MADAME WEB Reshoots Rumor Points To Major Timeline Change - Possible SPOILERS

MADAME WEB Reshoots Rumor Points To Major Timeline Change - Possible SPOILERS

We had been led to believe that Madame Web was going to be set in the early 2000s, but a new rumor suggests that recent reshoots may have made some major changes to the movie's timeline...

By MarkCassidy - Jan 18, 2024 09:01 PM EST
Filed Under: Madame Web

Shortly after Madame Web was first announced and some details about the SSU movie began to find their way online, we learned that the Spider-Man spin-off was to be set in the early noughties.

Later, word got out that Emma Roberts and Adam Scott had been cast as Peter Parker's mother, Mary, and beloved Uncle Ben, so the assumption was that the timeline allowed for either the introduction of a young Peter, or his conception. 

While this may still be the case, Jeff Sneider has shared a very interesting rumor on the latest episode of The Hot Mic.

Apparently, Madame Web was actually going to be set in the '90s - and in The Amazing Spider-Man universe! Though Sneider doesn't know if Andrew Garfield was going to appear, he was originally supposed to be this continuity's Spider-Man (and possible the SSU's Webhead going forward) until the decision was made to pivot to Tom Holland's take on the hero.

This does make a lot more sense - especially if Sony is hoping for sequels and spin-offs - but it means that the '90s setting no longer fits!

Sneider has heard that the majority of the movie's reshoots were needed to remove every '90s reference from the movie in order for the timelines to match up. This is very much just a rumor for now, but if accurate, we may be able to tell while watching the film!

For now, check out a featurette with some new footage below.

Dakota Johnson stars as the clairvoyant Cassandra Webb, who uses her abilities to save a group of young woman, played by Sydney Sweeney, Isabela Merced, and Celeste O’Connor, from a villainous Spider-Man lookalike known as Ezekiel Simms.

The girls Webb is doing her best to keep safe, Julia Carpenter, Mattie Franklin and Anya Corazón, are all destined to become heroes with Spider-like powers of their own.

Sony also has a third Venom movie slated for Nov. 8, 2024, and Kraven the Hunter, starring Aaron Taylor-Johnson, coming on Aug. 30, 2024. El Muerto, which was set to star Bad Bunny, has reportedly been dropped from the schedule.

"'Meanwhile, in another universe...'" reads the official synopsis, "In a switch from the typical genre, Madame Web tells the standalone origin story of one of Marvel publishing's most enigmatic heroines." "The suspense-driven thriller stars Dakota Johnson as Cassandra Webb, a paramedic in Manhattan who may have clairvoyant abilities. Forced to confront revelations about her past, she forges a relationship with three young women destined for powerful futures...if they can all survive a deadly present."

S.J. Clarkson, who also helmed Marvel’s Jessica Jones and The Defenders, directs from a script by Matt Sazama, Kerem Sazama and Burk Sharpless. Adam Merims executive produced.

Madame Web will swing into theaters on Feb. 14, 2024.

Sydney Sweeney Reportedly Agreed To Make MADAME WEB To Convince Sony To Greenlight ANYONE BUT YOU
Related:

Sydney Sweeney Reportedly Agreed To Make MADAME WEB To Convince Sony To Greenlight ANYONE BUT YOU

MADAME WEB Star Sydney Sweeney Reveals Impressive Transformation For Upcoming Role As Boxer Christy Martin
Recommended For You:

MADAME WEB Star Sydney Sweeney Reveals Impressive Transformation For Upcoming Role As Boxer Christy Martin

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Order66
Order66 - 1/18/2024, 9:03 PM
Nobody wants this movie.
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 1/18/2024, 9:24 PM
@Order66 - I like movies with big plots

Nolanite
Nolanite - 1/19/2024, 8:10 AM
@Order66 - I do!
Nolanite out
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 1/18/2024, 9:13 PM
This is about as bad as the Fox-men and their crazy timelines.
SheepishOne
SheepishOne - 1/18/2024, 9:25 PM
Having Garfield as that universe's Spidey to ultimately beat all these cheap versions of the characters to a pulp is maybe the only thing that would get me interested in the SPUMC.
OriginalGusto1
OriginalGusto1 - 1/18/2024, 9:31 PM
I like cheese.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 1/18/2024, 9:44 PM
@OriginalGusto1 - yup, go Pack GO!
MCUKnight11
MCUKnight11 - 1/18/2024, 9:44 PM
Would explain why this is the only installment of the SPUMC to be actively promoted on the official Marvel entertainment social media...
Jefferys
Jefferys - 1/19/2024, 1:48 AM
@MCUKnight11 - Yeah I've been noticing that, it's been really weird that they have been doing so. Is it also because outside of Deadpool there isn't much else from them to be released thus year?
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 1/19/2024, 4:43 AM
@MCUKnight11 - They should stop trying to roll with these SPUMCed up movies and make efforts to stop them entirely.

Instead of folding these crappy films into their continuity, they should buy Sony tomorrow and pull this from cinemas. Pull all of them. Apologize to cinemas and give them Groot merch and remind the theatre owners that they're actually doing them a favor by taking away a potentially damaging flop and freeing up screens for other films.
tmp3
tmp3 - 1/18/2024, 9:44 PM
Poor Tom. Good on Garfield for avoiding this mess. Love his Peter after NWH, but I’d rather he stay on ice if this is the only alternative haha
MuadDib
MuadDib - 1/18/2024, 9:45 PM
This movie and every other Spider-man-less movie that Sony puts out is beyond lame.

The only thing lamer is that ppl actually pay money to go watch these flaming garbage piles they call movies. So much time and energy and financial resources that could be used much more efficiently, just to end up with Kraven and Morbius and now this.. smh

No thank you.
MCUKnight11
MCUKnight11 - 1/18/2024, 9:45 PM
I don't think this will be a problem after the year is over with how all 3 will most likely perform.
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 1/18/2024, 10:05 PM
Turn the rumored aunt may movie into a spy espionage thriller with Richard and Mary and call it the Parker’s
incredibleTalk
incredibleTalk - 1/18/2024, 10:14 PM
Tom Holland single handed saved the Spiderman name and franchise for Sony and Marvel BUT....


MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 1/18/2024, 10:42 PM
Whenever anyone mentions that Aunt May movie idea, I immediately think of this and have to watch it again...

mountainman
mountainman - 1/18/2024, 11:23 PM
I have never heard a person in the real world use the word noughties to refer to what everyone says as 2000’s.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 1/19/2024, 4:53 AM
@mountainman - Aren't we technically still in the 2000s? Won't we be in them until the year 3000?

Early 2000s, I've heard people say. Hell I say early 2000s too. But since we're gonna be in the 2000s for a thousand years, it's still technically the early 2000s now.

Noughties or Oughties is more appropriate they just sound weird. Especially Noughties, lol.

I hear people say The Oughts a lot. That sounds better, tbh. Sounds more reserved than Noughties. I mean were the Noughties that naughty?
mountainman
mountainman - 1/19/2024, 7:55 AM
@ObserverIO - I’m not the official designator of words, I’m just sharing that I have never heard a person that isn’t writing an article online use that term. I’ve never heard a person say it out loud once in my life. And I’ve never seen it printed besides in an article online. It’s as if it’s in some style guide somewhere but no actual humans use the term. Do you also call the period between 1900-1910 the same word?
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 1/19/2024, 8:01 AM
@mountainman - I'd probably say turn of the century. Shit, THAT'S what we should say: Turn of the Century. Or turn of the millennium, so people don't think we're talking about the early 1900s.
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder