Canceled 'Justice League' Movie was "Dark, Brutal and Gory"

Canceled 'Justice League' Movie was "Dark, Brutal and Gory"

According to Jay Baruchel George Miller's Legaue could have been "F@$%^ Awesome!"

By KnightGambit - Aug 03, 2010 12:08 AM EST
Filed Under: Justice League
Source: Cinematical.com

There is no regret like the one born from a missed opportunity. When it comes to Hollywood, that regret is the source of movie legends about brilliant scripts being tossed away like garbage or a casting choice that just didn't work out. And now, thanks to some new information, we know that the big-screen Justice League can join the ranks of 'Movies That Could Have Been ... Pretty Awesome.' During a press event for The Sorcerer's Apprentice, comedian Jay Baruchel (who had been attached to George Miller's League), dished a little on Miller's plan for that buzzed-about canceled Justice League film, saying it was going to be "f**king epic."

Fans of the League (in all its incarnations) have been teased with a big-screen treatment of the DC legends as far back as 2007. When Miller stepped aboard in 2008, the director moved full steam ahead and after enduring what Baruchel called a "...blogosphere [that] was not very kind to us," the project was shelved, and Miller was out. So what happened? According to Baruchel, it all came down to a price tag (upwards of $300 million) that would've made Justice League of America "the single most expensive movie in the history of movies." And that's with a cast full of "who's that again?" I'm sorry, but how do you spend $300 million with Artie Hammer playing Batman and D.J. Cotrona (who?) playing Superman?


Of course, once Miller was gone, there was idle chatter that Christopher Nolan was being approached to direct, though Nolan made it pretty clear that he wanted to keep the Superman and Batman universes separate. But don't despair DC fans, because now that The Green Lantern (a key member of the League) is on his way, there is still hope that Lantern, plus a rebooted Superman and Batman (once Nolan's trilogy is finished), could finally help put DC back on the map -- culminating in an eventual Justice League movie that will rival what Marvel is doing with its Avengers in 2012.

At SDCC last month, Geoff Johns (DC's Chief Creative Officer) avoided any direct answers regarding the possibility of reviving the project, but he did hint that the success of Lantern would determine any future DC franchise flicks, including Justice League.

As a relative novice to the world of JLA, what was always the sticking point for me in creating a live action film was how do you get this many superheroes in one room and make it believable? Apparently, Miller had cracked that nut, and the production was underway in Australia. Everyone involved was busy with costume fittings, creating concept art (I know most fans would happily donate a major organ to get a look at those images) and even making some visits to the Weta Workshop. According to Baruchel, Miller's vision would have finally put to rest any fears that a big-screen Justice League movie was a cheap cash grab that would degenerate into an exercise in camp.

Baruchel explains, "I'll just say this, if we had been able to make the movie that we had gone down [to Australia] to rehearse, if you had seen the production art I'd seen ... it would've been the coolest thing ever. It would have been the neatest vision of Batman and the coolest vision of Superman you've ever seen. It would have been dark and fairly brutal and quite gory and just f**king epic."

Now I'm going to turn it over to the experts out there: Is a 'dark an gritty' Justice League the key to bringing the DC heroes to the big screen, or are you relieved that Miller never got his way? Sound off below ...

James Gunn Weighs In On JUSTICE LEAGUE Movie Rumors And Reveals Comic That's A Big Influence On DCU
Related:

James Gunn Weighs In On JUSTICE LEAGUE Movie Rumors And Reveals Comic That's A "Big Influence" On DCU

JUSTICE LEAGUE Star Amy Adams Praises Henry Cavill And Talks James Gunn's SUPERMAN Recasting
Recommended For You:

JUSTICE LEAGUE Star Amy Adams Praises Henry Cavill And Talks James Gunn's SUPERMAN Recasting

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

InSpace
InSpace - 8/4/2010, 11:07 PM
olllllllllllllllllddddddddd nnnnnnneeeeeeeeeeewwwwwwwssssssssssss
Curmudgeon
Curmudgeon - 8/4/2010, 11:15 PM
I still think it would have been laugable.

They cast Anton Yelchin as the Flash. Which isn't so hard to see, until you realize that they were aiming for the Flash's alter ego to be a police detective.

They really expected us to beleive that the teenaged-looking kid was actually old enough to rise to the rank of detective.
InSpace
InSpace - 8/4/2010, 11:33 PM
maxjaybo@I thought they casted adam brody?
NERO
NERO - 8/4/2010, 11:35 PM
I agree the story may or may not have been epic, but everything we were hearing regarding casting was all wrong and I think that was the major downfall with fanboys and bloggers.

We were seeing for lack of a better word amateurs and kids being cast as these epic heroes and to this day I cannot see the film being good with the group they put together. Add to that the $300 million price tag and lets face it; if it had failed, or even just broke more than even, then the resulting WB backlash to DC properties, all the major players of which would have been in the film, would have possibly ended the DC film universe before it began.

The film was just too much of a gamble. My biggest sticking points were the casting of a model (Megan Gail) with no acting experience as Wonder Woman and using the John Stewart version of Green Lantern. My reasoning for my displeasure at using Stewart was due to the fact that most of the seminal GL mythos revolves around Hal Jordan, to simply skip Jordan would bring a blow to the character's solo efforts. The rest of the casting was atrocious, IMO.
KALel3412
KALel3412 - 8/4/2010, 11:38 PM
the cast was awful
NERO
NERO - 8/4/2010, 11:43 PM
I like George Miller, but seeing his idea of who these characters were by the actors he was choosing to fill their shoes really pointed to the fact that he didn't have a grasp on the characters. And if you're making an ensemble film but have no clue as to who the characters are then you've already lost the battle before its begun. Miller was heading for trouble; I think the fans voicing their displeasure was valid. In the end I think it saved the DC Film Universe and I am shocked and highly grateful that WB actually listened for once.
marvel72
marvel72 - 8/5/2010, 3:19 AM
dc entertainment got to get the ball rolling soon on a justice league movie,because their falling further & further behind marvel.
marvel owns the comic book movie genre.
ElBicho
ElBicho - 8/5/2010, 6:35 AM
They should re-cast and make the movie...
TesDaGreat
TesDaGreat - 8/26/2010, 7:37 AM
View Recorder