Innocent until proven guilty; rings a bell? It should, because that's how we handle things here in the United States, and for good reason(even in civil cases like this one). Anyone can file a lawsuit and anyone can make accusations against another person, which means that an accusation made against someone could be false. When it comes to rape and sexual abuse cases, it's easier to make a false accusation against someone, than it is for the accused to prove his/her innocence. That's why the facts are important, because those quick to condemn Singer, whether it's because you're homophobic, don't like his films, or you take rape/sexual abuse cases to heart, due to personal experience, are possibly campaigning for someone to be punished for a crime he may have not even committed.
The facts are, is that there isn't any, not on Eagan's side at least. Right now, these accusations against Singer, are just accusations; there are no sufficent evidence, as of now, to back them. This doesn't mean Eagan is a liar though, which is why people should not be attacking him. What is a fact, is that Singer's name was not brought up in the original case back in 2000, and Singer claims to have new evidence putting him no where near Hawaii during the alleged sexual abuse. Still as of now, Singer could be guilty, but he could be innocent too, so attacking him is just as wrong as attacking Eagan. All of this is why I stand by allowing the accused anonymity in cases like these, because if Singer is innocent, he deserve to not have this ruin the rest of his life, and if he's guilty, he's the only one that should be punished. Allowing anonymity would help with that, for example: The upcoming X-men DOFP, wouldn't take a hit, or at least as big of a hit, because you wouldn't have all of this boycotting over one person associated with the film. It's not fair to the studio, cast, and crew of the film, to be punished over one man's actions.
Bottom line, if this case were to be settle right now, the right thing to do is allow Singer his innocence, without calling Eagan a liar. Doing so doesn't mean he isn't guilty, and doing so doesn't mean he's isn't innocent, doing so means you're giving him the respect anyone deserves in a case like this, because Singer, as of now, is innocent until sufficient evidence proves him guilty, if any exist.