SPIDER-MAN: FAR FROM HOME Concept Art Spotlights Alternate Mysterio Costume Designs - SPOILERS

SPIDER-MAN: FAR FROM HOME Concept Art Spotlights Alternate Mysterio Costume Designs - SPOILERS

Ryan Meinerding discusses the process of designing Mysterio's outfit, giving us a look at several alternate costumes - one of which is arguably even more comic-accurate that the one we saw in the movie.

By MarkCassidy - Jul 10, 2019 05:07 AM EST
Filed Under: Far From Home
Marvel has shared a new video in which Head of Visual Development Ryan Meinerding discusses the process of bringing classic Spidey villain Mysterio to life in Spider-Man: Far From Home.

Apparently, between 60-70 iterations of the character's look were considered before they settled on the final design, and we get a look at a handful of them here. Some are very different to the one we ended up with in the final film, while one, in particular, is arguably even more comic-accurate than the metallic outfit Jake Gyllenhaal's Quentin Beck donned to do battle with the wall-crawler.

You can check out the video for yourselves over at Marvel.com, but if you want a closer look at the alternate costume designs be sure to click the "view list" button below.

Simply click on the VIEW LIST (ONE PAGE) button below!



The biggest challenge was getting Mysterio's trademark fishbowl helmet right without making it look overly goofy, and Meinerding reveals that they attempted more "head friendly" designs before returning to something that would more closely honor Steve Ditko's original vision for the character.

This sleeker, slightly more effeminate armor was an early concept.



This is pretty close to the costume we ended up seeing on screen, although the helmet is a lot wider at the neck.

"It usually starts from such a unique place, and its one of the reasons why the MCU characters tend to end up looking more unique," said Meinerding of the decision to stick closer to Beck's original look. "With Ditko's stuff, the weirdness of the characters really came through, whether it was in Spider-Man or Mysterio or in Doctor Strange."


Looks like they were thinking about having Mysterio's suit glow at one point, which would have been... interesting!



Although they are still toying with making the helmet design more head-friendly here, this overall costume is arguably more comic-accurate than the one they went with. Meinerding reveals that they ultimately decided on a more metallic look to make the outfit seem more realistic.

"One of the things we do to make something automatically feel more real in some ways is just make it metallic," he explained. "The second you use a metallic paint on his suit, it just feels more real. It gives life; when he's moving around, there's reflections playing off of it, and it doesn't feel dead or flat."




The final two pieces of artwork are more drastic departures from the character's original look, both in design and color.

As you can see, the helmet is sculpted much closer to the head, and makes Mysterio look more like G.I. Joe's Cobra Commander than the classic Spidey villain he's based on.


It's probably safe to assume that the majority of fans will be glad these last couple of designs weren't utilized for the character in Far From Home!

What do you guys think? Did you prefer any of these alternate looks to the one we got in the film? Drop us a comment down below.
SPIDER-MAN: FAR FROM HOME Has Lowest Opening Of Re-Releases; Includes Deleted Scene
Related:

SPIDER-MAN: FAR FROM HOME Has Lowest Opening Of Re-Releases; Includes Deleted Scene

SPIDER-MAN: FAR FROM HOME's Disney+ Premiere Date In The U.S. Has Been Revealed
Recommended For You:

SPIDER-MAN: FAR FROM HOME's Disney+ Premiere Date In The U.S. Has Been Revealed

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
SpideyPuffsMJ
SpideyPuffsMJ - 7/10/2019, 5:33 AM
Zack Snyder's Vero Intern: 'Sir, they already know your movie was bad; they all saw it!'

Snyder: 'THEY'LL SEE WHAT I WANT THEM TO SEE!'

mastakilla39
mastakilla39 - 7/10/2019, 6:47 AM
This version looked more like the Snyder version, because Mysterio is overly buff like all his charaters lol
KnifeWasTooSlow
KnifeWasTooSlow - 7/10/2019, 7:50 AM
@mastakilla39 - The suit also seems to have that wierd texture, too.
DarkArrow19
DarkArrow19 - 7/10/2019, 5:36 AM
I still think it’s crazy how comic accurate the suit was AND I like that they didn’t shy away from his illusions since there was initially rumors that he was an actually sorcerer similar to Strange
Origame
Origame - 7/10/2019, 6:18 AM
@DarkArrow19 - yeah and while i really enjoyed that scene i felt like they could've done more with the illusions. What, some generic video game monsters then one admittedly awesome illusion sequence then nothing? Can't mysterio at least use holograms to make the drones look like something else?
DarkArrow19
DarkArrow19 - 7/10/2019, 6:28 AM
@Origame - yeah I agree. I would want at least one more intense scene. Overall o loved the movie but I think they should have touched upon showing Ned or MJ die to really try and break Peter. I’m sure when Mysterio returns it’ll be even more intense. Although after seeing how his powers work, I don’t think he could hang with the sinister 6 and I wish Mysterio would have had at least some sort of physical threat rather than only his illusions.
SuperbatSpider1003
SuperbatSpider1003 - 7/10/2019, 6:56 AM
@Origame - I think those scenes were too CGI heavy when they could have done stuff with practical effects.
Origame
Origame - 7/10/2019, 6:56 AM
@DarkArrow19 - yeah. But i also think its if mysterio returns. Gyllenhaal isnt the kind of actor to do multiple films in a franchise and killing him here seemed like them writing him out of the mcu. Maybe they can negotiate him to make another appearance and just use illusions to explain it, but that's still an if.
Origame
Origame - 7/10/2019, 7:00 AM
@SuperbatSpider1003 - i am admittedly a fan of practical effects (the whole reason i consider the mcu spiderman suits the worst is because they keep painting over them with cg) i felt using cgi here for the illusions was fine. Nothing there is supposed to be there so it not looking real makes sense while still making you wonder what's really going on. Hopefully we'll get a villain that can work with practical effects. Maybe kraven the hunter.
dragon316
dragon316 - 7/10/2019, 7:51 AM
@DarkArrow19 - maybe in comic he always kept stupid fish bowl on head and in comics cartoons he does not fly
dragon316
dragon316 - 7/10/2019, 7:52 AM
@SuperbatSpider1003 - yeah right this is Hollywood they rely to much on cgi shit someone turn into zombie forget makeup department use cgi make them look like zombie
kylo0607
kylo0607 - 7/10/2019, 9:55 AM
@dragon316 -

Chewtoy
Chewtoy - 7/10/2019, 5:39 AM
They nailed the look on film... I’m glad they didn’t go with any of these instead.
bkmeijer2
bkmeijer2 - 7/10/2019, 5:42 AM
The last one was actually the kind of design I thought they were going for. Instead they went with the actual fish bowl, which is pretty damn cool
Gmoney84
Gmoney84 - 7/10/2019, 6:11 AM
@Catmanlives - that’s ridiculous. Why would Sony kill the cash cow they’ve got as a part of the MCU??
BackwardGalaxy
BackwardGalaxy - 7/10/2019, 6:17 AM
@Gmoney84 - Because they think they can make the money and not have to split it with anybody. Duh.
hazapez
hazapez - 7/10/2019, 6:26 AM
@PeterCipher - if i remember correctly, they get all the money for solo flicks but not the roster films, i guess.
LongMayHeReign
LongMayHeReign - 7/10/2019, 6:47 AM
@BackwardGalaxy - Sony gets all of the money from the solo films since they also fund them and market them.
Catmanlives
Catmanlives - 7/10/2019, 7:03 AM
@Gmoney84 - I suppose, if true, the answer might be that if Spider-Man (in the MCU) wasn't as much of a cash cow as they might like, they could then pull out. It would be a way of hedging their bets a bit while they don't have creative control.
Nightwing1015
Nightwing1015 - 7/10/2019, 7:07 AM
@BackwardGalaxy - What do you mean? They aren't splitting any Far From Home profits with Marvel.
BullyFU
BullyFU - 7/10/2019, 8:41 AM
@Catmanlives - If that was legit then Marvel would have put more heroes and/or villains in it to guarantee it surpass the billion dollar mark quickly. They don't mess around. However if this is false the reporter isn't risking much of anything because Sony and Marvel will deny it regardless and this will hit 1 billion in a matter of time, so no change takes place. It's low risk, high reward for the person claiming it to be true because it'll be next to impossible to prove their report is false unless FFH tanks suddenly.

Attaching a dollar amount makes no sense either. The deal has always been Marvel can use Spider-Man in their films and keep the money from films he appears in like Avengers and Civil War but Sony gets all of the cash on the solo releases. Sony is only putting up the cost of production on solo films also. So they risk very little themselves. Marvel has creative control over Spider-Man and everyone gets money somehow.
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 7/10/2019, 10:59 AM
@Catmanlives - Do I believe that someone at Sony has said at some point something like: "If Marvel Studios makes us a billion dollar Spider-Man movie, we'll let them keep doing it?" Sure. That sounds entirely plausible (and could be the kernel of this reporting). But I find it extremely unlikely that was ever an official policy or stipulation in the deal itself.
1 2
View Recorder