LOKI Episode 2 Director Explains MCU's Take On Zaniac And What Exactly Sylvie Was Holding - SPOILERS

LOKI Episode 2 Director Explains MCU's Take On Zaniac And What Exactly Sylvie Was Holding - SPOILERS

Loki episode 2 director Dan Deleeuw has shared new details about bringing Zaniac into the Marvel Cinematic Universe and reveals what exactly Sylvie was holding during those closing moments. Check it out!

By JoshWilding - Oct 13, 2023 09:10 AM EST
Filed Under: Loki
Source: Games Radar

Last night's episode of Loki introduced the MCU's take on Zaniac, though he wasn't exactly the Brad Wolfe many of you will remember from the comic books. 

On the page, he was an actor who suffered from a traumatic childhood before landing the role of a lifetime as a serial killer named Zaniac. One night on set, Wolfe was caught up in an explosion which exposed him to radiation (of course) and, by some bizarre fluke, a demonic entity happened to possess and drive him made at the same time.

With that, he became a monstrous killer, though Loki only borrowed a few elements from that backstory. Its version of Brad was TVA agent Hunter X-5 who, after abandoning Agent Dox's mission to save the Sacred Timeline, chose to become a famous actor instead. 

Talking to Games Radar, Loki director Dan Deleeuw explained Marvel Studios' approach to bringing Zaniac to screen. 

"I think, within the multiverse, in terms of him being Brad Wolfe, he's on a timeline that's not really gone to the evil version of that," the filmmaker laughs. "Go a few timelines over and you'll probably find someone who's more like the villain character."

"We wanted to play around with that Easter egg and introduce a character that was fairly obscure in the comics. But also, we couldn't resist the idea of exploring someone that wasn't really believing in the reality of the TVA, and the artifice of the Timekeepers and all that, being an actor. Now he's someone that, you know, puts on a perception of reality for a living. So, it kind of worked for both sides of that."

In the same interview, Deleeuw was also asked to elaborate on what Sylvie was holding in the latest episode's final scene. We saw the Loki Variant back in her branched timeline mulling over her future and, as suspected, that is indeed He Who Remains' incredibly powerful Tempad. 

"She's still a Loki. If she's got the keys to the universe, the keys to the multiverse, she's not gonna give that up," Deleeuw teases. "I think she truly was happy on the timeline; I don't know how much manipulation has been going on behind the scenes..."

"I think she always suspected this might come back, and I think that ties in with a lot of the reaction to Loki in the McDonald's as well," he says of their reunion. "She knew she was on borrowed time, I think, and kept it because she knew, eventually, Loki would show or some other Loki would show up, some other variant of He Who Remains or something like that, that she'd have to ultimately deal with."

We're sure that won't be the final time we see Sylvie in Loki, but the extent of what she can do with that Tempad remains to be seen. It may, however, be key when the God of Mischief and Mobius need to search the Multiverse for a Kang Variant who can help them access the Time Loom!

The first two episodes of Loki are now streaming on Disney+. 

Marvel Television's Brad Winderbaum Talks LOKI Season 3 Chances, Jessica Jones, And Agatha Harkness' Future
Related:

Marvel Television's Brad Winderbaum Talks LOKI Season 3 Chances, Jessica Jones, And Agatha Harkness' Future

LOKI Season 2, HAWKEYE, And More Are Heading To 4K SteelBook With A Long List Of Deleted Scenes
Recommended For You:

LOKI Season 2, HAWKEYE, And More Are Heading To 4K SteelBook With A Long List Of Deleted Scenes

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Origame
Origame - 10/13/2023, 10:03 AM
In other words: you wanted a character you created to have more significance with fans so you slapped on a random marvel name to him in order to drive up speculation, then used "multiverse" to justify him having basically nothing in common with the comics
Variant
Variant - 10/13/2023, 10:27 AM
@Origame - Yes, because using an obscure character like "Zaniac" was anticipated to hit so hard with the audience...

Even when there's no ground to complain about something, you reach for a way. This is just really pathetic behavior. Stop subjecting the community to your depressed disposition.
marvel72
marvel72 - 10/13/2023, 10:32 AM
@Variant - He's entitled to his opinion and he is allowed to comment on any article or thread.
Variant
Variant - 10/13/2023, 10:35 AM
@marvel72 - Oh please. Opinions are one thing. When all someone ever does is complain, that's another. But also, this isn't even an "opinion". He's trying to assert something as true with absolutely no merit. It's asinine.

No one likes a complainer.
Origame
Origame - 10/13/2023, 10:35 AM
@Variant - you say this, yet we had at least 3 articles here talking about Zaniac before it was shown he was nothing but an "in name only" character.

Stop acting like this hasn't been the culture marvel studios has cultivated over the years. We've even speculated over characters being from the comics when their names are blatantly different. You really thing people weren't gonna be intrigued when we actually got one? Especially considering Zaniac time traveled and became the Marvel's version of Jack the ripper? You don't think that would intrigue people about the possible plot in a show like loki?
Variant
Variant - 10/13/2023, 10:41 AM
@Origame - What a crime! Marvel used one of their own IPs as an easter egg! Holy hell. And dude, even with a few articles shedding some light on this easter egg, who actually gives a fvck about this obscure ass character?? We have Loki, Sylvie, Mobius, Renslayer, KANG and his variants like Victor Timely to focus our attention. And you want to sit here and whine about a Zaniac easter egg. LOL... this is just entirely sad.
marvel72
marvel72 - 10/13/2023, 11:25 AM
@Variant - Well block him or don't read his comment, it's that simple.
AnthonyVonGeek
AnthonyVonGeek - 10/13/2023, 11:26 AM
@Variant - “no one likes a complainer” yet you’re complaining about someone you think is a complainer. 🤷‍♂️
Origame
Origame - 10/13/2023, 11:27 AM
@Variant -...if by Easter egg, you mean a lie then yes.

And it's not about honoring an obscure character. People were genuinely tricked into thinking they'd actually honor the source material and give us a storyline pertaining to a time traveler becoming Jack the ripper.

Oh but who am I kidding? I'm talking to the guy who claimed secret invasion was "accurate enough" because it had an invasion that was secret 🤣
Variant
Variant - 10/13/2023, 11:31 AM
@marvel72 - Derp. You can block me or don't read MY comment. It's that simple.
Variant
Variant - 10/13/2023, 11:34 AM
@AnthonyVonGeek - This is a ridiculous argument. Pointing out that someone is complaining isn't complaining. That's like saying the teacher that gave you all those Fs was complaining about your quality of work. No. They were assessing your work and showing you it was bad quality so that you could improve upon it.

Good try.
marvel72
marvel72 - 10/13/2023, 11:39 AM
@Variant - What? I'm trying to help you out, I don't read all the comments and it doesn't bother me like it does you.
Variant
Variant - 10/13/2023, 11:47 AM
@Origame - A lie? LOL... this is just idiotic. No one lied. You just like to complain. Don't blame your miserable outlook on someone else.

What people are you talking about?... A few people on the internet? This show isn't about a jack the ripper type character. It very clearly has a different plot. If they end up exploring that a little, great. But there's so much more going on here than to whine about a potential subplot from an obscure character.

Also, your last point reflects more on you. You tried saying it wasn't even about "secretly invading". A ridiculously dumb argument that also proves just how much you try to reach for complaints. Also the same guy that tried saying catcalling wasn't objectively bad. LOL.

Tell me you don't know how to talk to girls without telling me you don't know how to talk to girls.
Origame
Origame - 10/13/2023, 1:26 PM
@Variant - ...so how was he the character they claimed him to be?
Origame
Origame - 10/13/2023, 1:26 PM
@Variant - and of course you're throwing irrelevant sh!t for an ad hominem 🙄
Variant
Variant - 10/13/2023, 1:31 PM
@marvel72 - Lol. Help yourself not read my comments then. And by your logic I should never see you here commenting on what I have to say. So move it along.
Variant
Variant - 10/13/2023, 1:38 PM
@Origame - LOL! "Oh but who am I kidding? I'm talking to the guy who claimed secret invasion was "accurate enough" because it had an invasion that was secret"

You said this first and I responded in the same manner. Sit down. Your arguments are consistently idiotic.

As for how he was the character...the writers literally just talked about this. It's a fvcking easter egg. It's a nod to an obscure character. No one was going into E2 thinking about how much they wanted a 100% comic book accurate "ZANIAC".

Are you really this incapable of seeing how dumb your argument is?? Just stop complaining. It's not hard.
Origame
Origame - 10/13/2023, 1:45 PM
@Variant - 1) except that's the same vein of what's being discussed. And you didn't refute anything about that. Stop acting like you have some point here.

2) yeah, after the episode was released and everyone was speculating. Hence the lie.

3) there's a difference between 100% accurate and "this is the character, we just changed a few details to make it work in our universe". Captain america is perfectly fine yet isn't completely accurate to the comics for example.
Variant
Variant - 10/13/2023, 1:55 PM
@Origame - My point is you complain too much and sound silly.

Now all of a sudden some people SPECULATING about something that didn't end up being what they thought might have been means there was a lie?! LOL!! This is why your arguments are so bad. You reach to the point of absurdity.

There are so many positive moments to talk about with this show and you choose to find one little thing to whine about. It's pathetic.
Variant
Variant - 10/13/2023, 10:31 AM
So anyway... This episode was a lot of fun! I'm so excited that Loki is proving to be a return to form from S1. And the dynamic between Owen Wilson and Hiddleston is one of the most brilliant things Marvel Studios has given us.

And PS - Sylvie is bae

And PSS - Can't wait to see what Victor Timely is all about
Tonic24k
Tonic24k - 10/13/2023, 10:33 AM
@Variant - I agree on all counts!
HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 10/13/2023, 10:39 AM
@Variant - Dude, you forgot to include the company made hashtags in your advert.
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 10/13/2023, 10:39 AM
@Variant - did the promo for the next episode include Victor?
1 2
View Recorder