and if you could provide some examples in GotG. I don't recall anyone slipping on a banana peel or hitting their hand with a hammer or anything of the sort.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/2/2024, 8:25 AM
@Clintthahamster - Probably the closest to true slapstick bit in the first GotG was the scene where they were all fighting each other for the infinity stone leading to them all being captured. The single most TRUE slapstick scenes of the entire MCU was Stark and the robot arm in the first Iron Man film outside of the Antman franchise.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 4/2/2024, 9:16 AM
@Apophis71 - Those are certainly examples of physical comedy, but not all physical comedy is slapstick.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/2/2024, 9:46 AM
@Clintthahamster - Yup, not all make that distinction but spot on :D

Slapstick is specificaly about the use of clumsy actions with embarrassing impact on the characer(s) resulting in comedic effect (oft but not always with the aid of a laugh track/live audience) which I would say there certainly was with for instance the fire extinguisher scenes with the MKII suit and often in Antman.

Mostly in GotG the comedy came more from the verbal interations between the characters around the physical stuff, not so much pure clumsyness stuff. That and a lot of the physical comedy didn't fall into clumsy at all, silly at times for other reasons (such as Drax jumping down the throat of a beast thinking it would be easier from the inside) however even then the laughs were more from the reactions/verbals from other characters not the physical aspects alone.
JonC
JonC - 4/2/2024, 12:55 PM
@Forthas - slapstick by definition - Slapstick is a style of humor involving exaggerated physical activity that exceeds the boundaries of normal physical comedy.
I have yet to see anything involving 'exaggerated physical comedy' in the MCU.
You may not like the humor, you may not get the humor, but it is not 'slapstick' like the Three Stooges.
Forthas
Forthas - 4/3/2024, 6:58 PM
@Apophis71 - That was one moment in one film. The entire or not even a good portion of Iron man was slapstick.

Guardians of the Galaxy came right after the Avengers so it is not true that it did not exist in 2018. GoG came out in 2014 and Volume 2 came out in 2017.

So if I remove 6 billion dollar films, there would only be three left and none of them are a GoG films.
Forthas
Forthas - 4/3/2024, 7:02 PM
@Clintthahamster -

Dancing while little creatures scurry around Star Lord and using one as a makeshift Microphone
All of the GoG falling over each other trying to steal the Infinity stone from one another
Rocket Racoon's eyes bulging out in a cartoonish way as he is flying a space ship
Satr Lord breaking into a dance number against Ronan

That stuff....
Forthas
Forthas - 4/3/2024, 8:56 PM
@JonC - Looks like slpastick to me...

User Comment Image
User Comment Image
User Comment Image
User Comment Image
User Comment Image
User Comment Image
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/3/2024, 9:28 PM
@Forthas - Meaning there were zero GotG films released in 2018 or 2019 fool, which was the only time MCU new releases were averaging a billion for anything other than Avengers team-up movies (outside of Iron Man 3 and No Way Home), not for solo franchises.

Before the first GotG the MCU was making $260M to $700M outside of Avengers and Iron Man three and it landed on $773M straight out the gate as virtual unknown characters/team with no direct connectivity to the Avengers (more than the Cap 1 & 2, Thor 1 & 2 and Hulk movies who were ALL far bigger names in comics pre-MCU before it plus all Avengers a FAR more well known team... and more than Antman and Dr Strange released after it).

Also need to check your timeline as after Avengers came Iron Man 3, THEN Thor Dark World, THEN CptA Winter Soldier, THEN GotG in 2014 ie not right after, it was over two years after. Heck TASM films both also landing in theatres between Avengers and GotG and both making less money, in fact even XmenDofP made less which was released the same year as GotG (indeed 2013's Man of Steel made less than it too even tho DC was on a post Dark Knight High and it was frickin Superman).

GotG 2 made around the same as Spider-man homecoming who should be the most bankable Supe going in 2017 that had all the hype going by Peter's intro in Civil War so to argue they don't have wide appeal is dumb considering despite the downturn in BO for MCU post Far from Home the third still banked $845M, in a period for Marvel where only ONE MCU movie out TEN made more than a billion.

The point with the scene was it did not start with GotG having slapstick or toilet humor in the MCU so can't claim that is where it began.

