SUPERMAN's Global Release Is Once Again At Risk As Joe Shuster's Estate Files Another Lawsuit Against WBD

SUPERMAN's Global Release Is Once Again At Risk As Joe Shuster's Estate Files Another Lawsuit Against WBD

There could be bad news for James Gunn's Superman in several countries across the world as a new report reveals that another lawsuit has been filed seeking to block the DC Studios movie's global release.

By JoshWilding - May 22, 2025 09:05 AM EST
Filed Under: Superman
Source: Puck

In April, the Superman lawsuit filed by co-creator Joe Shuster's estate was dismissed after a U.S. court found no jurisdiction, thereby clearing the path for the Warner Bros. Discovery/DC Studios movie to be released globally amid ongoing copyright legacy battles.

However, the legal battle isn't over yet, as Shuster's estate has just filed a new lawsuit that could see the reboot caught up in yet another heated legal fight. 

According to Puck, attorney Marc Toberoff has refiled the copyright case in a New York state court. He's seeking an injunction to block Warner Bros. from "exploiting Superman" in the UK, Ireland, Canada, and Australia (countries where the estate is disputing copyright ownership under their respective, specific copyright laws). 

Warner Bros. Discovery has until Friday to "submit opposition papers" to the New York Supreme Court, with the impetus on them to explain why an injunction shouldn't be granted. As the report points out, this is "theoretically jeopardising the global rollout" of Superman

The UK, Ireland, Canada, and Australia are all major box office markets, and a release being blocked there would have a major impact on box office takings. It would also upset a lot of fans, with those in the UK already frustrated that Creature Commandos isn't available to watch—legally, at least—on that side of the pond. 

It seems likely that Warner Bros. will emerge victorious again here, but the clock is ticking as Superman's July 11 release gets closer. 

For the foreseeable future, it seems the Man of Tomorrow will continue to find himself in a tug of war between the studio and the family of the man who first brought him to the page. What that means for the future remains to be seen, but Superman may not emerge from this unscathed.

You can rewatch the latest trailer for Superman in the player below.

Superman, DC Studios' first feature film to hit the big screen, is set to soar into theaters worldwide this summer from Warner Bros. Pictures.

In his signature style, James Gunn takes on the original superhero in the newly imagined DC universe with a singular blend of epic action, humor and heart, delivering a Superman who’s driven by compassion and an inherent belief in the goodness of humankind.  

The movie stars David Corenswet in the dual role of Superman/Clark Kent, Rachel Brosnahan as Lois Lane and Nicholas Hoult as Lex Luthor.

Also appearing are Edi Gathegi, Anthony Carrigan, Nathan Fillion, Isabela Merced, Skyler Gisondo, Sara Sampaio, María Gabriela de Faría, Wendell Pierce, Alan Tudyk, Pruitt Taylor Vince, Neva Howell, and Milly Alcock.

Superman arrives in theaters on July 11, 2025.

SUPERMAN 4K Trailer Screenshots Reveal Baby Joe, The Fortress Of Solitude, Heat Vision Battle, And More
Related:

SUPERMAN 4K Trailer Screenshots Reveal Baby Joe, The Fortress Of Solitude, Heat Vision Battle, And More

SUPERMAN: Who Is The Mysterious Character Using Heat Vision In New Trailer? Possible SPOILERS
Recommended For You:

SUPERMAN: Who Is The Mysterious Character Using Heat Vision In New Trailer? Possible SPOILERS

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
archstar
archstar - 5/22/2025, 9:16 AM
first lets go so ez bro ezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
IAmAHoot
IAmAHoot - 5/22/2025, 9:24 AM
@archstar - You act like it should be hard to sit on this site during the appropriate morning hours and have no life...
archstar
archstar - 5/22/2025, 9:55 AM
@IAmAHoot - its very hard tho
TheShape9859
TheShape9859 - 5/22/2025, 9:22 AM
Here we go again...
JurassicClunge
JurassicClunge - 5/22/2025, 9:22 AM
That was quick, I thought they'd be back around the time of the next superman movie. 😅
THEKENDOMAN
THEKENDOMAN - 5/22/2025, 9:28 AM
@JurassicClunge - These mother[frick]ers
THEKENDOMAN
THEKENDOMAN - 5/22/2025, 9:26 AM
This mother[frick]er

This [frick]ing mother[frick]er

This money-grabbing, bitch ass mother[frick]er

God, hold me back; I [frick]ing don't want to write what I really want to write before these woke mother[frick]ers come after me.

But [frick]ing hell, you will not stop us, you jealous mother[frick]er.

And the fact is, if DC were to pay out, some other [frick]er would try and come up with some other bollocks.

[frick]ing leeches, you [frick]ing won't stop greatness.

May the strength of common sense descend on you. You will not [frick]ing stop us.

You mother [frick]er you.

Fuccccck

Woooosa

For [frick]s Sake
FrankenDad
FrankenDad - 5/22/2025, 11:11 AM
@THEKENDOMAN - User Comment Image
McMurdo
McMurdo - 5/22/2025, 11:15 AM
@FrankenDad - lol
THEKENDOMAN
THEKENDOMAN - 5/22/2025, 11:34 AM
@FrankenDad - Nah, [frick] that.

This [frick]er is taking the [frick]ing piss.

For [frick]s Sake
soberchimera
soberchimera - 5/22/2025, 1:13 PM
@THEKENDOMAN - You don’t realize how badly Siegel and Schuster were screwed over, Schuster couldn’t even afford to go see the Superman show on Broadway. Yeah, the two men who actually deserve to be compensated are gone, I wouldn’t be so quick to take a corporation’s side.
THEKENDOMAN
THEKENDOMAN - 5/22/2025, 1:30 PM
@soberchimera - Matey, you are 100% on point.

Yes, maybe they were screwed, or perhaps we dont know the real details, but either way, I believe there was an element of screwing.

And I'm not taking the corporations' side at all; I'm just pissed off about the timing. This could have been dealt with a long time ago, before the movie was made.

Why the [frick] now? We know for obvious reasons, but that is clear selfishness and unfair to us fans.

We as DC fans I've been waiting for this break to come and over my dead loyal die hard fan body am I going to stay quiet so this [frick]er can ruin this time for us.

[frick] the corperations!

Im on the side of the Fans.

For [frick]s sake
Nonameforme
Nonameforme - 5/22/2025, 9:31 AM
It's not at risk. They do this every time a superman movie is released.
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 5/22/2025, 9:34 AM
@Nonameforme - If the case isn't ruled on by July 11th, WB won't be able to release it internationally. That will kill whatever box office potential it has, unless WB decides last minute to delay the movie.
Nonameforme
Nonameforme - 5/22/2025, 11:18 AM
@TheJok3r - hell pay them off like they always do.
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 5/22/2025, 9:32 AM
These clowns are never going away, and for some reason the courts keep giving them a forum. This could literally destroy not only this movie, but the DC brand as a whole. I hope they're happy ruining the careers of hundreds if not thousands of people.
JurassicClunge
JurassicClunge - 5/22/2025, 9:58 AM
@TheJok3r - WB have already destroyed the DC Brand and are course to cause further damage to the brand this July 😌
Huskers
Huskers - 5/22/2025, 9:33 AM
Considering what happened to Jerry and Joe with regards to their creation, I think the families have every right to exhaust all their legal remedies. Admittedly, the timing is done as a bargaining chip and incredibly frustrating to us fans, but most of these things should just be settled. At least Richard Donner intervened in 1978 to make sure they received credit and a regular stipend.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 5/22/2025, 9:42 AM
@Huskers - their families didn't so shit. They aren't grand fathered in lmao
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 5/22/2025, 9:36 AM
Josh always reporting this nothingburger as if hes a snyder bot. Lolz
bobevanz
bobevanz - 5/22/2025, 9:41 AM
@vectorsigma - I remember very good reviews from him and others on this site. Just saying lol
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 5/22/2025, 12:06 PM
@bobevanz - lolz! 😂
HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 5/22/2025, 9:37 AM
User Comment Image
RockReigns
RockReigns - 5/22/2025, 9:38 AM
Lmao.
Warner Bros. need to counter sue so they can’t keep trying this crap.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 5/22/2025, 9:40 AM
None of this matters. THIS HAPPENS WITH ALMOST EVERY SUPERMAN RELEASE. I swear, Disney is so afraid F4 is gonna get H clapped by Supes and the dinos. You can see the haters ball starting to show up everywhere lmao.


You lost
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 5/22/2025, 10:10 AM
I think the law is that they CAN release Superman movies in Britain and Britain adjacent countries, but they have to be based on the John Cleese Superman.
User Comment Image
User Comment Image
RolandD
RolandD - 5/22/2025, 10:58 AM
@ObserverIO - What is this? John Cleese? Superman? How do I not know about this?
Pictilli
Pictilli - 5/22/2025, 10:29 AM
Outside of drawing the costume and look of the character, Shuster had very little to do with Superman's creation. In fact, many ghost artists like Wayne Boring filled in his Superman work even in the earliest of days.

So if Siegel's descendents aren't doing this, why are his?
McMurdo
McMurdo - 5/22/2025, 11:17 AM
@Pictilli - greed
Pictilli
Pictilli - 5/22/2025, 11:22 AM
@McMurdo - not that WB is innocent but yep I agree
Oberlin4Prez
Oberlin4Prez - 5/22/2025, 10:50 AM
Josh: "SuPeRmAn MoViE iN tRoUbLe"

Narrator: it wasn't.
HistoryofMatt
HistoryofMatt - 5/22/2025, 10:53 AM
Josh is so scared because he knows, deep down, that Superman is going to DESTROY The Fantastic Four that he keeps writing crap like this when everyone knows this isn't going to do anything at all.

A Disney shill is gonna shill for Disney.

User Comment Image
relentless1
relentless1 - 5/22/2025, 10:54 AM
Your great grand dad was a terrible businessman and gave his idea away on a work for hire peanuts contract. Get the [frick] over it already.
Pictilli
Pictilli - 5/22/2025, 11:24 AM
@relentless1 - Siegel & Shuster were screwed over by Jack Lebowitz and Harry Donnenfeld, who also screwed Major Malcolm Wheeler Nicholson over too, however, this lawsuit is stupid.
relentless1
relentless1 - 5/22/2025, 1:43 PM
@Pictilli - yeah but something that happened almost 100 years ago doesn't matter now, they may have been screwed over but then again maybe they should've did what Bob Kane did and lawyered up at the outset, been better businessmen from the get, peoples problems are usually of their own making and Seigel and Shuster are no exception
Pictilli
Pictilli - 5/22/2025, 2:52 PM
@relentless1 - no, I don't think the blame should be on Siegel for not being a shrewd, cutthroat asshole, especially as a young man, like Lebowitz & Donnenfeld, people who were affiliated with actual gangsters, were.


I think it is a shitty but very American mentality to see someone get screwed over and instead of being enraged over the injustice, identify with the swindler and think "boy that's a great hustle, wish I did that grift!"
relentless1
relentless1 - 5/23/2025, 4:36 PM
@Pictilli - not saying that shady people shouldnt be exposed or called out but at the end of the day we are all responsible for how our own lives turn out, im not blaming Siegel or Shuster for anything, im saying it was their responsibility to either cover themselves legally like Bob Kane did or be at peace with the deal that they made
Pictilli
Pictilli - 5/23/2025, 5:51 PM
@relentless1 - Bob Kane was a rapacious thieving piece of shit tho... and also helped to screw Siegel over.
relentless1
relentless1 - 5/24/2025, 4:23 PM
@Pictilli - if you consider Kane to be a bad guy then youd have to lump Stan in that category too because he did pretty much the same thing. It was a different time and although I agree that Bob shouldve given Bill Finger SOME credit, end of the day the character was legally Bob's no matter how you view that; it was right by the law and the standards found therein
Pictilli
Pictilli - 5/24/2025, 5:31 PM
@relentless1 - legally =|= ethically tho

And yeah, Stan Lee is very much like Bob Kane but more affable when facing the public
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder