MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE - FALLOUT Star Simon Pegg Comments On STAR TREK BEYOND's Underwhelming Box Office

MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE - FALLOUT Star Simon Pegg Comments On STAR TREK BEYOND's Underwhelming Box Office

The Star Trek film series is in an uncertain place at the moment, and Simon Pegg has been looking back on the response to 2016's Star Trek Beyond and why it underperformed at the Box-Office...

By FromACertainPOV - Mar 26, 2018 08:03 AM EST
Filed Under: Star Trek
Source: Geek Magazine

Star Trek has always had a very inconsistent track record when it comes to its cinematic endeavors, both critically and financially. That changed in 2009 with director JJ Abrams' reboot Star Trek,  which made the property something it never was before: a blockbuster.

Subsequent Star Trek films were few and far between however with a successful sequel that was maligned by fans in 2013 's Star Trek Into Darkness and then the better received but less successful 2016 entry  Star Trek Beyond. 

To the latter film's response, Simon Pegg who stars as Scotty in the rebooted films also served as co-writer on the 2016 film has been speaking to Geek Magazine about why he thinks the film was received poorly at the box-office. 

“I think it was poorly marketed, to be honest. If you look at a film like Suicide Squad, that was around for such a long time before it finally came out and people were so aware of it. Whereas with Star Trek Beyond, it was left too late before they started their marketing push. It still did great business, but it was disappointing compared to Into Darkness."


Even at the time, the Shaun of the Dead actor made no bones about his dislike of the marketing for the film, particularly the first teaser trailer released that was Beastie Boys and dirtbike heavy. He also isn't alone in his frustrations with Paramount choosing not to capitalize on the science-fiction franchises' 50th-anniversary which passed with very little fanfare: 

“I was really angry about that because it used ‘Sabotage,’ which was our surprise moment in the end. It was supposed to be a very fun and heightened twist, and something that was a big surprise and they blew it in the first trailer, which really annoyed me. They also made the film look like a boneheaded action film. And they were scared, I think, of mentioning the 50th Anniversary. It was fumbled as a thing; they didn’t know what to do with it and it’s a real shame. But I came away from it really, really happy and very proud of it.”

Despite the film's box-office failings, Pegg is still very proud of the film and it did garner a lot of praise from audiences and critics. The film currently sits at 84% / 80% on Rotten Tomatoes with the general consensus being that the film was far and away better than it's predecessor Star Trek Into Darkness and offered a fun blend of classic TOS and modern JJ Trek.

A result that Pegg and those involved were going for: 

“From a professional standpoint for me, it was such a great experience in the end, because the critical response that we did get was exactly what Doug Jung and I and Justin Lin had hoped for, which was a much more favorable response in terms of being Star Trek and not just something there that’s disguised as Star Trek.”

 

It's uncertain at the moment whether there will be a Star Trek 4, though The Revenant scribe Mark L Smith is currently writing a new film from a pitch idea by Quentin Tarantino, who will then take the film with JJ Abrams to Paramount. Nothing is currently known about its state or content, however. 

What do you think about Pegg's comments? Were you a fan of Star Trek Beyond? What would you like to see in a new Star Trek film? Leave your thoughts below.  

Quentin Tarantino Finally Explains Why His R-Rated STAR TREK Movie Is Never Going To Happen
Related:

Quentin Tarantino Finally Explains Why His R-Rated STAR TREK Movie Is "Never Going To Happen"

STAR TREK: Colm Meaney On Possible Miles O'Brien Return And What He REALLY Thinks About Trekkies (Exclusive)
Recommended For You:

STAR TREK: Colm Meaney On Possible Miles O'Brien Return And What He REALLY Thinks About Trekkies (Exclusive)

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Kevwebsz
Kevwebsz - 3/26/2018, 8:52 AM
Well at least he's being real.
GoldGuy
GoldGuy - 3/26/2018, 8:57 AM
He's right, promotion was sorely lacking. A lot of people didn't know it was coming out, and the first trailer didn't help things.
Luminus
Luminus - 3/27/2018, 2:41 AM
@GoldGuy -
FleischerSupes
FleischerSupes - 3/26/2018, 9:01 AM
This was the best of the Kelvin Timeline movies by far, the scene with Spock looking at the photo of the old cast killed me.
DarthGrizzly
DarthGrizzly - 3/26/2018, 9:41 AM
I loved Star Trek Beyond.
TheUnworthyThor
TheUnworthyThor - 3/26/2018, 10:24 AM
It was incredibly disappointing how Beyond didn’t do better considering how good it was. But I have to agree lots of times when a good movie does poorly at the box office or when a bad movie does great it’s because of the strength of the marketing. It’s an unfortunate the success of your movie has to be place somewhat in the hands of people who might not even understand it’s appeal.

Although I do find the sentiment that somehow we know the general consensus is that Beyond with it’s 84/80 on Rotten Tomatoes and smaller box office is thought to be better than Into Darkness with it’s 86/90 and much better box office to being very laughable.
bs77
bs77 - 3/26/2018, 11:17 AM
I liked it just fine. There were some really cool elements, but it felt more like an TV episode to me. I can't quite put my finger on it, but it felt like it was missing an act. Elba could've been an amazing villain, but he was underdeveloped.
GeneralZod
GeneralZod - 3/26/2018, 12:00 PM
Waiting 3 years between sequels in 21st century film-making (where continuity is so vital) is a killer. Also, Beyond had such a basic storyline, and how many times do we need to see the Enterprise utterly destroyed? Too much rinse and repeat
Ha1frican
Ha1frican - 3/26/2018, 12:38 PM
It wasn’t bad but it was kind of a nothing movie. It was basically a 2 hour long episode of the show and seemed kinda cheap Bc if jt
BillyBatson1000
BillyBatson1000 - 3/26/2018, 1:50 PM
Couldn't get into the first one (pained at how 'Krypton' is basically copying the same flaws). Hated the 2nd film (Not Khan/Is Khan/Lazy switcheroo of Spock/Kirk sacrifice scene). But I REALLY enjoyed the third film. It just brought everything together - suddenly the characters we 'use to know' had some depth again - and it was FUN too.
nhoj3
nhoj3 - 3/26/2018, 2:19 PM
I loved Star Trek Beyond and was really disappointed that it didn’t do better at the box office. It hurts even more when you compare it to some of the garbage out there that became hits.
newhire13
newhire13 - 3/26/2018, 2:36 PM
My favorite thing was Kirk was more like classic Kirk. He had his moments of humor and bravado but he was serious and focused. No love interest other than his love for his ship, crew and what Star Fleet stands for.
BigDaddyJinx
BigDaddyJinx - 3/26/2018, 9:36 PM
I think the villain in the movie killed it. I loves me some Elba, but man alive that villain he played was weak as balls.

Bendaflute Cumberbund would've made for a great standalone baddie that was NOT Khan. That to me is what killed Into Darkness. They should've just left him as a "John Smith" baddie and let that play.

Beyond was underwhelming, but far better than the first of the Kelvin timeline features. 2, 3, 1 would be how I rank them.

And after watching the dismal failure called Discovery, it looks like sagging box office and weak TV is gonna make for a rough ride in the Star Trek universe. They should just fire off another TNG installment, or even a DS9 feature. Perhaps even a 4th Kelvin feature that shatters all timelines and brings them all into one, seeing for the first time ever ALL casts from all renditions sharing the screen.

A one film "universe" entry.

I'd love that.
Doodlee
Doodlee - 3/26/2018, 10:34 PM
it was my favorite of the NuTreks, but i do remember being annoyed by the first trailer.
MrDandy
MrDandy - 3/28/2018, 8:28 AM
It's a bummer because it was a great flick. And I agree with Pegg here. It was poorly marketed. I don't think a lot of people were even aware it was Star Trek's 50th Anniversary, especially compared to James Bond and Doctor Who. They both really sold that as an event and got a lot of attention, momentum, and money from it.
KickUrBooty
KickUrBooty - 3/29/2018, 12:36 PM
In my opinion as a long-time fan of Star Trek, Beyond just wasn't very good. I loved Star Trek (2009)and into Darkness. To me Darkness, wasted the talent of the cast with it's boring story line, boring villain and side characters. Darkness lacked the freshness and intense action of ST (2009) and originality of Into Darkness.
View Recorder