Theory on why the Enchantress and The Executioner will be in THOR 3

Theory on why the Enchantress and The Executioner will be in THOR 3

Here's a few reasons as to why I believe both Amora and Scourge were meant to be in the first 2 Thor movies, but will definetly be in THOR 3.

Editorial Opinion
By wookiefit - Feb 07, 2014 03:02 PM EST
Filed Under: Thor

So earlier today I was talking to Dumegg about Nailbiter111's article on concept art from THOR 2. Dumegg believes that it had a hidden picture of Scourge the Executioner in it and I agree with him. The art was done by conceptual illustrator, Jerad S. Marantz. In the concept art of the Marauders you see a very large character with a huge ax and either tattoo marks or a bizarre hair pattern on his head.



This got me to thinking about concept art from the first THOR movie. In another article written by Nailbiter111, you see concept art of both the Executioner and the Enchantress. These came from Costume illustrator, Christian Cordella.





Now, most of you could say," They make concept art on many characters that never make it into a movie." Okay! I'll concede that, but in an article from the former G4 network that was posted on Attack of the Show by Josheph Baxter (you can read it here: http://www.g4tv.com/attackoftheshow/blog/post/712738/thor-2-the-enchantress-and-the-executioner-as-villains/ ). It says: According to a report by Cinema Blend, while the Thor sequel is still in its early planning stages and a script won't even be written until the year's end, word is that producers are very high on the duo of The Enchantress and The Executioner for the film's villain slots. This certainly would make the most sense, as Enchantress is probably the next in line after Loki as far as Thor's top-tier villains in the comics.

This would make the concept art from both Thor and Thor 2 have a lot more weight. I think producers wanted to add them, but were looking for the right fit.

Now, in the upcoming Episode 15 of Agents of Shield, we will have Lady Sif come to Earth to capture Lorelei who is the younger sister to Amora (Enchantress). She will be played by Elena Satine. This was also posted on Comicbookmovie.com by Josh Wilding.



Now this could just be a coincidence because this episode will air 2 weeks after Thor the Dark World is released on DVD. As anyone in sales of dvds and movies can tell you, you make most of your money in the first 2 weeks of sales and releases. So this can either be to a) increase dvd sales, b) draw viewers to AoS.

Now we are aware that the producers and writers of AoS were told they can use certain characters, and not use other characters. So if you can't use the Enchantress, why not her younger sister who not many people are not even aware of. This can be used to get around not using Enchantress or to to see if there is interest in her character at all. If the audience likes Lorelei, that can be used to push the Enchantress.

And finally, from what I understand, Amora has a huge part along with other magical villians from Asgard in the Surtur story line.

So what do you guys think? Do you think I'm on to something here?

THOR 5: Chris Hemsworth Addresses His MCU Future And Says That There's Nothing Official (Yet)
Related:

THOR 5: Chris Hemsworth Addresses His MCU Future And Says That There's "Nothing Official" (Yet)

THE 4:30 MOVIE Interview: Filmmaker Kevin Smith On How His Passion For The Theater Shaped New Film (Exclusive)
Recommended For You:

THE 4:30 MOVIE Interview: Filmmaker Kevin Smith On How His Passion For The Theater Shaped New Film (Exclusive)

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

kinghulk
kinghulk - 2/7/2014, 4:19 PM
sounds good
BenjiWest
BenjiWest - 2/7/2014, 5:02 PM
Sounds good. Seems logical, they are some of Thor's more known enemies.
Dumegg
Dumegg - 2/7/2014, 5:12 PM
Brilliant theory! I like the way you think.
wookiefit
wookiefit - 2/7/2014, 7:49 PM
Hopefully the fixed spelling mistakes and bigger pics help.
MightyZeus
MightyZeus - 2/7/2014, 11:19 PM
Interesting theory and great read. Your ideas are seemingly solid.
EdgyOutsider
EdgyOutsider - 2/7/2014, 11:29 PM
Nope. They are going to want to wrap up his arc in the for now trilogy, Enchantress and Executioner makes no sense there to me. Never found them interesting any way. Surtur should be the villain and Loki's arc should end. Said this a lot and sticking to it
brazilianbatman
brazilianbatman - 2/8/2014, 7:45 AM
charlize theron as Enchantress and Jason Mamoa as Executioner.
brazilianbatman
brazilianbatman - 2/8/2014, 7:51 AM
edyoutsider@I don't want to see Surtur because it will need a big budget and Marvel is usually cheap with Thor fx. Compare the action from MAN OF Steel and Thor 2. It looks like theres a 15 years gap in the special effects. Its kinda weird the Thor costs the same money to make as Captain America.

Save Surtur for whenever Marvel feel like spending some money and hiring a good special effects company.
View Recorder