5 Trends in cinema that 2014 showed us

5 Trends in cinema that 2014 showed us

Want to know how cinema will play out in 2015? Here are the 5 key things I identified from this year that will play a big part in your favourite studios future. Hit the jump to find out.

Editorial Opinion
By tonytony - Dec 31, 2014 12:12 PM EST
Filed Under: Other

Trend 1 - originality will become rarer


This year from the top 10 grossing  movies worldwide there was only one movie that was not a reboot, part of franchise or a sequel. That Movie was interstellar. The question however is where are the rest of the innovative movies? what is ironic is that any time you speak to any critic about the box office they always talk about seeing something original, the problem at the moment is that when it is released audiences seem to be shying away from original movies. We are already 10 movies into the marvel cinematic universe which runs on the same formula and heading to transformers 5 and fast and furios 7, every franchise needs a break. This is a worrying trend as Hollywood needs new good movies to make new franchises like hobbits or hunger games.

Tonys theory- studios are under more pressure than ever to deliver hits. If they put out movies that arent hits they dont just get criticised by the usual suspects (shareholders, management) today you have media and internet fanboys ready to really highlight any shortcomings to put the boot in.  So less and less risks will be taken on new movies not within a franchise or sequel. Interstellar only really got made because it had arguably two of the greatest directors alive in cinema behind it in spielberg and Nolan, it might be the case that the only way originality will prevail is if we have talent with clout pushing those movies. But even then i think studios will be more and more in favour of franchises.



Trend 2 - Marketing will grow in significance

you compare movies like the transformers 4 (18% on rotten tomatoes) and edge of tomorrow (90% on rotten tomatoes) yet transformers 4 has grossed a staggering billion dollars and edge of tomorrow grossed  370 mil (not a flop but definitely not making waves from a commercial perspective). Apart from proving my point above about franchises and sequels being the order of the day in hollywood What also really struck me about edge of tomorrow was the sombre and non- existent marketing, while transformers spared no expense in getting the message out

Tonys theory- I genuinely believe that with edge of tomorrow, the studio must have seen the movie and decided that it speaks for itself now this obviously with Hindsight was a mistake.  In every industry marketing can make or break the product, it is how you get products that are essentially inferior having the greatest market share in some industries. The morale of the story here is simple if you have a good product dont be lazy, realise nothing sells itself and invest in getting the message out.



Trend 3 - Romantic comedies are for yesteryear

I only decided to add this after speaking to my wife yesterday about an idea for an article

I remember as a youngster heading to the cinema in 2000 and watching what was essentially a really surprisingly funny and good movie called "what women want", which was the 4th highest grossing movie that year in that year as well believe it or not Mission impossible 2 was the only movie in the top 10 that was from a sequel or franchise.  The last romantic comedy that i saw in the cinema was hitch and that was a really good watch too. In the top 10 this year there are no romantic comedies and if i believe my wife and her sister, this is not because of a lack of appetite but rather from a lack of choices. all you need really is a leading man like say chris pratt and a leading lady like say jennifer lawrence to get together and do something fun and feel good. 

Tonys theory -  I believe that studios are increasingly foregoing these types of movies and concentrating on spectacle movies because of the emergence of television. I think those films which are drama pieces or romantic comedies will be made less and less simply because studios want the big ticket movies, they want movies that give the cinematic experience which you wont get from home from HBO.  Therefore studios want to invest in differentiation and are looking for movies like the hobbit, or planet of the apes. I dont believe this will change anytime soon. But its a shame as the rom-com sub-genre is essentially dead in cinema.


Trend 4 -Internet fanboys matter

I wish they didnt but they do!!!

I dont want to get too worked up about this but the biggest threat hollywood faces are from the internet fanboys who add nothing but can definitely take stuff away. 
Cast your minds back to batman begins, a movie with a similar budget ("$150 mil)and take ($374 mil) to edge of tomorrow. if that movie was made today and that performance was made today think of all the internet trolls that would have been queuing up to call it a failure (to make it sure it fails). In doing so most likely the dark knight wouldnt have been made the dark knight went on to gross over $1bil, and is still the only comic book movie to get over a billion without 3d (no mean feat) but aside from the money it is widely regarded as one of the best films ever made never mind comic book films. 
Studios need to find a way to deal with this sect that has emerged and is trying to intersect and gain influence in the industry, this is to the detriment of the industry as these fanboys do not add dollars but the noise they make can be picked up by wider resources and reported as fact or representation of the general populos which it isnt.
A big example was interstellar this year,where disneys trolls basically couldnt wait to attack the movie and paint it a failure the idea being that if you call it a failure then people will think its a failure before they review it and go into it reviewing trying to validate why its a failure as opposed to being objective. this naturally effects some (not all , thankfully) who want to go watch it and could be dissuaded from seeing it. The reverse was done with Guardians of the galaxy and the movie ended up grossing perhaps far more than it should. 
this is creating a problem at the domestic box office as more and more people will be put off not realising that alot of reviewers have an agenda. It even got to the point where some idiot was trying to attack the science in batman and interstellar yet decided to completely ignore the ridiculos assumption about a hammer with its own mind and can fly or that of the unkillable green man or the fact that if you had a suit of armour and took the tumbles and knocks that iron man routinely takes you would break every bone in your body (basically the science in those marvel movies are as crap as it gets), thats because its not about the science in the movies as much as it is about simply attacking a different studio and trying to create negativity around their products. This is a problem and honestly one that needs to be looked at now

Tonys theory- Honestly the world is getting more and more digitised and more people than ever are going online it is logical that some studios will try and use the internet to shape peoples perception. The problem is that this is being abused and the worst offender by some margin is disney the way they or their fans attack anything released within 2 weeks of a disney movie is appalling to say the least. I watched the attacks on man of steel last year, i saw it this year with interstellar when it was up against big hero 6. as an fyi at the time of writing this interstellar had grossed 640 million worldwide while big hero 6 (the interstellar killer )had grossed half of that or 320 million. imagine if those numbers where reversed? those internet trolls would be queuing up to shoot interstellar to make sure it never takes off.


Trend 5 - International markets are good for business

this year every single movie in the top 10 grossed more money internationally than in the US. Transformers grossed over 840 million of its billion dollar gross from abroad, and this sort of trend is not going to slow down, in the future you will see more and more films and franchises with international appeal as opposed to smaller ones that can not be sold abroad, the idea is to maximise every dollar. In doing this there will be less and less outright flops at the box office.


Tonys theory- as more and more countries open up to the idea of internationalisation there will be more and more markets that open up revenue streams for the box office, the flip side however is that it will become less and less uncommon to have movies being shot in international locations like china (as we saw in transformers 4) just to appeal. Im all for it. also the international markets are less and less influenced by internet fanboys and because of this their industry will continue to grow, like the US box office did prior to the recent years.



Thats it for now folks , I hope you have enjoyed reading this as much as i have enjoyed writing it. If you do then dont forget to hit the red thumb. Either way i want to wish everyone of our wonderful community a happy new year.
REAGAN Interview: Jon Voight On His Approach To Playing A KGB Agent And Pandemic Challenges (Exclusive)
Related:

REAGAN Interview: Jon Voight On His Approach To Playing A KGB Agent And Pandemic Challenges (Exclusive)

REAGAN Interview: Dennis Quaid & Penelope Ann Miller Explore Ronald And Nancy's Hollywood History (Exclusive)
Recommended For You:

REAGAN Interview: Dennis Quaid & Penelope Ann Miller Explore Ronald And Nancy's Hollywood History (Exclusive)

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

PAF
PAF - 12/31/2014, 2:40 PM


The delusion that is #4 of this list. Fanboys think they matter the most when studios mainly care about is the GENERAL AUDIENCE.
PAF
PAF - 12/31/2014, 2:50 PM
You sound so salty about Disney lmao its hilarious. You're going to let a couple of Nolan haters get to you? God. If fanboys really mattered then those Diseny "fanboys" would have sabotaged Interstellar like you said but plenty of people still went to see it.
tonytony
tonytony - 12/31/2014, 3:16 PM
@paf they tried and they failed. Also that is one of the 5 points what do you think about the other 4 points?
PAF
PAF - 12/31/2014, 3:28 PM
@tonytony

Your other points are on point tho. Lol. Especially #5. The international market has been helping a lot of these film reach a greater success.
ZeoTV
ZeoTV - 12/31/2014, 3:38 PM
the romantic comedy genre is pretty much dead
Odin
Odin - 12/31/2014, 3:45 PM
Oh number 4, that's bad...
tonytony
tonytony - 12/31/2014, 4:08 PM
@lexhairfight you gotta search for rom coms today. also any movie can be classed indie if its not pushed. but my general observation is that rom coms have really dropped off the map. Although will smiths movie focus is one im looking forward to. But im hard pressed to think of any in recent times. From a commercial perspective def the box office significance of these movies have really been reduced and less and less of these movies are being made even less being promoted.
Jazzy4
Jazzy4 - 12/31/2014, 6:19 PM
A movie any movie makes whatever BO it makes because X number of people went to see it willingly.

The fact that you have that insane idea of an evil force, a sect as you cAlled it, that will manipulate and pressure people into going to see a movie they don't want to see, changing the BO outcome of a movie according YOUR OWN perception of what it should generate, is a testament of your own twisted manipulative and unhealthy mind.

Just because a movie made more that YOU think it should doesn't mean that it's because people were forced, pressured or manipulated by a sect of fanboys to watch it against their own will.

Mind you, people can and will watch whatever movie they want without having a gun on their head or some manipulative group to force them to do it.
Lhornbk
Lhornbk - 12/31/2014, 8:36 PM
@Jazzy and @tonytony, you're both about half right. As @tonytony says, there is a snowball effect in how much movies make. People see movies making big money, hear good things about it on the internet, and they are more likely to go watch it. It's been that way from Star Wars to Titanic to Avatar to GotG. But, Jazzy is right that an attempt by fanboys or others to produce a snowball effect does not explain the success of movies. Yes, there was a pretty big fanboy push behind GotG, but if the movie hadn't been good, it wouldn't have made that much money. And if anything the Transformers movies have succeeded despite being trashed critically and by fanboys. And TASM2 wouldn't have even mafe it to $600 million if fanboys really had that much control. (And for the record, I couldn't care less about a movie's rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Frankly, I liked Edge of Tomorrow and Transformers about the same amount. I thought both were good, not great.)
imkennypowers
imkennypowers - 12/31/2014, 9:57 PM
@tonytony @lexhairfight
Pedrito
Pedrito - 1/1/2015, 12:39 AM
#1 is a straw man. And the assumption that "franchise movie = lack of originality" is simply a fallacy. It's also false nostalgia. To grossers in Hollywood have been adaptations of other work since the beginning.

#2 is obvious, but the studios knows what they're doing. If they don't market a movie they already paid for, there's a damn good reason why. Putting more money into what they deem a bad investment does not turn it into a better investment.

#3 is also false. Not breaking the top ten doesn't mean the genre is dying. There has been a decline, while the bullshit young adult genre has emerged.

#4 is pure delusional nonsense. Do you really believe that someone reading some troll's comments (or your own delusional ramblings for that matter) will change their minds about seeing a movie? Trolls are obvious by nature.
I'm sorry that GOTG made "more money than it should have". Haha. wtf does that even mean.

#5. Again, fanboys have zero influence.

Nice idea for an editorial, but it has the wrong author. You're delusional to a hilarious degree. Good read, but wrong.
tonytony
tonytony - 1/1/2015, 1:28 AM
@pedrito lets just do transformers and fast and furios over and over again right? Cos thats original. Also lets decide not to invest in marketing for movies, your point about the studios having their reasons is akin to someone telling me the lord works in mysterious ways.
If you are going to counteract be logical and qualify your points. I welcome sound rational challenge and discussion not comments that read like some bitter fanboy swipe
Pedrito
Pedrito - 1/1/2015, 2:04 AM
Once a studio is convinced that a given movie will flop or underperform, they won't invest into marketing.
How do they decide how well a movie will do? That's where I say, in general, studios know how what they're doing.

Of course there are mistakes and you get good movies that needed more support (like Dredd) and others where marketing couldn't save them because they simply weren't blockbuster material (like Transcendence).
In any case, the decision to market a film properly is more than just being lazy or not.
tonytony
tonytony - 1/1/2015, 4:47 AM
@pedrito i definitely agree about dredd, and i can understand your point about studios cutting losses on movies they dont think are blockbusters. But at the same time you never for sure, i just think something like edge of tomorrow or dredd for that matter is an example of marketing being non existent and its a shame as we propably could have got a dredd sequel with a bigger budget that goes terminator 2 on us, how awesome would that be? Any way i think there was excessive gore in dredd and maybe if they had toned it down it might have got a lower rating and be able to appeal to a wider audience. but we will never know now. what i think we can both agree on is that dredd along with edge of tomorrow could have used more marketing.
tonytony
tonytony - 1/1/2015, 12:43 PM
which naturally makes the point that marketing is important.
BawbScharf
BawbScharf - 1/1/2015, 2:16 PM
This was a great article ...but the bias for Nolan and against MARVEL STUDIOS (not Disney) made it almost unreadable. Long story short: Marvel films do well because it appeals to multiple demographics. Marvel has the pixar effect where they have a movie that all ages can watch and enjoy. Basically, it appeals to kids whereas Nolan and neo DC movies are not as geared towards them. A movie that BOTH parents and kids can enjoy together is RARE but marvel tapped into that. OF COURSE, those movies are going to make more money than a film targeted to mostly just adults. Doesn't mean GOTG is better than Interstellar, just that it speaks to a wider audience. Fanboys have NOTHING to with that.

Another thing that we are learning from the rise of the 'innovators' in the 2000's (Wright, Snyder, Nolan) is that their novelty wears out with the General Audience or their movies were TOO CREATIVE for normal audiences to latch onto. Most movie going audiences do not want to be challenged by their films thus pulling Snyder and Nolan away from a franchise, those movies are more likely than not going to be met with mixed thoughts. Wright's case is the reverse as when he adapted a comic book piece THAT is the one that bombed though it would be argued that he only really does cult movies. Again, this is more about the general audience not wanting things too weird and not internet fanboys.

Besides THAT, this was a fairly good article though the biased against Marvel is not appreciated. I am not saying that it should not be up for criticism but that that criticism needs more evidence than being bitter because people like it more than something you like. I think it is very much possible, if you removed the bitterness to the side, for you to see WHY Marvel is doing so well and that it has NOTHING to do with what the internet thinks but how much the GA can process.

Good article though.
View Recorder