Wolverine Movie Re-Shoots

Okay, let's not get our panties in a missunderstood twist right off the bat here! They're talking about "the trailer" not the movie (in regards to Deadpool's lack of a mask).

And probably, the director whent to show exactly what the movie looked like to the idiots at Fox that wanted to "change" things behind his back, to make them understand finally that the director was right and that things need to be "re-shot"! Good boy!!!

I don't think anybody is going to jump the gun on this one. I think Wolverine is going to be more faithful to the comics than the X-Men movies were.

Let's just crush some hopes now. This movie will not even touch Dark Knight. Fans need to crush this at every chance or else all films will be DOA with studios on release day when it doesn't make a billion bucks.

Not every comic movie is gonna be the next Dark Knight.

When they mention Deadpool's mask its oneof many EASY tweaks they could have made to make the movie better, take gambit's eyes for example. ANY fan would know they're Black and red. In the trailer they werent. How hard is it to CG them like the did with Mistique in X-men 3? Not hard at all. My only concern for the film is if FOX is gonna 'cut' the crap outta it like they did all the other MARVEL films theyve made and make it short. like 90mins short. A good MARVEL film has to be at least 120mins to keep me happy otherwise the story moves to quickly. And when the DVD versions come out the extended ones are always FAR better.

yeah i thought deadpool was pretty weak without the mask, all i saw was renolds in a red sleeveless outfit. I totaly forgot about weapon X-wolverine that would of been freaking tight. I also had trouble understanding the whole logan child with claws...is that going to be a metaphor. so what i got from the trailer was action hero i was kind of waiting for wolverine to say "i'll be back" . i just hope everything makes sense once all the pieces fall into place.

remake gambit's eye too...

See now i knew, that people would go off on a rant because we saw Reynolds "maskless" for a fraction of a second. They never showed the mask in the trailer and the comments above stated the same as we did when we first saw it. These guys did not assist to a pre-screening, they saw the same "trailer" as you did, which showed [frick] all!!!

DrFever, no one is implying that Wolverine will be as successfull as TDK. Ironman, in my opinion was a better "adaptation" than TDK, even though it didn't make as much. The money it makes doesn't make it a better movie. Us "Wolverine" fans have a better chance of prefering Wolverine over TDK, even though the "general public" as well as "Batman" fans will dissagree. But that's "if" and only "IF" they stick true to his actuall origins. All that, will depend on the "finished" product and not on a 2 minute trailer.

And seriously... are we done yet with Gambit's eyes? His powers are accurate, his fighting abilites are accurate even his outfit looks remotely accurate. So he doesn't have his "costume" or his black and red eyes, big deal, are you guys gonna complain about the color of his panties now??? THEY'RE PURPLE, GET OVER IT!!! To me he just looks cool as hell!!! And he seems to kick ass at the drop of a dime too!!!

WORD to both SHAMAN and SGA. Ya saw him for a second twirling swords. You may have seen a picture of him chained to the floor (I have) NEITHER of which showed his mask. Wow, for less than 2 seconds he doesn't have his mask, and ya freak out. I understand how absolutely coo it's going to be to see his mask in the movie. BUT, what if he doesn't have it?!?!?! BUM BUM BUUUUUUUM.Auuuuugh NOOOOOO!

Seriously, so what? Wolverine doesn't have his? I HIGHLY doubt they're going to show you Maverick in his Maverick suit. Sabretooth in the Brown and orange outfit? Don't think so. Maybe some allusions to that, but not the whole thing. I understand, Deadpool having his mask on is a big huge deal to you uberfans, but really, NOBODY else in an X-Men movie YET has had on they're costumes. Magneto and Juggernaut are the CLOSEST 2. Oh yea, Beast looked like Beast, how else could he look? But really, there may not be a mask, he'll have his terrible scars, BUT what if he doesn't have his mask? Are you going to wet the bed over it? I'm sure not, I know it's a part of his persona, because of his scars, but it's NOT Deadpool, it doesn't make him who he is, it is just a part of who he is. Even when he's not wearing it, he's still Deadpool, and even when it's on he's still Wilson Wade. So, I personally don't care either way. It would be sweet, just like breaking the 4th wall in a surveillance camera idea I had. But if it's not done, it so isn't going to ruin this for me. Nor is going to ruin Deadpool as a character or Ryan Reynolds as an actor.

Grifter, wow. There's a relatively obscure reference. Always thought he was cool. Oh well. That wouldn't make me upset either, I don't care, things change. I get it. I can deal with that. No mask, no foul. In my book.

as long as the re-shoots are not due to Fox wrangling in some last minute advertising deals... which wouldnt surprise me if it was...

imagine the scene at fox studios, we need to ad a scene with wolvie cooking wall's sausages on his claws, shaving with a philips electric razor and wearing ray-ban shades or even driving a mazda rx-8... (wait, they did that last one in X2...)

Logan x im getting a bit sick of hearing those silly arguements. ill say this one last time. the movie does not take place in the past, its flashbacks! some of the movie will be set just before the events of xmen 1. and why in the name of jesus h christ would wolverine be in a costume when he didnt start wearing one until he joined the xmen?

WELL????

i know right? damn fanboys!

okay, whoever it was up there that gambits eye colour doesn't matter...are you kidding me? his eye colour is a fundamental part of his character. he became part of the guild of theives because of his eyes. he was abandoned as a baby, because his eyes were not 'normal', and they brought him in and raised him as a thief. thats the basis of his character, he's a thief. you can't just say, 'it's just eye colour get over it'. no, when its a big part of the character and especially my favourite character, then yeah, it's important, it's a big deal

redo gambits eyes make them red