Taika Waititi On Ignoring THOR: RAGNAROK Source Material In Casting Tessa Thompson As Valkyrie

Taika Waititi On Ignoring THOR: RAGNAROK Source Material In Casting Tessa Thompson As Valkyrie

The director of the third Thor installment talks here about overlooking the comics to fill the role of Valkyrie, and also how he and Marvel landed such a stellar ensemble cast. Check it out!

By DCMarvelFreshman - Jul 16, 2016 04:07 AM EST
Filed Under: Thor: Ragnarok
Source: CBR
4zelgbib


With two weeks of filming now completed, Thor: Ragnarok director Taika Waititi took a quick hiatus today to discuss his critically acclaimed movie Hunt for the Wilderpeople with Comic Book Resources’ Spinoff. Of course, he also touched on the Marvel threequel, and he addressed why Tessa Thompson was cast as Valkyrie, a traditionally white superheroine.

“Right from the start we wanted to diversify the cast, and it is hard when you are working with Vikings,” explained Taika Waititi. “You want to be more inclusive and provide a broader representation. And at that point, you have to look at the source material as a very loose inspiration. And then take it from there and go with your gut. Say, ‘You know what? None of that stuff matters. Just because the character was blonde and white in the comic book. That doesn’t matter. That’s not what Valkyrie is about.’ People forget that.”

“Die-hard fans will say, ‘That’s not really authentic to the comics,’ but as soon as they watch the movie, and they’re involved in the story, and actually what’s happening, everybody forgets. The fact that we even have to keep having this conversation is ridiculous, because we keep forgetting. Unless it’s the topic of the film, it just shouldn’t even be — what do we even care? I think the story is king, and you want the best person for the job. And Tessa tested against — we cast a very broad net, and Tess was the best person.”
 
Beyond Tessa Thompson, other big newcomers that Thor: Ragnarok will bring into the ever-growing Marvel Cinematic Universe include Karl Urban, Jeff Goldblum, and Cate Blanchett. Taika Waititi went on to explain how he and Marvel managed to get them all on board.
 
“I think a lot of them having seen how good the other Marvel films are, they want to be part of that,” said the director. “Superhero movies are seen like really ridiculous, cartoony things anymore. There’s a time and a point where you really wouldn’t want to touch superhero movies, especially in the mid to late ’90s and definitely in the ’80s. There were a lot of very ridiculous and possibly career-ending move to make if you were an actor. But I think that the reputation of Marvel is very high. The things that they do is very high quality and they tell good stories. That’s the main thing. That’s why I got involved with them as well. At the heart of it they want to tell good stories, and that’s what I’m about as well. I’m not about explosions and the like. I like that stuff. I think it’s fun to do, but it’s not why I became a filmmaker. The thing I love is character and story.” Very promising! 

Make the jump over to CBR to see what director Waititi had to say about working with Marvel Studios, and whether or not Green Lantern informed his directing on Ragnarok.


Marvel’s Thor: Ragnarok is directed by Taika Waititi, and it stars Chris Hemsworth (Thor), Tom Hiddleston (Loki), Idris Elba (Heimdall), Sir Anthony Hopkins (Odin), Tessa Thompson (Valkyrie), Karl Urban (Skurge), Mark Ruffalo (Hulk), with Jeff Goldblum (Grandmaster) and Cate Blanchett (Hela). And Thor: Ragnarok is set to open in theaters on November 3, 2017.
THOR: RAGNAROK Star Jeff Goldblum's Reign Of KAOS Begins In Trailer For Netflix's Greek Mythology Series
Related:

THOR: RAGNAROK Star Jeff Goldblum's Reign Of KAOS Begins In Trailer For Netflix's Greek Mythology Series

MAD MAX Director George Miller On If He'd Consider Directing Chris Hemsworth In THOR 5
Recommended For You:

MAD MAX Director George Miller On If He'd Consider Directing Chris Hemsworth In THOR 5

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
konoyaro
konoyaro - 7/16/2016, 4:42 AM
and because im a loser.



anh first??
xcan
xcan - 7/16/2016, 4:52 AM
@konoyaro - only winners recieve first place. You have a right to claim that prize and let all the small nerds know that you are superior.

Apocalypse would be proud.
konoyaro
konoyaro - 7/16/2016, 4:57 AM
@xcan - yeepy!!!

ComicBookGuy015
ComicBookGuy015 - 7/16/2016, 4:43 AM
"I’m not about explosions and the like. I like that stuff. I think it’s fun to do, but it’s not why I became a filmmaker. The thing I love is character and story."

YES PRAISE ODIN THE ALLFATHER. Character and story is something this Thor franchise definitely needs right now waaay more than the Thunder and Lightning.
xcan
xcan - 7/16/2016, 4:49 AM
I disagree, Tahiti, I disagree.

On a more important note: who else saw ghostbusters this weekend? Uncensored reviews (or non-sponsored) seem to range from "insulting" to "average", but I sure don't see any glowing reviews like some critics led the public to believe early on.

What other site tried their best to talk up that movie? Who was it again?
ccxa
ccxa - 7/16/2016, 5:17 AM
@xcan - I did.

Transformers 2 and The Happening were the worst movies I had seen. This Ghostbusters just took the spot. It is just absurd how bad that shit is. I have no words to explain. It is a infuriating hot pile of shit
xcan
xcan - 7/16/2016, 5:32 AM
@ccxa - thank you. I don't expect all feedback to be as... disappointing as yours, but there sure as shit has been some manipulating done on the critics / website side to try and present this movie as somethings it's not - that being good.

tranny 2 and the happening? that is some pretty bad comparisons, but I'm not too suprised to be honest.
ccxa
ccxa - 7/16/2016, 7:29 AM
@xcan - Honestly, the trailers are not as bad as the actual movie. Other people might not hate it as much as I did, but to me it was just plain terrible. I'm not even drawing comparisons to the old Ghostbusters. As a movie, the new Ghostbusters failed on every level to me. The cast is awful, the jokes are terrible, the writing, directing, editing, the CGI oh my god... I'd rather watch The Wicker Man 5 times in a row than this piece of trash ever again
xcan
xcan - 7/16/2016, 9:08 AM
@ccxa - if I was a good Sony employee, I'd pay you back for ticket prices, gas and punitive Damages, but sadly I'm not.

That's so Sony.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
View Recorder