"World's First" Iron Man 2 Review

"World's First" Iron Man 2 Review

A popular UK website has released what a review in which they call Jon Favreau's superhero sequel ‘mind-numbingly dull, chaotic and unwatchable.’

Review Opinion
By multipurposeponi - Apr 26, 2010 05:04 PM EST
Filed Under: Iron Man 2
Source: The Mirror



A detailed review of Marvel Studio's Iron Man 2 has just hit the web, courtesy of UK gossip site The Mirror; and it's not pretty. Attempting to sum up the context of the review wouldn't do it justice, so here it is in all it's broken-hearted glory:

SPOILER WARNING!

Iron Man 2: World’s First Review

"One of the biggest surprises of 2008 was Iron Man, an honest-to-goodness crowd-pleaser that boasted not just a great story and stirring special effects but which cemented the comeback of Robert Downey Jr. Casting the former hellraiser as the latest superhero was a masterstroke; his devil-may-care attitude and that wicked glint in his eye proving a refreshingly alternative to the clean-cut rivals such as Tobey ‘Spider-man’ Maguire and Brandon ‘Superman’ Routh.

Now we have the much-anticipated sequel whose world premiere was rerouted from London to LA following the volcano eruption in Iceland.

Packed into a cinema in the distinctly unstarry Westfield shopping centre in Shepherd’s Bush, there were no celebs and no red carpet but, thanks to GMT, at least we got to see the film first.

What none of realised was that another disaster was about to unfold in front of our eyes, for Iron Man 2 is a travesty – a mind-numbingly dull, chaotic and often unwatchable muddle. It might even be the ultimate masterclass in how not to make a movie.

Given the strength of part one, the sequel is not just a terrific failure but a terrific disappointment.

Things kick off in a squalid Moscow flat as the heavily-tattooed Ivan Vanko (Mickey Rourke) sets to work with a hammer and welding torch on a mysterious metalwork project following the death of his father.

Meanwhile back in the States, our first glimpse of Iron Man comes as he leaps from a plane to land at the Stark Industries Expo, his metal suit peeling away to reveal Tony Stark (Downey Jr) who tells the whooping crowd how his metal creation has brought about world peace. With the ability to fly at supersonic speeds and fire lightning from the palms of his hands, it seems the world’s aggressors have laid down their arms.

But problems loom. The US Senate is pressing Stark to give up the secrets of this startling technology to the military, egged on by slimy businessman Justin Hammer (Sam Rockwell). There’s also the small matter of our hero’s health, with the energy pack fitted in his chest driving up his blood-toxicity levels.

That’s only the first 20 minutes or so but I’m going to stop for a second and ask if you’re thinking what I’m thinking, namely that Iron Man 2 is making the same mistake that was levelled at Spider-man 3 of throwing too much into the mix. Do we really need Stark vs. the US Government, a rival tycoon and the mysterious Vanko? Aside from muddling proceedings, that’s three bad guys we’re expected to hate.

Anyways, it turns out Vanko has been knocking together his own energy pack and launches an attack on his bitter rival as he’s taking part in a Formula 1 event in Monte Carlo. Why is Stark taking part in a car race? Dunno. Why is Vanko so angry with Stark? No idea.

With the raging Russian contained and sent to jail, he receives an unlikely offer from Hammer to team up and build an army of their own iron men. Meanwhile (yes, there’s more) Stark’s old pal Lt Col Rhodes (Don Cheadle) may be about to betray him.

Confused yet? Me too – but wait, there’s still more as, for reasons none too apparent, Stark hands control of his business to his long-suffering sidekick Pepper Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow) and then starts to fancy one of his employees (Scarlett Johansson).

And that’s not all. It seems Iron Man has attracted the attention of the mysterious Nick Fury (Samuel L Jackson) who drops by to... well, talk a bit then bugger off.

How do all these elements come together? More often than not, they don’t. This is a patchwork quilt without the stitching, a muddle of too many ideas and too many characters that connect loosely at best.

If that wasn’t bad enough, our iron-clad hero is off screen for 90 per cent of the time. As Potts tells Stark at one point: “People expect you to be Iron man -- and he’s disappeared.” No kidding.

In fact Iron Man appears just four times and only two of these are battle scenes.

They’re not badly done but what’s meant to be the big, show-stopping face-off at the end is overshadowed by a perplexing, out-of-nowhere romantic pay-off.

I don’t know what went on behind the scenes while the film was being made but rumours of reshoots and recuts have been swirling around the internet. Was this the film director Jon Favreau wanted to make? I doubt it. After Elf, the underrated Zathura and the first instalment, he’s proved himself a capable pair of hands. Perhaps the blame lies higher up the studio food chain.

Whoever’s at fault, if Favreau still wishes to make the series a trilogy, this is a franchise in serious need of rewiring."


- EXCLUSIVE By David Edwards 27/04/2010





MPP - In the words of our beloved Tony Stark, 'My turn...'

