WONDER WOMAN 1984: Gal Gadot Would Have "Flipped Out" Over HBO Max Release Under Different Circumstances

WONDER WOMAN 1984: Gal Gadot Would Have "Flipped Out" Over HBO Max Release Under Different Circumstances

Wonder Woman 1984's Gal Gadot comments on the decision to release the DC sequel in theatres and on HBO Max at the same time, and admits that she would not have been happy under different circumstances...

By MarkCassidy - Dec 18, 2020 06:12 AM EST
Filed Under: Wonder Woman 1984

Warner Bros.' decision to release Wonder Woman 1984 (along with the rest of its 2021 slate) in theaters and on the HBO Max streaming service simultaneously has been met with a mixed reaction, and it's probably safe to assume that the majority of directors, actors and others on the creative end of the filmmaking spectrum are not best pleased.

WW84 director Patty Jenkins has already said that she "embraces" her film's streaming release, but wouldn't want it to become the norm for blockbuster cinema moving forward. Now, Diana actress Gal Gadot has weighed in, and she takes a similar stance.

“Before the pandemic, I would’ve flipped out and had a tantrum and fought super hard for a traditional theatrical release," she tells The LA Times. “But in pandemic times, you just don’t know. I hope that, once the pandemic is over, all these wonderful big movies with great filmmakers and stars will go to theaters. I can’t see studios making tentpole movies just for the streamers because it’s a 360 experience to go to a theater and experience that. I certainly hope that, once the pandemic is over, things will go back on track.”

Most people would probably take a similar view of the situation, but "once the pandemic is over" is far from a concrete timeframe, and Warners clearly won't be taking any chances in the immediate future. Could other major studios follow suit? We'll just have to wait and see.

How would you guys feel about a shortened theatrical/streamer release for tentpole movies becoming the norm? Drop us a comment down below.

WONDER WOMAN 1984 Star Chris Pine On Sequel's Negative Reception: I Love The Movie, So There
Related:

WONDER WOMAN 1984 Star Chris Pine On Sequel's Negative Reception: "I Love The Movie, So There"

WW84 Director On Sequel's Third Anniversary: I Love That You Are Thinking Of It As A Christmas Movie Now
Recommended For You:

WW84 Director On Sequel's Third Anniversary: "I Love That You Are Thinking Of It As A Christmas Movie Now"

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
BigMikeReviews
BigMikeReviews - 12/18/2020, 6:33 AM
Very diplomatic answer, you can't really expect her to take a hard stance in either direction.
inkniron
inkniron - 12/18/2020, 6:33 AM
I'm sure the 8 figure payday cushioned the blow.
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 12/18/2020, 7:54 AM
@Waddles -

DoubleD
DoubleD - 12/18/2020, 6:39 AM
Wonder Woman mad as Hell just trying to be nice.
KingLeonidas
KingLeonidas - 12/18/2020, 6:40 AM
This would have easily cracked a billion in normal times.
KWilly
KWilly - 12/18/2020, 6:57 AM
@KingLeonidas - It'll be a loooong time before a movie makes a billion again. In fact, I don't think Endgame will ever be topped.

Unless Marvel does it themselves lol
KingLeonidas
KingLeonidas - 12/18/2020, 7:02 AM
@KWilly - Avatar 2009 will top Endgame with re-releases.
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 12/18/2020, 7:37 AM
@KingLeonidas - Yeah, but in time they can re-release Endgame as well.
KingLeonidas
KingLeonidas - 12/18/2020, 8:16 AM
@MosquitoFarmer - They can but Endgame is well seen by the current generation. Avatar is not. So it will have the novelty factor tied to it once it re-releases in time for Avatar 2.

I think over time, Avatar will regain the crown and keep it for all time essentially.
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 12/18/2020, 8:25 AM
@KingLeonidas - And Endgame can be released for the next generation. And so on and so forth.
KingLeonidas
KingLeonidas - 12/18/2020, 8:40 AM
@MosquitoFarmer - Objectively, the pool of people that haven't seen Avatar will be much larger than the pool of people that haven't seen Endgame. There is also just 1 Avatar film and 22 MCU films, so there might be a fatigue factor that might afflict the audience of Endgame that might not afflict the audience of Avatar. So if you did a calculation, you would come out with a higher probability of Avatar coming out on top.

James Cameron certainly believes so.
https://www.indiewire.com/2019/12/james-cameron-avatar-reclaim-avengers-endgame-box-office-record-1202198472/
duncboy
duncboy - 12/18/2020, 9:31 AM
@KingLeonidas - I dunno about you buddy, but I ain't sick of Marvel movies one bit. Give me X-Men, Fantastic Four, Sentry, Thunderbolts, Galactus and Silver Surfer. I want Marvel movies for another 20 years.
patdog122482
patdog122482 - 12/19/2020, 11:19 PM
@KingLeonidas - honestly, I feel like the novelty of AVATAR is gone & now it's just POCAHONTAS, TITANIC, ROMEO & JULIET & WEST SIDE STORY with SMURFS. The novelty gimmick of 3D is what made that movie
Kumkani
Kumkani - 12/18/2020, 6:40 AM
I can just picture Gal Gadot in her Wonder Woman costume flipping tables over at the WB office.
spiderken1
spiderken1 - 12/18/2020, 6:42 AM
Actually I'm totally ok with it going directly to streaming. There are pros and cons for it. The idea of watching a movie in your home with friends (post pandemic) is way more appealing then dealing with unruly theatre attendees that have ZERO interest in the film they're watching and talking and fiddling with their phones, and having to tell them to shut up! On the pro side there are just some films that NEED to be seen on the big screen. However, the entire structure of how Studio's do business with actors/actresses would have to be completely overhauled. The fact is, the actors are paid far too much! I can understand getting paid $20 million a film, but the back end deals/profit sharing should be eliminated. My earliest memory of such a deal is when Jack Nicholson signed on to play the Joker in Tim Burton's BATMAN. He got paid a handsome salary for signing on, and then made an additional $70 million once box office receipts were tallied, and that was in 1989!

Take RDJ for example: the sheer volume of cash from Avengers Endgame netted him somewhere in the neighborhood of $150 million! Exactly how much money do these people need to feel they have a "secure" future?? My point being that the costs of films (Superheroes in particular) that have a $250 million + budget NEED to be able to be distributed in the movie theatre to make their money back but again, we are headed for streaming regardless so the studio's really need to think about a new structure/foundation for these films because theatre's are like the dinosaurs they will eventually become extinct....
GhostDog
GhostDog - 12/18/2020, 6:47 AM
And you’re getting THE BAG so....yea
xfactor
xfactor - 12/18/2020, 6:51 AM
I’m not mad at her. Yea it’s a pandemic going on, but I would’ve been perfectly fine with waiting considering the circumstances.
patdog122482
patdog122482 - 12/19/2020, 11:33 PM
@xfactor - now I'd say just readjust release dates, less movies on more screens, new showing every 1/2 hours or so & send things to Blu-Ray, cable & streaming sooer?
KWilly
KWilly - 12/18/2020, 6:58 AM
Glad she's got that "Save the Theaters" mindset
CasualAF
CasualAF - 12/18/2020, 6:59 AM
“Before the pandemic, I would’ve flipped out and had a tantrum and fought super hard for a traditional theatrical release,". She answered it fine. But its a mute point. At no point would this movie have gone streaming first before the pandemic. NONE of these movies would.
soberchimera
soberchimera - 12/18/2020, 7:15 AM
What a useless comment, why else besides a situation that endangers the lives of people would a studio release a blockbuster film on VOD?
soberchimera
soberchimera - 12/18/2020, 7:24 AM
@Resnov -
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 12/18/2020, 7:46 AM
@soberchimera - Studios always release blockbusters on VOD... eventually.
SpideyQuad
SpideyQuad - 12/18/2020, 7:56 AM
@soberchimera - seriously this movie was in the can back in 2017, they have no one but themselves to blame. Of course no one could've predicted the way 2020 came down, but really…
LameLuka
LameLuka - 12/18/2020, 10:40 AM
@SpideyQuad - back in 2019, not 2017, that was when the first movie came out
soberchimera
soberchimera - 12/18/2020, 11:08 AM
@MosquitoFarmer - "Premiere" a film to general audiences on VOD then...
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 12/18/2020, 4:39 PM
@soberchimera - Randy frustrated is as hysterically real as it gets.
patdog122482
patdog122482 - 12/19/2020, 11:43 PM
@soberchimera - is say any & all VOD platforms the company has w/ merch in stores & have the showing tell when the physical release is coming
1 2
View Recorder