If anything they doubled down on RDJ style humor in general terms anyway, beyond JUST the slapstick which by the definition of the term is questionable, as that was the first solo franchise to pass a billion (and I'd argue the most comedic solo franchise BEFORE GotG and Antman) and moved away from the slightly more serious tones of Cap and Thor which failed to do so post Avengers/IM3 with their second solo films.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 4/4/2024, 7:18 AM
@Forthas - So, like, semi-broad comedy. None of that is slapstick, but I can see not digging it if you are more into the Nolan/Snyder style Very Serious CBM.
Forthas
Forthas - 4/4/2024, 7:59 AM
@Clintthahamster - I would not put Nolan and Snyder in the same category. Nolan is grounded with layered themes while Snyder's films are neither grounded or have discernable themes.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 4/4/2024, 9:24 AM
@Forthas - Both put out over-serious, moody superhero films devoid of comedy. That's all I was getting at. Obviously, Snyder's not on the same level as Nolan, but Nolan was a producer on Snyder's early DCEU stuff, so it's not like they're completely separate.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 4/4/2024, 9:30 AM
@Forthas - I just saw the array of GIFs you shared for JonC. Some of that isn't even physical comedy. It's just comedy. Slapstick is a specific form of physical comedy, normally characterized by outrageous physical comedy at the expense of plot or character development. The Three Stooges, Abbot & Costello, Laurel & Hardy. The plot exists only as a framing device for physical comedy set pieces.

Sorry, I know I'm picking nits, but I'm History-of-Film buff, and also very concerned with precise language.
Forthas
Forthas - 4/4/2024, 11:03 AM
@Clintthahamster - All of Chris Nolans films had humor (as opposed to comedy) which is how character driven drama should be. Nolan ONLY produced Man of Steel which also had moments of humor but it ended there with Zack Snyder. It is why Man of Steel is a great film and everything that followed is not.
Forthas
Forthas - 4/4/2024, 11:08 AM
@Clintthahamster -

The Oxford definition of slapstick is "comedy based on deliberately clumsy actions and humorously embarrassing events."

So even if Thor is not doing physical humor, him sitting around being fat is an embarrassing event this constitutes slapstick. There are other definitions that include a broader definition having to do with outlandish behavior beyond the norm.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 4/4/2024, 11:21 AM
@Forthas - Alright, man. Cool. Verbal jokes and visual gags are slapstick now. Literally means figuratively. Gift is the past tense of give. Language marches on. Doesn't mean I have to like it. 😤
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 4/4/2024, 11:22 AM
#NotMySlapstick
cadunovaes01
cadunovaes01 - 4/2/2024, 12:44 AM
Of all the characters from the MCU's successful days, I think the return of the Guardians would be the easiest to achieve, as the entire group practically survived the third film.
Of course, we have actors who don't want to return to the role, but one or two absences would be replaceable.
In fact, I believe that the fact that we don't have new perspectives on the horizon for many characters from the Infinity Saga to appear makes the public feel less inclined to follow new faces like Moon Knight, Shang-Chi or Eternals.
S8R8M
S8R8M - 4/2/2024, 12:51 AM
I hope not. Those last 2 Guardian movies were crap. Yes they had heart but I really wanted to learn more about the whole team, not just Quill and Rocket.
roboticJohnson
roboticJohnson - 4/2/2024, 3:09 AM
@S8R8M - wasn't a good part of the second movie focused on gamora and nebula? I mean, we also got a lot of time with yondu in volume 2, then they focused on drax and mantis in the christmas special, and in volume 3 they also put the spotlight on the new gamora, and kraglin and kosmo, and the trio of nebula-mantis-drax...
S8R8M
S8R8M - 4/2/2024, 5:09 AM
@roboticJohnson - Yes and no for Gamora and Nebula. I wanted to see more of their upbringing.
I also wanted to learn more about Thanos killing Drax's wife and kid. Also, I wanted to delve more into Groot meeting Rocket.
Mantis was an easy sell with the silly Ego story.
I would of preferred Yondu being a selfish badass.
As for Kraglin, less would of been more. And for the new additions... meh.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/2/2024, 5:18 AM
@roboticJohnson - The only one we didn't get the backstory of was the original Groot but he had all those animated shorts for baby Groot and saw him grow up from a sapling so...

...we also had a fair amount of Nebula and Gamora explored in Infinity War and Endgame too such that feel we had a better exploration and better arc for the two daughters of Thanos than we did for Quill and Rocket overall.

Drax was the only one I felt was a tad hard done by, was hoping we would get him meeting Moondragon and thus go over his past in more depth in some way whilst doing their own take on how he is her father.
roboticJohnson
roboticJohnson - 4/2/2024, 7:21 AM
@S8R8M - as the other comment said, the past of gamora and the relationship between the two sisters and their adoptive father have been explored in infinity war and endgame, where it made more sense considering that their father was the main villain; and drax's family was probably killed off like gamora's, I doubt thanos even killed them himself, most likely it was one of his underlings given his background and motivations in the mcu. As for the rest, it sounds more like you didn't like the characterization of the guardians, rather than them not being explored enough, which mind you, is totally fine, it's your subjective opinion, but it's a different issue.
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder