What's With Covering All of the Non-Comic Book Related Movies?

What's With Covering All of the Non-Comic Book Related Movies?

A trend I've been noticing this past few months here on CBM is the coverage of several non-comic book related movies, or movies that have a tenuous at-best comic book connection. Can we cool it and focus on what makes this site great?

Editorial Opinion
By jamedog - Feb 26, 2012 10:02 AM EST
Filed Under: Other

I've been a user on this website for about a year now, give or take. During the past few months I've slowed down my posts considerably, most of it because of other obligations, but there's one thing about cbm.com that I've been meaning to get off my chest for a while now.

Whats with all of the attention given to non comic book movies?

As a comic book fan, what attracted me to this site is the fact that it is a purely comic book movie site. As a movie buff and geek, there comes a point where you get tired of hearing about the latest artsy film or newest celebrity gossip and just want to hear the news you love to hear: the latest comic book movie news. Now there are already several websites out there that are dedicated to comic book movie news, but what makes this site unique is that it's run entirely by the users. Users can post editorials, post news, fan fic, etc. It makes it fun and unique, but also can work against it. One thing that I've been noticing these past few months is that users are posting more and more news about movies that really don't have much of a connection to comic books, and it kinda takes away from the integrity of the website.

Just look at the main page and you'll see stories dedicated to Star Trek, John Carter, Prometheus, Wrath of the Titans, Transformers, Game of Thrones, and The Raven; and none of these are based on comic books. Yes, there have been comic book tie-ins and adaptations of some of these properties, but none are based off of comic books.

When I think of a comic book movie, I think of something BASED off of a comic book. When a comic is adapted to the big screen, then that is a true comic book movie, not the other way around. Let's face it, a lot of movies have comic book tie-ins these days because it's a cheap and easy way to market your movie to an audience. Geeks are a big audience that studios want to cater to, and tying in a movie to the comic world is a great way to win geeks over, but it isn't a true comic book movie. Trying to say that these properties are comic book movies just seems cheap and makes it obvious that users are just grasping at straws so that they can make their adsense goals.

If you look at the movies I've listed above, they are all big GEEK properties. Geeks love Game of Thrones, Transformers and John Carter, but none are based on comic books. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't ever think there was a Game of Thrones comic, but it does have a big geek following. I can almost understand covering John Carter, Transformers, and Star Trek because they have had popular comic book tie-ins, but that doesn't make them a true cbm. Hell, Star Trek is still best known as a T.V. show, and one can argue that the long running novels are more popular than the comics. John Carter is still better known for the pulp novels its based off of, though there are several comics based on it running now.

As for Wrath of the Titans, Prometheus, and The Raven, why? Wrath of the Titans and Prometheus feature actors that have starred in CBMs, but that doesn't make it a comic book movie. And The Raven, other than the fact that it's from the director of V for Vendetta, why are we covering this? This isn't even the tip of the iceberg, as I've seen considerable space on this site dedicated to The Bourne Legacy, Immortals,Pacific Rim, Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter, Dark Shadows and even The Three Stooges. Just because a movie has talent involved that has starred in a CBM, doesn't make it a CBM, and just because there have been comic book tie-ins, doesn't mean it's a CBM.

Just as an example, this time last year we were covering Battle: Los Angeles because it starred Aaron Eckhart, but The Rum Diary also starred Aaron Eckhart, so why didn't we cover that? It doesn't make much sense to me.

I can understand covering the Transformers and G.I.Joe movies because one can argue that the comic books have surpassed the cartoons and toy lines in longevity and popularity, and same with Conan and Red Sonja, but what about the other ones. When you think Dark Shadows, you think of the long running soap, not of a comic book.

I guess what I'm arguing is that when we cover this non-comic book movies, it takes away from the uniqueness of this website. Comic book movies are very popular today, and there is enough news out there about them to fill up the front page of cbm.com without us trying to justify posting the trailer to The Three Stooges. This is a site for comic geeks to be comic geeks, lets not turn this into just another movie website.

By: TwitterButtons.com

By TwitterButtons.com

THE 4:30 MOVIE Interview: Filmmaker Kevin Smith On How His Passion For The Theater Shaped New Film (Exclusive)
Related:

THE 4:30 MOVIE Interview: Filmmaker Kevin Smith On How His Passion For The Theater Shaped New Film (Exclusive)

THE FRANCHISE: Trailer For Max Series Starring Daniel Brühl Reveals Chaos Inside World Of Superhero Filmmaking
Recommended For You:

THE FRANCHISE: Trailer For Max Series Starring Daniel Brühl Reveals Chaos Inside World Of Superhero Filmmaking

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

PaulRom
PaulRom - 2/26/2012, 10:40 AM
Nice write up. In my experience, something can be covered on the site as long as it has a comic book and/or it's sci-fi, fantasy or (occasionally) horror. I don't care for covering movies like Dark Shadows, Bourne Legacy or Game Of Thrones on the main page too often, personally. But if there's something sci-fi and/or fantasy related (Wrath Of The Titans, Avatar, Harry Potter) and it's of general interest to the CBM audience, then it can be covered. Same reason with Battle LA; I believe we were covering that because it's a sci-fi movie.

As for Three Stooges, I'd rather we not cover that at all. :P
PaulRom
PaulRom - 2/26/2012, 10:43 AM
Oh, and regarding The Raven, I was unsure of covering that film as well. It doesn't seem like something we'd cover often. But the story has been adapted into a graphic novel years ago, so I don't mind covering it as long as we don't have five articles in a row on main.
SHHH
SHHH - 2/26/2012, 11:32 AM
Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter Is A Comic/Graphic Novel Also The Raven.. But The Rest Skip Em... Other People Like Em..

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
golden123
golden123 - 2/26/2012, 12:06 PM
If the co-owners of this site don't want a movie covered on here, then it won't be covered. They have a vision, you know. "Comicbookmovie" is just a cool geeky title. The title doesn't dictate much.
CBK
CBK - 2/26/2012, 12:18 PM
There are cool movies without comic ties, why NOT cover them on this site?
MovieMaster
MovieMaster - 2/26/2012, 12:47 PM
I've always thought that the site should've been called Comic Book Media
95
95 - 2/26/2012, 1:39 PM
This site covers basically all projects we're interested in. A person interested in 'The Avengers' is likely interested in 'Star Trek', as well. We're geeks and fans to numerous genre and popular culture icons. All of these projects have an established fanbase.

But I do share your pain. Surely, if an article received little hits, no one will post more on that topic. Perhaps, we can ignore 'The Raven' related articles (let that shit die). Generating no response is a good indicator that we don't give a shit. Unfourtantely, seems like some of us do care.

Why do food manufacturer sell unhealthy products?

Because people still buy them.


GOTG
GOTG - 2/26/2012, 2:00 PM
yh its called CBM 4 a reason
headlopper
headlopper - 2/26/2012, 2:06 PM
I like the other stuff. Sorry.
RidiculousFanBoyDemands
RidiculousFanBoyDemands - 2/26/2012, 2:36 PM
It's fine the way it is. If you don't like the articles, don't click on them. It's very simple.
SHHH
SHHH - 2/26/2012, 3:02 PM
Wolverine19742
Wolverine19742 - 2/26/2012, 3:20 PM
So what some are saying is that we should cover the Rock @ Werstlemania because he is in G.I. Joe? LoL.
acidbath
acidbath - 2/26/2012, 3:45 PM
Promethius ties directly to aliens which have a long comic history it belongs here and I say expansion is great so long as it doesn't hamper the content we love so much.
Supes17
Supes17 - 2/26/2012, 8:12 PM
Who gives a [frick]?
ecksmanfan
ecksmanfan - 2/26/2012, 9:07 PM
The first redesign that was done a long ways back actually dropped the "ComicBookMovie" logo in favor of the "CBM" logo. Galactus saw the site was evolving to other genres and saw an opportunity to improve the site and allow fans of other genres to take part. If you do a bit of digging on the site, you'll see that we have pages for anime, horror, video games, fantasy and many others
alucard365
alucard365 - 2/27/2012, 10:28 AM
I hope you know people do watch other movies, not just CBM's. Lol
ThaMessenger07
ThaMessenger07 - 2/27/2012, 10:33 AM
Because this site would have limited material and fewer updates then it does now if it was simply dedicated to CBM's. It is absurd to limit news that ties closely with the genre to simply keep the site "Pure".

Ignorant post none the Less. All of the titles you listed are actually based on a Comic book or Graphic Novel. So it came down to either, you just had no idea or have been turned into long running comics, so they fit the theme but you disagree.
Potterman
Potterman - 2/27/2012, 2:09 PM
while I understand the your point. we would have to talk about the same 10 movies over and over again. There are only so many "true" CBMs coming out this year. Also Abraham Lincoln - Vampire Hunter is based on a book. Maybe not a comic but a book nonetheless. Game of Thrones, same thing. LOTR/Hobbit, same thing. To say people shouldn't write about some of the best books turned to movies you are crazy! Oh so should we not cover The Walking Dead because its a TV show and not a movie??? cmon man. The beauty of CBM is that you can read a description about the article before clicking on it. If you don't like the subject then don't read it! Its not your personal site JA. Other people actually enjoy reading about other things besides Avengers, Spiderman, Batman, and X-men.
marvelguy
marvelguy - 2/27/2012, 2:32 PM
I agree. It seems a little much to cover the more extraneous films. I think the compromise shouldn't garner more front page articles than traditional DC/Marvel, etc. film adaptations.

More importantly, an article that is on the main page about Sam Jackson and his asinine rationale for voting was irrelevant and on it way too long.
As much as I enjoy an actor's work, I don't want to hear him speak other than his latest role and the like--regardless if I agree with his beliefs, etc.
View Recorder