Reasons to what went wrong with Star Wars episodes 1-3

Reasons to what went wrong with Star Wars episodes 1-3

Many were ticked off about the Star Wars prequels. Justsomeawesomeguy rants on about his top five problems with Lucas's universe. Rant along with him!

Editorial Opinion
By sonofsamadams - Jul 11, 2011 12:07 AM EST
Filed Under: Star Wars

Thanks to a CBM user's comment, I decided to write this article about the problems with the Star Wars prequels. Now the list of problems could be stuffed into a dictionary. I don't feel like writing about all of them, but instead I narrowed it down to my top five problems with Star Wars prequels.

5. Jar Jar Binks.


Honestly. Really. Why. the. heck. was he in this trilogy in the first place? He did absolutely NOTHING to support the story. Even in episode I he wasn't a good hero. It was Anakin that shut down the battle droids (single-handedly btw). It was a failed and ludicrous attempt by Lucas to create the next Chewbacca and instead he got millions of hate mail from his fans. Some even said Jar Jar was racist? That right there I have to disagree with. Racist no? Prejudice against Handicap people? Yes.

4. A love story with no chemistry

In my opinion, Episode 2 is a mediocre experience saved by the duel between Jango and Obi-wan, and the Jedi battle/war sequence in the end. What really drags down this movie is the lame love story composed by Lucas. Now the love between both Anakin and Padme would have been awesome, but instead we got a 2 hour scenary of both of them throwing around silly dialogue and looking lazily into each others eyes...




As I recall sitting in the theater almost ten years ago, I found myself falling asleep during such a popular movie. Something that rarely happens with me. There is little to none chemistry between the two 'lovers' in Attack of the Clones, but it shows some signs of it towards the end. It was as if Lucas didn't care about Attack of the Clones simply because it HAD to happen. He just quickly came up with a dumb story and a bad script and threw it aside before working on his target-Revenge of the Sith. Even though there is SOME chemistry in Revenge, its unforgettable.


3. Some scenes just don't make sense.

For instance, In episode I, what was up with the whole Gungun leader shaking his head ferociously? I mean, none of the other GunGuns didn't do that! And speaking of GunGuns, the Battle on the Plains of Naboo wasn't really needed to be honest. Did it boast some cool sequences? Of course, but it wasn't needed.
Episode 2-The love story @ Jar Jar bringing the senate together to grant the Supreme Chancellor emergency powers. Really? First of all, Jar Jar is a goon. How did he get so smart and responsible? Lucas never told us.
Episode 3-Anakin turning to the darkside too quickly. Grant it the scene where this takes place is a minor problem to the entire movie, it still kinda doesn't make sense. Where's the regret? Where's the deep emotion? Where's the idea that if you turn to the dark side you'll be living a life of hate and despair? It wasn't there at all. Just, 'Oh I killed the only black Jedi in the Council. Might as well turn to the Dark Side to make up for it. Red was my favorite color anyway'. Lucas really should have considered his plot more. Even with the biggest plot hole of them all-so Anakin supposedly goes off to war for 3 years, comes back and his wife is pregnant? Whaaaaaa...? He's okay with this? I'd be pissed! I'd call the Maury Show!

2. The Casting.

Ewan McGregor, Liam Neeson, Ian McDiarmid were perfect for their roles. PERFECT. But their co-stars weren't as much. Samuel L. Jackson may play a lot of badass characters (Nick Fury, Jules etc) but his acting was dull and plain. His character was badass, but the acting wasn't. It was as if Lucas said, 'you don't have to act really. Just flash that lightsaber around and collect your paycheck at the end of the day'. Black Swan has proven to us that Natalie Portman is a very talented actress. But where did that talent go in Star Wars? Grant it she did a decent job in Revenge, and a passable (barely passable) job in Attack, but in Phantom she was just as dry as Anakin's sand speech in Episode 2. It was sad to see such a great actress as Portman to be used so dully in her role as Padme. Hayden is the big problem. He was a robot in Attack of the Clones and when he got angry it wasn't thrilling, it was laughable. He did a marginally better job in Revenge of the Sith, boasting a character fighting his inner demons. But he'll always be remembered for his bombastic performance in Attack of the Clones. How could Lucas not see this? Was he so blinded by the thought of how much cash these movies would bring in through sales that he couldn't see the logic of making the movies worthwhile for everyone?

1. Choosing the wrong villains.
Count Dooku was pointless. He really was. All he did was chop off Anakins arm and his death came too quickly. Let's face it, Darth Maul should have been the main villain in these movies. That would've been so much better. Having him killing Qui-gon, wounding Obi-wan, and then getting away, then plotting a huge campaign against the Jedi by laying waste in the Jedi Temple for episode 2 and then having Anakin becoming Vader by slaying him in Episode 3 would have been the cherry on the top. Maul's character was badass, mysterious, and dark.

Giving him more time to adapt to the storyline would have made him so much better. But instead we remember him as being the highlight of Phantom menace. Lucas thought he had something going with Dooku. Lucas must be getting the good kind of weed.



In the end, what Lucas should have done in the late 90s was grab a different director and screenwriter and told them, 'this is what I want the look and feel of the prequels to be' and so on, produce and have a co-writer for the story and then let it be. It was as if he was paranoid someone would screw it up.
To be honest, I loved Phantom, but only because I didn't fully focus on Jar Jar and Padme's acting but on the Jedi and Darth Maul. Attack of the Clones was bad, and Revenge was an awesome way to wrap it up but it could have been better.
Phantom: A-
Attack: C-
Revenge: A

but that's my opinion.

so rant with me people with your
thoughts.
comments.
and let me know!

Major Studios Are Assembling Superfan Focus Groups In An Effort To Combat Online Backlash
Related:

Major Studios Are Assembling "Superfan Focus Groups" In An Effort To Combat Online Backlash

STAR WARS Actor John Boyega Sends Superhero Speculation Into Overdrive With New Social Media Posts
Recommended For You:

STAR WARS Actor John Boyega Sends Superhero Speculation Into Overdrive With New Social Media Posts

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 7/11/2011, 5:32 AM
"Anakin turning to the darkside too quickly. Grant it the scene where this takes place is a minor problem to the entire movie, it still kinda doesn't make sense."

Anakin was turning to the darkside all through episode 2 and 3. It didn't just happen when he killed Windu, that was really just the straw that broke the camel's dick. He was constantly complaining about the council holding him back and blaming the Jedi for pretty much all of his shortcomings.

In episode 2 he slaughtered the sand people, and then afterwords was conflicted with himself about it, and even regretted it because he only did it out of revenge, which is a dark side emotion. Also, when Anakin and Obi Wan were going to fight Dooku, Kenobi began to tell Anakin to take it slow and fight Dooku together, but Anakin interrupted him and said, "I'm Taking him now!", and rushed in head long, getting taken out of the fight in seconds. That showed impatience and overconfidence, both dark side traits. He later got his hand cut off by Dooku, which also helped lead him to hate.

In episode 3 he cut off a defeated Dooku's head, and then instantly regretted it, and wasn't sure why he did it. Even though, us, the viewers, were SUPPOSED to see that he did it because he was turning closer and closer to the dark side. and really, you can see him turning that whole movie. he was blaming the Jedi, and even his own master Obi Wan, for everything bad that was happening to him, rather than accepting the truth. Lets not forget also, that Palpatine was poisoning his mind the entire movie. Killing Windu and feeling betrayed by the Council was just the final catalyst of pushing him toward the dark side.

Also, the Gunguns had to attack to the Capital of Naboo to take the palace back. The battle between them and the droid army wasn't pointless at all. They had to get Padme back into power in case the Nubians failed to take out the droid ship in orbit which controlled all the droids.

ROBBEATZZZ
ROBBEATZZZ - 7/11/2011, 8:26 AM
I CONCUR WITH CORNDOGBURGLAR..U CAN TOTALLY SEE HIS DARK SIDE EVOLVING EARLY ON IN EP 2..

I ALSO AGREE THAT THE LOVE STORY WAS @ TIME'S BORING AND TO MUCH(OTHER THAN LOOKING @ NATALIE)

JAR JAR WAS ANNOYING...

I WOULD HAVE LIKED MORE DARTH MAUL..

OVERALL I LIKED THE PREQUALS...THEY DID THE JOB
sonofsamadams
sonofsamadams - 7/11/2011, 8:39 AM
@Intruder

LMFAO!!!!!!!!

That is one funny man right there.
RunDTC
RunDTC - 7/11/2011, 9:52 AM
My 2 biggest beefs are Jar Jar and Christensen. Have Jar Jar die in Phantom Menace and you're good. Replace Christensen with Leonardo Dicaprio (who was the other final candidate for the role) and you got three much better films. and the Maul as Vader thing. just don't have him die and replace Dooku.
dmm5
dmm5 - 7/11/2011, 10:57 AM
I love Jar Jar :D And Darth Maul would've been bad ass to be in the other two. Having Anny kill him in the middle of III in front of the Emperor would be pretty bad. Old ass Dooku can suck it lol
YourMomNaked
YourMomNaked - 7/12/2011, 6:10 AM
Lucas tried to redefine the original trilogies to fit his new trilogies. Reusing catch phrases from those didn't help, either. "I've got a bad feeling about this."
kriswone
kriswone - 7/15/2011, 1:48 PM
@yourmomnaked, re-using catch phrases ties the movies together, and honestly the original trilogies had been hyped up for 20 years before the prequels came out, so expectations had to of been off.
CapFan79
CapFan79 - 7/15/2011, 4:12 PM
I agree that Maul should have been the baddie in all 3. I've been saying that for years. Also, the casting was bad and a poor script didn't help. I love Ewan and he gives the only good performance. Everyone else lacks any enthusiasm.

The prequels were a case of doing something because you can. Lucas wanted to use a bunch of new technology to do something new, yet he rehashed what he had done before.

His original ideas for Indiana Jones and Star Wars are great. Sequels like Empire Strikes Back and Temple of Doom were born out of left over original ideas from the first films. By the time those things were used the "fresh" ideas for constant sequels sucked.

The mine cart chase and giant Gong gag in "Doom" were ideas that didn't fit into Raiders. Cloud City and the AT-AT's were ideas created for the original Star Wars. Indiana Jones felt more original due to Spielberg but that train has sailed too.

I like episode III for what it is just like I enjoy Indiana Jones 4 for the most part, but they are in no way the culturally iconic masterpieces their predecessors were.

It's just a bummer these did not live up to the hope or hype and in a way they ruined the orinal trilogy.
kong
kong - 7/18/2011, 10:52 PM
why is everyone still hung up on this. Instead of doing all these editorials about what they could've done, do one about the future. It seems like you guys are prequels. Stop going back do a Star Wars 7 fan-cast or a How I Think Star Wars 7 8 and 9 should play out.
View Recorder