ANT-MAN AND THE WASP: QUANTUMANIA Actually Did Turn A Profit... Of Around $88K

ANT-MAN AND THE WASP: QUANTUMANIA Actually Did Turn A Profit... Of Around $88K

Despite the perception that Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania was a box office flop, a new report reveals that the Marvel Studios threequel actually did turn a very small profit...

By MarkCassidy - Oct 29, 2024 06:10 PM EST

2013's Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania is widely regarded as a box office disappointment, if not an outright flop, but a new report reveals that the MCU threequel actually did turn a small - and we mean small - profit.

The third Ant-Man movie had a reported budget of around $200 million (before marketing costs), and ended up taking in $476 million worldwide by the end of its theatrical run. Analysts predicted that the movie would need to pass the $500 million mark just to break even, but not according to Forbes.

"The super hero flick debuted in February last year to a lukewarm reception and only grossed $476.07 million according to industry analyst Box Office Mojo. Studios typically receive around 50% of the takings meaning that Disney got around $238.05 million which was $92.05 million less than its net spending on making the movie, as we recently revealed."

Apparently, Quantumania earned a profit of $88,236 after expenses were factored in. Not exactly going to have Marvel execs scrambling to fast-track a fourth film, but an interesting statistic, nonetheless.

Ant-Man 3 was released during a bit of a bad patch for the MCU, with the next instalment in the franchise, The Marvels, emerging as the lowest-grossing Marvel Studios film of all time. The studio would later announce a new "quality over quantity" initiative, with fewer movies and Disney+ shows released on a yearly basis.

It remains to be seen if this strategy ultimately pays off, but this year's Deadpool and Wolverine was incredibly successful (it's now the biggest R-rated release of all time), and Agatha All Along has proven to be one of the more popular series in quite a while.

Super-Hero partners Scott Lang (Paul Rudd) and Hope van Dyne (Evangeline Lilly) return to continue their adventures as Ant-Man and the Wasp. Together, with Hope’s parents Janet van Dyne (Michelle Pfeiffer) and Hank Pym (Michael Douglas), and Scott’s daughter Cassie Lang (Kathryn Newton), the family finds themselves exploring the Quantum Realm, interacting with strange new creatures and embarking on an adventure that will push them beyond the limits of what they thought possible.

Directed by Peyton Reed and produced by Kevin Feige and Stephen Broussard, Ant-Man and The Wasp: Quantumania also stars Jonathan Majors as Kang, David Dastmalchian as Veb, Katy O'Brian as Jentorra, William Jackson Harper as Quaz and Bill Murray as Lord Krylar.

The MCU threequel is now available to stream on Disney+.

ANT-MAN & THE WASP: QUANTUMANIA's Katy O'Brian Officially Joins THE RUNNING MAN Cast
Related:

ANT-MAN & THE WASP: QUANTUMANIA's Katy O'Brian Officially Joins THE RUNNING MAN Cast

Paul Rudd And Jack Black In Talks To Star In ANACONDA Remake For Colombia Pictures
Recommended For You:

Paul Rudd And Jack Black In Talks To Star In ANACONDA Remake For Colombia Pictures

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
Spidey91
Spidey91 - 10/29/2024, 6:11 PM
Hey, that's a night out with the entire team so it wasn't a complete loss
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 10/29/2024, 6:15 PM
sequeal confirmed?
TheLobster
TheLobster - 10/29/2024, 6:16 PM
Sure it carved out 88k, great, but the damage it did to the studio cost them so much more lol
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 10/29/2024, 6:22 PM
@TheLobster - How do you figure when Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 3 went on to gross $875 million after Quantumania release and then Deadpool & Wolverine grossed over $1 billion.
Batmangina
Batmangina - 10/29/2024, 6:43 PM
@SonOfAGif - GOTG 3 was the last hurrah of the OG MCU. DP&W was basically a fan service What If movie.

Does ANYONE think the MCU will EVER get back to what it was at peak creative output?

AllsGood
AllsGood - 10/29/2024, 6:45 PM
@TheLobster - Marvel Studios has made Billions and Billions and Billions and Billions and Billions.... Only trying to Beat their Own Box Office Records. Marvel Studios has NO competition.

User Comment Image
Moriakum
Moriakum - 10/29/2024, 6:46 PM
@TheLobster - It made so much damage to the studio that their next movie grossed almost 900 million and they just had another movie making more than a billion.

Marvel Studios is really damaged indeed.
JustBrootal
JustBrootal - 10/29/2024, 6:48 PM
@SonOfAGif - the success of those movies did not stem from the loss of Antman in any way. Antman didn’t need to exist and those movies would have done fine regardless.
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 10/29/2024, 6:55 PM
@JustBrootal - That's not what he said though. He said that the damage Quantumania did cost the studio so much more. It's incorrect.
AllsGood
AllsGood - 10/29/2024, 6:56 PM
@Moriakum - Warner Bros. Discovery WBD -0.27% posted a nearly $10 billion quarterly loss mostly due to a write-down of the value of its cable networks.

A stunning acknowledgment of how the television industry has deteriorated since the blockbuster deal that created the conglomerate two years ago.

User Comment Image
TheLobster
TheLobster - 10/29/2024, 7:23 PM
@SonOfAGif - you’re talking about two established franchises that were gonna make stupid money anyways.

Funny how you neglected to talk about The Marvels which was a sequel to a BILLION dollar film and how bad most Disney+ series have done. The amount of bad press Marvel has gotten really started with Quantumania.
Feralwookiee
Feralwookiee - 10/29/2024, 7:26 PM
@SonOfAGif - You failed to mention The Marvels box office performance I see.

User Comment Image
TheLobster
TheLobster - 10/29/2024, 7:29 PM
@AllsGood - you have blinders on if you don’t think Marvel is on unstable ground. Sure, Deadpool made all the money, but Marvel was untouchable in 2019 and that’s not the case anymore.

Why do you think they agreed to bring back the Russos and RDJ when Feige was adamant that he wasn’t going to? Why were they talking about cutting Kang early on before all the controversies surrounding Majors? Because things are clearly not working and they’re trying to course correct.

Now they might and if so? Fantastic. However, acting like they’re some unbeatable force that’s doing great just makes you sound like a painfully unaware fanboy.
TheLobster
TheLobster - 10/29/2024, 7:32 PM
@Moriakum - as I’ve already mentioned - GOTG is beloved and was going to make all the money and a Deadpool and Wolverine movie is no different.

How about The Marvels? A sequel to a BILLION dollar film?? You don’t think people are getting fatigued on Marvel? Get real.
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 10/29/2024, 7:46 PM
@TheLobster - The Marvels did bad because it was a bad movie. But I'm glad you guys cherry picked on bad movie to justify your argument while finding every excuse possible to justify why two other movies did well. Despite Deadpool being a continuation of the TVA storyline from Loki.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 10/29/2024, 7:46 PM
@AllsGood - Defending this movie shows the shill-factor of a person. They lost 468 million on the Marvels(expected at least 800 million profit), they only made 170 million (expecting a billion worldwide) on Gotg 3, and about 587 million on Deadpool 3. So they aren't back by any means. They're barely in the green after spending 800 million on these budgets. Remember you account 2.5x for profit because they don't get 100% of ticket sales and you need to account for marketing. All is not good haha idc about WB. Disney is on a down trend. It's why they're bringing back RDJ and putting out feelers for Thanos. Give me a break
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 10/29/2024, 7:48 PM
@Feralwookiee - As I said before. It was a bad movie that didn't make money. Doesn't mean it failed because of Quantumania. It failed because there was no interest in it and it wasn't reviewed well.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 10/29/2024, 7:48 PM
Feralwookiee
Feralwookiee - 10/29/2024, 8:17 PM
@SonOfAGif - It got better reviews than Ant Man 3 and the original made $1 billion +.
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 10/29/2024, 8:53 PM
@Feralwookiee - Since you brought up successful franchises, Captain Marvel came after the success of Avengers infinity war and was billed to lead into Endgame. This is how it was marketed along with Ant-Man & The Wasp.
Itwasme
Itwasme - 10/29/2024, 9:01 PM
@Feralwookiee - ok.. how can you tie The Marvel's performance to this film? What evidence do you have thats anything but circumstantial?
Itwasme
Itwasme - 10/29/2024, 9:08 PM
@SonOfAGif - seems like people are saying The Marvels would have done $1bn without this film. Or Joker 2's BO is really just based off Awuaman 2. It's a very weird stance to take. Are they arguing The Marvels was good and should have killed it?
TheLobster
TheLobster - 10/29/2024, 10:28 PM
@SonOfAGif - The Marvels didn’t bomb solely because it’s a bad movie - there’s plenty of shit Marvel films that still did well (Love and Thunder) but it bombed because some people were getting Marvel fatigue from mediocre projects which Quantumania is absolutely a big part of.

You want another failure? Okay - how about The Eternals? That should have been a slam dunk between the cast, story, and filmmaker but Marvel truly shit the bed there too lol

How about most Disney+ series? Most have been either underwhelming or straight up bad.

If you crank out mediocre shit - it will catch up. Quantumania was a final straw for a lot of casual moviegoers and guess what - that’s a big portion of Marvel’s audience.

Yes, GOTG 3 and Deadpool did well (already mentioned why) but how do you think this new Captain America film is going to do? It’s definitely not gonna turn a profit since they filmed the damn thing twice and have to still market it and if the film ends up being even just okay - it’ll tarnish the Captain America legacy too.

I’m somewhat hopeful that Marvel can turn things around but to act like the failure of Quantumania along with a few other films from Phase Four didn’t cost Marvel its previously sterling reputation is just denial.

JustBrootal
JustBrootal - 10/29/2024, 11:40 PM
@SonOfAGif - it kinda did in terms of what to next with a major plot line in the continuation of one of the next largest movie events. But they came in clutch by pulling out the Russo/Downey Wildcard!
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 10/30/2024, 1:04 AM
@Moriakum - cherry picking the successful ones is not a good argumrnt.

Where's The Marvels on this list? Lolz.

Gotg3 was a Gunn movie so it is great. D&W was a stupid fanservice and didnt contribute anything to the mcu lore (that anchor BS will be forgotten). Majors is a hollywood cancer and Marvel needed to change course midway their Multiverse shenanigans

2025 looks bleak. Im only mildly hopeful of F4.


cc @Batmangina
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 10/30/2024, 1:10 AM
@TheLobster - well said, i completely agree.

2025 will be a good barometer for Marvel to make the loyalists shut it
Gabimaru
Gabimaru - 10/30/2024, 3:45 AM
@SonOfAGif - incorrect? Well it damage the overall saga from kang to doom
Moriakum
Moriakum - 10/30/2024, 4:16 AM
@vectorsigma - User Comment Image
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 10/30/2024, 5:08 AM
@Moriakum - lolz

Still cant get over the fact you went giddy and mightve even air punched in the theater for that faked cameo??

I havent even gotten an answer from you on why do you think evans was tied up separately if they are indeed together

Lololololz. 😂😂
SpiderParker
SpiderParker - 10/30/2024, 6:16 AM
@Batmangina - The whole Snyderverse was a fan service What if franchise, it didn't do as well as DP&W.
SpiderParker
SpiderParker - 10/30/2024, 6:18 AM
@TheLobster - You are forgetting about the strikes in Hollywood and little to no promotion for The Marvels.
KennKathleen
KennKathleen - 10/30/2024, 6:42 AM
@AllsGood - No competition.... but a parasitic brainworm taking them down from the inside.

We COULD be watching new solo films from
Iron Man
Captain America
Namor
Black Panther
HULK
Thor
Daredevil
Ghost Rider
Dr. Strange

And bring them in for the New Avengrs story.

BUT- we're getting

Agatha

Wonder Man, being trolled by faux Mandarian

"Ya need to do better" American

Blade promises: it's really, really happening.

Daredevil "wait, Fisk was defeated by - who!??"

"You ARE the father" bro HULK.

"You are NOT the father" Thor.

Father-less T'Challa: It Takes a Village

And: Blink and miss
Moon 🌙 Knight.

PS:
Where the hell IS Vision????




Moriakum
Moriakum - 10/30/2024, 7:00 AM
@vectorsigma -

Moriakum
Moriakum - 10/30/2024, 7:04 AM
@vectorsigma real question and be honest: are you trolling about all of this or do you actually believe what you’re saying?
Batmangina
Batmangina - 10/30/2024, 8:06 AM
@SpiderParker - The Snyderverse was a roadmap of exactly what NOT to do with generational IP.

Snyder fans are NOT comic book fans. DP&W was nothing BUT fan service.

It gave fans of the genre (which are mostly male) two iconic/violent/irreverent characters totally off the chain instead of retarded shit like The Marvels or The Acolyte.
1 2 3

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder