NOW YOU SEE ME: NOW YOU DON'T Rotten Tomatoes Score Revealed As First Reviews Are Conjured Up

NOW YOU SEE ME: NOW YOU DON'T Rotten Tomatoes Score Revealed As First Reviews Are Conjured Up

The review embargo for Now You See Me: Now You Don't lifted earlier today, and an all-important Rotten Tomatoes score has been magicked up as critics start weighing in on the threequel. Check it out...

By JoshWilding - Nov 11, 2025 12:11 PM EST
Filed Under: Action
Source: ActioNewz.com

Now You See Me was released in 2013, with Now You See Me 2 following three years later. Close to a decade on, Now You See Me: Now You Don't arrives in theaters this weekend. 

The review embargo has just lifted, and as we first shared on ActioNewz.com, it sits at a "Fresh" 65% on Rotten Tomatoes. That's an improvement over the first movie's 51% and the follow-up's dismal 34%. While the threequel has debuted with a franchise-best Tomatometer score, its odds of avoiding the dreaded green splat as more verdicts are added are TBD. 

It would need to slip under 60% for that to happen, which is a very real risk when only 37 reviews have been counted as of now. 

The reviews are mixed, though it does seem to be a bit of a love/hate situation as of now, with a few ending up somewhere in between. In other words, if you weren't already a fan of the Now You See Me movies, this latest caper likely won't change your mind.

"You start to long for the simplicity of a basic card trick," writes The Hollywood Reporter"While Now You See Me: Now You Don’t proves undeniably entertaining, it’s more than a little exhausting as well." Variety counters, "[Now You See Me: Now You Don't] does it all in good fun. Which is all this movie is or needs to be."

The Mary Sue posits, "If you love this franchise for the fun magic tricks and the sometimes cheesy jokes, you’re in for a great time and hey, what if we make more of these movies just for fun?" The Daily Beast argues, "Its most impressive feat, however, is finding a way to somehow be even duller than its predecessors."

IndieWire had a far more positive take. "I felt, if not magic, a generous dash of cinematic enchantment. Let’s make four more of these things," the site argues, only for Screen Rant to state, "Jesse Eisenberg, Woody Harrelson et al return to join Dominic Sessa and others in a convoluted trick of hollow nostalgia."

Ultimately, Globe and Mail seems to best sum up the issue with this latest instalment. "For a franchise built on surprise and misdirection, the spectacle of Now You See Me: Now You Don’t is all too familiar and lacking in the sheer gusto and ridiculous flair that made the original movie such a hit," they shared. 

In Now You See Me: Now You Don't, The Four Horsemen return along with a new generation of illusionists performing mind-melding twists, turns, surprises, and magic unlike anything ever captured on film. 

Directed by Ruben Fleischer (Venom, Uncharted, Zombieland), the movie stars Jesse Eisenberg, Woody Harrelson, Dave Franco, Isla Fisher, Justice Smith, Dominic Sessa, Ariana Greenblatt, with Rosamund Pike, and Morgan Freeman.

Now You See Me: Now You Don't arrives in theaters this weekend. 

NUREMBERG Star John Slattery On Adapting The True Story, Sparring With Russell Crowe, & More! (Exclusive)
Related:

NUREMBERG Star John Slattery On Adapting The True Story, Sparring With Russell Crowe, & More! (Exclusive)

KILL BILL: THE WHOLE BLOODY AFFAIR Trailer Includes Gruesome Never-Before-Seen Footage
Recommended For You:

KILL BILL: THE WHOLE BLOODY AFFAIR Trailer Includes Gruesome Never-Before-Seen Footage

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

mountainman
mountainman - 11/11/2025, 12:18 PM
The first one was good. Hoping this one is too.
DocSpock
DocSpock - 11/11/2025, 12:30 PM

The first one was pretty good. The second was tedious and bland for me. I'll wait for this 3rd one to hit TV.
LenSpiderman
LenSpiderman - 11/11/2025, 12:46 PM
@DocSpock - they should have called it “now you see me… no, you won’t”
DocSpock
DocSpock - 11/11/2025, 2:53 PM
@LenSpiderman -

Yeah, kinda.
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 11/11/2025, 12:30 PM
Now you see me is old enough to be nostalgia bait? Sheesh

Going with the fam Thursday. Screw the reviews.
JustAWaffle
JustAWaffle - 11/11/2025, 12:32 PM
Second one felt super try hard. First one was cheesy but interesting. Didn’t want a third, but I’ll probably see it on Netflix someday
LenSpiderman
LenSpiderman - 11/11/2025, 12:44 PM
It really itches my OCD that “now you don’t” is implied in the title of the first two, but NOW they’ve added it, and not to complete the phrase properly (that would be “Now you see me. Now you don’t.”), which would be odd in and of itself, but as a subtitle. I’m overthinking this for sure, which is probably a trait that would interfere with me enjoying these movies in the first place.
ElJefe
ElJefe - 11/11/2025, 12:55 PM
@LenSpiderman - I’ll follow down the rabbit hole! The correct punctuation for two independent clauses would be: Now you see me, now you don’t. Or: Now you see me; now you don’t.

In this case it’s a movie title, and “Now You Don’t” is the subtitle so the colon is correct.

The better title would’ve just been simply Now You Don’t, IMO.
LenSpiderman
LenSpiderman - 11/11/2025, 2:57 PM
@ElJefe - I mean, because it’s a subtitle it is technically punctuated correctly. But it makes very little sense as a subtitle, because we are all so familiar with the expression, “now you see me, now you don’t” (which I read as two complete sentences, but we are both correct on that front). So for me, it’s difficult to separate the brand “now you see me” from the first portion of the colloquialism, particularly because they are contradictory statements. It would be like if a move franchise was called “nighttime” and there was a movie in the series called “it’s nighttime: it’s daytime”. Also they’ve kind of boxed themselves in, because now they’ve completed the expression, do they just go back to using numbers, or do they try to stretch the expression, or loosen its meaning (eg: now you see me: in the dark) or do they just abandon both options and come up with unrelated subtitles like “now you see me: wild on Cancun”?
ElJefe
ElJefe - 11/11/2025, 4:02 PM
@LenSpiderman - I would watch Now You See Me: Wild in Cancun!

The real expression, I believe, is now you see IT, now you don’t, referring to a magician making something disappear.

Because technically (get ready) if you are speaking the phrase “Now you see me, now you don’t” you haven’t disappeared… you’ve just turned invisible. Otherwise, you can’t speak the second part of the phrase if you are actually gone, whether I can see you or not.
JackDeth
JackDeth - 11/11/2025, 12:53 PM
I was enjoying the first film until it got to the big reveal at the end. Didn't watch the second.
OrgasmicPotatoe
OrgasmicPotatoe - 11/11/2025, 1:01 PM
I kinda liked the first two, but I honestly can't remember which is which. The second one had Radcliffe as the bad guy, right ?

I'll probably catch this one later.
EskimoJ
EskimoJ - 11/11/2025, 2:11 PM
@OrgasmicPotatoe - Radcliffe's in the second one, yep.
Nolanite
Nolanite - 11/11/2025, 1:02 PM
I've only watched them because of the chicks TBH

Nolanite out
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 11/11/2025, 1:07 PM
Man , I really wish this franchise was better since the premise is really fun but the past couple of films haven’t really done much if anything for me & this seems like more of the same…

Still , I’ll try to check it out when I can since the concept of magician thieves is just too cool to pass up!!.

User Comment Image
ModHaterSLADE
ModHaterSLADE - 11/11/2025, 1:41 PM
Always thought these movies were fun time wasters. Looking forward to seeing it.
HistoryofMatt
HistoryofMatt - 11/11/2025, 2:38 PM
As much as Lizzie Caplan is cool, replacing Isla Fisher in the second movie was never going to work and it made the second movie damaged goods from the beginning.

Bringing her back for the third movie was the right choice.
Shivermetimbers
Shivermetimbers - 11/11/2025, 4:02 PM
I dont remember anything about any of the previous films. This is really a trilogy? The trailer seemed like a mess, not seeing this when Running Man is the other option this week.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder