Nomis Review of X-MEN: DAYS OF THE FUTURE PAST *Contains Spoilers*

Nomis Review of X-MEN: DAYS OF THE FUTURE PAST *Contains Spoilers*

Does the latest X-Men: Days of the Future Past solve all the problems of the previous films...or add to them?

Review Opinion
By Nomis - May 24, 2014 08:05 PM EST

It shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone who has ever read any of my previous comments on this site concerning Bryan Singer's (and other Directors) "X-men Movies.

I do not like them. 

I think they are subpar as movies in general and abysmal as comic book movies.  

To helm the direction of an X-men movie, one should know the nuances that make the team such a fan favorite for decades and understand the long standing legacy it has created in the comics and other mediums to fully convey how they should be portrayed on the silver screen.

To me, Bryan Singer and subsequent directors in the franchise have severely failed in showing in their films what it is that truly make the X-Men stand out from other superhero teams in comics.

The book in essence isn't just about a group colorful costume characters just trying to stop the "bad guy" but an attack on the social and moral ill of prejudice including those who have let the bitterness of being discriminate and persecution miscued their view of what is right and wrong (Magneto).

However, just as if someone is discriminate because of their sex, race, religion or sexual orientation, the X-Men are portrayed in their colorful costumes in the comics as part of who they are and yet are still hated by the world in contrast with similar colorful costumed heroes in the comics because of how they are born.

For anyone who have been discriminated you can related to this if you are minority in society because no matter how much you change your looks or how you act to fit in with the majority, you will never be fully accepted because of how you were born.

The same is true with the X-Men, no matter how much they look like the Avengers or any other superpower group they will be hated because they were born different.

But with anyone who is a minority or has been decimated against knows that you have to be yourself or you will lose yourself in trying to fit in with the majority. 

So when you learn to love yourselves as you are and where your colorful costumes to let society know that you will be yourself and society will have to conform to you.

As Shakespeare wrote in Hamlet: to Thine Self, be true. Or as Jimi Hendrix said: Let your freak flag fly!
Or as Scott Summers said in Astonishing X-Men" “We’re heroes Logan...and Heroes were costumes."

That one little detail about the value of showing the X-men in their colorful costumes, be it the original yellow and black team ones or when they are presented in their various uniform to express their individual "gifts' that they were born with, not being shown in this franchise movies is just ONE of the many problems that I've had with them

The other issues I have with them is that the chronology of the X-men legacy being ripped to shreds, the watering down the fantastic and the main protagonist of the movies being Wolverine.

Singer and others and their blatant disregard to anything that comes close to what have been established in the X-men comics is a "slap in the face" to the incredible creators that have contribute over the decades to make the X-men of the bestselling and most admired comic in history shows their audacity in thinking they have a better grasp on the concept of the X-men than the creators.

However, to go into them in greater detail would be an editorial… and this is a movie review.

So last night a good friend of mine, who knows how I fell about this franchise convince me to join him and seeing 'Days of the Future Past'.

I only agreed because my original plans for last night fell through and he said he would pay (I haven’t paid for an X-Men movie since the first one). 

However, with the rave reviews the movie have been getting from the press as well as reviews from those on here whom opinions I respect, I decide to go in with a clean slate knowing what have been set up with previous movies are nowhere what I have always hope for in an X-Men movie because it is so far away from the source the material.

So I decide to see this movie with the mindset based on what have been established in the previous movies that have already part of this franchise and not a long time reader of the comics.

This movie have been herald as cleaning up the continuity problem and bringing the X-Men movies back some respectability to the franchise before Singer initially left and what was somewhat recaptured  with “First Class” to the fans and media.

However, after seeing it with a mindset of basing it of the previous movies, I can only say that Bryan Singer have NOT delivered an X-Men movie that clean up the continuity problems or brought it back to some respect that it had but have only added to the confusion and have now gone so far to blatant disregard the ground work they have already established I their own films.

Before the movie came out Bryan Singer (and producer Lauren Donner) ask if the movie goer will forgive him for the contradictions this movie will have and forget certain previous movies (X-3, Wolverine: Origins) but they are so obvious in the movie that it was hard to simple “forget” what have gone on before.

This is not what I want in a movie that was made a movie to clean up previous mistakes by adding to them by ignoring their own movie history.

I want them to produce a script thoroughly and present a movie to us that answer and rectify these issues and not ask the movie goer to simply forget or look the other way.

Just making that suggestion public you are already shooting yourself in the foot.

And with a plot this thin and simplistic (in the bad way) they didn’t even come close to answering those nagging continuity questions.

Why wasn’t  it explained how Professor was able to get back in his body after being destroyed by Jean in X-3 and inhabiting the paralysis body of the vegetable state man in X-3?

Why is William Stryker younger in this movie if he had recruited Wolverine when he was older during the Vietnam War in Origins?

And wasn’t his adamantium given in to him in that movie? Why wouldn’t he have it in ‘73?

Additionally, I also had a huge issue with the acting of Jennifer Lawrence. I don’t know if he is worn out from all the work that she been doing of late, but she basically walked through this movie.

Why did she change to a woman that was in the crowd after being shot by Magneto?

Wouldn’t that make it worse since it was established in “first Class” that it takes more effort and energy to mimic someone else? Energy she could’ve used to get away.

And why do it at all since everyone there had seen her jumped out the window in her true blue anyway?  
 
And the scene where she’s watching herself on TV in the hospital talking to the nurse about how it must fell to be a mutant was about as flat as a pancake instead of showing some true emotion.

Pete Dinklage was laughable in some scenes as Trask and never shown the depth of the “antagonist’” that he has shown in other performances.  What a waste.

Magneto being able to learn how to rearrange the circuitry by examine the specs in one night and rearrange the Sentinels on a train (Not protected by guards mind you) is more astonishing than him moving RFK stadium over the white house.

Since when is Magneto the master of Complex Circuitry?

How does having the ability to walk through walls and subsequently take other make it able for Kitty to send Wolverine back to his former self in the ‘70s?

I still haven’t figure out why someone named Ice man need a jacket or the Beast being a lighter shade of blue than previous movies?

And when you rearrange the future, only the people disappear and not the actually place they were at itself? (The cathedral underground was still there after everyone disappeared).

And the climatic events of the future X-men with the Sentinels reminded me of the first Matrix that it reminded me in X-2 Singe used the ending of Star Trek 2: Wrath of Kahn in the movie.

He has a knack for “borrowing” other examples of a climactic scene for his these movies.
Sound like I’m being nitpicky? Maybe so.
 
But these questions about the movie stood out like a sore thumbs in relation what had already gone by that I couldn’t excuse them or forget some of the contradictions of previous movies to enjoy the film.

Buy there was things I did enjoy and though they got right.

Michael Fassenbender as a younger Magneto is amazing! 

He just commands a presence with every scene he was in!

Lessing the main story arc about Wolverine (relatively speaking from the previous movies that mostly about him) and making it more about the professor was a pleasant surprise.

The scene when the younger Professor X meets the older professor X was exquisite and very touching.
And as everyone has been mentioned the Quicksilver save of Magneto from the pentagon was quite funny and entertaining.

The cameos of Kelsey grammar as Beast, Jean and Scott was a nice touch. (Scott appearance got the some in the audience clapping at my showing).

But I felt that overall the movie did not convey what it should been when it comes to cleaning up the convoluted and contradictory nature that is seen too permeate all of these  movies.

And if ever watched in a chronological order from the first movie to this last one it would leave the view more confused than before.

Singer and company have now gone so far as to contradict their own movies as well as disregard the comics and that just adding another insult to the injury and is just bad movie making.

I know many of you on this site enjoyed the movie and think it’s one of the best CBM even made, but if I learn anything from reading the X-Men comics for almost 4 decades is that you have to be TRUE TO YOURSELF regardless of how the majority or how the mainstream may disagree with your views.

And before any of you think I’m towing some kind of “Hater” line, I don’t have any agenda with my distaste for this movies.

I Am not a  Marvelite” if you are someone inclined to describe people you disagree as such.
 
I honestly went in last night to enjoy the movie despite my own issues with the previous ones.

 And I’m don’t hate Bryan Singer or have anything against him (unless he found guilty of the charges against him) and actually have like and enjoyed some of his work (Apt Pupil for one).

But he has not yet delivered a proper X-men film that fully expresses what the fundamental essences of what the X-men in any of his films.

Unfortunate, while in the movie the X-men and history was change, but in their movie the story remain the same:  A subpar movie in general and abysmal as a comic book movie.   
 

X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST Star Adan Canto Has Passed Away At Age 42
Related:

X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST Star Adan Canto Has Passed Away At Age 42

X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST Arrives On Disney+ With F-Bomb And Hugh Jackman's Butt Still Intact
Recommended For You:

X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST Arrives On Disney+ With F-Bomb And Hugh Jackman's Butt Still Intact

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

GetsugaTensho22
GetsugaTensho22 - 5/25/2014, 6:07 AM
Horrid review, but i've come to respect your opinion on other matters, so i'll just accept that you've brainwashed yourself into hating everything related to these films.
MrBlackJack
MrBlackJack - 5/25/2014, 6:25 AM
Nomis wrote a review!!! Now all you have to do is spam the hell out of everybody's inbox and you're golden!
MrBlackJack
MrBlackJack - 5/25/2014, 6:25 AM
That process is called "whoring yourself out" FYI. It's quite the experience.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 5/25/2014, 1:51 PM
How does having the ability to walk through walls and subsequently take other make it able for Kitty to send Wolverine back to his former self in the ‘70s?

^ That one I actually thought about too, [frick]ed up right!

By no means is X-MEN:DOFP perfect and even less now after reading this, some good point outs I never even thought about.

Thumbs up, I'm happy at least FOX is trying to fix their shit - I'd rather see the franchise you know where, but not gonna happen so happy in the direction X-Men is going... pity it only took 6 movies to [frick] so much X-continuity up in the first place, a joke really.

I still never wanna see the FF reboot but now Singers back with X-Men hoping the next ones even better.
Klone
Klone - 5/25/2014, 1:55 PM
@Soto

Yes. I enjoyed three of the X-films a lot but it did miss some of the personality and charm of the 80's series.
blackandyellow
blackandyellow - 5/25/2014, 8:16 PM
Nice work.
SimpleeComplex
SimpleeComplex - 5/26/2014, 4:36 PM
@Nomis.

DOFP is not the definitive X-men film. I must say it is the best one so far but that's not saying much. I feel like this movie was intentionally made fix continue errors and to finally acquiesce to comic fans. Cyclops is my fave character and Apocalypse is my fave villain. And although it is nice to see them, these things are not automatic fixes. I really agree with Nomis' sentiments I have read and bought X-men comics my whole life. I have the comic from the 90's rite in front me, the 1 where Magneto extracted Wolverine's adamantium. I have the Barry Windsor Smith Weapon X trade. I even tried subscribing to Avengers, amazing Spider-man at one time yet it never caughr my attention like the X-men. Yet i find myself gravitating towards Captain America for exameple because of how awesome he was portrayed in Cap 2.

So as i left the theater last nite after DOFP. I felt something still missing. That team element (except when facing extinction) otherwise they're always antahonizing each other. I felt like ok this movie was pretty good (not great like Cap 2). But we had to wait 7 films and 14 years to get this pretty good film (but not definitive X-men film)?? It took you this long to realize why Chris Claremont, John Byrne, Jim Lee, Len Wein knew what they were doing when they made X-men the all time best that Marvel has to offer. Why did the wheel have to be re-invented only to fail several times, to now say hey "forget all that" we're gonna use something called...the wheel. Where does it go from here? Will Fox treat the ending scene as a send off to the original cast or try to milk them again now that things are "reset". But what the First Class rising stars Fassbender, Mcavoy, Lawrence they are simply too golden to forfeit. And how do you train Channing Tatum to be on their level??

So for me more questions than answers. A pretty good movie to watch with my lady (who thinks I'm a hero). But it did not wow me.
Btw Mcavoy's Charles Xavier is soool emo. My gosh man i though Jackman's Logan cried alot but young Charles takes the cake. He even whinced when he punched young Erik. And he's alwaYs begging Erik , "Edddik?!!..Edddikkk?!!...EDDDIIKKKK!!!" But he is great at doing it though. Those are my thoughts @Nomis. Nice review.
IIIAdamantiumIII
IIIAdamantiumIII - 5/26/2014, 5:41 PM
all I ever wanted was the 90's cartoon turned live action
WakeOfMagellen
WakeOfMagellen - 5/26/2014, 7:52 PM
I agree with 98.6% of what ya wrote Nomis.
I liked the movie for what it was.... a movie.

But.... once again it is not a TRUE "X-Men" film.
Once again....
just flagrantly "based on" the X-Men comics, stories, and characters.
(eyes roll).

Oh....
and by the way....
the FF reboot will make Singer's interpretation of the X-Men
LOOK LIKE true Shakespeare.
It WILL be that BADLY interpreted from comics to the big screen :-/
MeanDeanMachine
MeanDeanMachine - 5/26/2014, 9:10 PM
You want comics? Read the f*cking comics.

You want a movie based on the comics? Then you're subjected to the writer's, director's, and each individual actor's interpretation and portrayal of said characters. Some things work on screen, others don't. Quit crying and wake up about the reality of comic book adaptations.
batz11
batz11 - 5/26/2014, 9:32 PM
Thank god they never do shit like this in the comics lol...Good job Nom, though I loved this movie, so go [frick] yourself ;)
smudgewhat2
smudgewhat2 - 5/26/2014, 9:59 PM
I'm completely uninterested in literal adaptations of comics. What's the point? If they'd gone literal then Jackman would've been in this for 2 seconds. Creative people want to get creative with source material otherwise you will not get an inspired product. DOFP was awesome.
Brainiac13
Brainiac13 - 5/27/2014, 3:59 AM
Great review........true believer. ;)

I really enjoyed this movie.......it was way better than the previous installments. We are old school and understaind how Fox changed the way X-Men have portrayed on screen.

I have to admit. .......I haven't read enough X-Men comics over the years compared to you......I kind of discovered them after reading Wolverine mini series in 84.

I was shocked to see a review by you.......I wanna read more of your review now........

Respect brother. :)





MakluIV
MakluIV - 5/27/2014, 4:08 AM
The X-Men movies are definitely not like the comics, which really sucks because it would be so great if they were. For whatever reason Fox watered them down, which is weird because it's the comics that made X-Men so cool and so likable in the first place. I think if the X-Men movies were more like the comics, they would'v probably made a billion bucks a long time ago. And then everybody would be happy...
turdfergusonshat
turdfergusonshat - 5/27/2014, 11:58 AM
It's clear that people mistake "literal adaptation of the comics" with getting the characters and their motivations correct based on those comics. It has pained me how much the writers and directors of this franchise continue to misunderstand, reinterpret and ignore that, and for those of us who do love the comics, all we really want is to see those characters we've followed for so long receive that same respect and love. Make completely new stories, I'd love to see them on the big screen, but populate them with characters that are actually recognizable as the ones these movies are so loosely based upon. That's all we ask.
SteveBosell
SteveBosell - 5/27/2014, 9:20 PM
I posted this somewhere else and I'll post it here: how can Magneto lift submarines out of the water, infuse metal from train tracks into the sentinels, and lift an entire stadium but is unable to stop two freakin' bullets (the ones that shot JFK)? If Magneto had killed JFK that would be far more plausible.
SteveBosell
SteveBosell - 5/27/2014, 9:21 PM
That's only one example but DOFP is riddled with oddities like that.
SteveBosell
SteveBosell - 5/27/2014, 9:28 PM
Okay. Here's another one that bugs me. Magneto was willing to kill Mystique to prevent the future war (an excellent and brutal scene) but then does something far worse by trying to kill Trask and the President on television. That's very stupid, inconsistent thinking.
ChuckV
ChuckV - 5/28/2014, 8:58 AM
I dig this.... finally a review where someone was actually paying attention and NOT caught up in the visuals!!!
JustinQu33f3r
JustinQu33f3r - 5/28/2014, 8:50 PM
DOFP felt like Bryan Singer slipped me a roofie at one of his pool parties. He completely raped the First Class era.
View Recorder