"Spider-Man" Age Controversy Is Blown Out Of Proportion

"Spider-Man" Age Controversy Is Blown Out Of Proportion

These days fanboys are very crucial about getting an actor that really fits to perfection to play one of there beloved characters, but does that take away amazing possibilities?

Editorial Opinion
By MarvelCinematicUniverse - Nov 05, 2010 02:11 PM EST
Filed Under: Spider-Man



Ever since July 1, 2010, when Andrew Garfield was announced as the new Peter Parker/Spider-Man in Marc Webb's 2012 reboot of the "Spider-Man" franchise, a good majority of fans have grossly criticized the young actor for being "too old" for the role.

In this reimagining of the 2002 film starring Tobey Maguire, Peter Parker will be a teenager going through high school and dealting with personal issues such as the death of his Uncle Ben, and even his transformation into Spider-Man. As well as growing up. This information was let out by Sony themselves, and has grown doubt about Andrew being able to really pull of a high schooler around 15 through 17.

But needless to say, Tobey Maguire was 25 when he was cast as the iconic character in 2001, in which he also played the character in high school for the begining of the film where he was able to pull it off. Keeping in mind that Andrew was only two years older when he was cast, it seems that the negativity is a bit unneeded. Especially when you consider that Tobey really did not receive the "age" backlash when he won the part.

Looking through cinema, it is hardly a new trend to cast an actor in there 20s as a high schooler. For instance, Michael J. Fox played Marty McFly, a high schooler, in the "Back to the Future" films when he was around 25. He also returned to the role when he was 28, still with his character set in high school.

Robert Pattinson, the teen british heartthrob that is coincidentally a best friend of Andrew Garfield's has become known around the world as vampire Edward Cullen in the "Twilight" films, another character set in high school. Though Pattinson was around 21 or 22 when he was cast, he still managed to play off the high schooler part with ease.

Taking a look at Andrew Garfield's growing resume of work, it is clear that the young actor has a special place in cinema in the coming years and has an incredibly classy range of acting. He has gone toe to toe with actors Robert Redford and the late Heath Ledger, and is also heavily being talked about to be nominated for "Best Supporting Actor" at the 2011 Academy Awards ceremony. Also, Andrew did play a high schooler not to long ago in a TV series called "Sugar Rush".



If the look Garfield has in that show works as a basis for how he can pull of Peter Parker in this coming reboot, then have no fear Spidey fans, Garfield should be a sure bet to pull off the role.
SPIDER-MAN: Why Marvel Studios Needs To Adapt This Controversial 1990s Storyline In The MCU
Related:

SPIDER-MAN: Why Marvel Studios Needs To Adapt This Controversial 1990s Storyline In The MCU

SEND HELP: Rachel McAdams Is The Boss Now In First Trailer For Sam Raimi's Survival Horror Movie
Recommended For You:

SEND HELP: Rachel McAdams Is The Boss Now In First Trailer For Sam Raimi's Survival Horror Movie

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

LEEE777
LEEE777 - 11/5/2010, 2:46 PM
Yeah, he's no TOBEY MAGUIRE! : p
ager
ager - 11/5/2010, 2:59 PM
it bothers me that a highschooler cant be casted. not saying he wont be amazing. i hope he is. but as for toby if he didnt already look to old in the 1st or 2nd, by the 3rd he was notisably older. longevity needs to be addressed. but i hope for the best
Xandera
Xandera - 11/5/2010, 6:35 PM
I thought Toby Maguire was gonna blow as spiderman and he turned out alright... I say give garfield a chance and see what happens.
WeekendAvenger
WeekendAvenger - 11/5/2010, 6:49 PM
Tobey Maguire was okay I dont understand why everyone is sucking his d**k he isnt that good an actor and I'm bettin that Garfield blows Tobey's perfomance out of the water.
FutureCBMHero
FutureCBMHero - 11/6/2010, 12:16 AM
The issue isn't about him being able to pull of as high schooler once, it is about the longevity of the franchise. His age will force Sony to move in too similar of a direction of the first series of movies, and quite frankly I think it's going to hurt the product. If they had picked someone younger they could focus on a whole new world in those teenage years as opposed to only doing 1 movie (or half of one movie like the first Raimi film). Once again, Garfield is a heck of an actor, but he was a poor choice for the FRANCHISE, not the role.
ScottPilgrim
ScottPilgrim - 11/6/2010, 3:52 AM
Spiderman 1 was good, Spiderman 2 was awesome and Spiderman 3 was poor.

BUT the thing that sucked throughout was....Tobey Maguire.

Tobey was never Spiderman he had such an awkwardness on scene as Parker that was so cringy. Admittedly Spiderman 1 needed that social awkwardness. But after that I just hoped Wolverine walked on scene a slashed that stupid grin off Peters face.

Garfield's age is of no concern, the only thing I am worried about is his height. I don't know how tall Andrew is BUT he 'seems' to be around 6". Which in the Spidey costume could look slightly odd.

With all things considered I think the reboot will be awesome and I'm looking forward to it. Even though they could have just carried on with Spiderman 4 but with an all new cast and crew (which would have been better).
WeekendAvenger
WeekendAvenger - 11/6/2010, 1:09 PM
@Mr Blonde and Blitzed
agreed!
Osiris
Osiris - 11/6/2010, 6:05 PM
I have faith in Garfield and this movie, it is shaping up to be something great.
Ranger14
Ranger14 - 11/8/2010, 12:26 PM
Garfield will be pushing 30 by the time the first film is released. That leaves little time for continuity and future films with him. That is my main concern. We will be back at the same reboot situation as we are now. If they are going to do a high school Spidey, than go with a younger and talented actor. There are plenty of them. Instead they go with one they may be able to push another movie or two out of, then back to Groundhog Day. For many of us older Spidey fans, we want to see continuity and more development of the vast array of villains that we just got cheated out of due to rebooting and starting over again. It's going to be a vicious cycle. I am not the least bit interested in seeing a teenie Spidey going through his origins again.
FutureCBMHero
FutureCBMHero - 11/8/2010, 4:18 PM
Thank you Ranger for using common sense. I'm not worried about 1 movie, I'm worried about where this franchise can go. We also have to consider that at Garfields current age and resume, that he his going to get called on to do many other projects and may want to leave the franchise earlier than Sony would like. If that happens we are back in a hole of either rebooting or recasting, neither of which is an optimal situation. If they had cast Logan Lerman, or someone in that range so that way we could really get a solid 10 years out of the franchise. Someone that young isn't going to get offered the great, meatier roles that Garfield is going to get in the next 4 years.
WeekendAvenger
WeekendAvenger - 11/10/2010, 6:37 PM
LOGAN LERMAN CANNOT ACT TO SAVE HIS F**KING LIFE!
View Recorder