DAREDEVIL Showrunner Clarifies His BORN AGAIN Comments; Praises Charlie Cox's SHE-HULK Appearance

DAREDEVIL Showrunner Clarifies His BORN AGAIN Comments; Praises Charlie Cox's SHE-HULK Appearance

The showrunner of Netflix's long-cancelled Daredevil series, Steven DeKnight, has taken to Twitter (X) to clarify his recent criticism of Disney choosing to relaunch the show with Born Again...

By MarkCassidy - Sep 19, 2023 06:09 AM EST
Filed Under: Daredevil

Last night, the showrunner of Netflix's Daredevil series, Steven DeKnight, made headlines for his comments on Marvel Studios' upcoming Born Again "reboot," calling out Disney's practice of relaunching and slightly altering the title of a show after three seasons in order to reset contract terms.

DeKnight described this as an "old Disney scam" (and there's certainly evidence to back it up), but does rebooting - no matter how loosely - a series five years after it was cancelled really fall into this category?

Regardless, DeKnight has now shared some follow-up Tweets clarifying his feelings on the matter, making it clear that he fully supports Born Again and the returning cast members. He also gives his take on Charlie Cox's (Matt Murdock) recent appearance in She-Hulk: Attorney at Law, which proved to be somewhat divisive among fans of the Man Without Fear.

Vincent D'Onofrio (Wilson Fisk), and Jon Bernthal (Frank Castle/The Punisher) will also reprise their roles from the now defunct Netflix series, along with new cast members Michael Gandolfini, Nikki M. James and Sandrine Holt.

We recently learned that Holt will play Vanessa Fisk, while James is believed to be playing Kristen McDuffie. Gandolfini's role hasn't been confirmed, but there's speculation that he'll wither be playing a younger take on Fisk in flashbacks, or the villain's son.

The show will be loosely based on the '80s Marvel Comics series of the same name by Frank Miller and David Mazzuchelli, but is not expected to be an overly faithful adaptation. Despite some significant changes to the story, "Daredevil versus Wilson Fisk, aka the Kingpin, remains the focal point."

Born Again will be PG-13, but Marc Jobst, who helmed some key episodes of the Netflix show, simply doesn't believe Cox, D'Onofrio and Bernthal would have agreed to return if they didn't think it was going to work.

"So I’ve got no idea what they’re doing and how they’re approaching the Disney version of those worlds," he said in a recent interview. "I can’t imagine that Charlie, Vince and Jon would sign up for something that they felt was anodyne. They just wouldn’t do it. So in some form or another, Disney must have persuaded them to say, 'This is a journey worth coming on.'"

Born Again was recently removed from Marvel Studios' line-up, but we're expecting an update when the Hollywood strikes come to an end.

DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN Still Features Familiar Faces From Netflix As Charlie Cox Shares New Story Details
Related:

DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN Still Features Familiar Faces From Netflix As Charlie Cox Shares New Story Details

DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN's Fired Head Writers Are Now Only Credited For A Single Season 1 Episode
Recommended For You:

DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN's Fired Head Writers Are Now Only Credited For A Single Season 1 Episode

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

CyberNigerian
CyberNigerian - 9/19/2023, 6:52 AM
Can't afford to upset the big mouse
Crtdacct2say
Crtdacct2say - 9/19/2023, 6:56 AM
@CyberNigerian - he's still being very critical of Disney but wanted it to be clear that he has no issues with the show itself or the people working on it. In fact, his clarified message makes it clear that he is in their corner
CoHost
CoHost - 9/19/2023, 7:05 AM
Off Topic: Method acting is the only good acting.
mastakilla39
mastakilla39 - 9/19/2023, 11:16 AM
@CoHost - Agree
Fogs
Fogs - 9/19/2023, 7:10 AM
LOOOOL

This article sequence is gold.
Origame
Origame - 9/19/2023, 7:10 AM
"Not at all what I said, but I totally believe that statement".
KillerOfSaints
KillerOfSaints - 9/19/2023, 7:15 AM
That was some fast damage control!
WakandanQueen
WakandanQueen - 9/19/2023, 7:34 AM
I don't get the difference between the two statements honey.
Origame
Origame - 9/19/2023, 7:42 AM
@WakandanQueen - there isn't any. He's just trying to avoid getting in trouble with disney without going back on his word.
Toonstrack
Toonstrack - 9/19/2023, 4:03 PM
@WakandanQueen - then your reading comprehension isn't great
MarvelZombie616
MarvelZombie616 - 9/19/2023, 7:46 AM
I don't like a too light take on Daredevil or The Punisher.

I saw "Captsin America: The Winter Soldier" yesterday on tv and it wasn't light, a lot of people were killed, but it wasn't graphic.
The same can workfor Daredevil.
But the story needs to be dark.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 9/19/2023, 7:55 AM
'Clarify' now means 'backtrack'.

I kinda hate how it's now illegal to say anything critical if you're in the industry.
Scarilian
Scarilian - 9/19/2023, 8:19 AM
@ObserverIO -
Hollywood is a bunch of pedo's, racists, sexists and suckups all pretending to care in order to backstab each other on the way to the top. If you are in that industry and critique them at all you'll have difficulty gaining a foothold in the social circles which are the only method of advancement.
RitoRevolto
RitoRevolto - 9/19/2023, 9:25 AM
@ObserverIO - It's not illegal, people like him are just pvssy.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 9/19/2023, 10:07 AM
@RitoRevolto - He was probably threatened, either legally or in terms of future work. Could have been the latter, I suppose. But people don't backtrack so fast otherwise.

Gave me whiplash he backtracked so fast.
Toonstrack
Toonstrack - 9/19/2023, 4:04 PM
@ObserverIO - you cant get threatened legally for saying you dotn like a business practice. He did nothing illegal.

If he wss concerned with future business work he wouldn't have said anything in the first place.

It sounds like you really want a narrative.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 9/19/2023, 5:36 PM
@Toonstrack - He's a known writer/director/showrunner associated with the Daredevil character contributing to bad sentiment about an upcoming Disney+ show. They have lawyers for that. Trust me, it's a thing.
Toonstrack
Toonstrack - 9/20/2023, 7:14 PM
@ObserverIO - bad sentiment is not a legal thing. Hes not in contract with them. Hes fine.

No, I dont trust you. I have no reason to.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 9/20/2023, 7:39 PM
@Toonstrack - I guess you don't. But it is a thing. There's precedent.
Toonstrack
Toonstrack - 9/21/2023, 10:25 PM
@ObserverIO - if there was enough, he wouldn't have said anything
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 9/22/2023, 4:28 AM
@Toonstrack - If there wasn't he wouldn't have backtracked a day later.
Toonstrack
Toonstrack - 9/24/2023, 10:23 AM
@ObserverIO - he didn't. He clarified. He didn't change anything he said.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 9/24/2023, 12:05 PM
@Toonstrack - Ah yes, of course, that's right. He 'clarified'. I forgot.
Blergh
Blergh - 9/19/2023, 11:56 AM
He’s not backtracking on his critique towards Disney, he’s just separating his problems with the mouse from his problems with the show.
DanFlashesShirt
DanFlashesShirt - 9/19/2023, 12:48 PM
“Let me just say what i said but with different words”
asherman93
asherman93 - 9/19/2023, 7:55 PM
Y'all need to start internalizing the idea of separating opinions about the executive from opinions about the art itself.
View Recorder