First of all, I'm so happy that someone decided to post a review for the film already. I don't know exactly where this person saw it or how they managed to get around posting this review without violating the worldwide sanction imposed by Paramount; but I'm glad they did so that I can gleefully rebut it.

As most of you know, I had the pleasure of watching this film last night in an advanced screening. Not only do I think it is a fantastic movie, but I am very much looking forward to seeing it again and again opening weekend. I rarely pay to see a film more than once in theaters but I doubt can resist seeing this one every weekend for the next month or two. It's.. simply.. that.. good.

Were there disappointments? A few small ones, definitely. But that only has to do with personal preference and NOT because of the actual storytelling. There is triple the action from the first film, better dialog, sharper effects and a solid story any moviegoer with common sense and a bit of good taste will thoroughly enjoy.

To put it simply, if you liked the first film, you'll love this one. It's not only a fanboy or girl's wet dream but easily one of the best and most well thought out comic book movies we're ever been given.

It appears to me that either Mr. Edwards at The Mirror didn't see the same movie I did (which, by the way, garnered a standing ovation at it's conclusion) or he just wants to be the first critic to brandish the enormous stick keeps secured up his ass. Either way, he's a dipshit... Pardon my Russian.



Marvel Creative Committee Nixed IRON MAN 2 Scene With A Drunk Tony Stark Hitting Pepper Potts
Related:

Marvel Creative Committee Nixed IRON MAN 2 Scene With A Drunk Tony Stark Hitting Pepper Potts

IRON MAN 2: New Details Emerge About Why Demon In A Bottle Storyline Was Scrapped
Recommended For You:

IRON MAN 2: New Details Emerge About Why "Demon In A Bottle" Storyline Was Scrapped

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
JahanX
JahanX - 4/26/2010, 5:57 PM
It's The Mirror...like the Daily Mail and the Sun; their reviews are null and void and should not be taken seriously.
Let's wait till Total Film and Empire do their reviews
TANKGIRL
TANKGIRL - 4/26/2010, 5:59 PM
iron man is evrey were even in arabic television
InTylerWeTrust
InTylerWeTrust - 4/26/2010, 6:05 PM
Call me crazy, but I'm going to place my trust in Multi and Brent over whoever this guy is.

IM 2 will rule.
DaenerysTargaryen
DaenerysTargaryen - 4/26/2010, 6:05 PM
@multi
Didn't you say that Captain America's shield is in it and you didn't like it? Why?
superbatspiderman
superbatspiderman - 4/26/2010, 6:06 PM
I think this guy doesn't understand Iron Man because if the movie is like what the previews show it to be it will be amazing.
DCMarvelFreshman
DCMarvelFreshman - 4/26/2010, 6:08 PM
@Multi I am definitely taking you word over his. If you thought it was great, then I'm sure gonna like it. I really wanted this to be better than TDK though. Ah well..
Thanks Multi
Nando
Nando - 4/26/2010, 6:16 PM
Actually the first available review of the film was this:

http://www0.epinions.com/review/Iron_Man_2/content_508878950020
plan99fromouterspace
plan99fromouterspace - 4/26/2010, 6:16 PM
I don't mean to lump all British reviewers into one pot, but I generally do not agree with any of their reviews. For instance, I read one review which eviscerated Kick-Ass, and another really really hated Alice in Wonderland. For the record, I thought Kick-Ass was the best movie of the year so far, while Alice in Wonderland was not as bad as some British reviewers made it out to be.
bsprecher
bsprecher - 4/26/2010, 6:16 PM
Okay, this is so lame. I watched Iron Man 2 last week and I assure everyone that it does not disappoint! It's action-packed, with great acting and it satisfies on so many levels.
DaenerysTargaryen
DaenerysTargaryen - 4/26/2010, 6:18 PM
@multi
so was the design wrong? Just a yes or no question.
InstigatorGIRL
InstigatorGIRL - 4/26/2010, 6:26 PM
@Ozy... "I'm actually looking forward to seeing Robin Hood and A Nightmare on Elm Street more than IM2 to be honest ;)"


InstigatorGIRL
InstigatorGIRL - 4/26/2010, 6:29 PM
And this is to the Mother chucker who wrote this damn reveiw...
jazzman
jazzman - 4/26/2010, 6:31 PM
from reading this review it seems he does not know nothing about this movie it never ment to answer everything for him. the movie ment to lead onto Iron Man 3 and The Avengers movie.

Jonathan Ross is a much more better reviewer then this guy.
CaptainOtter
CaptainOtter - 4/26/2010, 6:33 PM
Yeah, I read the review, and from what little I know about the movie it doesnt make sense. Why does Vanko hate Stark? Maybe the whole damn father issue. Why is he driving a race car? Because hes Tony Stark. And the whole "energy pack" thing means the person clearly wasnt paying attention. The thing is an arc reactor, dammit.

I'm not saying the review is wrong, since i havnt seen the movie and can't say. I'm just saying that this isnt a convincing review, and isnt well structured.
AlSimmons
AlSimmons - 4/26/2010, 6:34 PM
Basicly here's what he said: "I didn't like it because I was too drunk to understand it."
Jeri
Jeri - 4/26/2010, 6:34 PM
Something tells me this guys never read a comic book before... (sarcasm)

The bit about Iron-man only appearing four times and "only" two being action scenes, this guy obviously doesn't understand that the only reason superhero movies work is because of good character; witch kind of kills his spider-man 3 comparison, in the sense that none of those characters were developed BECAUSE of pointless action scenes.

He kill's his own logic in the review more than once really... Its obvious hes just hating because he can.
DrDon
DrDon - 4/26/2010, 6:35 PM
If you disagree with the bloke's review, why even bother to post it? Is it just so you could have that "first" headline? You're only going to discourage people from watching it by giving the review a bigger audience. Just saying.
heyDS
heyDS - 4/26/2010, 6:36 PM
This guy seems like a puts who I'm sure has a canon XLH1 in his moms basement and thinks he's going to be the next big director. His review seems pointless. Moving to fast for you when things have been explained in the first movie? Adding to much all at once? The first movie was fast moving...I'm sure this guy thinks Time Cop was to complicated. Jeeze.

PS: Just for the record the British make horrible movies 90 plus percent of the time.
Joe6Pack74
Joe6Pack74 - 4/26/2010, 6:43 PM
What do you expect they are British. If it ain't their national treasure Dr. Who they don't understand it.
Joe6Pack74
Joe6Pack74 - 4/26/2010, 6:44 PM
No offense of course...
jazzman
jazzman - 4/26/2010, 6:46 PM
@heyDS

"the British make horrible movies 90 plus percent of the time"

dont know where you get that from this has nothing to do with how us Brits make movies. if we that bad i guess Nolan TDK suck then since British make horrible movies 90 plus percent of the time then.

@Number21

how you say No offense but you attack us. i dont agree with the reviewer and im British.
DaenerysTargaryen
DaenerysTargaryen - 4/26/2010, 6:48 PM
I just hope Thor makes a cameo or at least Cap's shield looks right.
SHHH
SHHH - 4/26/2010, 6:50 PM
Go Iron Man 2

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
EditNinja
EditNinja - 4/26/2010, 6:50 PM
It's not a very well-written review.
He's just hating on it to raise his career profile. It's a UK celeb tabloid for Stark's sakes!!
We'll see how wrong David Edwards is in a week or so...
ViperXX79
ViperXX79 - 4/26/2010, 6:51 PM
"Why is Vanko so angry with Stark? No idea."

If this guy can't figure it out from all the press and clips then he's an idiot.
jazzman
jazzman - 4/26/2010, 6:52 PM
yo EditNinja you know they mention you on Slashfilm.com
Set2Fallfirst
Set2Fallfirst - 4/26/2010, 6:55 PM
@dr.donald HE was doing it so ppl can get a taste of what to experience. And being the non biased person he is he would a what u might feel and what u might not feel. He knows his audience aka the CBM attendees and knows well take in his consideration because he thinks things through without being an ASS.

As for this cool Poni hahaha i love u man that was priceless.
MARV3L
MARV3L - 4/26/2010, 6:55 PM
Nothing can be as bad as Alice in Wonderland! I'm sure this film will not disappoint, especially at the biggest imax screen in the world... can't wait!
DirtWolf
DirtWolf - 4/26/2010, 6:56 PM
It sounds to me like this review is total BS. Everything specific he mentions regarding the movie is from the trailers.
REAL213
REAL213 - 4/26/2010, 6:57 PM
he says that the first 20 min of it already "threw to much in to the mix" it sounds like this guy has a short attention span.
AlSimmons
AlSimmons - 4/26/2010, 7:03 PM
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 4/26/2010, 7:17 PM
ANIL: Lol! :)

Sounds to me like this guys doesnt really understand the movie..! And hell, The Mirror is a crappy paper anyway! :P Anyway, some of you guys may not like our reviews but these more than make up for that...

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 4/26/2010, 7:18 PM
Guys, check out my EXCLUSIVE interview with DD writer, Antony Johnston!!! Just click the link! :)
goldilocks
goldilocks - 4/26/2010, 7:21 PM
This guy aside, I've gotten to the point over the years that I don't give much credence to professional reviewers. I still go to rotten tomatoes and read them but I find the most accurate reviews come word of mouth or from user reviews on yahoo. I'm going to see the movie regardless and I'll be shocked if its anywhere as bad as this guy says. From everything I've seen of the movie so far. I don't think there's any reason to think the movie will be a disappointment. This is just one guy's opinion and reviewers (just like a certain segment of fan boys) tend to knock the movies I really like. So for this guy and all those out there like him, I've got two words for you. MAY SEVENTH!
juggy4711
juggy4711 - 4/26/2010, 7:23 PM
@Anil The first time I heard pre-Revolver Beatles I felt ill. Bublygum bullsnot. Seriously have a hard time understanding how they got anywhere playing that garbage. Anyway....


No review could stop me from seeing IM2. I can't fricking wait!
1 2 3
View Recorder